Association Between Response to Etrolizumab and Expression of Integrin αE and Granzyme A in Colon Biopsies of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Etrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the ß7 integrin subunit that has shown efficacy vs placebo in patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients with colon tissues that expressed high levels of the integrin αE gene (ITGAE) appeared to have the best response. We compared differences in colonic expression of ITGAE and other genes between patients who achieved clinical remission with etrolizumab vs those who did. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from 110 patients with UC who participated in a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of etrolizumab, as well as from 21 patients with UC or without inflammatory bowel disease (controls) enrolled in an observational study at a separate site. Colon biopsies were collected from patients in both studies and analyzed by immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling. Mononuclear cells were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry. We identified biomarkers associated with response to etrolizumab. In the placebo-controlled trial, clinical remission was defined as total Mayo Clinic Score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1, and mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic score ≤1. RESULTS: Colon tissues collected at baseline from patients who had a clinical response to etrolizumab expressed higher levels of T-cell-associated genes than patients who did not respond (P < .05). Colonic CD4(+) integrin αE(+) cells from patients with UC expressed higher levels of granzyme A messenger RNA (GZMA mRNA) than CD4(+) αE(-) cells (P < .0001); granzyme A and integrin αE protein were detected in the same cells. Of patients receiving 100 mg etrolizumab, a higher proportion of those with high levels of GZMA mRNA (41%) or ITGAE mRNA (38%) than those with low levels of GZMA (6%) or ITGAE mRNA (13%) achieved clinical remission (P < .05) and mucosal healing (41% GZMA(high) vs 19% GZMA(low) and 44% ITGAE(high) vs 19% ITGAE(low)). Compared with ITGAE(low) and GZMA(low) patients, patients with ITGAE(high) and GZMA(high) had higher baseline numbers of epithelial crypt-associated integrin αE(+) cells (P < .01 for both), but a smaller number of crypt-associated integrin αE(+) cells after etrolizumab treatment (P < .05 for both). After 10 weeks of etrolizumab treatment, expression of genes associated with T-cell activation and genes encoding inflammatory cytokines decreased by 40%-80% from baseline (P < .05) in patients with colon tissues expressing high levels of GZMA at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of GZMA and ITGAE mRNAs in colon tissues can identify patients with UC who are most likely to benefit from etrolizumab; expression levels decrease with etrolizumab administration in biomarker(high) patients. Larger, prospective studies of markers are needed to assess their clinical value.

The role of centralized reading of endoscopy in a randomized controlled trial of mesalamine for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Interobserver differences in endoscopic assessments contribute to variations in rates of response to placebo in ulcerative colitis (UC) trials. We investigated whether centralized review of images could reduce these variations. METHODS: We performed a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 281 patients with mildly to moderately active UC, defined by an Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) sigmoidoscopy score ≥2, that evaluated the efficacy of delayed-release mesalamine (Asacol 800-mg tablet) 4.8 g/day. Endoscopic images were reviewed by a single expert central reader. The primary outcome was clinical remission (UCDAI, stool frequency and bleeding scores of 0, and no fecal urgency) at week 6. RESULTS: The primary outcome was achieved by 30.0% of patients treated with mesalamine and 20.6% of those given placebo, a difference of 9.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.7% to 19.4%; P = .069). Significant differences in results from secondary analyses indicated the efficacy of mesalamine. Thirty-one percent of participants, all of whom had a UCDAI sigmoidoscopy score ≥2 as read by the site investigator, were considered ineligible by the central reader. After exclusion of these patients, the remission rates were 29.0% and 13.8% in the mesalamine and placebo groups, respectively (difference of 15%; 95% CI, 3.5%-26.0%; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Although mesalamine 4.8 g/day was not statistically different from placebo for induction of remission in patients with mildly to moderately active UC, based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the totality of the data supports a benefit of treatment. Central review of endoscopic images is critical to the conduct of induction studies in UC; ClinicalTrials.gov Number, NCT01059344.

Basiliximab does not increase efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds CD25 and thereby inhibits interleukin (IL)-2-mediated proliferation of lymphocytes. IL-2 might contribute to the resistance of T cells to corticosteroids. We investigated the efficacy and safety of basiliximab as a corticosteroid-sensitizing agent in patients with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: We studied 149 patients with moderate to severe UC (Mayo score ≥6 and endoscopic subscore ≥2) despite treatment for at least 14 days with oral prednisone (40-50 mg/day). Subjects were randomly assigned to groups that were given 20 mg (n = 46) or 40 mg (n = 52) basiliximab or placebo (n = 51) at weeks 0, 2, and 4. All subjects received 30 mg/day prednisone through week 2; the dose was reduced by 5 mg each week to 20 mg/day, which was maintained until week 8. At week 8, we compared the rates of clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1) for patients given basiliximab with the rate for patients given placebo. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of patients given placebo, 29% of those given the 40-mg dose of basiliximab, and 26% of those given the 20-mg dose of basiliximab achieved clinical remission (P = 1.00 vs placebo for each dose). Basiliximab was generally well tolerated. Six subjects who received basiliximab had serious adverse events (6.1%) compared with 2 who received placebo (3.9%; P = .72). In subjects given basiliximab, incomplete saturation of CD25 (<50%) on peripheral T cells was associated with the presence of anti-basiliximab antibodies (odds ratio, 21; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-184). CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab does not increase the effect of corticosteroids in the induction of remission in outpatients with corticosteroid-resistant moderate to severe UC.

Consecutive fecal calprotectin measurements to predict relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving infliximab maintenance therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study examined whether fecal calprotectin can be used in daily practice as a marker to monitor patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving infliximab maintenance therapy. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study enrolled adult patients with UC in clinical remission under infliximab maintenance therapy. Fecal calprotectin levels were measured every 4 weeks. Sigmoidoscopies were performed at inclusion and at study end. Relapse was defined as a clinical need for change in treatment or an endoscopic Mayo subscore of ≥2 at week 52. Sustained deep remission was defined as a partial Mayo score <3 at all points and an endoscopic Mayo score 0 at week 52. RESULTS: Full analysis was possible for 87 of 113 included patients with UC (77%). Of these patients, 30 (34.4%) were considered to be in sustained deep remission and 13 (14.9%) to have relapsed. Calprotectin levels in patients with sustained deep remission remained very low (median < 40 mg/kg at all time points). Patients who flared had significantly higher calprotectin levels (median > 300 mg/kg) already 3 months before the flare. Further receiver operator curve analysis suggested that a calprotectin level >300 mg/kg had a reasonable sensitivity (58.3%) and specificity (93.3%) to model flare. Two consecutive calprotectin measurements of >300 mg/kg with 1-month interval were identified as the best predictor of flare (61.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin can be used in daily practice to monitor patients with UC receiving infliximab maintenance therapy. Two consecutive measurements >300 mg/kg is more specific than a single measurement for predicting relapse.