Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 71
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316143

RESUMEN

To build a coherent knowledge base about what psychological intervention strategies work, develop interventions that have positive societal impact, and maintain and increase this impact over time, it is necessary to replace the classical treatment package research paradigm. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is an alternative paradigm that integrates ideas from behavioral science, engineering, implementation science, economics, and decision science. MOST enables optimization of interventions to strategically balance effectiveness, affordability, scalability, and efficiency. In this review we provide an overview of MOST, discuss several experimental designs that can be used in intervention optimization, consider how the investigator can use experimental results to select components for inclusion in the optimized intervention, discuss the application of MOST in implementation science, and list future issues in this rapidly evolving field. We highlight the feasibility of adopting this new research paradigm as well as its potential to hasten the progress of psychological intervention science. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 20 is May 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

2.
Prev Sci ; 25(Suppl 3): 384-396, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294614

RESUMEN

Interventions (including behavioral, biobehavioral, biomedical, and social-structural interventions) hold tremendous potential not only to improve public health overall but also to reduce health disparities and promote health equity. In this study, we introduce one way in which interventions can be optimized for health equity in a principled fashion using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). Specifically, we define intervention equitability as the extent to which the health benefits provided by an intervention are distributed evenly versus concentrated among those who are already advantaged, and we suggest that, if intervention equitability is acknowledged to be a priority, then equitability should be a key criterion that is balanced with other criteria (effectiveness overall, as well as affordability, scalability, and/or efficiency) in intervention optimization. Using a hypothetical case study and simulated data, we show how MOST can be applied to achieve a strategic balance that incorporates equitability. We also show how the composition of an optimized intervention can differ when equitability is considered versus when it is not. We conclude with a vision for next steps to build on this initial foray into optimizing interventions for equitability.


Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud , Humanos , Promoción de la Salud
3.
Cancer ; 129(9): 1351-1360, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872873

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk-stratified follow-up guidelines that account for the absolute risk and timing of recurrence may improve the quality and efficiency of breast cancer follow-up. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship of anatomic stage and receptor status with timing of the first recurrence for patients with local-regional breast cancer and generate risk-stratified follow-up recommendations. METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of 8007 patients with stage I-III breast cancer who enrolled in nine Alliance legacy clinical trials from 1997 to 2013 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02171078). Patients who received standard-of-care therapy were included. Patients who were missing stage or receptor status were excluded. The primary outcome was days from the earliest treatment start date to the date of first recurrence. The primary explanatory variable was anatomic stage. The analysis was stratified by receptor type. Cox proportional-hazards regression models produced cumulative probabilities of recurrence. A dynamic programming algorithm approach was used to optimize the timing of follow-up intervals based on the timing of recurrence events. RESULTS: The time to first recurrence varied significantly between receptor types (p < .0001). Within each receptor type, stage influenced the time to recurrence (p < .0001). The risk of recurrence was highest and occurred earliest for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/progesterone receptor (PR)-negative/Her2neu-negative tumors (stage III; 5-year probability of recurrence, 45.5%). The risk of recurrence was lower for ER-positive/PR-positive/Her2neu-positive tumors (stage III; 5-year probability of recurrence, 15.3%), with recurrences distributed over time. Model-generated follow-up recommendations by stage and receptor type were created. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports considering both anatomic stage and receptor status in follow-up recommendations. The implementation of risk-stratified guidelines based on these data has the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Receptores de Progesterona
4.
Ann Surg ; 277(5): 841-845, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36521077

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate local/regional recurrence rates after breast-conserving surgery in a cohort of patients enrolled in legacy trials of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology and to evaluate variation in recurrence rates by receptor subtype. BACKGROUND: Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated equivalent survival between breast conservation and mastectomy, albeit with higher local/regional recurrence rates after breast conservation. However, absolute rates of local/regional recurrence have been declining with multi-modality treatment. METHODS: Data from 5 Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology legacy trials that enrolled women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1997 and 2010 were included. Women who underwent breast-conserving surgery and standard systemic therapies (n=4,404) were included. Five-year rates of local/regional recurrence were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were censored at the time of distant recurrence (if recorded as the first recurrence), death, or last follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with time to local/regional recurrence, including patient age, tumor size, lymph node status, and receptor subtype. RESULTS: Overall 5-year recurrence was 4.6% (95% CI=4.0-5.4%). Five-year recurrence rates were lowest in those with ER+ or PR+ tumors (Her2+ 3.4% [95% CI 2.0-5.7%], Her2- 4.0% [95% CI 3.2-4.9%]) and highest in the triple-negative subtype (7.1% [95% CI 5.4-9.3%]). On multivariable analysis, increasing nodal involvement and triple-negative subtype were positively associated with recurrence ( P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of local/regional recurrence after breast conservation in women with breast cancer enrolled in legacy trials of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology are significantly lower than historic estimates. This data can better inform patient discussions and surgical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Mastectomía , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
Value Health ; 25(7): 1063-1080, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35779937

RESUMEN

Advances in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence offer tremendous potential benefits to patients. Predictive analytics using ML are already widely used in healthcare operations and care delivery, but how can ML be used for health economics and outcomes research (HEOR)? To answer this question, ISPOR established an emerging good practices task force for the application of ML in HEOR. The task force identified 5 methodological areas where ML could enhance HEOR: (1) cohort selection, identifying samples with greater specificity with respect to inclusion criteria; (2) identification of independent predictors and covariates of health outcomes; (3) predictive analytics of health outcomes, including those that are high cost or life threatening; (4) causal inference through methods, such as targeted maximum likelihood estimation or double-debiased estimation-helping to produce reliable evidence more quickly; and (5) application of ML to the development of economic models to reduce structural, parameter, and sampling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Overall, ML facilitates HEOR through the meaningful and efficient analysis of big data. Nevertheless, a lack of transparency on how ML methods deliver solutions to feature selection and predictive analytics, especially in unsupervised circumstances, increases risk to providers and other decision makers in using ML results. To examine whether ML offers a useful and transparent solution to healthcare analytics, the task force developed the PALISADE Checklist. It is a guide for balancing the many potential applications of ML with the need for transparency in methods development and findings.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Lista de Verificación , Economía Médica , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(1): 25-32, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136426

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness analysis is an important tool for informing treatment coverage and pricing decisions, yet no consensus exists about what threshold for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained indicates whether treatments are likely to be cost-effective in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To estimate a U.S. cost-effectiveness threshold based on health opportunity costs. DESIGN: Simulation of short-term mortality and morbidity attributable to persons dropping health insurance due to increased health care expenditures passed though as premium increases. Model inputs came from demographic data and the literature; 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were constructed. SETTING: Population-based. PARTICIPANTS: Simulated cohort of 100 000 individuals from the U.S. population with direct-purchase private health insurance. MEASUREMENTS: Number of persons dropping insurance coverage, number of additional deaths, and QALYs lost from increased mortality and morbidity, all per increase of $10 000 000 (2019 U.S. dollars) in population treatment cost. RESULTS: Per $10 000 000 increase in health care expenditures, 1860 persons (95% UI, 1080 to 2840 persons) were simulated to become uninsured, causing 5 deaths (UI, 3 to 11 deaths), 81 QALYs (UI, 40 to 170 QALYs) lost due to death, and 15 QALYs (UI, 6 to 32 QALYs) lost due to illness; this implies a cost-effectiveness threshold of $104 000 per QALY (UI, $51 000 to $209 000 per QALY) in 2019 U.S. dollars. Given available evidence, there is about 14% probability that the threshold exceeds $150 000 per QALY and about 48% probability that it lies below $100 000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS: Estimates were sensitive to inputs, most notably the effects of losing insurance on mortality and of premium increases on becoming uninsured. Health opportunity costs may vary by population. Nonhealth opportunity costs were excluded. CONCLUSION: Given current evidence, treatments with ICERs above the range $100 000 to $150 000 per QALY are unlikely to be cost-effective in the United States. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Vigilancia de la Población , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
7.
Health Econ ; 30(3): 699-707, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368853

RESUMEN

Many epidemiological models of the COVID-19 pandemic have focused on preventing deaths. Questions have been raised as to the frailty of those succumbing to the COVID-19 infection. In this paper we employ standard life table methods to illustrate how the potential quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses associated with COVID-19 fatalities could be estimated, while adjusting for comorbidities in terms of impact on both mortality and quality of life. Contrary to some suggestions in the media, we find that even relatively elderly patients with high levels of comorbidity can still lose substantial life years and QALYs. The simplicity of the method facilitates straightforward international comparisons as the pandemic evolves. In particular, we compare five different countries and show that differences in the average QALY losses for each COVID-19 fatality is driven mainly by differing age distributions for those dying of the disease.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Esperanza de Vida/tendencias , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Skeletal Radiol ; 48(1): 103-108, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29915937

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated, two-sequence MRI protocol using limited pulse sequences for the detection of radiographically occult hip and pelvis fractures in the elderly compared to the complete MRI examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eleven consecutive emergency department patients age 65 or older who had undergone MRI to evaluate for clinically suspected hip fracture after negative radiographs were included in the study. The large field-of-view coronal T1 and STIR sequences were isolated from the complete six-sequence MRI protocol and reviewed independently in a blinded fashion by two musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologists who recorded presence or absence of fractures of the proximal femora or pelvis, fracture type, and presence or absence of soft tissue injury. Test accuracy was calculated with 95% confidence intervals and accuracy of fracture classification for the abbreviated protocol was compared to that made on the basis of the full exam. RESULTS: For proximal femoral fractures, the abbreviated protocol had a pooled sensitivity and specificity for the two readers of 100 and 97%, respectively. For pelvic fractures, sensitivity was 92% and specificity was 98%. The kappa coefficient for fracture classification was 0.90 for reader 1 and 0.88 for reader 2, indicating excellent agreement for both readers in fracture classification compared to the classification made based on the complete MRI protocol. CONCLUSIONS: An abbreviated MRI protocol that includes only coronal T1 and STIR sequences maintains high sensitivity and specificity for hip and pelvis fracture detection and fracture classification.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
9.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 24(6): 1111-1118, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29408289

RESUMEN

The goal of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) is to help patients and those who care for them make informed decisions about healthcare. However, the clinical research enterprise has not involved patients, caregivers, and other nonproviders routinely in the process of prioritizing, designing, and conducting research in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To address this need the National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match engaged patients, caregivers, researchers, and other key stakeholders in a 2-year project with the goal of setting a PCOR agenda for the HCT community. Through a collaborative process we identified 6 major areas of interest: (1) patient, caregiver, and family education and support; (2) emotional, cognitive, and social health; (3) physical health and fatigue; (4) sexual health and relationships; (5) financial burden; and (6) models of survivorship care delivery. We then organized into multistakeholder working groups to identify gaps in knowledge and make priority recommendations for critical research to fill those gaps. Gaps varied by working group, but all noted that a historical lack of consistency in measures use and patient populations made it difficult to compare outcomes across studies and urged investigators to incorporate uniform measures and homogenous patient groups in future research. Some groups advised that additional pre-emptory work is needed before conducting prospective interventional trials, whereas others were ready to proceed with comparative clinical effectiveness research studies. This report presents the results of this major initiative and makes recommendations by working group on priority questions for PCOR in HCT.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/normas , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Cuidadores , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Prioridades en Salud , Humanos , Participación del Paciente
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 172(3): 647-657, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30159788

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Higher mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis has been observed among women who are obese. We investigated the relationships between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause or breast cancer-specific mortality after a diagnosis of locoregional breast cancer. METHODS: Women diagnosed in 2004 with AJCC Stage I, II, or III breast cancer (n = 5394) were identified from a population-based National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) patterns of care study (POC-BP) drawing from registries in seven U.S. states. Differences in overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, including age- and stage-based subgroup analyses. RESULTS: In women 70 or older, higher BMI was associated with lower overall mortality (HR for a 5 kg/m2 difference in BMI = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.95). There was no significant association between BMI and overall mortality for women under 70. BMI was not associated with breast cancer death in the full sample, but among women with Stage I disease; those in the highest BMI category had significantly higher breast cancer mortality (HR for BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 vs. 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 = 4.74, 95% CI 1.78-12.59). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, greater BMI was not associated with higher overall mortality. Among older women, BMI was inversely related to overall mortality, with a null association among younger women. Higher BMI was associated with breast cancer mortality among women with Stage I disease, but not among women with more advanced disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Obesidad/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(9): 2587-2595, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29777402

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although not guideline recommended, studies suggest 50% of locoregional breast cancer patients undergo systemic imaging during follow-up, prompting its inclusion as a Choosing Wisely measure of potential overuse. Most studies rely on administrative data that cannot delineate scan intent (prompted by signs/symptoms vs. asymptomatic surveillance). This is a critical gap as intent is the only way to distinguish overuse from appropriate care. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess surveillance systemic imaging post-breast cancer treatment in a national sample accounting for scan intent. METHODS: A stage-stratified random sample of 10 women with stage II-III breast cancer in 2006-2007 was selected from each of 1217 Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities, for a total of 10,838 patients. Registrars abstracted scan type (computed tomography [CT], non-breast magnetic resonance imaging, bone scan, positron emission tomography/CT) and intent (cancer-related vs. not, asymptomatic surveillance vs. not) from medical records for 5 years post-diagnosis. Data were merged with each patient's corresponding National Cancer Database record, containing sociodemographic and tumor/treatment information. RESULTS: Of 10,838 women, 30% had one or more, and 12% had two or more, systemic surveillance scans during a 4-year follow-up period. Patients were more likely to receive surveillance imaging in the first follow-up year (lower proportions during subsequent years) and if they had estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional breast cancer patients undergo asymptomatic systemic imaging during follow-up despite guidelines recommending against it, but at lower rates than previously reported. Providers appear to use factors that confer increased recurrence risk to tailor decisions about systemic surveillance imaging, perhaps reflecting limitations of data on which current guidelines are based. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02171078.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Intención , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cintigrafía/estadística & datos numéricos , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
12.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 23(6): 1021-1028, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28263920

RESUMEN

The primary aim of this study was to describe healthcare costs and utilization during the first year after a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for privately insured non-Medicare patients in the United States aged 50 to 64 years who were treated with either chemotherapy or chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). MarketScan (Truven Health Analytics) adjudicated total payments for inpatient, outpatient, and prescription drug claims from 2007 to 2011 were used to estimate costs from the health system perspective. Stabilized inverse propensity score weights were constructed using logistic regression to account for differential selection of alloHCT over chemotherapy. Weighted generalized linear models adjusted costs and utilization (hospitalizations, inpatient days, and outpatient visit-days) for differences in age, sex, diagnosis year, region, insurance plan type, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index), and 60-day prediagnosis costs. Because mortality data were not available, models could not be adjusted for survival times. Among 29,915 patients with a primary diagnosis of AML, 985 patients met inclusion criteria (774 [79%] receiving chemotherapy alone and 211 [21%] alloHCT). Adjusted mean 1-year costs were $280,788 for chemotherapy and $544,178 for alloHCT. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone had a mean of 4 hospitalizations, 52.9 inpatient days, and 52.4 outpatient visits in the year after AML diagnosis; patients receiving alloHCT had 5 hospitalizations, 92.5 inpatient days, and 74.5 outpatient visits. Treating AML in the first year after diagnosis incurs substantial healthcare costs and utilization with chemotherapy alone and with alloHCT. Our analysis informs healthcare providers, policymakers, and payers so they can better understand treatment costs and utilization for privately insured patients aged 50 to 64 with AML.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/economía , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/economía , Quimioterapia/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Trasplante Homólogo/economía , Estados Unidos
13.
Mycoses ; 60(2): 79-88, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27562016

RESUMEN

Patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) are at risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Even with introduction of oral triazole antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole) IFI-associated morbidity and mortality rates and economic burden remain high. Despite their proven efficacy, it is currently unknown which is the most cost-effective antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) agent. To determine the costs and outcomes associated with AFP, a decision-analytic model was used to simulate treatment in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients undergoing alloHSCT from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Generic itraconazole was the least costly AFP (€162) relative to fluconazole (€500), posaconazole oral suspension (€8628) or voriconazole (€6850). Compared with posaconazole, voriconazole was associated with the lowest number of breakthrough IFIs (36 vs 60); thus, the model predicted fewer deaths from breakthrough IFI for voriconazole (24) than posaconazole (33), and the lowest predicted costs associated with other licensed antifungal treatment and IFI treatment in a cohort of 1000. Voriconazole resulted in cost savings of €4707 per patient compared with posaconazole. Itraconazole demonstrated a high probability of being cost-effective. As primary AFP in alloHSCT patients 180 days posttransplant, voriconazole was more likely to be cost-effective than posaconazole regarding cost per additional IFI and additional death avoided.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/economía , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/prevención & control , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Fluconazol/economía , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/economía , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/etnología , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/microbiología , Itraconazol/economía , Itraconazol/uso terapéutico , España , Triazoles/economía , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico
14.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(5): 465-472, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28237627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging and obtaining a tissue diagnosis. The objective was to determine patterns of preoperative EUS and the impact on downstream treatment. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare-linked database was used to identify patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The staging period was the first staging procedure within 6 months of surgery until surgery. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with preoperative EUS. The main outcome was EUS in the staging period, with secondary outcomes including number of staging tests and time to surgery. RESULTS: 2782 patients were included, 56% were treated at an academic hospital (n = 1563). 1204 patients underwent EUS (43.3%). The factors most associated with receipt of EUS were: earlier year of diagnosis, SEER area, and a NCI or academic hospital (all p < 0.0001). EUS was associated with a longer time to surgery (17.8 days; p < 0.0001), and a higher number of staging tests (40 tests/100 patients; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Factors most associated with receipt of EUS are geographic, temporal, and institutional, rather than clinical/disease factors. EUS is associated with a longer time to surgery and more preoperative testing, and additional study is needed to determine if EUS is overused.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
15.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 22(10): 1738-1746, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27184624

RESUMEN

There is an increasing need for the development of approaches to measure quality, costs, and resource utilization patterns among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients. Administrative claims data provide an opportunity to examine service utilization and costs, particularly from the payer's perspective. However, because administrative claims data are primarily designed for reimbursement purposes, challenges arise when using it for research. We use a case study with data derived from the 2007 to 2011 Truven Health MarketScan Research database to discuss opportunities and challenges for the use of administrative claims data to examine the costs and service utilization of allogeneic HCT and chemotherapy alone for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Starting with a cohort of 29,915 potentially eligible patients with a diagnosis of AML, we were able to identify 211 patients treated with HCT and 774 treated with chemotherapy alone where we were sufficiently confident of the diagnosis and treatment path to allow analysis. Administrative claims data provide an avenue to meet the need for health care costs, resource utilization, and outcome information. However, when using these data, a balance between clinical knowledge and applied methods is critical to identifying a valid study cohort and accurate measures of costs and resource utilization.


Asunto(s)
Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/economía , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Recursos en Salud , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/economía , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia
16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(10): 3385-91, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27491784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although breast cancer follow-up guidelines emphasize the importance of clinical examinations, prior studies suggest a small fraction of local-regional events occurring after breast conservation are detected by examination alone. Our objective was to examine how local-regional events are detected in a contemporary, national cohort of high-risk breast cancer survivors. METHODS: A stage-stratified sample of stage II/III breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2006-2007 (n = 11,099) were identified from 1217 facilities within the National Cancer Data Base. Additional data on local-regional and distant breast events, method of event detection, imaging received, and mortality were collected. We further limited the cohort to patients with breast conservation (n = 4854). Summary statistics describe local-regional event rates and detection method. RESULTS: Local-regional events were detected in 5.5 % (n = 265) of patients. Eighty-three percent were ipsilateral or contralateral in-breast events, and 17 % occurred within ipsilateral lymph nodes. Forty-eight percent of local-regional events were detected on asymptomatic breast imaging, 29 % by patients, and 10 % on clinical examination. Overall, 0.5 % of the 4854 patients had a local-regional event detected on examination. Examinations detected a higher proportion of lymph node events (8/45) compared with in-breast events (18/220). No factors were associated with method of event detection. DISCUSSION: Clinical examinations, as an adjunct to screening mammography, have a modest effect on local-regional event detection. This contradicts current belief that examinations are a critical adjunct to mammographic screening. These findings can help to streamline follow-up care, potentially improving follow-up efficiency and quality.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/diagnóstico , Examen Físico , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Autoexamen de Mamas , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Mamografía , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
17.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 43(6): 1346-54, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26691590

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies since 2005 that evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the general population presenting to emergency departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis published in English and listed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cinahl Plus, and the Cochrane Library since 2005 were included. Excluded studies were those without an explicitly stated reference standard, with insufficient data to calculate the study outcomes, or if the population enrolled was limited to pregnant women or children. Data were abstracted by one investigator and confirmed by another. Data included the number of true positives, true negatives, false positives, false negatives, number of equivocal cases, type of MRI scanner, type of MRI sequence, and demographic data including study setting and gender distribution. Summary test characteristics were calculated. Forest plots and a summary receiver operator characteristic plot were generated. RESULTS: Ten studies met eligibility criteria, representing patients from seven countries. Nine were prospective and two were multicenter studies. A total of 838 subjects were enrolled; 406 (48%) were women. All studies routinely used unenhanced MR images, although two used intravenous contrast-enhancement and three used diffusion-weighted imaging. Using a bivariate random-effects model the summary sensitivity was 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.3%-98.5%) and summary specificity was 95.9% (95% CI: 89.4%-98.4%). CONCLUSION: MRI has a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of appendicitis, similar to that reported previously for computed tomography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1346-1354.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Apendicitis/patología , Niño , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
18.
J Surg Res ; 203(2): 390-7, 2016 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27363648

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Air leaks after lobectomy are associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and protracted resource utilization. Portable drainage systems (PDS) allow for outpatient management of air leaks in patients otherwise meeting discharge criteria. We evaluated the safety and cost efficiency of a protocol for outpatient management of air leaks with a PDS. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer at our institution between 2004 and 2014. All patients discharged with a PDS for air leak were included in the analysis. The study group was compared to an internally matched cohort of patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer managed without the need for outpatient PDS. Study end points included resource utilization, postoperative complications, and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 739 lobectomies were performed during the study period, 73 (10%) patients with air leaks were discharged with a PDS after fulfilling postoperative milestones. Shorter LOS was observed in the study group (3.88 ± 2.4 versus 5.68 ± 5.7 d, P = 0.014) without significant differences in 30-d readmission (11.7% versus 9.0%, P = 0.615). PDS-related complications occurred in 6.8% of study patients (5/73), and 2.7% (2/73) required overnight readmission. PDSs were used for 8.30 ± 4.5 outpatient days. A CMS-based cost analysis predicted an overall savings of $686.72/patient (4.9% of Medicare reimbursement for a major thoracic procedure), associated with significantly fewer hospital days and resources used. CONCLUSIONS: In patients otherwise meeting discharge criteria, outpatient management of air leaks is safe and effective. This strategy is associated with improved efficiency of postoperative care and a modest reduction in hospital costs. This model may be applicable to other thoracic procedures associated with protracted LOS.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neumonectomía , Neumotórax/terapia , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/economía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumotórax/economía , Neumotórax/etiología , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
BMC Infect Dis ; 15: 128, 2015 Mar 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25887385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antifungal prophylaxis is a promising strategy for reducing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) recipients, but the optimum prophylactic agent is unknown. We used mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis to compare clinical trials examining the use of oral antifungals for prophylaxis in alloHCT recipients, with the goal of informing medical decision-making. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis were identified through a systematic literature review. Outcomes of interest (incidence of IFI/invasive aspergillosis/invasive candidiasis, all-cause mortality, and use of other antifungals) were extracted from eligible RCTs and incorporated into a Bayesian hierarchical random-effects MTC. RESULTS: Five eligible RCTs, randomizing 2147 patients in total, were included. Relative to fluconazole, prophylaxis with itraconazole (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52; interquartile range [IQR]: 0.35-0.76), posaconazole (OR: 0.56; IQR: 0.32-0.99), and voriconazole (OR: 0.46; IQR: 0.28-0.73) reduced incidence of overall proven/probable IFI. Posaconazole (OR: 0.31; IQR: 0.17-0.58) and voriconazole (OR: 0.33; IQR: 0.17-0.58) prophylaxis reduced proven/probable invasive aspergillosis more than itraconazole (OR: 0.68; IQR: 0.42-1.12). All-cause mortality was similar across all mould-active agents. CONCLUSION: As expected, mould-active azoles prevented IFIs, particularly invasive aspergillosis, more effectively than fluconazole in alloHCT recipients. The paucity of comparative efficacy data suggests that other factors such as long-term tolerability, availability of intravenous formulations, local IFI epidemiology, and drug costs may need to form the basis for selection among the mould-active azoles.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Micosis/prevención & control , Teorema de Bayes , Humanos , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptores de Trasplantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA