The Efficacy of Antihypertensive Drugs in Lowering Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. One of the main risk factors for cardiovascular events is hypertension. The use of antihypertensive drugs can protect against these events. It occurs directly through the control of hypertension and indirectly through other cardiovascular effects. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to assess the impact of various antihypertensive medications (ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, etc.) on blood pressure and various cardiovascular outcomes. A thorough search was conducted using several online databases and search engines, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Medline, Embase, and others. RCTs evaluating the impact of antihypertensive medications on BP and other cardiovascular events like coronary heart disease and stroke were included in this study. Included were studies detailing the use of antihypertensive medication in monotherapy. The meta-analysis was done using RevMan version 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Means and standard deviations were extracted for the continuous variables and events, and the total sample number was extracted for the dichotomous variables. This analysis encompassed a total of 18 RCTs of the elderly population. The data for each variable was extracted independently, and analysis was performed. Overall, systolic blood pressure (SBP) revealed an impact of -11.88, CI=95% (-20.56, -3.19). The diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed -5.41, CI=95% (-9.62, -1.20), myocardial infarction 0.92, CI=95% (0.82, 1.04), stroke 0.83, CI=95% (0.74, 0.94), and cardiovascular mortality 0.93, CI=95% (0.86, 1.00). Heterogeneity was present due to the variable sample size of the studies and other unidentified biases. In conclusion, there was a significant reduction in the elderly population's risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death when antihypertensive medications were taken.

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

An effective anticoagulation therapy is required for patients with atrial fibrillation because it presents a significant risk of stroke. The current study evaluates the relative safety as well as efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients who are diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. A thorough literature review of relevant databases was conducted, focusing on academic and clinical studies that were published from 2017 onward. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials and other observational studies comparing the incidence of stroke and the safety index of rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for data overview reporting and overview. A total of 21 studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. A total of 19/21 studies advocated the adoption of rivaroxaban for minimizing stroke incidence. Rivaroxaban also showed superiority in achieving the therapeutic objectives, i.e., reduction in the incidence of stroke. The results for rivaroxaban against warfarin showed an improved safety index and effectiveness of rivaroxaban. The total effect size for the analysis was calculated to be Z=2.62 (p-value=0.009). The individual effect of all studies favored the "rivaroxaban" group. The heterogeneity in the study was as follows: tau2=0.10; chi2=110.10, df=6; I2=95%. The second analysis for risk reduction and incidence of stroke after rivaroxaban therapy also showed a bias towards rivaroxaban therapy. The combined effect for the analysis was found to be as follows: HR=0.73 ((95% CI: 0.50, 1.07). The total effect was calculated to be Z=1.61 (p-value= 0.10). The heterogeneity was found to be as follows: tau2= 0.20, chi2=89.97, df=6, I2=93%. Standard dosing of rivaroxaban emerges as a preferred strategy for stroke prevention, balancing efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making should consider individual patient characteristics and future research should delve into specific subpopulations and long-term outcomes to further refine treatment guidelines.

The Safety and Efficacy of the Early Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a significant global cause of mortality, necessitating the exploration of innovative treatments against the condition. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) such as sacubitril/valsartan have demonstrated promise in managing acute heart failure (HF). However, despite favorable evidence from clinical trials for the use of sacubitril/valsartan in AMI, its overall efficacy remains a subject of debate. Hence, we conducted this review and meta-analysis, by adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and aligned with European Society of Cardiology recommendations, to compare sacubitril/valsartan with traditional ACEI/ARB treatments for AMI. We employed Review Manager 5.4 for statistical analysis, the Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was utilized for quality assessment, and publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. Our findings revealed that participants treated with sacubitril experienced significantly improved outcomes in terms of HF (OR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95; p=0.01; I2=23%), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD = -1.58; 95% CI: -1.78 to -1.37, p<0.00001; I2=97%), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99; p=0.03; I2=44%). However, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD=3.68; 95% CI: 3.35-4.01, p<0.00001; I2=71%) showed greater improvement in the control group compared to the experimental group. Our meta-analysis suggests that sacubitril offers a favorable balance between safety and effectiveness. Sacubitril significantly improved outcomes in terms of HF, MACE, and NT-proBNP levels when compared to the control group. However, improvement in LVEF was notably higher in the control group over the sacubitril/valsartan group.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Surveillance Studies for Detecting Dysplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)is an extremely common gastrointestinal disorder that can give rise to dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC). There are various diagnostic methods but endoscopy has proved to be the best in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of IBD. The objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopy in detecting patients with IBD. A structured search strategy on PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was used, as well as formal inclusion or exclusion, data extraction, validity assessment, and meta-analysis. RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) (Computer program). Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) was used for the meta-analysis, and forest plots were generated for each outcome separately. All of these studies are prospective cohorts and 11 of these are randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In IBD, both chromoendoscopy and white light endoscopy are useful in detecting dysplasia and neoplastic lesions. Furthermore, narrow-band imaging is a less time-consuming option for endoscopic surveillance. The meta-analysis also showed that chromoendoscopy is superior to other methods.

The Trend of Arrhythmias in Patients With COVID-19: A Complication or Late Manifestation?

Patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease (CVD) who experience cardiovascular complications or have pre-existing cardiovascular disease are at an increased risk of death. The primary heart-related consequences associated with COVID-19 encompass venous thromboembolism, shock, heart failure, arrhythmias, myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, and acute cardiac damage. The coronavirus has the potential to induce cardiovascular complications or exacerbate pre-existing CVD through various mechanisms. These mechanisms include dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; direct viral toxicity; damage to endothelial cells; formation of blood clots and subsequent inflammation, a phenomenon known as thromboinflammation; an excessive immune response known as cytokine storm; and an imbalance between the demand and supply of oxygen in the body. In this study, we comprehensively analyze the cardiovascular symptoms, histology, and underlying mechanisms associated with COVID-19. Our aim is to contribute to the identification of future research objectives and aid in the advancement of therapeutic management approaches.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a range of conditions, from fatty liver to cirrhosis. In response to evolving research and to better reflect the complex metabolic underpinnings, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality between NAFLD and MAFLD patients. The present study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science to identify studies that compared cardiovascular outcomes in MAFLD and NAFLD from inception to July 31, 2023. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events. A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in patients with MAFLD patients compared to NAFLD patients (risk ratio (RR): 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11 to 1.98). The risk of all-cause mortality was higher in MAFLD patients compared to NAFLD, and the difference was statistically significant (RR: 2.80, 95% CI: 2.39 to 3.28). The risk of cardiovascular events was significantly higher in MAFLD patients compared to NAFLD (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.61). The key findings underscore that individuals diagnosed with MAFLD face a notably higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events when compared to those with NAFLD.

Safety and Efficacy of Liraglutide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder, with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) significantly impacting the cardiovascular (CV) system. Our comprehensive study on the cardiovascular effects of liraglutide, conducted concurrently with the formulation of diabetes treatment guidelines, aims to provide healthcare providers and patients with reassurance regarding the safety and effectiveness of liraglutide. From the beginning until August 20, 2023, we conducted searches in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar. These searches aimed to identify studies comparing liraglutide to control in terms of symptom resolution among patients with T2DM. For all relevant outcomes, we calculated risk ratios along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this analysis. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality. No significant difference was found between the liraglutide and control groups for the outcome of stroke. However, sensitivity analysis revealed a significant reduction in the risk of stroke among patients taking liraglutide. Our comprehensive meta-analysis strongly supports the use of liraglutide for managing cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to its established safety and effectiveness. Further RCTs and meta-analyses are needed to more thoroughly evaluate liraglutide's therapeutic potential, with the aim of enhancing the quality of life for those with CVD.

The Effectiveness of Polypill for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

A significant global health concern, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is characterized by a rising prevalence and accompanying mortality rates. It is crucial to implement primary and secondary prevention strategies, particularly in resource-scarce settings. Polypills, which combine blood pressure, cholesterol, and homocysteine drugs, hold significant potential for lowering the risk of CVD. This study follows PRISMA meta-analysis guidelines. Two researchers conducted an extensive literature search. Inclusion criteria encompassed RCT design, polypill use, a four-week duration, and one meta-analysis outcome. Primary outcomes included MACE and CV mortality, while secondary outcomes encompassed SBP and LDL-C changes. Data extraction was performed independently, and conflicts were resolved. Review Manager 5.4 with random effects was employed for statistical analysis, and ROB 2.0 bias evaluation was conducted. The study reported CVD mortality and MACE risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs, as well as SBP and LDL-C weighted mean differences (MD). A total of 24 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that the polypill was associated with a decreased risk of CVD mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Additionally, a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was observed. This meta-analysis showed that polypill is a viable medication for reducing the risk of CVD mortality and MACE. It is also a beneficial medication for lowering LDL-C levels and SBP.