Assessment of combined use of ArcCheck® detector and portal dosimetry for delivery quality assurance of head and neck and prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficiency of combined use of ArcCheck® detector (AC) and portal dosimetry (PDIP) for delivery quality assurance of head and neck and prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurement processes were studied with the Gamma index method according to three analysis protocols. The detection sensitivity to technical errors of each individual or combined measurement processes was studied by inserting collimator, dose and MLC opening error into five head and neck and five prostate initial treatment plans. A total of 220 plans were created and 660 analyses were conducted by comparing measurements to error free planned dose matrix. RESULTS: For head and neck localization, collimator errors could be detected from 2° for AC and 3° for PDIP. Dose and MLC errors could be detected from 2% and 0.5 mm for AC and PDIP. Depending on the analysis protocol, the detection sensitivity of total simulated errors ranged from 54% to 88% for AC vs 40% to 74% for PDIP and 58% to 92% for the combined process. For the prostate localization, collimator errors could be detected from 4° for AC while they could not be detected by PDIP. Dose and MLC errors could be detected from 3% and 0.5 mm for AC and PDIP. The detection sensitivity of total simulated errors ranged from 30% to 56% for AC vs 16% to 38% for PDIP and 30% to 58% for combined process. CONCLUSION: The combined use of the two measurement processes did not statistically improve the detectability of technical errors compared to use of single process.

Task-Based Image Quality Assessment Comparing Classical and Iterative Cone Beam CT Images on Halcyon®.

BACKGROUND: Despite the development of iterative reconstruction (IR) in diagnostic imaging, CBCT are generally reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) in radiotherapy. Varian medical systems, recently released with their latest Halcyon® V2.0 accelerator, a new IR algorithm for CBCT reconstruction. PURPOSE: To assess the image quality of radiotherapy CBCT images reconstructed with FBP and an IR algorithm. METHODS: Three CBCT acquisition modes (head, thorax and pelvis large) available on a Halcyon® were assessed. Five acquisitions were performed for all modes on an image quality phantom and reconstructed with FBP and IR. Task-based image quality assessment was performed with noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d'). To illustrate the image quality obtained with both reconstruction types, CBCT acquisitions were made on 6 patients. RESULTS: The noise magnitude and the spatial frequency of the NPS peak was lower with IR than with FBP for all modes. For all low and high-contrast inserts, the values for TTF at 50% were higher with IR than with FBP. For all inserts and all modes, the contrast values were similar with FBP and IR. For all low and high-contrast simulated lesions, d' values were higher with IR than with FBP for all modes. These results were also found on the 6 patients where the images were less noisy but smoother with IR-CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: Using the IR algorithm for CBCT images in radiotherapy improve image quality and thus could increase the accuracy of online registration and limit positioning errors during processing.

Inverse planning approach for 3-D MRI-based pulse-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cervix cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) software for the optimization of dose distribution in patients with cervix carcinoma treated with MRI-based pulsed-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients treated with a technique using a customized vaginal mold were selected. Dose-volume parameters obtained using the IPSA method were compared with the classic manual optimization method (MOM). Target volumes and organs at risk were delineated according to the Gynecological Brachytherapy Group/European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology recommendations. Because the pulsed dose rate program was based on clinical experience with low dose rate, dwell time values were required to be as homogeneous as possible. To achieve this goal, different modifications of the IPSA program were applied. RESULTS: The first dose distribution calculated by the IPSA algorithm proposed a heterogeneous distribution of dwell time positions. The mean D90, D100, and V100 calculated with both methods did not differ significantly when the constraints were applied. For the bladder, doses calculated at the ICRU reference point derived from the MOM differed significantly from the doses calculated by the IPSA method (mean, 58.4 vs. 55 Gy respectively; p = 0.0001). For the rectum, the doses calculated at the ICRU reference point were also significantly lower with the IPSA method. CONCLUSIONS: The inverse planning method provided fast and automatic solutions for the optimization of dose distribution. However, the straightforward use of IPSA generated significant heterogeneity in dwell time values. Caution is therefore recommended in the use of inverse optimization tools with clinical relevance study of new dosimetric rules.

Mixed modality treatment planning of accelerated partial breast irradiation: to improve complex dosimetry cases.

BACKGROUND: Although 3D-conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is widely used, several questions still remain such as what are the optimal treatment planning modalities. Indeed, some patients may have an unfavorable anatomy and/or inadequate dosimetric constraints could be fulfilled ("complex cases"). In such cases, we wondered which treatment planning modality could be applied to achieve 3D-conformal APBI (2 mini-tangents and an "en face" electron field or non-coplanar photon multiple fields; or a mixed technique combining non-coplanar photon multiple fields with an "en face" electron beam). METHODS: From October 2007 to March 2010, 55 patients with pT1N0 breast cancer were enrolled in a phase II APBI trial. Among them, 7 patients were excluded as they were considered as "complex cases". A dosimetric comparison was performed according to the 3 APBI modalities mentioned above and assessed: planning treatment volume (PTV) coverage, PTV/whole breast ratio, lung and heart distance within irradiated field and exposure of organs at risk (OAR). RESULTS: Adequate PTV coverage was obtained with the 3 different treatment planning. Regarding OAR exposure, the "mixed technique" seemed to reduce the volume of non-target breast tissue in 4 cases compared to the other techniques (in only 1 case), with the mean V50% at 44.9% (range, 13.4 - 56.9%) for the mixed modality compared to 51.1% (range, 22.4 - 63.4%) and 51.8% (range, 23.1 - 59.5%) for the reference and non-coplanar techniques, respectively. The same trend was observed for heart exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed technique showed a promising trend of reducing the volume of non-target breast tissue and heart exposure doses in APBI "complex cases".

Early side effects of three-dimensional conformal external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation to a total dose of 40 Gy in one week (a phase II trial).

PURPOSE: Several accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques are described in the literature, and apparently, the three-dimensional (3D)-conformal technique is being used increasingly. Nonetheless, the optimal radiation dose is not yet known. Here, we report feasibility and early toxicities of APBI delivering 40 Gy over 5 days, in a phase II trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 2007 to September 2008, 25 patients with pT1N0 cancer received 3D-conformal APBI. The prescribed radiation dose was 40 Gy in 4-Gy fractions given twice daily. This technique used two minitangents and an "en face" electron field. Toxicities were systematically assessed at 1, 2, and 6 months and then once every 6 months. RESULTS: The planning tumor volume for evaluation (PTV_EVAL) coverage was adequate: the mean dose to the PTV_EVAL was 41.8 Gy (range, 41-42.4 Gy). Mean doses to the ipsilateral lung and heart were 1.6 Gy (range, 1.0-2.3 Gy) and 1.2 Gy (range, 1.0-1.6 Gy), respectively. One and two months after completion of APBI, most patients had no or mild erythema (n=16 patients at 1 month; n=25 patients at 2 months); none of these patients developed moist desquamation. After a median follow-up of 12 months, only 1 patient had a significant moderate field contracture (grade 2). Other reported late toxicities were grade 1. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-conformal APBI (with two minitangents and an "en face" electron field) using a total dose of 40 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily over 5 days achieved appropriate PTV_EVAL coverage and offered significant sparing of normal tissue. Early tolerance was excellent.