Front-Line Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy with or without Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Observational Study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

Front-line bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with taxanes offers benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The medical records of mBC patients, treated with front-line BEV-based chemotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed in order to generate real life safety and efficacy data. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative mBC treated with front-line BEV in combination with chemotherapy were eligible. Maintenance therapy with BEV and/or hormonal agents was at the physicians' discretion. Among the 387 included patients, the most common adverse events were anemia (61.9%, mainly grade 1), grade 3/4 neutropenia (16.5%), grade 1/2 fatigue (22.3%), and grade 1/2 neuropathy (19.6%). Dose reductions were required in 164 cycles (7.1%) and toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 21 patients (5.4%). The median PFS and the median overall survival (OS) were 13.3 (95% CI: 11.7-14.8) and 32.3 months (95% CI: 27.7-36.9), respectively. Maintenance therapy, with hormonal agents (ET) and/or BEV, was associated with longer OS versus no maintenance therapy (47.2 versus 23.6 months; p < 0.001) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease and BEV maintenance offered longer OS versus no maintenance in patients with HR-negative disease (52.8 versus 23.3; p = 0.023). These real-life data show that front-line BEV-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative mBC patients is an effective treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile. The potential benefit of maintenance treatment, especially ET, is important and warrants further research.

Cancer cachexia syndrome and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: results from a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia syndrome (CCS) is an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or surgical procedures. We performed a prospective study to investigate the effect of CCS on treatment outcomes in patients with non-oncogene driven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing therapy with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. METHODS: Patients were categorized as having cancer cachexia if they had weight loss >5% in the last 6 months prior to immunotherapy (I-O) initiation or any degree of weight loss >2% and body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2 or skeletal muscle index at the level of third lumbar vertebra (LSMI) <55 cm2/m2 for males and <39 cm2/m2 for females. LSMI was calculated using computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen at the beginning of I-O and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis and the prevalence of cancer cachexia at the beginning of I-O was 51.8%. The presence of CCS was associated with inferior response rates to ICIs (P≤0.001) and consisted an independent predictor of increased probability for developing disease progression as best response to treatment, OR =8.11 (95% CI: 2.95-22.40, P≤0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of baseline cancer cachexia consisted an independent predictor for inferior survival, HR =2.52 (95% CI: 1.40-2.55, P=0.002). Reduction of LSMI >5% during treatment did not affect overall survival (OS; P=0.40). CONCLUSIONS: CCS is associated with reduced PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in NSCLC patients and should constitute an additional stratification factor in future I-O clinical trials. Further research at a translational and molecular level is required to decipher the mechanisms of interrelation of metabolic deregulation and suppression of antitumor immunity.

A multicenter phase II trial with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for inoperable/metastatic cancer of the biliary tract.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) as first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable biliary adenocarcinoma were treated with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (200 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between May 2005 and March 2009. The overall objective response rate was 17.9% with an additional 21.4% of patients with stable disease (disease control rate 39.3%). The median overall survival time was 9.2 months (95% CI 5.8-12.5) and the median progression-free survival time 2.7 months (95% CI 2.2-3.2). Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 1 (3.6%) and 4 (14.3%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 3 (10.7%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was observed in 2 (7.1%) patients and grade 3 asthenia in 1 (6%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan has a modest antitumor activity with manageable toxicity as first-line treatment in metastatic cancer of the biliary tract and therefore it cannot be recommended as front-line treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Continuous administration of daily low-dose temozolomide in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide, a novel triazene derivative, has shown activity in vitro against lung cancer as well as against brain metastases from a variety of solid tumors including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in pretreated patients with NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one pretreated patients (median age 60 years) with histologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. Sixteen (52%) patients had a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1, 12 (39%) had pretreated brain metastases and 28 (90.3%) had received >2 lines of treatment. Temozolomide was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) daily for 21 days every 28 days. A total of 73 chemotherapy cycles were administered. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 2 patients (6.5%; 95% CI: -2.2 to 15.1%) achieved a partial response and 3 (10%) stable disease. The median time to progression was 2.4 months, the median survival time 3.3 months and the 1-year survival rate 22.5%. There was a toxic death due to grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 and 4 lymphopenia occurred in 4 (13%) and 2 (6%) patients, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was mild, consisting of grade 2-3 asthenia (n = 14 patients) and grade 3 diarrhea (n = 1 patient). CONCLUSION: Prolonged low daily doses of temozolomide demonstrate minimal activity as salvage therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The combination of low daily doses of temozolomide with other anticancer drugs probably merits further evaluation.

Combination of weekly topotecan and gemcitabine as a salvage treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of safety of the weekly intravenous gemcitabine/topotecan combination as salvage treatment in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Twenty-four women with histologically-proven relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC) were enrolled in the study. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2 IV) along with escalated doses of gemcitabine (starting dose 700 mg/m2 with increments of 100 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity of the combination were evaluated at the first cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-four ROC patients were enrolled in six dose-levels. Most patients had high-grade serous metastatic ovarian cancer (41.7%) and performance status score of 0-1 (95.8%). For 12 patients (50%) treatment was 2nd line and for 12 >2nd line. Eighty-eight cycles were administered with a median of three cycles per patient. The MTD was not reached and grade 3-4 (3.4% and 2.3% of cycles, respectively) neutropenia and grade 4 (3.4% of cycles) thrombocytopenia were the main adverse events. There was no case of febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild with grade 2 fatigue being the most frequent complain. The recommended MTD doses of the combination were topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Two complete (8.3%) and three (12.5%) partial responses were achieved (ORR: 20.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The weekly administration of gemcitabine/topotecan regimen in patients with pretreated metastatic ovarian cancer is an active chemotherapy combination, even in heavily pretreated patients, with a manageable toxicity profile which merits further investigation.

A dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD), paclitaxel and oxaliplatin (L-OHP) administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Thirty-nine pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors received escalated doses of PEG-LD (10-16 mg/m(2)), paclitaxel (100-120 mg/m(2)) and L-OHP (50-70 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks. As one cycle of treatment was considered the administration of both drugs on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. RESULTS: The MTDs were PEG-LD 14 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 120 mg/m(2) and L-OHP 70 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the DLT in all but one case with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. Four (4%) and 13 (12%) cycles were complicated by grades 4 and 3 neutropenia, respectively. Grades 2-3 fatigue and neurotoxicity occurred in 13 and 12% of cycles, respectively. Responses were observed in patients with breast, endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: This is a quite well-tolerated regimen which merits further evaluation in phase II studies.

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in pretreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and activity of a gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination (GEMOX) regimen in pretreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Twenty-seven platinum-refractory/resistant and 14 platinum-sensitive patients received gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 intravenously in days 1+8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in day 8 every 21 days. Ten responses (one complete, nine partial) were observed; five in platinum-sensitive and five in platinum-resistant tumors. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 17 and 10 patients, respectively. There were two treatment-related deaths due to thrombocytopenia and non-neutropenic sepsis. The GEMOX regimen has moderate activity in both platinum-sensitive and resistant ovarian cancer and a toxicity profile that can be significant and therefore requires careful monitoring.

Panitumumab in combination with modified docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

BACKGROUND: A phase I/II study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of biweekly docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (DCF) plus panitumumab (P), its efficacy, and tolerability as first-line treatment in advanced gastroesophageal cancer. METHODS: In phase I part, patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinomas of the stomach or the gastroesophageal junction received cisplatin (40 mg/m2 on day 1), leucovorin (400 mg/m2 on day 1), 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1), 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/daycontinuous infusion on days 1-2), and escalated doses of docetaxel (on day 1) plus P (6 mg/kg on day 1) every 2 weeks. In phase II part, patients were treated with DCF/P at the MTD and the primary endpoint was response rate. The expected response rate was set at >40%. RESULTS: The MTD for docetaxel in the mDCF/P was defined at 40 mg/m2 and a total of 40 evaluable patients were enrolled in phase II study. One (2.5%) complete and 13 (32.5%) partial responses (overall response rate: 35%), as well as 16 (40%) disease stabilizations were documented. The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-10.3) and the median overall survival was 11.3 months (95%CI 7.7-14.8). Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 10 patients (25%) and febrile neutropenia in 2 (5%). Allergic reactions (grade 1-4) occurred in 9 patients (22.5%). There was 1 treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: mDCF/P combination was feasible, though associated with a poor toxicity profile. However, the study failed to meet its primary endpoint and was terminated prematurely due to futility.

Prognostic significance of CEACAM5mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Τo evaluate the clinical relevance of CEACAM5mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Peripheral blood was obtained from 436 patients with mCRC before the initiation of systemic therapy. A second sample was obtained on treatment assessment from 296 (67.9%) patients. The detection of CEACAM5mRNA-positive CTCs was performed using a real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 67 years and PS (EGOG 0-1) 92%; KRAS exon 2 and BRAFV600E mutated primary tumors were identified in 31.9% and 6.4% of the tested patients, respectively, whereas metastasectomy was performed in 17.7% of the patients. Circulating CEACAM5mRNA-positive CTCs were detected in 125 (28.7%) and 85 (28.7%) patients at baseline and on treatment assessment, respectively. The detection of CEACAM5mRNA-positive cells was revealed, in multivariate analysis, as an independent prognostic factor associated with decreased PFS (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.5; p = 0.026) and OS (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.2; p < 0.001). The detection of CEACAM5mRNA-positive CTCs in patients with KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations was correlated with shorter PFS (p = 0.041 and p = 0.022, respectively). Moreover, OS was significantly shorter in patients with CEACAM5+/KRAS mutations compared to those with CEACAM5+/KRAS wt tumors (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of peripheral blood CEACAM5mRNA-positive CTCs is an adverse prognostic factor correlated with poor clinical outcome in patients with mCRC, especially in patients with KRAS and BRAF mutated tumors.

Nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Thirty-nine pretreated patients [33 with taxane-based regimens (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil)] and 6 with combination of fluoropyrimidines plus cisplatin with locally advanced inoperable and metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2 d1, d8, d15 in cycles of 28 days). RESULTS: Partial response (PR) was documented in nine patients (23.1%; 95% confidence interval 10.1-37.2%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (28.2%) and disease progression in 18 (46.2%). The disease control rate (SD + PR + complete response) was 51.3%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 10.2% and 5.1% of patients, respectively; grade 3 anemia in 5.1%; grade 3 neurotoxicity in 5.1%; and grade 2 pain in 5.1%. The median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (range 0.3-13.6) and the median overall survival 6.8 months (range 0.3-22). CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in locally advanced inoperable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma is an active chemotherapy regimen with a manageable toxicity profile and merits further evaluation.

A dose escalation study of the biweekly administration of paclitaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated doses of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin (LOHP) and capecitabine combination in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel (starting dose 100 mg/m2) and LOHP (starting dose 40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and capecitabine (starting dose 800 mg/m2/day) on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 28 days. DLTs were evaluated in the first cycle. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated at four dose-escalating levels. Eleven (68.7%) patients had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. The DLT level was reached at paclitaxel 110 mg/m2, LOHP 50 mg/m2 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2/day. DLTs due to grade 2-3 neutropenia resulted in treatment delays. No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death occurred. Grade 2-3 neutropenia occurred in 3 (19%) patients each, grade 2-4 fatigue affected 6 (37.5%) patients, and grade 2-3 neurotoxicity was observed in 2 (12.5%) and 1 (6%) patients, respectively. Two partial responses and four disease stabilizations were achieved. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and LOHP 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2/day on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 4 weeks. This regimen is well tolerated and merits further evaluation.

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin combination (GEMOX regimen) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin (GEMOX regimen) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced NSCLC who had disease progression after a cisplatin- and taxane-based front-line regimen were treated with gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on day 8) every 3 weeks. The patients' median age was 62 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 11, 1 for 17 and 2 for 4 patients. The treatment was second line for 22 (69%) and >or=third line for 10 (31%) patients. RESULTS: Partial response was achieved in 5 (16%) patients, stable disease in 8 (25%) and progressive disease in 19 (59%). Two patients with stable disease and one patient with progressive disease while on previous chemotherapy experienced a partial response with GEMOX regimen. The median duration of response was 2.5 months (range, 1-11.5), the median time to tumor progression 3 months (range, 1-18) and the median survival 5.6 months (range, 1-31). Grade III neutropenia occurred in five (16%) patients, grade III thrombocytopenia in two (6%) and grade III anemia in three (9%); moreover, grades II-III asthenia was reported in eight (25%) patients and grades II-III neurotoxicity in three (9%). CONCLUSION: The GEMOX combination is a relatively active and well tolerated second-line regimen in NSCLC patients pretreated with a taxane- and/or platinum-based chemotherapy.

Multicenter dose-finding study of concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is the standard adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. A Phase I study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of capecitabine combined with standard RT as adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with Stage II-III rectal cancer after surgery were eligible. RT included a total dose of 50.4 Gy in fractions of 1.8 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, for 5.5 weeks. Capecitabine was administered twice daily in escalating doses during the entire period of RT. Dose-limiting toxicity included Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity, or treatment delay because of unresolved toxicity for >1 week. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: 1000 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), 1150 mg/m(2)/d (4 patients) 1300 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients), 1400 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients), 1500 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), 1600 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), and 1700 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 patients at 1300 mg/m(2)/d (Grade 3 diarrhea), and 2 patients at 1400 mg/m(2)/d (skin toxicity in 1 and abdominal pain with fever in 1, resulting in treatment delay), and 3 patients at 1700 mg/m(2)/d (2 patients had Grade 3 diarrhea and 1 had hand-foot syndrome). Four patients presented with chronic postradiation colitis. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal tolerated dose of capecitabine given concurrently with RT was 1600 mg/m(2)/d in this study. This dose is recommended for additional use in Phase II-III studies.

A dose escalation study of leucovorin (LV) and 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of vinorelbine (VNR) with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (CPM) and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled. VNR was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1 at escalated doses with CPM 300 mg/m2 i.v. bolus and LV 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour i.v. infusion, followed by 5-FU 1500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour continuous infusion (c.i.) for two consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of VNR 22.5 mg/m2 without rhG-CSF and 25 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support, the DLT had been reached. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in six (33%) patients and in fourteen (27%) cycles with no episode of febrile neutropenia. One (5.5%) patient developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 neurotoxicity occurred in two patients and grade 2 and 3 asthenia in five (28%). CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are 20 mg/m2 for VNR (22.5 mg/m2 with rhG-CSF support) and 300 mg/m2 for CPM on day 1, with 500 mg/m2 for LV and 1500 mg/m2 for 5-FU on days 1 and 2.

A 52-year-old-male patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and recurrent venous thromboembolism in unusual sites despite anticoagulation.

The link between cancer and venous thromboembolism is well known, with an annual incidence rate of venous thromboembolism between 0.5% and 20% depending on the primary site and background risk factors. Current guidelines suggest treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin over oral vitamin K antagonists. However, data regarding the management of recurrent venous thromboembolism when the patient is under treatment with anticoagulants are sparse. In this article we present a patient with multiple thromboembolic events in unusual sites despite anticoagulant treatment and we discuss the management options.

A phase II study of metronomic oral vinorelbine administered in the second line and beyond in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

INTRODUCTION: Frequent administration of low doses of cytotoxic drugs (metronomic chemotherapy) has been suggested to suppress tumour growth possibly by inhibiting angiogenesis. We evaluated a metronomic regimen of oral vinorelbine in pre-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Forty-six pre-treated NSCLC patients received oral vinorelbine at a fixed dose of 50 mg three times a week. RESULTS: Treatment was administered as second-line in 12 (26·1%) patients and as third- or further-line in 34 (73·9%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 23·9% and febrile neutropenia in 10·9%. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common severe non-hematologic toxicity (10·9%). Response rate was 10·9%; 19·6% achieved disease stabilization. Median tumour progression (TTP) was 2·2 months, median overall survival 9·4 months and the 1-year survival rate was 30·1%. CONCLUSION: The administration of metronomic oral vinorelbine is feasible and results in acceptable clinical efficacy associated with manageable toxicity in a population consisting mostly of heavily pre-treated NSCLC patients.

Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with chemoresistant relapsed small cell lung cancer as salvage treatment: a phase II multicenter study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic options for patients with relapsed, chemo-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are limited. Since paclitaxel has demonstrated single-agent activity in the second-line setting of SCLC and angiogenesis seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease, a phase II trial was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerance of their combination in patients with relapsed, chemo-resistant SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 who experienced relapse within 3 months after completion of 1st line chemotherapy for SCLC were eligible. Patients were treated with paclitaxel (90 mg/m(2), days 1, 8 and 15) along with bevacizumab (10mg per kg of body weight, days 1 and 15) in cycles of 28 days. RESULTS: Thirty patients (male/female: 27/3) with a median age of 64 years and ECOG performance status 0/1/2: 2/25/3 were enrolled. Nineteen patients (63.3%) had received at least two lines of prior treatment, 17 (56.7%) had undergone prior radiotherapy and nine (30%) had brain metastases at the time of study entry. The overall objective response rate was 20% (95% CI: 5.69-34.31%), including one complete remission, whereas the disease control rate was 36.7%. The median duration of response was 2.5 months (range, 1.5-5.7), the median progression-free survival 2.7 months (range, 0.5-9.2) and the median overall survival 6.3 months (range, 0.5-17.9). Grades 3 and 4 toxicities were limited in neutropenia, diarrhea and fatigue. There was one case of non-fatal pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel with bevacizumab was feasible and active in this poor prognosis and heavily pretreated population of patients with advanced, chemoresistant SCLC, representing a valid therapeutic alternative which merits further evaluation.

A phase II trial of erlotinib as front-line treatment in clinically selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib as front-line treatment in clinically selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine previously untreated white patients who had stage IIIB/IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma or bronchoalveolar carcinoma and who were nonsmokers or former light smokers were treated with erlotinib 150 mg daily, irrespective of the EGFR mutation status. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate (ORR) was 24.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 61.3%. Among the 36 patients for whom tumor material was available, 9 (25%) had activating EGFR mutations. The ORR was 66.7% in patients with activating EGFR mutations and 14.8% in patients with wild-type EGFR (2P = .006). In patients with activating EGFR mutations, the OS has not been reached, whereas it was 12.9 months in patients with EGFR wild type (2P = .045). Twenty-four patients had a PFS of > 6 months; 11 (45.8%) of them had EGFR wild type and 7 (29.1%) had EGFR mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The selection of patients for treatment with EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) should be based on mutation testing. However use of clinical (smoking status) and pathologic (adenocarcinoma) criteria may identify a subgroup of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who can benefit from front-line treatment with erlotinib when mutation testing is not feasible.

Chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel in the treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel (GCD) regimen in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. PATIENT AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients, aged ≤70 years with measurable or evaluable disease and a performance status (PS) of 0-2 were treated with sequential cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (d1), gemcitabine 1,100 mg/m(2) (d1 and d14), and docetaxel 80 mg/m(2) (d14) every 28 days. RESULTS: Sixty patients with an ECOG PS of 0-2 were enroled. Most (71.7%) patients had stage IV disease. A median number of 4 chemotherapy cycles per patient (range, 1-9) was administered. Eight (13.3%) patients achieved a CR and 16 (26.7%) a partial response (PR) (intention-to-treat: ORR 40%; 95% CI 27.6-52.4%). Thirteen (21.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 7.7 months (range, 0.7-43.4), and the median overall survival 21.4 months (range, 0.7-68.6). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 27 (45%) patients and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in five (8.3%). Three (5%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Severe non-haematological toxicity was infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: The GCD combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with chemotherapy-naive locally advanced or metastatic TCC and merits to be further investigated.

A multicenter phase I trial of metronomic oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin in patients with NSCLC.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities of a metronomic administration of oral vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Twenty-six patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. Escalating doses of vinorelbine (40-70 mg p.o./trice per week) and cisplatin (70-85 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion) were administered on day 1 every 3 weeks. ΜΤDs were reached at 60 mg thrice/week p.o. for vinorelbine and 85 mg/m(2) for cisplatin. Grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and grade 4 diarrhea were the dose-limiting events during the first cycle of chemotherapy. The most common grade III-IV hematologic toxicity was neutropenia occurring in seven (27%) patients, while non-hematological toxicities were relatively infrequent and mostly of grade I or II. Objective responses were observed in 20.8% of patients with measurable disease. The regimen of metronomic administration and cisplatin is feasible and active in patients with NSCLC.