Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 7(2): e1001073, 2011 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21304935

RESUMEN

Unmodified or as a poly[lactide-co-glycolide] nanoparticle, tetraiodothyroacetic acid (tetrac) acts at the integrin αvß3 receptor on human cancer cells to inhibit tumor cell proliferation and xenograft growth. To study in vitro the pharmacodynamics of tetrac formulations in the absence of and in conjunction with other chemotherapeutic agents, we developed a perfusion bellows cell culture system. Cells were grown on polymer flakes and exposed to various concentrations of tetrac, nano-tetrac, resveratrol, cetuximab, or a combination for up to 18 days. Cells were harvested and counted every one or two days. Both NONMEM VI and the exact Monte Carlo parametric expectation maximization algorithm in S-ADAPT were utilized for mathematical modeling. Unmodified tetrac inhibited the proliferation of cancer cells and did so with differing potency in different cell lines. The developed mechanism-based model included two effects of tetrac on different parts of the cell cycle which could be distinguished. For human breast cancer cells, modeling suggested a higher sensitivity (lower IC50) to the effect on success rate of replication than the effect on rate of growth, whereas the capacity (Imax) was larger for the effect on growth rate. Nanoparticulate tetrac (nano-tetrac), which does not enter into cells, had a higher potency and a larger anti-proliferative effect than unmodified tetrac. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of harvested cells revealed tetrac and nano-tetrac induced concentration-dependent apoptosis that was correlated with expression of pro-apoptotic proteins, such as p53, p21, PIG3 and BAD for nano-tetrac, while unmodified tetrac showed a different profile. Approximately additive anti-proliferative effects were found for the combinations of tetrac and resveratrol, tetrac and cetuximab (Erbitux), and nano-tetrac and cetuximab. Our in vitro perfusion cancer cell system together with mathematical modeling successfully described the anti-proliferative effects over time of tetrac and nano-tetrac and may be useful for dose-finding and studying the pharmacodynamics of other chemotherapeutic agents or their combinations.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Modelos Biológicos , Tiroxina/análogos & derivados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/instrumentación , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Cetuximab , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Biología Computacional , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Nanopartículas/administración & dosificación , Resveratrol , Estilbenos/administración & dosificación , Tiroxina/administración & dosificación , Tiroxina/farmacología
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(6): 2646-54, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20368395

RESUMEN

New approaches are needed for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. All available single agents are suboptimal, especially for resistance suppression. Classical beta-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations are not used often enough at least in part because of concern for nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the combination of meropenem and levofloxacin against the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type and its isogenic MexAB pump-overexpressed mutant. The drugs were studied using an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic infection model. There were 16 different regimens evaluated for both isolates. Both total population and resistant subpopulations were quantified. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The impact of monotherapy versus that of combination therapy for attainment of a 3-log cell kill and for resistance suppression was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Drug exposures were calculated by fitting the concentration-time data using the ADAPT II package of programs. For both isolates, monotherapy allowed resistance emergence with all but the largest exposure or with all exposures. In contrast, there was no resistance emergence with any combination regimen. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in time to attainment of a 3-log cell kill as well as time to resistance emergence for monotherapy and combination therapy for both isolates, in favor of the combination regimens. Determination of the pharmacodynamic indices associated with resistance suppression demonstrated a 2- to 3-fold reduction with the use of combinations. Combination therapy with meropenem and levofloxacin provides a significantly faster time to attain a 3-log cell kill and significantly better resistance suppression than does either monotherapy. This combination should be evaluated in a clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Tienamicinas/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/genética , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genes Bacterianos , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/genética , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mutación , Ofloxacino/farmacología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Tienamicinas/farmacología
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(6): 2638-45, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20308371

RESUMEN

We compared drugs (imipenem and doripenem), doses (500 mg and 1 g), and infusion times (0.5 and 1.0 [imipenem], 1.0 and 4.0 h [doripenem]) in our hollow-fiber model, examining cell kill and resistance suppression for three isogenic strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. The experiments ran for 10 days. Serial samples were taken for total organism and resistant subpopulation counts. Drug concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Free time above the MIC (time > MIC) was calculated using ADAPT II. Time to resistance emergence was examined with Cox modeling. Cell kill and resistance emergence differences were explained, in the main, by differences in potency (MIC) between doripenem and imipenem. Prolonged infusion increased free drug time > MIC and improved cell kill. For resistance suppression, the 1-g, 4-h infusion was able to completely suppress resistance for the full period of observation for the wild-type isolate. For the mutants, control was ultimately lost, but in all cases, this was the best regimen. Doripenem gave longer free time > MIC than imipenem and, therefore, better cell kill and resistance suppression. For the wild-type organism, the 1-g, 4-h infusion regimen is preferred. For organisms with resistance mutations, larger doses or addition of a second drug should be studied.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Carbapenémicos/administración & dosificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Carbapenémicos/farmacocinética , Doripenem , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Genes Bacterianos , Humanos , Imipenem/administración & dosificación , Imipenem/farmacocinética , Técnicas In Vitro , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mutación , Porinas/genética , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo , beta-Lactamasas/genética
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 52(11): 3973-9, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18725437

RESUMEN

Sixty days of ciprofloxacin administration at 500 mg every 12 h is currently recommended for the prophylaxis of inhalational exposure to Bacillus anthracis. We examined Bacillus anthracis (Delta-Sterne strain) in our hollow-fiber infection model. We measured the ciprofloxacin concentrations achieved and the number of organisms present before heat shock (total population) and after heat shock (spore population). We fit a mathematical model to these data. Monte Carlo simulation with differing initial spore burdens (3, 5, and 6.9 log(10) CFU/ml) demonstrated that 35 days of this regimen would completely clear the spore burden in 95% of patients. Durations of 110 days did not achieve 99.9% eradication, irrespective of initial burden, because of between-patient variance in drug pharmacokinetics. Given the absence of person-to-person transmission for Bacillus anthracis, adverse drug effects with long-term ciprofloxacin administration, and the possibility of engendering resistance in bodily flora, shorter prophylaxis duration should be given consideration, along with careful monitoring of all exposed individuals.


Asunto(s)
Carbunco/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Carbunco/microbiología , Carbunco/transmisión , Bacillus anthracis/efectos de los fármacos , Bacillus anthracis/genética , Bacillus anthracis/aislamiento & purificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Esquema de Medicación , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Respuesta al Choque Térmico , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Modelos Estadísticos , Método de Montecarlo , Mutación , Esporas Bacterianas/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA