Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 251, 2024 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819574

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are cerebral vascular lesions that occasionally occur with seizures. We present a retrospective case series from IRCCS Gaslini Children's Hospital, a systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature with the goal of elucidating the post-surgery seizure outcome in children with CCMs. METHODS: a retrospective review of children with cavernous malformation related epilepsy who underwent surgery at Gaslini Children's Hospital from 2005 to 2022 was conducted. We also conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases from January 1989 to August 2022. Inclusion criteria were: presence of CCMs-related epilepsy, in under 18 years old subjects with a clear lesion site. Presence of post-surgery seizure outcome and follow-up ≥ 12 months. RESULTS: we identified 30 manuscripts and 223 patients with CCMs-related epilepsy, including 17 patients reported in our series. We identified 85.7% Engel class I subjects. The risk of expected neurological deficits was 3.7%; that of unexpected neurological deficits 2.8%. We found no statistically significant correlations between Engel class and the following factors: site of lesion, type of seizure, drug resistance, duration of disease, type of surgery, presence of multiple CCMs. However, we found some interesting trends: longer disease duration and drug resistance seem to be more frequent in subjects in Engel class II, III and IV; multiple cavernomas would not seem to influence seizure outcome. CONCLUSIONS: epilepsy surgery in children with CCMs is a safe and successful treatment option. Further studies are necessary to define the impact of clinical features on seizure prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Epilepsia/cirugía , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central/cirugía , Hemangioma Cavernoso del Sistema Nervioso Central/complicaciones , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/cirugía , Convulsiones/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lactante
2.
Neurosurg Focus ; 53(3): E5, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36052629

RESUMEN

Henry Shrapnel invented an antipersonnel weapon capable of defragmenting with the explosion of charge. Modern grenades or improvised explosive devices may be seen as an evolution of Shrapnel's ammunition. Starting by analyzing the ballistics of these weapons, it is possible to understand the historical evolution of the management of skull fractures and penetrating brain injuries (PBIs). A circular crack line with a splinter at the center, depressed in bone, was a characteristic feature of fractures due to Shrapnel's bullet. Three longitudinal fissures, one medial and two lateral, may be present due to tangential blows. Craniectomy and/or fracture reduction were almost always necessary in these cases. The first document describing medical examination and therapeutic strategies for head-injured patients dates back to 1600 bc (the Edwin Smith Papyrus). Several doctors from the past century, such as Puppe, Matson, and Cushing, proposed different theories about skull fractures and the management of craniocerebral injuries, paving the way for diagnosing and treating these injuries. Shrapnel fractures required wider craniotomies and in the past surgeons had to deal with more severe injuries. Based on past military experiences during what could be called the postshrapnel age, guidelines for the management of PBIs were introduced in 2001. In these guidelines various concepts were reviewed, such as the importance of antibiotics and seizure prevention; included as well were prognostic factors such as hypotension, coagulopathy, respiratory distress, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. Furthermore, they highlight how it has not been possible to reach a common viewpoint on surgical management. Nevertheless, in contrast with the past, it is preferable to be less aggressive regarding retained fragments if there is no intracranial mass effect. Although military situations were useful in building basic principles for PBI guidelines, civilian PBIs differ noticeably from military ones. Therefore, there is a need to review modern guidelines in order to apply them in every situation.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza , Neurocirugia , Fracturas Craneales , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/cirugía , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/cirugía , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía
3.
J Clin Med ; 13(12)2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929960

RESUMEN

Background: Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) involves the cerebellar tonsils' descent below the foramen magnum. In Chiari malformation type 1.5 (CM-1.5), both the cerebellar tonsils and the brainstem are herniated. Common symptoms include headaches and cervical pain, often associated with conditions like syringomyelia and hydrocephalus. Surgical treatment is not performed in asymptomatic patients, while the presence of syringomyelia represents an indication for surgery. Methods: This study retrospectively examined pediatric patients with CM-1 and CM-1.5 at Giannina Gaslini Hospital from 2006 to 2020, analyzing demographics, radiological findings, surgical interventions, and outcomes. Results: Out of 211 patients who underwent surgery, 83.9% were diagnosed with CM-1 and 16.1% with CM-1.5. Headaches were prevalent (69%) and cerebellar signs were noted in 29% of patients. Syringomyelia and hydrocephalus were present in 28.4% and 8% of cases, respectively. Intraoperative ultrasonography guided interventions, with 59.8% requiring bony and ligamentous decompression, and 27.1% undergoing duraplasty. Conclusions: The surgical treatment of CM-1/CM-1.5 involves posterior cranial fossa decompression. Choosing between bony decompression alone and its combination with duraplasty has always been controversial in the pediatric population. If we consider as surgical endpoint the restoration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flux, intraoperative ultrasound may be a real-time helpful tool in orienting the surgical strategy, yet refinement with quantitative measures is needed.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA