Variable effect of the post-partum menstrual cycle on aldosterone and renin in women with recent preeclampsia.

The purpose of the present study is to identify the impact of the postpartum menstrual cycle on aldosterone, renin, and their ratio of women with and without a preeclamptic pregnancy in the past. To this end, we analysed the data from 59 women with a history of preeclampsia and 39 healthy parous controls. Five to seven months post-partum, we measured aldosterone, renin, and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio during both the follicular and the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. All measurements were taken in the supine position in the morning. Patients had maintained a standardized sodium diet in the week prior to the measurements. Our results show that in both post-partum women with recent preeclampsia and controls, average levels of renin and aldosterone are significantly elevated in the luteal phase as compared to the follicular phase. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio does not differ between the two phases in either group. Compared to controls, women with recent preeclampsia have significantly lower levels of renin, aldosterone, and aldosterone-to-renin ratio in the follicular phase. This remained consistent in the luteal phase, except for renin. A close correlation existed between the luteal and follicular aldosterone-to-renin ratio in the control group but not in the preeclampsia group. We conclude that both renin and aldosterone are significantly affected by the menstrual cycle whereas the resulting aldosterone-to-renin ratio is not. Post-partum women with recent preeclampsia tend to have lower values for aldosterone and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio than controls.

Reporting guidelines in medical artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential in medicine. However, the lack of universal reporting guidelines poses challenges in ensuring the validity and reproducibility of published research studies in this field. METHODS: Based on a systematic review of academic publications and reporting standards demanded by both international consortia and regulatory stakeholders as well as leading journals in the fields of medicine and medical informatics, 26 reporting guidelines published between 2009 and 2023 were included in this analysis. Guidelines were stratified by breadth (general or specific to medical fields), underlying consensus quality, and target research phase (preclinical, translational, clinical) and subsequently analyzed regarding the overlap and variations in guideline items. RESULTS: AI reporting guidelines for medical research vary with respect to the quality of the underlying consensus process, breadth, and target research phase. Some guideline items such as reporting of study design and model performance recur across guidelines, whereas other items are specific to particular fields and research stages. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis highlights the importance of reporting guidelines in clinical AI research and underscores the need for common standards that address the identified variations and gaps in current guidelines. Overall, this comprehensive overview could help researchers and public stakeholders reinforce quality standards for increased reliability, reproducibility, clinical validity, and public trust in AI research in healthcare. This could facilitate the safe, effective, and ethical translation of AI methods into clinical applications that will ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to computer systems that can perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, like recognizing patterns or making decisions. AI has the potential to transform healthcare, but research on AI in medicine needs clear rules so caregivers and patients can trust it. This study reviews and compares 26 existing guidelines for reporting on AI in medicine. The key differences between these guidelines are their target areas (medicine in general or specific medical fields), the ways they were created, and the research stages they address. While some key items like describing the AI model recurred across guidelines, others were specific to the research area. The analysis shows gaps and variations in current guidelines. Overall, transparent reporting is important, so AI research is reliable, reproducible, trustworthy, and safe for patients. This systematic review of guidelines aims to increase the transparency of AI research, supporting an ethical and safe progression of AI from research into clinical practice.

Using histopathology latent diffusion models as privacy-preserving dataset augmenters improves downstream classification performance.

Latent diffusion models (LDMs) have emerged as a state-of-the-art image generation method, outperforming previous Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in terms of training stability and image quality. In computational pathology, generative models are valuable for data sharing and data augmentation. However, the impact of LDM-generated images on histopathology tasks compared to traditional GANs has not been systematically studied. We trained three LDMs and a styleGAN2 model on histology tiles from nine colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue classes. The LDMs include 1) a fine-tuned version of stable diffusion v1.4, 2) a Kullback-Leibler (KL)-autoencoder (KLF8-DM), and 3) a vector quantized (VQ)-autoencoder deploying LDM (VQF8-DM). We assessed image quality through expert ratings, dimensional reduction methods, distribution similarity measures, and their impact on training a multiclass tissue classifier. Additionally, we investigated image memorization in the KLF8-DM and styleGAN2 models. All models provided a high image quality, with the KLF8-DM achieving the best Frechet Inception Distance (FID) and expert rating scores for complex tissue classes. For simpler classes, the VQF8-DM and styleGAN2 models performed better. Image memorization was negligible for both styleGAN2 and KLF8-DM models. Classifiers trained on a mix of KLF8-DM generated and real images achieved a 4% improvement in overall classification accuracy, highlighting the usefulness of these images for dataset augmentation. Our systematic study of generative methods showed that KLF8-DM produces the highest quality images with negligible image memorization. The higher classifier performance in the generatively augmented dataset suggests that this augmentation technique can be employed to enhance histopathology classifiers for various tasks.

Direct image to subtype prediction for brain tumors using deep learning.

Background: Deep Learning (DL) can predict molecular alterations of solid tumors directly from routine histopathology slides. Since the 2021 update of the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria, the classification of brain tumors integrates both histopathological and molecular information. We hypothesize that DL can predict molecular alterations as well as WHO subtyping of brain tumors from hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology slides. Methods: We used weakly supervised DL and applied it to three large cohorts of brain tumor samples, comprising N = 2845 patients. Results: We found that the key molecular alterations for subtyping, IDH and ATRX, as well as 1p19q codeletion, were predictable from histology with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.95, 0.90, and 0.80 in the training cohort, respectively. These findings were upheld in external validation cohorts with AUROCs of 0.90, 0.79, and 0.87 for prediction of IDH, ATRX, and 1p19q codeletion, respectively. Conclusions: In the future, such DL-based implementations could ease diagnostic workflows, particularly for situations in which advanced molecular testing is not readily available.