Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 112(1): 12-21, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30041863

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac catheterization is the gold-standard modality for investigation of cardiovascular morphology before bidirectional cavopulmonary connection, but requires general anaesthesia and is associated with procedural risk. AIMS: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of computed tomography in diagnosing great vessel stenosis/hypoplasia compared with cardiac catheterization and surgical findings. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (10 after Norwood stage I) underwent computed tomography before surgery between January 2010 and June 2016; 16 of these patients also underwent cardiac catheterization. Proximal and distal pulmonary artery, aortic isthmus and descending aorta measurements, radiation dose and complications were compared via Bland-Altman analyses and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The accuracy of computed tomography in detecting stenosis/hypoplasia of either pulmonary artery was 96.1% compared with surgical findings. For absolute vessel measurements and Z-scores, there was high correlation between computed tomography and angiography at catheterization (r=0.98 for both) and a low mean bias (0.71mm and 0.48; respectively). The magnitude of intertechnique differences observed for individual patients was low (95% of the values ranged between -0.9 and 2.3mm and between -0.7 and 1.7, respectively). Four patients (25%) experienced minor complications from cardiac catheterization, whereas there were no complications from computed tomography. Patients tended to receive a higher radiation dose with cardiac catheterization than with computed tomography, even after exclusion of interventional catheterization procedures (median 2.5 mSv [interquartile range 1.3 to 3.4 mSv] versus median 1.3 mSv [interquartile range 0.9 to 2.6 mSv], respectively; P=0.13). All computed tomography scans were performed without sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography may replace cardiac catheterization in identification of great vessel stenosis/hypoplasia before bidirectional cavopulmonary connection when no intervention before surgery is required. Computed tomography carries lower morbidity, can be performed without sedation and may be associated with less radiation.


Asunto(s)
Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimiento de Fontan , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Arteria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Pulmonar/cirugía , Aorta/anomalías , Aorta/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/efectos adversos , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Arteria Pulmonar/anomalías , Arteria Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA