Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Nutr ; 27(2): 264-8, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18280619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric emptying (GE) is influenced by the type of nutrition. The objective of this study was to compare GE in infants fed an intact protein formula (IPF), a partially hydrolysed formula (PHF), and an extensively hydrolysed formula (EHF). METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. Following a fasting period of > or = 3 h, 20 healthy newborns were fed IPF, PHF, and EHF containing 50 microl (13)C-octanoic acid (OA). Breath samples were taken before feeding and every 15 min for 4 h thereafter. (13)C-OA breath test was assessed by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry, and GE half-times (t(1/2)) were determined. RESULTS: Seventeen infants with a mean gestational age of 37 wk (range 28-40 wk) and birth weight of 2698 g (range 720-3690 g) completed the study. At study initiation, the mean age was 31 d (range 6 d-13 wk) and the mean weight was 3466 g (range 2100-5700 g). EHF emptied significantly faster than IPF and PHF (medians 46 vs. 55 and 53 min, respectively, Wilcoxon, P<0.05 for both). There was no significant difference between GE of PHF and IPF (Wilcoxon, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: EHF may be better tolerated by infants with GE problems.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Proteínas en la Dieta/metabolismo , Vaciamiento Gástrico/efectos de los fármacos , Vaciamiento Gástrico/fisiología , Fórmulas Infantiles , Caprilatos , Isótopos de Carbono , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrólisis , Lactante , Alimentos Infantiles , Fórmulas Infantiles/administración & dosificación , Fórmulas Infantiles/química , Fórmulas Infantiles/metabolismo , Recién Nacido , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA