Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health disparities have important effects on orthopaedic patient populations. Socioeconomic factors and poor nutrition have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of complications such as infection in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Currently, there are limited published data on how food insecurity is associated with medical and surgical complications. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to (1) determine the percentage of patients who experience food insecurity in an orthopaedic trauma clinic at a large Level 1 trauma center, (2) identify demographic and clinical factors associated with food insecurity, and (3) identify whether there are differences in the risk of complications and reoperations between patients who experience food insecurity and patients who are food-secure. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using food insecurity screening surveys, which were obtained at an orthopaedic trauma clinic at our Level 1 trauma center. All patients 18 years and older who were seen for an initial evaluation or follow-up for fracture care between November 2022 and February 2023 were considered for inclusion in this study. For inclusion in this study, the patient had to have surgical treatment of their fracture and have completed at least one food insecurity screening survey. Ninety-eight percent (121 of 123) of patients completed the screening survey during the study period. Data for 21 patients were excluded because of nonoperative treatment of their fracture, nonfracture-related care, impending metastatic fracture care, and patients who had treatment at an outside facility and were transferring their care. This led to a study group of 100 patients with orthopaedic trauma. The mean age was 51 years, and 51% (51 of 100) were men. The mean length of follow-up available for patients in the study was 13 months from the initial clinic visit. Patient demographics, hospital admission data, and outcome data were collected from the electronic medical records. Patients were divided into two cohorts: food-secure versus food-insecure. Patients were propensity score matched for adjusted analysis. RESULTS: A total of 37% of the patients in this study (37 of 100) screened positive for food insecurity during the study period. Patients with food insecurity were more likely to have a higher BMI than patients with food security (32 kg/m2 compared with 28 kg/m2; p = 0.009), and they were more likely not to have healthcare insurance or to have Medicaid (62% [23 of 37] compared with 30% [19 of 63]; p = 0.003). After propensity matching for age, gender, ethnicity, current substance use, Charleston comorbidity index, employment status, open fracture, and length of stay, food insecurity was associated with a higher percentage of superficial infections (13% [4 of 31] compared with 0% [0 of 31]; p = 0.047). There were no differences between the groups in the risk of reoperation, deep infection, and nonunion. CONCLUSION: Food insecurity is common among patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma, and patients who have it may be at increased risk of superficial infections after surgery. Future research in this area should focus on defining these health disparities further and interventions that could address them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

2.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ; 57(33): 10692-10696, 2018 08 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923285

RESUMEN

Hyperpolarization techniques are key to extending the capabilities of MRI for the investigation of structural, functional and metabolic processes in vivo. Recent heterogeneous catalyst development has produced high polarization in water using parahydrogen with biologically relevant contrast agents. A heterogeneous ligand-stabilized Rh catalyst is introduced that is capable of achieving 15 N polarization of 12.2±2.7 % by hydrogenation of neurine into a choline derivative. This is the highest 15 N polarization of any parahydrogen method in water to date. Notably, this was performed using a deuterated quaternary amine with an exceptionally long spin-lattice relaxation time (T1 ) of 21.0±0.4 min. These results open the door to the possibility of 15 N in vivo imaging using nontoxic similar model systems because of the biocompatibility of the production media and the stability of the heterogeneous catalyst using parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) as the hyperpolarization method.


Asunto(s)
Colina/química , Hidrógeno/química , Nanopartículas del Metal/química , Rodio/química , Agua/química , Aminas/química , Catálisis , Deuterio/química , Hidrogenación , Isótopos de Nitrógeno/química
3.
J Child Orthop ; 18(3): 295-301, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831850

RESUMEN

Purpose: Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. Methods: A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. Results: A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. Conclusion: Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. Level of evidence: level III therapeutic.

4.
Hand (N Y) ; : 15589447231163943, 2023 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the characteristics of concomitant distal radius and scaphoid fractures and determine outcome differences of operative and nonoperative management. METHODS: A retrospective search of a level-1 trauma center's database over a 15-year period (2007-2022) for concomitant distal radius and scaphoid fractures in adult patients was completed. In all, 31 cases were reviewed for mechanism of injury, method of fracture management, distal radius fracture AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, scaphoid fracture classification, time to radiographic scaphoid union, time to motion, and other demographics. A multivariate statistical analysis was completed comparing outcomes in operative versus conservative management of the scaphoid fracture in these patients. Outcomes were defined as time to radiographic union and time to motion. RESULTS: In all, 22 cases of operative fixation of the scaphoid and 9 cases of nonoperative management of the scaphoid were reviewed. One case of nonunion was identified in the operative group. Operative management of scaphoid fractures resulted in a statistically significant reduction in time to motion (2-week reduction) and time to radiographic union (8-week reduction). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that operative management of scaphoid fractures in the setting of a concomitant distal radius fracture reduces the time to radiographic union and time to clinical motion. This suggests that operative management is ideal in patients who are good candidates for surgery and desire earlier return of motion. However, conservative management should be considered, as nonoperative care showed no statistical difference regarding union rates of scaphoid or distal radius fractures.

5.
OTA Int ; 5(4): e221, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36569115

RESUMEN

Objectives: To compare operative rates, total hospital charges, and length of stay between different socioeconomic cohorts in treating distal radius fractures (DRFs). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large public level 1 trauma center. Patients: A retrospective search of all trauma activations over a 7-year period (2013-2020) yielded 816 adult patients diagnosed with DRF. Patients were separated into cohorts of socioeconomic status based on 2010 US Census data and insurance status. Intervention: DRFs were treated either nonoperatively using closed reduction and splinting or operatively using open reduction and internal fixation, closed reduction percutaneous pinning, or external fixator application. Main Outcome Measurements: Operative rates of DRF, total hospital charges, and length of stay. Results: Patients who were uninsured or in the low-income socioeconomic cohort had no significant difference in operative rates, total hospital costs, or length of stay when compared with their respective insured or standard income groups. Younger patients and those with OTA/AO type C, bilateral, or open DRFs were more likely to undergo operative intervention. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that low socioeconomic status based on annual household income and insurance status was not associated with differences in operative rates on DRFs, length of stay, or total hospital charges. These results suggest that outcome disparities between groups may be caused by postoperative differences rather than treatment decision-making. Although this study investigates access to surgical care at a publicly funded level 1 trauma center, disparities may still exist in other models of care. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA