Implementing Change: Sustaining Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Pediatric Surgery Using Iterative Assessments.

INTRODUCTION: While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are becoming more common in pediatric surgery, there is still little published about protocol compliance and sustainability. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study to evaluate the compliance of an ERAS protocol for pectus repair at a large academic children's hospital. Our primary outcome was overall protocol compliance at 1-y postimplementation of the ERAS protocol. Our comparison group included all pectus repairs for 2 y before protocol implementation. RESULTS: Overall protocol compliance at 12 mo was 89%. Of the 16 pectus repairs included in the ERAS protocol group, 94% (n = 15) and 94% (n = 15) received preoperative acetaminophen and gabapentin, respectively, which was significantly greater than the historical control group (P < 0.001). For the intraoperative components analyzed, only the intrathecal morphine was significantly different than historical controls (100% versus 49%, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the time from operating room to return to normal diet was shorter for the ERAS group (0.53 d versus 1.16 d, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in readmission rates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol compliance varies based on phase of care. Solutions to sustain protocols depend on the institution and the patient population. However, the utilization of implementation science fundamentals was invaluable in this study to identify and address areas for improvement in protocol compliance. Other institutions may adapt these strategies to improve protocol compliance at their centers.

Implementation Science Fundamentals: Pediatric Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Pectus Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum in children has historically been associated with severe postoperative pain and prolonged hospitalization. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal approach designed to fast-track surgical care. However, obstacles to implementation have led to very few within pediatric surgery. The aim of this study is to outline the process of development and implementation of an ERAS protocol for pectus surgical repair using fundamental principles of implementation science. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of providers worked collaboratively to develop an ERAS protocol for surgical repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum and methods for identifying eligible patients. The surgical champion collaborated with all end users to review and revise the ERAS protocol, assessing all foreseeable barriers and facilitators prior to implementation. RESULTS: Our entire pediatric surgery team, nurses at every stage (clinic/preoperative/recovery/floor), physical therapy, and information technology contributed to the creation and implementation of an ERAS protocol with seven phases of care. The finalized version was implemented by end users focusing on four main areas: pain control, ambulation, diet, and education. Barriers and facilitators were continually addressed with an iterative process to improve the success of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies in children which details the step-by-step process of developing and implementing an ERAS protocol for pectus excavatum and carinatum. The process of development and implementation of an ERAS protocol as outlined in this manuscript can serve as a model for future ERAS protocols in pediatric surgery.

Ultrasound assessment of abdominal adhesions in neonates: data over dogma for re-operative timing.

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal abdominal reoperation is difficult and can be complicated by abdominal adhesions. Identifying patients who could safely undergo early reoperation would save TPN and central line days, decrease associated infection and liver injury, and NICU and hospital length of stay. We sought to determine if ultrasound (US) could accurately assess the location and severity of adhesions in neonates as an objective dynamic marker capable of informing reoperation timing. METHODS: After IRB approval, we conducted a prospective observational study including neonates undergoing abdominal operations. Patients received surgeon-performed US approximately every 2 weeks until reoperation or discharge. Adhesions were assessed in five zones: right upper quadrant (RUQ), right lower quadrant (RLQ), left upper quadrant (LUQ), left lower quadrant (LLQ) and peri-incision (INC). RESULTS: Over a 6-month study period, 16 neonates were enrolled. Median gestational age was 34 weeks at birth and median weight 2.2 kg. 6 underwent reoperation within initial NICU admission. At time of operation US correctly identified the absence or presence and severity of adhesions in: RUQ (3/3); RLQ (6/6); LUQ (4/5); LLQ (6/6); and INC (5/5). CONCLUSION: US can identify location and severity of post-operative adhesions in neonates, potentially identifying patients who can safely undergo reoperation earlier than predetermined wait periods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Do preoperative factors predict success of antegrade continence enemas in children?

INTRODUCTION: Antegrade continent enemas (ACE) procedures are one treatment option in children with medically refractory constipation or encopresis and predicting success is difficult. We hypothesize that there are preoperative factors that can be identified to help with patient selection and family counseling. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children who underwent a cecostomy or appendicostomy for an ACE program between 2015 and 2021. Underlying diagnosis, pre-operative bowel regimen and imaging were analyzed. Patients were reviewed for success at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-procedure. Data was analyzed with Fisher's Exact, Kruskal-Wallis and logistic regression where applicable with significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-three children were identified; 28 were male, 15 were female, mean age at time of operation was 8 years old. 76% were considered successful at 3-months, 86% at 6-months, and 87% at 12-months post- procedure. Univariate analysis showed that a pre-ACE retrograde enema program predicted success at 3-months (94% vs. 64% p = 0.03) but no difference at 6- or 12-months. At one year after ACE procedure there was a significant reduction in number of enteral medications (2 to 0, p < 0.01) and 94% of patients were on one or fewer at one year follow-up. Age, gender, weight at time of operation, contrast enema, anorectal manometry and colonic transit time results were not predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this study, we characterized expected time to success in our population as well as identified use of a pre-operative retrograde enema program as a potential predictor of success at 3-months in children undergoing an ACE procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study.

Views of American Pediatric Surgeons on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

INTRODUCTION: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are concepts common in surgery. However, these can be difficult to define, and what constitutes DEI can be vague. Closing this knowledge gap, particularly within pediatric surgery, would be helpful to understand the views and needs of current surgeons. METHODS: 1558 APSA members were sent an anonymous survey, of which 423 (27%) responded. Respondents were asked about their demographics, views on what constitutes diversity as well as questions on how DEI is handled within APSA and definitions of common DEI terms. RESULTS: Of 11 possible diversity measures, members agreed that a median of 9 (IQR 7-11) counted towards diversity. The most common being race and ethnicity (98%), gender (96%), sexual orientation (93%), religion (92%), age (91%), and disability (90%). On a 5-point Likert scale, the median response was 4 or greater on questions regarding how APSA handles issues related to DEI. However, members who identify as black were less likely to score in favor of APSA, and members identifying as women were more likely to rank higher importance of DEI initiatives. We also captured subjective responses on DEI terminology. CONCLUSION: Respondents had broad definitions of diversity. There is support for further DEI initiatives and how APSA handles DEI, however this perception differs based on identities. There is significant variability in beliefs and views regarding DEI definitions and understanding this is helpful for the organization moving forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TYPE OF STUDY: Original Research.

'Step Up' approach to the application of REBOA technology in a rural trauma system.

Our group has developed a 'Step Up' approach to the application of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in a rural trauma system. This incorporates viewing REBOA as a spectrum of technology. Examples of REBOA technology use to improve outcomes and provision of our system's clinical practice guideline for the Step-Up application of REBOA technology in the care of trauma patients are presented.