European Respiratory Society guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare syndrome caused by several distinct diseases leading to progressive dyspnoea, hypoxemia, risk of respiratory failure and early death due to accumulation of proteinaceous material in the lungs. Diagnostic strategies may include computed tomography (CT) of the lungs, bronchoalveolar lavage, evaluation of antibodies against granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), genetic testing, and, eventually, lung biopsy. The management options are focused at removing the proteinaceous material by whole lung lavage (WLL), augmentation therapy with GM-CSF, rituximab, plasmapheresis, and lung transplantation. The presented diagnostic and management guideline aim to provide guidance to physicians managing patients with PAP. METHODS: A European Respiratory Society Task Force committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in PAP developed recommendations in accordance with the ERS Handbook for Clinical Practice Guidelines and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach. This included a systematic review of the literature and application of the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendations. The committee formulated five PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions, and two narrative questions to develop specific evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS: The Task Force committee developed recommendations for five PICOs. These included management of PAP with WLL, GM-CSF augmentation therapy, rituximab, plasmapheresis, and lung transplantation. Also, the committee made recommendations regarding the use of GM-CSF antibody testing, diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsy based on narrative questions.In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on the hierarchy of diagnostic interventions and therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of PAP is based on CT and BAL cytology or lung histology, whereas diagnosis of specific PAP-causing diseases requires GM-CSF antibody testing or genetic analysis. There are several therapies including WLL and augmentation therapy with GM-CSF available to treat PAP, but supporting evidence is still limited.

Mortality surrogates in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with coexistent emphysema, termed combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) may associate with reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) declines compared to non-CPFE IPF patients. We examined associations between mortality and functional measures of disease progression in two IPF cohorts. METHODS: Visual emphysema presence (>0% emphysema) scored on computed tomography identified CPFE patients (CPFE/non-CPFE: derivation cohort n=317/n=183, replication cohort n=358/n=152), who were subgrouped using 10% or 15% visual emphysema thresholds, and an unsupervised machine-learning model considering emphysema and interstitial lung disease extents. Baseline characteristics, 1-year relative FVC and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) decline (linear mixed-effects models), and their associations with mortality (multivariable Cox regression models) were compared across non-CPFE and CPFE subgroups. RESULTS: In both IPF cohorts, CPFE patients with ≥10% emphysema had a greater smoking history and lower baseline D LCO compared to CPFE patients with <10% emphysema. Using multivariable Cox regression analyses in patients with ≥10% emphysema, 1-year D LCO decline showed stronger mortality associations than 1-year FVC decline. Results were maintained in patients suitable for therapeutic IPF trials and in subjects subgrouped by ≥15% emphysema and using unsupervised machine learning. Importantly, the unsupervised machine-learning approach identified CPFE patients in whom FVC decline did not associate strongly with mortality. In non-CPFE IPF patients, 1-year FVC declines ≥5% and ≥10% showed strong mortality associations. CONCLUSION: When assessing disease progression in IPF, D LCO decline should be considered in patients with ≥10% emphysema and a ≥5% 1-year relative FVC decline threshold considered in non-CPFE IPF patients.

Decreased serpin C1 in extracellular vesicles predicts response to methotrexate treatment in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology primarily affecting the lungs. Treatment is needed when disease symptoms worsen and organ function deteriorates. In pulmonary sarcoidosis, prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) are the most common anti-inflammatory therapies. However, there is large inter-patient variability in response to treatment, and predictive response markers are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the predictive potential of biomarkers in extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from biobanked serum of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis stored prior to start of therapy. METHODS: Protein concentrations of a four-protein test panel of inflammatory proteins were measured in a discovery (n = 16) and replication (n = 129) cohort of patients with sarcoidosis and 47 healthy controls. Response to therapy was defined as an improvement of the absolute score of > 5% forced vital capacity (FVC) and/or > 10% diffusion lung of carbon monoxide (DLCO) after 24 weeks compared to baseline (before treatment). RESULTS: Serum protein levels differed between EV fractions and serum, and between sarcoidosis cases and controls. Serpin C1 concentrations in the low density lipid particle EV fraction were lower at baseline in the group of patients with a good response to MTX treatment in both the discovery cohort (p = 0.059) and in the replication cohort (p = 0.032). EV Serpin C1 showed to be a significant predictor for response to treatment with MTX (OR 0.4; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: This study shows that proteins isolated from EVs harbor a distinct signal and have potential as new predictive therapy response biomarkers in sarcoidosis.

Clinical trials in pulmonary sarcoidosis; what is needed, what is happening and what is next?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a clinical unmet need to improve treatment for patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Both retrospective and prospective drug trials are hampered by the fact that patients with sarcoidosis are characterized by a heterogeneous presentation and disease course. In this review, an overview is given of different drug trials in pulmonary sarcoidosis with an emphasis on different primary endpoints and the problems related to them. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, using significant input from patients with sarcoidosis, different task-forces/studies tried to develop a core set of most important outcomes to measure in future studies on treatment of sarcoidosis. Furthermore, at present, three major clinical trials are being conducted on new drugs for treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis. SUMMARY: Progress has been made to develop a core set of outcomes measures that can be used in making a combined primary endpoint in future drug trials in sarcoidosis.

Inhaled Molgramostim Therapy in Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) is a rare disease characterized by progressive surfactant accumulation and hypoxemia. It is caused by disruption of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signaling, which pulmonary alveolar macrophages require to clear surfactant. Recently, inhaled GM-CSF was shown to improve the partial pressure of arterial oxygen in patients with aPAP. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-group trial, we randomly assigned patients with aPAP to receive the recombinant GM-CSF molgramostim (300 µg once daily by inhalation), either continuously or intermittently (every other week), or matching placebo. The 24-week intervention period was followed by an open-label treatment-extension period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the alveolar-arterial difference in oxygen concentration (A-aDo2) at week 24. RESULTS: In total, 138 patients underwent randomization; 46 were assigned to receive continuous molgramostim, 45 to receive intermittent molgramostim, and 47 to receive placebo. Invalid A-aDo2 data for 4 patients (1 in each molgramostim group and 2 in the placebo group) who received nasal oxygen therapy during arterial blood gas measurement were replaced by means of imputation. For the primary end point - the change from baseline in the A-aDo2 at week 24 - improvement was greater among patients receiving continuous molgramostim than among those receiving placebo (-12.8 mm Hg vs. -6.6 mm Hg; estimated treatment difference, -6.2 mm Hg; P = 0.03 by comparison of least-squares means). Patients receiving continuous molgramostim also had greater improvement than those receiving placebo for secondary end points, including the change from baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score at week 24 (-12.4 points vs. -5.1 points; estimated treatment difference, -7.4 points; P = 0.01 by comparison of least-squares means). For multiple end points, improvement was greater with continuous molgramostim than with intermittent molgramostim. The percentages of patients with adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the three groups, except for the percentage of patients with chest pain, which was higher in the continuous-molgramostim group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aPAP, daily administration of inhaled molgramostim resulted in greater improvements in pulmonary gas transfer and functional health status than placebo, with similar rates of adverse events. (Funded by Savara Pharmaceuticals; IMPALA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02702180.).

Prednisone vs methotrexate in treatment naïve cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Side effects limit the long-term use of glucocorticoids in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), and methotrexate has gained attention as steroid sparing agent although the supporting evidence is poor. This study compared prednisone monotherapy, methotrexate monotherapy or a combination of both, in the reduction of myocardial Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and clinical stabilization of CS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective cohort study, 61 newly diagnosed and treatment naïve CS patients commenced treatment with prednisone (N = 21), methotrexate (N = 30) or prednisone and methotrexate (N = 10) between January 2010 and December 2017. Primary outcome was metabolic response on FDG PET/CT and secondary outcomes were treatment patterns, major adverse cardiovascular events, left ventricular ejection fraction, biomarkers and side effects. At a median treatment duration of 6.2 [5.7-7.2] months, 71.4% of patients were FDG PET/CT responders, and the overall myocardial maximum standardized uptake value decreased from 6.9 [5.0-10.1] to 3.4 [2.1-4.7] (P < 0.001), with no significant differences between treatment groups. During 24 months of follow-up, 7 patients (33.3%; prednisone), 6 patients (20.0%; methotrexate) and 1 patient (10.0%; combination group) experienced at least one major adverse cardiovascular event (P = 0.292). Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Significant suppression of cardiac FDG uptake occurred in CS patients after 6 months of prednisone, methotrexate or combination therapy. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes during follow-up. These results warrant further investigation of methotrexate treatment in CS patients.

Methotrexate Polyglutamate Concentrations as a Possible Predictive Marker for Effectiveness of Methotrexate Therapy in Patients with Sarcoidosis: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate (MTX), a folate antagonist, is often used as second-line treatment in patients with sarcoidosis. Effectiveness of MTX has large inter-patient variability and at present therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MTX is not possible. Upon administration, MTX is actively transported into cells and metabolized to its active forms by adding glutamate residues forming MTXPG(n=1-5) resulting in enhanced cellular retention. In this study we address the question whether different MTXPG(n) concentrations in red blood cells (RBC) of patients with sarcoidosis after 3 months of MTX therapy correlate with response to treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with sarcoidosis that had started on MTX therapy and from whom blood samples and FDG-PET/CT were available 3 and 6-12 months after MTX initiation, respectively. FDG-uptake was measured by SUVmax in the heart, lungs and thoracic lymph nodes. Changes in SUVmax was used to determine anti-inflammatory response after 6-12 months of MTX therapy. MTXPG(n) concentrations were measured from whole blood RBC using an LC-MS/MS method. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationship between changes in the SUVmax and MTXPG(n) concentrations. RESULTS: We included 42 sarcoidosis patients treated with MTX (15 mg/week); 31 with cardiac sarcoidosis and 11 with pulmonary sarcoidosis. In MTXPG3 and MTXPG4 a significant negative relation between the absolute changes in SUVmax and MTXPG(n) was found r = - 0.312 (n = 42, p = 0.047) for MTXPG3 and r = - 0.336 (n = 42, p = 0.031 for MTXPG4). The other MTXPG(n) did not correlate to changes in SUVmax. CONCLUSION: These results suggest a relation between MTXPG(n) concentrations and the anti-inflammatory effect in patients with sarcoidosis. Further prospective validation is warranted, but if measuring MTXPG concentrations could predict treatment effect of MTX this would be a step in the direction of personalized medicine.

Improved Survival of IPF patients Treated With Antifibrotic Drugs Compared With Untreated Patients.

PURPOSE: Pirfenidone and nintedanib unequivocally inhibit FVC decline, but have been inconsistently linked to reduced mortality in phase III studies. On the contrary, real-world data show a survival benefit of antifibrotic drugs. However, it is unknown what this benefit is across different Gender, Age, and Physiology (GAP) stages. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Is there a difference in transplant-free (TPF) survival of IPF patients receiving antifibrotic drugs (IPFAF) compared with an untreated cohort (IPFnon-AF)? Is this different for patients with GAP stage I, II, or III. METHODS: This is a single-center observational cohort study using prospectively included patients diagnosed with IPF between 2008-2018. Primary outcomes were TPF survival difference and 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative mortality for IPFAF and IPFnon-AF. This was repeated after stratification for GAP stage. RESULTS: In total, 457 patients were included. The median transplant-free survival was 3.4 years in IPFAF (n = 313) and 2.2 years in IPFnon-AF (n = 144, p = 0.005). For GAP stage II, a median survival of 3.1 and 1.7 years was noted for IPFAF (n = 143) and IPFnon-AF (n = 59, p < 0.001), respectively. A significantly lower 1-, 2-, and 3- year cumulative mortality was found for IPFAF with GAP stage II (1 yr: 7.0% vs 35.6%, 2 yr: 26.6% vs 55.9%, and 3 yr: 46.9% vs 69.5%). The 1-year cumulative mortality of IPFAF with GAP III was also significantly lower (19.0% vs 65.0%). CONCLUSION: This large real-world study showed a survival benefit in IPFAF compared with IPFnon-AF. This especially holds true for patients with GAP stage II and III.

Simultaneous Assessment of mTORC1, JAK/STAT, and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Pathways in Patients with Sarcoidosis.

The unknown etiology of sarcoidosis, along with the variability in organ involvement and disease course, complicates the effective treatment of this disease. Based on recent studies, the cellular inflammatory pathways involved in granuloma formation are of interest regarding possible new treatment options, such as the mechanistic (formerly mammalian) target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, and the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich-containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome pathway. The aim of this study was to explore the potential coexpression of these three inflammatory pathways in patients with sarcoidosis and see whether possible differences were related to disease outcome. The tissue of 60 patients with sarcoidosis was used to determine the activity of these three signaling pathways using immunohistochemistry. The activation of NLRP3 was present in 85% of all patients, and the activation of mTORC1 and JAK/STAT was present in 49% and 50% of patients, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of NLRP3 activation at diagnosis was associated with a chronic disease course of sarcoidosis. Our finding of different new conceptual inflammatory tissue phenotypes in sarcoidosis could possibly guide future treatment studies using the available inhibitors of either NLRP3, JAK-STAT, and mTORC1 inhibitors in a more personalized medicine approach.

Predictors of appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy in cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is associated with an increased risk for sudden cardiac death. An implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) is recommended in a subgroup of CS patients. However, the recommendations for primary prevention differ between guidelines. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICDs in CS and to identify predictors of appropriate therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in CS patients with an ICD implantation between 2010 and 2019. Primary outcome was appropriate ICD therapy. Independent predictors were calculated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: 105 patients were included. An ICD was implanted for primary prevention in 79%. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 34 patients (32.4%) received appropriate ICD therapy of whom 24 (22.9%) received an appropriate shock. Three patients (2.9%) received an inappropriate shock due to atrial fibrillation. Independent predictors of appropriate therapy included prior ventricular arrhythmias (hazard ratio [HR]: 10.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.0-21.9]) and right ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (HR: 3.6 [95% CI: 1.7-7.6]). Within the primary prevention group, right ventricular LGE (HR: 5.7 [95% CI: 1.6-20.7]) was the only independent predictor of appropriate therapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ between patients with and without appropriate therapy (44.4% vs. 45.6%, p = .70). CONCLUSION: In CS patients with an ICD, a high rate of appropriate therapy was observed and a low rate of inappropriate shocks. Prior ventricular arrhythmias and right ventricular LGE were independent predictors of appropriate therapy.

Safety and tolerability of pirfenidone in asbestosis: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Pirfenidone slows down disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recent studies suggest a treatment effect in progressive pulmonary fibrosis other than IPF. However, the safety and effectiveness of pirfenidone in asbestosis patients remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of pirfenidone in asbestosis patients with a progressive phenotype. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study in asbestosis patients with progressive lung function decline. After a 12-week observational period, patients were treated with pirfenidone 801 mg three times a day. Symptoms and adverse events were evaluated weekly and patients completed online patient-reported outcomes measures. At baseline, start of therapy, 12 and 24 weeks, in hospital measurement of lung function and a 6 min walking test were performed. Additionally, patients performed daily home spirometry measurements. RESULTS: In total, 10 patients were included of whom 6 patients (66.7%) experienced any adverse events during the study period. Most frequently reported adverse events were fatigue, rash, anorexia and cough, which mostly occurred intermittently and were reported as not very bothersome. No significant changes in hospital pulmonary function (forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), 6 min walking test or patient-reported outcomes measures before and after start of pirfenidone were found. Home spirometry demonstrated a FVC decline in 12 weeks before start of pirfenidone, while FVC did not decline during the 24 week treatment phase, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pirfenidone in asbestosis has an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and home spirometry data suggest this antifibrotic treatment might attenuate FVC decline in progressive asbestosis. Trial registration MEC-2018-1392; EudraCT number: 2018-001781-41.

The emerging role of inorganic elements as potential antigens in sarcoidosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Previous studies mainly described a role for organic agents as possible triggers for sarcoidosis. In this review, we address recent studies suggesting a possible role for inorganic elements, such as metals or silica in sarcoidosis pathogenesis. RECENT FINDINGS: Several epidemiological papers suggest that inorganic agents, either by environmental exposures or occupational activities, could trigger sarcoidosis. Association between inorganics and sarcoidosis is also described in several recently published case reports and studies demonstrating immunological sensitization to inorganic agents in sarcoidosis patients.Studies comparing chronic beryllium disease (CBD) and sarcoidosis suggest that although antigenic triggers may differ, underlying processes may be comparable.Besides the fact that a growing number of studies show a possible role for inorganic triggers, it is also suggested that inorganic triggered sarcoidosis may result in a more severe phenotype, including pulmonary fibrosis. SUMMARY: We can use the knowledge already gained on CBD pathogenesis to conduct further research into role of inorganics, such as metals and silica as antigens in sarcoidosis. Given the importance of a lymphocyte proliferation test (LPT) in diagnosing CBD, it seems obvious to also implement this test in the diagnostic work-up of sarcoidosis to identify patients with an inorganic antigenic trigger of their disease.

Patient reported side-effects of prednisone and methotrexate in a real-world sarcoidosis population.

Currently prednisone is the first-line pharmacological treatment option for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Methotrexate is used as second-line therapy and seems to have fewer side-effects. No prospective comparative studies of first-line treatment with methotrexate exist. In this study, we evaluated patient reported presence and bothersomeness of side-effects of prednisone and methotrexate in a sarcoidosis population to guide the design of a larger prospective study. During a yearly patient information meeting 67 patients completed a questionnaire on medication use; 11 patients never used prednisone or methotrexate and were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 56 patients, 89% used prednisone and 70% methotrexate (present or former). Significantly more side-effects were reported for prednisone than for methotrexate, 78% versus 49% (p = 0.006). In conclusion, methotrexate seems to have fewer and less bothersome side-effects than prednisone. These findings need to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Serial CT analysis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: comparison of visual features that determine patient outcome.

AIMS: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) receiving antifibrotic medication and patients with non-IPF fibrosing lung disease often demonstrate rates of annualised forced vital capacity (FVC) decline within the range of measurement variation (5.0%-9.9%). We examined whether change in visual CT variables could help confirm whether marginal FVC declines represented genuine clinical deterioration rather than measurement noise. METHODS: In two IPF cohorts (cohort 1: n=103, cohort 2: n=108), separate pairs of radiologists scored paired volumetric CTs (acquired between 6 and 24 months from baseline). Change in interstitial lung disease, honeycombing, reticulation, ground-glass opacity extents and traction bronchiectasis severity was evaluated using a 5-point scale, with mortality prediction analysed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Both IPF populations were then combined to determine whether change in CT variables could predict mortality in patients with marginal FVC declines. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, change in all CT variables except ground-glass opacity predicted mortality in both cohorts. On multivariate analysis adjusted for patient age, gender, antifibrotic use and baseline disease severity (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide), change in traction bronchiectasis severity predicted mortality independent of FVC decline. Change in traction bronchiectasis severity demonstrated good interobserver agreement among both scorer pairs. Across all study patients with marginal FVC declines, change in traction bronchiectasis severity independently predicted mortality and identified more patients with deterioration than change in honeycombing extent. CONCLUSIONS: Change in traction bronchiectasis severity is a measure of disease progression that could be used to help resolve the clinical importance of marginal FVC declines.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Best Practice in Monitoring and Managing a Relentless Fibrotic Disease.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fibrosing interstitial lung disease that is, by definition, progressive. Progression of IPF is reflected by a decline in lung function, worsening of dyspnea and exercise capacity, and deterioration in health-related quality of life. In the short term, the course of disease for an individual patient is impossible to predict. A period of relative stability in forced vital capacity (FVC) does not mean that FVC will remain stable in the near future. Frequent monitoring using multiple assessments, not limited to pulmonary function tests, is important to evaluate disease progression in individual patients and ensure that patients are offered appropriate care. Optimal management of IPF requires a multidimensional approach, including both pharmacological therapy to slow decline in lung function and supportive care to preserve patients' quality of life.

Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis is recommended in case of significant symptoms, impaired or deteriorating lung function. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are limited and largely based on expert opinion. Prednisone is currently the first-choice therapy and leads to short-term improvement of lung function. Unfortunately, prednisone often has side-effects and may be associated with impaired quality of life. Methotrexate is presently considered second-line therapy, and appears to have fewer side-effects. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of methotrexate as first-line therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis compared with prednisone. The primary endpoint of this study will be the change in hospital-measured Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) between baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary objectives are to gain more insights in response to therapy in individual patients by home spirometry and patient-reported outcomes. Blood biomarkers will be examined to find predictors of response to therapy, disease progression and chronicity, and to improve our understanding of the underlying disease mechanism. METHODS/DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized, non-blinded, multi-center, non-inferiority trial, we plan to randomize 138 treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who are about to start treatment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prednisone or methotrexate in a predefined schedule for 24 weeks, after which they will be followed up in regular care for up to 2 years. Regular hospital visits will include pulmonary function assessment, completion of patient-reported outcomes, and blood withdrawal. Additionally, patients will be asked to perform weekly home spirometry, and record symptoms and side-effects via a home monitoring application for 24 weeks. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing first-line treatment of prednisone and methotrexate and provide valuable data on efficacy, safety, quality of life and biomarkers. If this study confirms the hypothesis that methotrexate is as effective as prednisone as first-line treatment for sarcoidosis but with fewer side-effects, this will lead to improvement in care and initiate a change in practice. Furthermore, insights into the immunological mechanisms underlying sarcoidosis pathology might reveal new therapeutic targets. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the 19th of March 2020 in the International Clinical Trial Registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT04314193 .

Biomarkers in Sarcoidosis: Beginning of a New Era?

At present, no biomarker exists which is truly specific for sarcoidosis and the ones available have modest sensitivity and specificity. The clinical context should dictate the choice of biomarker(s) used to address different clinical questions such as diagnosis, monitoring disease activity or monitoring response to treatment. In the future, in addition to known serum biomarkers, it seems fruitful to further explore a possible role of imaging, exhaled air and even biopsy-related biomarkers in sarcoidosis to guide clinical management.