Internalization of human 5-HT4a and 5-HT4b receptors is splice variant dependent.

The family of 5-HT4 receptors comprises 16 putative splice variants. We have previously shown that there are differences in signal transduction of the h5-HT(4a) and h5-HT(4b) receptors. In the present study, the internalization of these two splice variants following receptor stimulation was investigated with confocal microscopy on living cells. Chimeric receptors, h5-HT(4a)-GFP and h5-HT(4b)-GFP were generated by fusing the coding sequence of the 5-HT4 receptor with the coding sequence of the GFP. The agonist stimulation of fluorescent receptors resulted in a time-dependent internalization of the h5-HT(4b)-GFP receptor, but not of the h5-HT(4a)-GFP receptor. The h5-HT(4b) receptor displays a dual coupling to G(alpha)i,o and G(alpha)s proteins, in contrast to the h5-HT4a receptor, which couples to Galphas proteins only. We investigated whether the difference in internalization of the two splice variant receptors was related to their differential coupling. Therefore, we performed agonist-stimulation of the receptor following inhibition of the G(alpha)i,o protein coupling using PTX. The h5-HT(4b) receptor internalization is PTX insensitive. We co-transfected the fluorescent chimeric receptors with other wild-type variants, which did not produce an alteration of the receptor trafficking. These findings provide the first evidence of differential internalization between the two splice variants, 5-HT(4a) and 5-HT(4b) receptors.

Differences in signal transduction of two 5-HT4 receptor splice variants: compound specificity and dual coupling with Galphas- and Galphai/o-proteins.

This study documents differences in ligand binding and signal transduction properties between the human (h) 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4a and h5-HT4b receptor splice variants stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. The fraction of the [3H]5-HT high-affinity site relative to the whole receptor population measured with [3H]GR113808 was higher for the h5-HT4a isoform (around 0.4) than for the 5-HT4b isoform (around 0.2) and was independent of the level of expression. The potency and efficacy of reference compounds tested for the cAMP response differed slightly but significantly between both variants. Most remarkably, 5-methoxytryptamine and prucalopride were found more potent on the 5-HT4b variant, whereas SDZ-HTF 919 and SB204070 were more potent on the 5-HT(4a) variant. Guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding on membranes and cAMP assays in whole cells revealed that only the h5-HT4b isoform coupled to Galphai/o-proteins in addition to its well-documented Galphas coupling. In contrast, the h5-HT4a receptor coupled only to Galphas-proteins, however, was able to trigger an increase in the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)]i). The observed [Ca(2+)]i increase did not occur through inositol phosphate formation and was not sensitive to Bordetella pertussis toxin, forskolin, or 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (pre)treatment but was due to Ca(2+) influx from the extracellular environment. Interestingly, the Ca(2+) pathway was dependent on high receptor expression levels and was compound-specific, because benzamide-like compounds triggered two to three times higher responses than indoleamines. Taken together, these data provide the first evidence for fine functional differences between C-terminal splice variants of the h5-HT4 receptor, which may contribute to a better understanding of the functional diversity of this receptor class.

Supersensitivity of human metabotropic glutamate 1a receptor signaling in L929sA cells.

The effect of antagonist pretreatment on the signaling properties of the human metabotropic glutamate 1a (hmGlu1a) receptor was examined in stably transfected L929sA cells. Pre-exposure of hmGlu1a receptor-expressing cells to the mGlu1 receptor antagonists (S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine and 7-(hydroxyimino)cyclo-propa[b]chromen-1a-carboxylate ethyl ester dramatically enhanced subsequent glutamate-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis and intracellular [Ca(2+)] rise. We found clear indications that the antagonist-mediated enhancement of glutamate-evoked mGlu1a receptor signaling is caused by the development of mGlu1a receptor supersensitivity: the potency of glutamate was increased by 3-fold after 24 h antagonist pretreatment and the potency of the antagonists was significantly decreased in antagonist-pretreated cells. The kinetic profile of the antagonist-mediated enhancement showed that the maximal increase in intracellular [Ca(2+)] was already reached after 30-min pretreatment, suggesting that de novo receptor synthesis is not involved in the process of mGlu1a receptor supersensitization. Glutamate-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis increased up to 24 h after antagonist treatment. Although it seemed likely that the hmGlu1a receptor could desensitize after activation by endogenously present glutamate, removal of glutamate from the extracellular medium with GPT resulted in a much smaller enhancement of glutamate responsiveness. Moreover, the magnitude of antagonist-mediated receptor supersensitivity was much larger than the magnitude of agonist-induced receptor desensitization. These results suggest that antagonist-evoked mGlu1 receptor supersensitivity is not merely the result of a blockade of agonist-induced desensitization. Finally, we found that antagonist pretreatment doubled the amount of receptors at the cell surface. Our findings are the first lines of evidence that prolonged antagonist treatment can supersensitize the hmGlu1a receptor. In view of the potential therapeutic application of mGlu1 receptor antagonists, it will be important to know whether these phenomena occur in vivo.