RESUMEN
Early mortality post-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in France remains high. The multicentre France Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry includes every patient undergoing coronary angiography in France. We analyzed the prevalence and impact of unmodifiable and modifiable risk factors on 30-day survival in patients experiencing STEMI. Patients admitted for STEMI between 01/2014 and 12/2016 were included in the analysis. Patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease, with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest without STEMI, were excluded. Prehospital, clinical and procedural data were collected prospectively by the cardiologist in the cath lab using medical reporting software. Information on outcomes, including mortality, was obtained by a dedicated research technician by phone calls or from medical records. Marginal Cox proportional hazards regression was used to test the predictive value for survival at 30 days in a multivariable analysis. Included were 2590 patients (74% men) aged 63 ± 14 years. During the first month, 174 patients (6.7%) died. After adjustment, unmodifiable variables significantly associated with reduced 30-day survival were: age > 80 years (prevalence 15%; hazard ratio [HR] 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-4.7), chronic kidney disease (2%; HR 5.3; 95% CI 2.6-11.1), diabetes mellitus (14%; HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.5), anterior or circumferential electrical localization (39%; HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.9), and Killip class 2, 3, or 4 (7%; HR 3.4; 95% CI 1.9-5.9; 2%; HR 10.1; 95% CI 5.3-19.4; 4%; HR 18; 95% CI 10.8-29.8, respectively). Among modifiable variables, total ischemic time > 3 hours (68%; HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.0), lack of appropriate premedication (18%; HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.5-3.3), and post-PCI TIMI < 3 (6%; HR 4.9; 95% CI 3.2-7.6) were significantly associated with reduced 30-day survival. Most predictors of 30-day survival post-STEMI are unmodifiable, but outcomes might be improved by optimizing modifiable factors, most importantly ischemic time and appropriate premedication.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on incidence, delays, and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in France. Methods: We analyzed all patients undergoing PPCI <24 hours STEMI included in the prospective France PCI registry. The 2 groups were compared on mean monthly number of patients, delays in the pathway care, and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding). Results: From January 15, 2019 to April 14, 2020, 2064 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were included: 1942 in the prelockdown group and 122 in the lockdown group. Only 2 cases in the lockdown group were positive for COVID-19. A significant drop (12%) in mean number of STEMI/month was observed in the lockdown group compared with prelockdown (139 vs 122, P < 0.04). A significant increase in "symptom onset to first medical contact" delay was found for patients who presented directly to the emergency department (ED) (238 minutes vs 450 minutes; P = 0.04). There were higher rates of in-hospital MACE (7.7% vs 12.3%; P = 0.06) and mortality (4.9% vs 8.2%; P = 0.11) in the lockdown group but the differences were not significant. Conclusion: According to the multicenter France PCI registry, the COVID-19 outbreak in France was associated with a significant decline in STEMI undergoing PPCI and longer transfer time for patients who presented directly to the ED. Mortality rates doubled, but the difference was not statistically significant.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A two-step strategy of invasive management without stenting, guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT), in selected patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), might avoid systematic stent implantation and allow medical therapy alone. AIMS: To assess the feasibility and safety of such a procedure, and to define coronary imaging characteristics in a specific population. METHODS: This single-centre proof-of-concept study included all patients with ACS who benefited from a two-step revascularization procedure with optimal reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention followed by delayed angiography and OCT. OCT imaging determined medical therapy treatment alone without stenting in case of absence of vulnerable plaque rupture and <70% stenosis. Follow-up consisted of screening for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12months. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included, mainly men (86.9%) and smokers (65.2%), with a mean age of 47.1years. Most cases (80.4%) were large thrombus burden lesions. Delayed angiography and OCT were performed in a median period of 6 [3-10] days. No adverse events occurred between the initial and second angiograms. Plaque rupture was detected in 39.1% of patients, plaque erosion in 54.3% and calcified nodule in 6.5%. Twenty-three patients benefited from systematic delayed OCT over a median period of 171days, showing an increase in minimal lumen area. At 12months, two patients (4.3%) presented MACE and were stented. No sudden death or myocardial infarction recurrence occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Analysing ACS mechanisms by OCT might facilitate treatment decisions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction managed by a two-step procedure. Conservative treatment with antithrombotic therapy without stenting seems to be a reliable option in a selected population.