RESUMEN
This article investigates the pivotal role of non-hazardous waste landfills in achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction objectives within the European Union (EU).1 This study leverages the experience of key stakeholders in the European landfilling, assesses the efficacy of 'best-in-class' landfill installations, evaluates their potential impact on GHG reduction, and offers concrete recommendations for operators and policymakers. 'Best-in-class' landfills exceed the commonly accepted best practices by implementing all the following practices: (1) an anticipated capture system during the operating phase, (2) prompt installation of the final cover and capture system, with use of an impermeable cover, (3) operated as bioreactor, keeping optimal humidity, (4) adequate maintenance and reporting, (5) recovery of captured gas and (6) treatment of residual methane emissions throughout the waste decomposition process. The main finding is that switching from the actual mix of practices to 'best in class' practices would reduce by ~21 MtCO2eq (-36%) the emissions due to the degradation of waste landfilled between 2024 and 2035, compared to the 'business-as-usual scenario', while also providing a renewable energy source, bringing potential avoided emissions and energy sovereignty. The findings underscore that in addition to implementing the organics diversion and waste reduction targets of the EU, adopting 'best-in class' landfill practices has the potential to bolster energy recovery, mitigate emissions and stimulate biomethane production, thereby advancing the EU environmental goals.
Asunto(s)
Unión Europea , Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Instalaciones de Eliminación de Residuos , Gases de Efecto Invernadero/análisis , Metano/análisis , Administración de Residuos/métodos , Eliminación de Residuos/métodos , Contaminación del Aire/prevención & control , Política Ambiental , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisisRESUMEN
The microbunching instability driven by collective effects of the beam inside an accelerator can significantly degrade the final electron beam quality for free electron laser (FEL) radiation. In this Letter, we propose an inexpensive scheme to suppress such an instability in accelerators for next generation FEL light sources. Instead of using an expensive device such as a laser heater or RF deflecting cavities, this scheme uses longitudinal mixing associated with the transverse spread of the beam through bending magnets inside the accelerator transport system to suppress the instability. The final uncorrelated energy spread increases roughly by the current compression factor, which is important in seeded FEL schemes in order to achieve high harmonic short-wavelength x-ray radiation.
Asunto(s)
Electrones , Rayos Láser , Imanes/química , Modelos TeóricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This open-label study compared docetaxel/gemcitabine vs. paclitaxel/gemcitabine and a weekly (W) vs. 3-weekly (3 W) schedule in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients relapsed after adjuvant/neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were randomized to: A) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 Day 1,8 + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Day 1 q3W; B) gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 Day 1,8 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Day 1 q3W; C) gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15 + docetaxel 30 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15 q4W; D) gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 Day 1,15 + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 Day 1,8,15 q4W. Primary endpoint was time-to-progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Interim analysis led to accrual interruption (241 patients enrolled of 360 planned). Median TTP (months) was 8.33 (95% CI: 6.19-10.16) with W and 7.51 (95% CI: 5.93-8.33) with 3 W (p=0.319). No differences were observed in median TTP between docetaxel and paclitaxel, with 85.6% and 87.0% of patients progressing, respectively. OS did not differ between regimens/schedules. ORR was comparable between regimens (HR: 0.882; 95% CI: 0.523-1.488; p=0.639), while it was significantly higher in W than in the 3 W (HR: 0.504; 95% CI: 0.299-0.850; p=0.010) schedule. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 69.2% and 71.9% of patients on docetaxel and paclitaxel, and in 65.8% and 75.2% in W and 3 W. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment regimens showed similar TTP. W might be associated with a better tumour response compared with 3 W. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov ID NCT00236899.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Inutilidad Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Cooperación del Paciente , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: International treatment guidelines recommend administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer based on clinical, prognostic and predictive parameters. METHODS: An observational study (NEMESI) was conducted in 63 Italian oncology centres in patients with early breast cancer. Age, performance status, concomitant disease, menopausal status, histology, tumor dimension (pT), axillary lymph node status (pN), grading (G), estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PgR), proliferative index (ki67 or MIB-1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and type of adjuvant treatment were recorded. The primary objective of the study was to define parameters influencing the decision to prescribe adjuvant chemotherapy and the type of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Data for 1894 patients were available. 69.0% postmenopausal, 67.0% pT1, 22.3% pTmic/pT1a/pT1b, 61.0% pN0, 48.7% luminal A, 18.1% luminal B, 16.1% HER2 positive, 8.7% triple negative, 8.4% unknown. 57.8% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 38.1% of luminal A, 67.3% luminal B, 88.2% HER2-positive, 97.6% triple negative. Regimens administered: 9.1% CMF-like, 48.8% anthracyclines, 38.4% anthracyclines plus taxanes, 3.7% taxanes alone. Increasing pT/pN and, marginally, HER2-positive were associated with the prescription of anthracyclines plus taxanes. Suboptimal schedules (CMF-like or AC/EC or FEC-75) were prescribed in 37.3% receiving chemotherapy, even in HER2-positive and triple negative disease (36.5% and 34.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed an overprescription of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer, particularly referred to luminal A. pT, pN and, marginally, HER2 were the principal determinants for the choice of chemotherapy type. Suboptimal chemotherapy regimens were adopted in at least one third of HER2-positive and triple negative.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of pT1a-pT1b breast cancer (BC) used to be considered very good, with a 10-y RFS of 90%. However, some retrospective studies reported a 10-y RFS of 81%-86% and suggested benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS: To evaluate the variables that determined the choice of adjuvant chemotherapy and the type of chemotherapy delivered in pT1a-pT1b BC, we analysed the small tumours enrolled in the NEMESI study. RESULTS: Out of 1,894 patients with pathological stage I-II BC enrolled in NEMESI, 402 (21.2%) were pT1a-pT1b. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in 127/402 (31.59%). Younger age, grading G3, high proliferative index, ER-negative and HER2-positive status were significantly associated with the decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy. An anthracycline without taxane regimen was administered in 59.1% of patients, anthracycline with taxane in 24.4%, a CMF-like regimen in 14.2% and taxane in 2.4%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 88.4% triple-negative and 73.46% HER2-positive pT1a-pT1b BC. Adjuvant trastuzumab was delivered in 30/49 HER2-positive BC (61.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in 31.59% T1a-pT1b BC treated at 63 Italian oncological centres from January 2008 to June 2008. The choice to deliver chemotherapy was based on biological prognostic factors. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was administered in 83.5% patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Magnesium alloys represent a valuable option for the production of bioresorbable implantable medical devices aimed to improve the therapeutic approach and minimize the potential risks related to biostable materials. In this regard, the degradation process needs to be carefully evaluated in order to assess the effectiveness of the regenerative support and the eventual toxic effects induced by the released corrosion products. Aluminium is one of the most common alloying element that raised several safety concerns, contributing to shift the investigation toward Al-free alloys. To delve into this issue, a long-term investigation (up to 28 days) was performed using AZ91D alloy, due to its relevant Al content. Immersion tests in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution was performed following the ASTM standards and the corrosion behaviour was evaluated at fixed time points by means of electrochemical techniques. Cytotoxic effects were assessed by culturing human neuroblastoma cells with conditioned medium derived from immersion tests at different dilution degree. An increase in the resistance corrosion with the time was observed. In all the investigated cases the presence of Al in the conditioned media did not induce significant toxic effects directly correlated to its content. A decrease of cell viability was only observed in the case of 50 % dilution of PBS conditioned for the longest immersion period (i.e., 28 days).
Asunto(s)
Aleaciones , Materiales Biocompatibles , Corrosión , Magnesio/química , Línea Celular Tumoral , Técnicas Electroquímicas , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Difracción de Rayos XRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Premenopausal patients with breast cancer are at high risk of premature ovarian failure induced by systemic treatments, but no standard strategies for preventing this adverse effect are yet available. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the temporary ovarian suppression obtained by administering the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin during chemotherapy on the incidence of early menopause in young patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The PROMISE-GIM6 (Prevention of Menopause Induced by Chemotherapy: A Study in Early Breast Cancer Patients-Gruppo Italiano Mammella 6) study, a parallel, randomized, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial, was conducted at 16 sites in Italy and enrolled 281 patients between October 2003 and January 2008. The patients were premenopausal women with stage I through III breast cancer who were candidates for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Assuming a 60% rate of early menopause in the group treated with chemotherapy alone, it was estimated that 280 patients had to be enrolled to detect a 20% absolute reduction in early menopause in the group treated with chemotherapy plus triptorelin. The intention-to-treat analysis was performed by including all randomized patients and using imputed values for missing data. INTERVENTIONS: Before beginning chemotherapy, patients were randomly allocated to receive chemotherapy alone or combined with triptorelin. Triptorelin was administered intramuscularly at a dose of 3.75 mg at least 1 week before the start of chemotherapy and then every 4 weeks for the duration of chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of early menopause (defined as no resumption of menstrual activity and postmenopausal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol 1 year after the last cycle of chemotherapy). RESULTS: The clinical and tumor characteristics of the 133 patients randomized to chemotherapy alone and the 148 patients randomized to chemotherapy plus triptorelin were similar. Twelve months after the last cycle of chemotherapy (last follow-up, August 18, 2009), the rate of early menopause was 25.9% in the chemotherapy-alone group and 8.9% in the chemotherapy plus triptorelin group, an absolute difference of -17% (95% confidence interval, -26% to -7.9%; P < .001). The odds ratio for treatment-related early menopause was 0.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.59; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The use of triptorelin-induced temporary ovarian suppression during chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer reduced the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced early menopause. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00311636.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Infertilidad Femenina/prevención & control , Luteolíticos/uso terapéutico , Menopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/prevención & control , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Goserelina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Premenopausia , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Italy is divided into 20 regions. As a consequence of local autonomy, following marketing authorization by the Italian Medicines Agency, each drug for hospital use is not immediately available, because its approval needs to undergo further steps that can be different among regions. The Italian Society of Medical Oncology conducted the present study to describe the impact of the existence of sub-national pharmaceutical formularies on the disparity of access to new anti-cancer drugs among patients treated in different Italian regions. METHODS: The availability of 8 new anti-cancer drugs at a regional level and the coherence of regional authorizations compared with national authorizations approved by the Italian Medicines Agency were analyzed as of April 2009. RESULTS: Fourteen regions and autonomous province of Trento have a regional pharmaceutical formulary. In most cases, the regional pharmaceutical formularies include the eight analyzed drugs, with therapeutic indications coherent with national marketing authorization indications. Five drugs (bevacizumab, trastuzumab, rituximab, erlotinib, sunitinib) were included in all the existing regional pharmaceutical formularies, without restrictions, whereas three drugs (cetuximab, sorafenib, pemetrexed) were found to have restrictions in some regions. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of multiple hierarchical levels of drug evaluation creates a potential element of disparity in the access to pharmacological therapies for Italian citizens.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/provisión & distribución , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacopeas como Asunto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Formularios Farmacéuticos como Asunto , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Italia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacopeas como Asunto/normas , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
The quality and relevance of nanosafety studies constitute major challenges to ensure their key role as a supporting tool in sustainable innovation, and subsequent competitive economic advantage. However, the number of apparently contradictory and inconclusive research results has increased in the past few years, indicating the need to introduce harmonized protocols and good practices in the nanosafety research community. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate if best-practice training and inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) of performance of the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay for the cytotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials among 15 European laboratories can improve quality in nanosafety testing. We used two well-described model nanoparticles, 40-nm carboxylated polystyrene (PS-COOH) and 50-nm amino-modified polystyrene (PS-NH2). We followed a tiered approach using well-developed standard operating procedures (SOPs) and sharing the same cells, serum and nanoparticles. We started with determination of the cell growth rate (tier 1), followed by a method transfer phase, in which all laboratories performed the first ILC on the MTS assay (tier 2). Based on the outcome of tier 2 and a survey of laboratory practices, specific training was organized, and the MTS assay SOP was refined. This led to largely improved intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in tier 3. In addition, we confirmed that PS-COOH and PS-NH2 are suitable negative and positive control nanoparticles, respectively, to evaluate impact of nanomaterials on cell viability using the MTS assay. Overall, we have demonstrated that the tiered process followed here, with the use of SOPs and representative control nanomaterials, is necessary and makes it possible to achieve good inter-laboratory reproducibility, and therefore high-quality nanotoxicological data.
RESUMEN
HER2-positive breast cancer is characterized by high chemosensitivity. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is recognized as a very effective adjuvant treatment in HER2-positive disease. One of the possible explanations is the co-amplification of TOPO II-alpha and HER2. However, recent data seem to demonstrate that HER2 and TOPO II-alpha seem to be less predictive of anthracycline-based chemotherapy efficacy than chromosome 17 polysomy. Chromosome 17 polysomy is present in 21-40% of breast cancer and for this reason benefit of anthracycline-based chemotherapy seems to be not restricted only to HER2-positive disease. Trastuzumab added to chemotherapy administered for one year is associated with improvement in disease-free survival and sometimes in overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Efficacy of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting seems to be increased if administered concomitantly with chemotherapy instead of sequentially. However, the interpretation of longer follow-up results is difficult because of a large crossover from the control arm to trastuzumab.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Antraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígenos de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , ADN-Topoisomerasas de Tipo II/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trastuzumab , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The background and the aim of the work: The Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the "Carlo Poma" Hospital (Social Territorial Health Authority of Mantova), has pointed out in 2017, through the questionnaires survey over the citizens satisfaction, an appreciation decrease compared to the previous years. The obtained data were not sufficiently explanatory of the reasons for that kind of deterioration and also not enough specific to define possible corrective measures. The aim of this work was to identify the patients' perception regarding the hospitalization phases (from booking to follow up), taking into account five kind of operations and pathologies: 1st knee, shoulder and tibio-talar arthroscopy; 2nd hip and knee prosthesis; 3rd upper limb traumatology; 4th lower limb traumatology and 5th orthogeriatrics. METHODS: The research is based on 29 narrations resulted from orthopedic patients between 30 and 80 days after the time of discharge. RESULTS: The phases of care path which get the highest level of satisfaction are those concerning the operation and the outpatient visit followed by rehabilitation and assistive continuation. The most negative phase was the discharge but, also the needs assistance respond, the reception, the microclimate and the pre-operative medical assessment resulted contradictory. At the same time the three most significant areas of improvement were: the organization (critical for upper limb traumatology, arthroscopy and prosthetics); the health features (critical for the lower limb, orthogeriatrics and traumatology) and medical information (the most critical issues were those concerning the upper limb traumatology while the less were the orthogeriatrics ones). CONCLUSION: Use the narration to go into the orthopedic patient needs and perceptions allows to activate appropriate and customized organizational and professional changes in order to answer adequatly to the patient's needs to limit litigation and defence medicine expences.
Asunto(s)
Unidades Hospitalarias/normas , Ortopedia/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Traumatología/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Breast cancer continues to be one of the most prominent causes of cancer death among women worldwide. Mortality in breast cancer is most commonly caused by the occurrence of distant metastases. Thus, treatments that reduce the risk of distant metastases are likely to improve survival. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, have been investigated as alternatives to tamoxifen for the adjuvant treatment of early, endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Results from several large trials have established the superior efficacy of the AIs over tamoxifen in reducing the risk of recurrences when used as upfront, switch, and extended adjuvant therapy. Here, we review recent updated results obtained with AIs as adjuvant therapy, in terms of reducing the risk of distant metastases.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the validity of objective response to chemotherapy as a surrogate end point for survival in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis on individual data from 2,126 metastatic breast cancer patients who were enrolled onto 10 randomized trials comparing standard versus intensified epirubicin-containing chemotherapy. RESULTS: The intensified chemotherapy was associated with a significantly higher tumor response rate compared with standard chemotherapy (pooled odds ratio for nonresponse, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72). The intensified regimens also led to better (although not significant) survival (pooled odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.04; P = .22). Tumor response was a highly significant predictor of survival (P < .0001). When tumor response was introduced in the Cox model, the hazard ratio in favor of experimental treatment changed from 0.94 to 1.005 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.11; P = .92), indicating that no residual effect of the experimental treatment on survival was present once tumor response was adjusted for. This suggests that the overall survival benefit of intensified epirubicin was a result of the increase in response rate. The median survival time of patients with complete response and partial response was 28.8 months (95% CI, 25.4 to 45.3 months) and 21.3 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 22.4 months), respectively; whereas, the median survival time of patients with no response was 14.6 months (95% CI, 13.9 to 15.4 months). CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that the achievement of an objective response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer is associated with a true survival benefit. The potential role of objective response as a surrogate end point for survival in chemotherapy trials of metastatic breast cancer warrants further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Fertility impairment induced by adjuvant treatments and potential risk associated with pregnancy, are major concerns of young pre-menopausal patients with early breast cancer. Although current evidences suggest that pregnancy does not negatively affect prognosis, a low rate (3-8%) of pregnancy after breast cancer has been reported. Among the potential causes of such a low rate there are a high chance of spontaneous abortions (25%) as well as the fertility impairment induced by adjuvant treatments. No standard strategy to preserve fertility in breast cancer patients is available so far. Experimental approaches include cryopreservation strategies, and use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to render germinal epithelium quiescent and less sensitive to the chemotherapy cytotoxicity. Here, we reviewed current knowledge about incidence and risks of pregnancy after breast cancer, risks of ovarian failure after adjuvant treatments and experimental strategies aiming to preserve ovarian function and fertility in young breast cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Infertilidad/etiología , Embarazo , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The fascinating properties of nanomaterials opened new frontiers in medicine. Nanocarriers are useful systems in transporting drugs to site-specific targets. The unique physico-chemical characteristics making nanocarriers promising devices to treat diseases may also be responsible for potential adverse effects. In order to develop functional nano-based drug delivery systems, efficacy and safety should be carefully evaluated. To date, no common testing strategy to address nanomaterial toxicological challenges has been generated. Different cell culture models are currently used to evaluate nanocarrier safety using conventional in vitro assays, but overall they have generated a huge amount of conflicting data. In this review we describe state-of-the-art approaches for in vitro testing of orally administered nanocarriers, highlighting the importance of developing harmonized and validated standard operating procedures. These procedures should be applied in a safe-by-design context with the aim to reduce and/or eliminate the uncertainties and risks associated with nanomedicine development.
Asunto(s)
Portadores de Fármacos/administración & dosificación , Portadores de Fármacos/toxicidad , Técnicas In Vitro/métodos , Nanomedicina/métodos , Nanomedicina/normas , Nanoestructuras/administración & dosificación , Nanoestructuras/toxicidad , Animales , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/métodos , Portadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Nanoestructuras/efectos adversosRESUMEN
In October 2003, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) published its own guidelines on the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The present survey was conducted during the same period with the aim of collecting data on the current use of G-CSF to provide a starting point for future evaluations of the implementation of AIOM guidelines. From October 2003 to January 2004, 1591 AIOM members were asked to complete a questionnaire based on specific clinical scenarios, regarding the use of G-CSF for primary and secondary prophylaxis and treatment of neutropenia. The rate of response was 22%. For primary prophylaxis, the majority of physicians avoid using G-CSF, with no difference in cases of adjuvant, curative or palliative chemotherapy (CT). In fact, 67.2% to 74.9% would 'rarely or never' use G-CSF in the proposed clinical scenarios. In chemosensitive tumors, rather than reducing CT doses, 55.7% would use G-CSF as a secondary prophylaxis after afebrile neutropenia (AN), and 68.8% after febrile neutropenia (FN). In elderly patients experiencing FN, 35.7% would reduce the adjuvant CT doses and 23.1% would change the regimen. Most oncologists would use G-CSF to treat neutropenia, and the median duration of G-CSF treatment is less than 1 week and would depend on neutrophil count. Our survey shows that Italian oncologists are particularly oriented towards the use of G-CSF in clinical practice to maintain the CT dose intensity, and are sensitive to the prevention and treatment of not only FN, but also AN. Finally, Italian medical oncologists appear to be very cautious in introducing G-CSF when treating elderly patients.
Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recolección de Datos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Works of art are constantly under physical, chemical and biological degradation, so constant restoration is required. Consolidation is an important step in restoration, and traditional approaches and materials have already shown their limitations. To solve these problems, new nanoparticle-based consolidants were developed. No information on their toxicity is yet available. In this work, we focused our attention on potential risks posed by three commercially available nanoparticle-based consolidants: silica (SiO2 NPs), silanized silica (silanized SiO2 NPs) and calcium hydroxide (nanolime) nanoparticle dispersions. Occupational exposure impact was tested on three in vitro models mimicking inhalation, dermal contact and systemic routes. While no toxic effects were observed for nanolime and silanized SiO2 NPs, bare SiO2 NPs showed a dose- and time-dependent damage in all considered models. Corrosion test on EpiSkin® revealed no viability reduction. Works of art degradation is partially due to microorganism activity. Consolidant antibacterial activity was evaluated on three representative bacterial strains. Silica NPs-based consolidants showed effect on specific bacterial groups, while no specificity was observed with nanolime. In conclusion, silanized SiO2 NPs-based consolidant emerged as the safest and bacteriologically active product. The different biological impact of bare and silanized SiO2 NPs highlights the importance of safe-by-design approach in developing nanoparticle-containing products.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/toxicidad , Hidróxido de Calcio/toxicidad , Nanopartículas/toxicidad , Dióxido de Silicio/toxicidad , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Hidróxido de Calcio/farmacología , Línea Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/crecimiento & desarrollo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Dióxido de Silicio/farmacología , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/crecimiento & desarrolloRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral anticancer drugs are an attractive treatment option, even if patient-focused education and specific nursing staff are needed to support home care intervention. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a nurse monitoring program for patients taking oral chemotherapy, and to evaluate the patients' approval of the program. METHODS: At the beginning of oral chemotherapy treatment, outpatients completed a specific form so that we could assess their comprehension of the information related to therapy. Nurses gave patients a diary to record drug intake and toxicity at home, and phone calls were planned to evaluate toxicity or modification of the treatment plan during the first and second cycles of therapy. Finally, patients were requested to complete a specific form to express their level of agreement with the program. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in the analysis. Nurse intervention at the beginning of therapy resulted in an increased proportion of patients having received correct information related to treatment, with a level of confidence rising to more than 90% for all items considered. One hundred ninety-one of 243 planned phone calls were made, corresponding to 78.6% of the planned activity. The diary proved a valid tool for patients and 144 of 153 diaries were completed at home (94%). Only 5 patients (6%) had unplanned hospital admission for toxicity, probably because of early intervention by nursing staff. Only 2 out of 63 patients expressed a negative opinion, while the remaining patients expressed their approval of the program. CONCLUSION: Our model proved practicable and accepted by patients, thus supporting the role of nurse intervention in training and monitoring patients receiving oral chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Comprensión , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Teléfono , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of oral anticancer drugs used in clinical practice has rapidly increased. The Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM) conducted a survey to describe the impact of the use of oral anticancer drugs on the daily activity of Italian oncology practices. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A survey questionnaire was distributed to the coordinators of the regional sections of AIOM. A 6-month period was considered, from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010. The survey addressed (1) quantitative aspects of the use of oral anticancer drugs; (2) practical aspects in the management of patients treated with these drugs; (3) issues related to treatment costs and reimbursement procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-six questionnaires were received from institutions distributed throughout the Italian territory. Oral anticancer drugs (both chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents) accounted for a significant proportion (17%) of prescribed treatments. Among the responding institutions, there were different dispensation procedures of oral drugs to patients: drugs were dispensed by the pharmacist (57%) or directly by the medical oncologist (23%) or nurse (20%). The medical oncologist played a major role in the communication with patients (73% alone and a further 24% in cooperation with other professional figures) and was the point of reference in the event of side effects in 97% of cases. In most cases, the reimbursement of drug costs was separated ("File F" procedure) from the flat fare received by the hospital for outpatient visits or day-hospital access. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal organization of oral anticancer treatment warrants the cooperation and integration of multiple professional figures. At least three figures are involved in patient management in the hospital: the medical oncologist, the nurse, and the hospital pharmacist. Oral anticancer treatments are associated with specific reimbursement issues: in the majority of cases, the cost of the drug is reimbursed separately from the cost of patient access.