A Practical Guide to the Clinical Evaluation of Endometriosis-Associated Pelvic Pain.

Endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) has a significant impact on the quality of life of those affected and their families. Recognizing that endometriosis is a chronic condition associated with an impairment in function and negative social impact, there is a shift toward reducing diagnostic delays and initiating timely management. This article provides a comprehensive and practical approach to the clinical diagnosis of EAP, which can subsequently facilitate prompt and directed treatment. The key components of the history, physical examination, and high-quality imaging to evaluate suspected EAP and related pain conditions are presented. Currently, biomarkers have limited utility in the diagnosis of endometriosis, but research in this area continues; development of a reliable noninvasive test for endometriosis may further improve early identification of this condition.

Patient perceptions of same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecologic and pelvic reconstructive surgery.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery is safe and cost effective and does not result in increased readmissions when compared with inpatient surgery. However, few studies have assessed patient satisfaction with same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery. Increased knowledge of patients' values allows for evidence-based, patient-centered perioperative care and guides perioperative counseling. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to evaluate patient perceptions of same-day discharge after minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery, to identify barriers to patient acceptance of same-day discharge, and to assess changes in patient acceptance before and after reading an evidence-based statement regarding same-day discharge. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional survey study. All English-speaking new patients presenting to a subspecialty, benign gynecological surgery clinic, including female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery providers, were invited to participate. The survey included an evidence-based statement about same-day discharge. Participants were asked to rate their comfort with same-day discharge before and after reading this statement. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of women (208 of 216) who were approached completed the study. The majority rated their overall health and mental or emotional health as good or very good (61.1% and 64.9%). Most (82.7%) completed at least some college. Most (86.1%) reported having at least 1 prior surgery and 68.8% reported same-day discharge after a prior surgery: 74.8% rated their prior experience with same-day discharge favorably. The majority of respondents (86.1%) reported they would feel comfortable with same-day discharge. The most important cited reasons for going home the same day as surgery included sleeping in own bed (73.4%) and being with family (61.8%). The most important cited reasons for staying overnight in the hospital included anticipated better pain control (58.9%) and decreased overall complications (43.0%). Forty percent believed it would be easier to take care of a catheter if needed in the hospital. Patients who reported living alone and those 65 years old and older were less likely to feel comfortable with same-day discharge (odds ratio, 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.91). Of the 29 patients who reported at baseline that they would not feel comfortable with same-day discharge, most (65.5%) changed their minds after reading an evidence-based statement about same-day discharge. When asked if their surgeon recommended it, almost all patients (96.1%) reported they would feel comfortable with same-day discharge. CONCLUSION: Among new patients presenting to a subspecialty, benign gynecologic surgery clinic including female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery and minimally invasive gynecological surgery providers, most perceive same-day discharge favorably following minimally invasive gynecological and pelvic reconstructive surgery. Women who live alone and those aged 65 years and older feel less comfortable with same-day discharge. While an evidence-based statement regarding the benefits and safety of same-day discharge further improves patient acceptance, direct surgeon counseling may be more important to establish discharge goals.

Utility of anterior vaginal wall length measurement in vaginal reconstructive surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) is the most commonly used method to quantify the extent of pelvic organ prolapse. However, it does not include assessment of anterior vaginal wall length (AVL). The objectives of this study were to characterize AVL and distance to the sacrospinous ligament (SSL), and to examine associations between total vaginal length (TVL), AVL, body mass index (BMI) and age. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 139 patients with cervix in situ presenting during an 8-month period for initial evaluation to the University of Rochester Medical Center Urogynecology practice. AVL, TVL and distance to the SSL were measured in addition to POP-Q measurements. Age, height, BMI, presenting complaint and prolapse stage were obtained from medical records. Simple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between TVL and AVL. Multivariate regression was used to test independent variables. RESULTS: The mean ± SD TVL, AVL and distance to the SSL were 9.4 ± 1.2 cm, 7.4 ± 0.9 cm and 7.2 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. All three measurements approached a normal distribution. TVL decreased slightly with age. No association was found between vaginal length and BMI or parity. CONCLUSIONS: AVL is a useful measurement that may aid in surgical decision-making. Providers should consider using AVL when planning sacrospinous hysteropexy.

Expectant management of cystotomy at the time of midurethral sling placement: a retrospective case series.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Cystotomy is one of the most common complications of retropubic midurethral sling placement. Some centers manage cystotomy with prolonged catheter drainage, and there are few published studies evaluating this practice. The purpose of this study is to review postoperative outcomes of patients who experienced cystotomy at the time of sling placement and did not undergo prolonged catheter drainage. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing midurethral sling placement complicated by a cystotomy at the University of Rochester between 2004 and 2009. Outpatient and inpatient records were reviewed and data collected include demographics, intraoperative details, voiding trial results, postoperative complications, and voiding function. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2009, 30 subjects experienced a cystotomy of the 374 subjects that had a midurethral sling placed, all by a suprapubic approach. There were 25 patients who underwent a voiding trial on the day of surgery and 20 (80 %) were discharged home without prolonged drainage. Five subjects (20 %) had urinary retention and were discharged with an indwelling catheter. All five successfully voided within 4 days of discharge. No subject required subsequent catheterization for any reason and at the 6-week postoperative evaluation all subjects denied voiding dysfunction or irritative bladder symptoms. No subject required additional intervention and postoperative complications were rare. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the majority of subjects experiencing a cystotomy during midurethral sling placement were successfully discharged home the day of surgery without catheter drainage. The results suggest that prolonged catheter drainage after a cystotomy during midurethral sling placement may be unnecessary.

Validation of a Simulation Model for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate a simulation model for robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSCP) that includes multiple steps: presacral dissection/mesh attachment, vaginal mesh attachment, and peritoneal closure. METHODS: An RSCP training model was developed. Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) experts and current FPMRS fellows were videotaped using the model; sessions were timed and scored using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) by 3 surgeon reviewers masked to participants' identities. Construct validity was measured by comparing performance on the model between experts and trainees. Interrater reliability was determined by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients for total GEARS scores. Face validity was assessed by a postprocedure questionnaire. RESULTS: Experts included 9 board-certified FPMRS physicians experienced in RSCP; trainees were 17 fellows. Experts practiced at 7 different institutions in the United States, and the majority (5/7) taught fellows. Trainees were from 7 institutions and in various years of training: postgraduate year (PGY) 5 (n = 6), PGY 6 (n = 5), and PGY 7 (n = 6). Experts' performances were rated significantly higher for total GEARS scores and for relevant domains of the GEARS scale. Intraclass correlation coefficient for the 3 reviewer pairs (0.96-0.99) indicated high interrater reliability. All participants "agreed/strongly agreed" that the model closely approximated live RSCP surgery and was useful for teaching and learning the procedure, indicating high face validity. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, multistep simulation model demonstrated construct validity and high interrater reliability. Face validity was also established. Consequently, this RSCP model could be used for surgical training and assessment of these discrete surgical skill steps.

A Cadaveric Simulation Model to Teach Suture Placement During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe a cadaveric simulation model designed to teach sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and to assess trainee performance, comfort, and skill with suture placement. METHODS: Nine invited participants from 3 institutions participated in cadaveric simulation training, consisting of a didactic lecture, technical demonstrations, and supervised execution of suture placement. Trainee self-perceived knowledge and confidence levels of SSLF were assessed before and after the educational intervention. Suture placement was assessed by expert faculty pelvic reconstructive surgeons. The number of attempts required by trainees for an anatomically safe suture placement was recorded. Participants completed a postintervention satisfaction survey. RESULTS: All 9 participants correctly identified where an SSLF suture should be placed on a printed image before the educational intervention, but only 33% achieved anatomically safe suture placement on the first attempt (mean ± SD, 2.88 ± 2.10 attempts). Four participants (44%) reported comfort with independently performing SSLF before the course. Of these, three (75%) required more than 1 attempt for successful suture placement. Mean ± SD distance of SSLF suture from the ischial spine was 1.90 ± 0.59 cm. All participants reported that they found the training helpful in learning the surgical steps and anatomy related to SSLF and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: A cadaveric simulation teaching model led to improved trainee-reported confidence with the operative steps and anatomy related to SSLF. Participants' prior knowledge of procedural steps and anatomy did not always transfer to adequate procedural skills for safe suture placement, suggesting the need for further simulation practice for fellow trainees.

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Simulation Model and Associated Hierarchical Task Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are limited robotic dry lab training resources that include presacral dissection with vaginal and sacral mesh attachment for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Our objective was to create a simulation model to resemble the anatomy encountered during robotic sacrocolpopexy. Additionally, we sought to outline the steps required to complete a robotic sacrocolpopexy by performing a hierarchical task analysis. With the results of the hierarchical task analysis, we assessed the model's ability to provide an adequate platform for completion of robotic sacrocolpopexy procedural steps. METHOD: This observational simulation study was divided into two phases. Phase 1 included model development. Phase 2 involved development of the hierarchical task analysis and assessment of the model. EXPERIENCE: After model creation, six experts each performed a robotic sacrocolpopexy using the model. Overall, experts agreed that the model replicated opening the peritoneum, presacral dissection, suturing on the anterior and posterior vagina, and presacral mesh attachment. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate construction and use of a robotic sacrocolpopexy simulation model to aid surgeons in training. Further, the hierarchical task analysis provides a method to assess the model's ability to replicate each step of robotic sacrocolpopexy.