The Learning Curve in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Few data are available on the learning curve (LC) in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD) and no study specifically addresses the LC of a single surgeon. METHODS: The LC of a single surgeon in RAPD was determined using the cumulative sum method, based on operative time (OT). Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database and analyzed retrospectively considering all events occurring within 90 days of index operation. RESULTS: Seventy RAPD were analyzed. One operation was converted to open surgery (1.4%). One patient died within 30 days (1.4%) and one within 90 days (2.8%). Postoperative complications occurred in 53 patients (75.7%) and exceeded Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb in 7 patients (10%). OT dropped after 33 operations from a mean of 564 ± 101.7 min to a mean of 484.1 ± 77.9 min (p = 0.0005) and was associated to reduced incidence of delayed gastric emptying (72.7 vs. 48.7%; p = 0.039). The rate of hospital readmission improved after 40 operations from 20.0 (8 of 40) to 3.3% (1 of 30) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: RAPD was safely feasible in selected patients. OT dropped after the first 33 operations and was associated with reduced rate of delayed gastric emptying. Readmission rate improved after 40 operations.

Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, but requires adaptations to established surgical techniques. The improved dexterity offered by robotic assistance provides the opportunity to see whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely when faithfully reproducing the open operation. METHODS: Patients were selected for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy when generally suitable for laparoscopy. Obese patients were excluded, and those with pancreatic cancer were highly selected. A prospectively designed database was used for data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Of 238 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 34 (14·3 per cent) were operated on robotically. No procedure was converted to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery, despite three patients requiring segmental resection of the superior mesenteric/portal vein and reconstruction. The mean duration of operation was 597 (range 420-960) min. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved and analysed from patients with neoplasia was 32 (range 15-76). Four patients required blood transfusions and five developed postoperative complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade II. There were four grade B pancreatic fistulas. One patient died on postoperative day 40. Excess mean operative cost compared with open resection was €6193. CONCLUSION: Selected patients can safely undergo robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The main downsides are high costs and prolonged operating times compared with open resection.

Evidence for a role of frataxin in pancreatic islets isolated from multi-organ donors with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Frataxin (FXN) is a mitochondrial protein involved in iron metabolism and in the modulation of reactive oxygen and/or nitrogen species production. No information is currently available as for the role of frataxin in isolated human pancreatic islets. We studied islets from pancreases of multi-organ donors with (T2DM) and without (Ctrl) Type 2 diabetes mellitus. In these islets, we determined FXN gene and protein expression by qualitative and quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR, nitrotyrosine concentration, and insulin release in response to glucose stimulation (SI). FXN gene and protein were expressed in human islets, though the level of expression was much lower in T2DM islets. The latter also had lower insulin release and higher concentration of nitrotyrosine. A positive correlation was apparent between SI and FXN gene expression, while a negative correlation was found between nitrotyrosine islet concentration and FXN expression. Transfection of Ctrl islets with siRNA FXN caused reduction of FXN expression, increase of nitrotyrosine concentration, and reduction of insulin release. In conclusion, in human pancreatic islets FXN contributes to regulation of oxidative stress and insulin release in response to glucose. In islets from T2DM patients FXN expression is reduced while oxidative stress is increased and insulin release in response to glucose impaired.

Posttransplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies negatively impact pancreas transplantation outcome.

During a 9-year follow-up, 167 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients (152 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]) were followed for the detection of posttransplant anti-HLA antibodies. Forty patients (24%) developed anti-HLA antibodies, 26 (65%) had donor-specific antibodies (DSA; 61% anticlass 2) and 14 (35%) non-DSA (78.6% anticlass 1). More rejection episodes were observed in patients with positive anti-HLA antibodies than in patients without antibodies (42.5% vs. 11%; p = 0.001), with the highest incidence observed in DSA patients (53.8%). More severe rejections (according to rescue therapy) were observed in DSA patients compared to non-DSA (p < 0.05) or to negative patients (p < 0.001). Contrasting with the kidney, pancreas graft survival did not differ between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies. On the contrary, pancreas and kidney survivals were significantly lower in DSA positive patients (75% for both organs) as compared to non-DSA positive patients (100% for pancreas and 92% for kidney) or to HLA-negative patients (91% for pancreas and 89% for kidney). Nontechnical pancreas and kidney graft failures were significantly higher in positive than in negative anti-HLA patients (32.5% vs. 11%; p < 0.01). Occurrence of posttransplant DSA was an independent risk factor for both pancreas and kidney survival (HR 3.2; p = 0.039) in diabetic transplant recipients.

Total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage: a rescue operation for duodenal complications occurring after pancreas transplantation.

Duodenal graft complications (DGC) occur frequently after pancreas transplantation but rarely cause graft loss. Graft pancreatectomy, however, may be required when DGC compromise recipient's safety. We herein report on two patients with otherwise untreatable DGC in whom the entire pancreas was salvaged by means of total duodenectomy with enteric drainage of both pancreatic ducts. The first patient developed recurrent episodes of enteric bleeding, requiring hospitalization and blood transfusions, starting 21 months after transplantation. The disease causing hemorrhage could not be defined, despite extensive investigations, but the donor duodenum was eventually identified as the site of bleeding. The second patient was referred to us with a duodenal stump leak, 5 months after transplantation. Two previous surgeries had failed to seal the leak, despite opening a diverting stoma above the duodenal graft. Thirty-nine and 16 months after total duodenectomy with dual duct drainage, respectively, both patients are insulin-independent and free from abdominal complaints. Magnetic resonance pancreatography shows normal ducts both basal and after intravenous injection of secretin. The two cases presented herein show that when DGC jeopardize pancreas function or recipient safety, total duodenectomy with enteric duct drainage may become an option.

[Living donor kidney transplant: the crossover modality]. / Il trapianto di rene da donatore vivente: la modalita' crossover.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LKD) has to be considered the best transplant choice for ESRD patients in terms of organ quality and survival. ABO incompatibility and positive cross-match frequently impede LKD. Recently, options based on stronger immunosuppression, apheresis techniques and Ig administration have been proposed to overcome the biological barriers. International guidelines on LKD advise paired exchange as the preferable transplant option to avoid the hazard of blood type or cross-match incompatibility. Since 1986 many paired exchange LKD programs have been started in the world including the USA, Japan, South Korea and, in Europe, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Romania, Germany and Italy. The first Italian paired exchange LKD was performed at the Pisa Transplant Center in November 2005 between three couples of spouses. One year later a National Program was established by the Italian National Transplant Center. The second experience in Italy was again in Pisa in December 2007 between two couples of spouses. International reports have shown that paired exchange LKD offers good clinical results comparable to direct LKD. In our experience paired exchange LKD is to be considered a quality choice for uremic patients, in that it allows them to obtain the benefit of an LKD that would otherwise not be practicable.

Pancreas transplants from donors aged 45 years or older.

AIMS: Since donor age of 45 years or more is considered a relative contraindication for pancreas transplantation (PTx), we herein report our experience with these donors. METHODS: Pancreases from donors aged 45 years or older were used in 16 of 147 PTx procedures (11%). The final decision to accept a graft for PTx was based mainly on the quality of visceral perfusion and the gross appearance of the pancreas and the vessels. There were 9 men and 7 women, ranging in age from 45 to 55 years (average, 48.9 years) who were donors, due to cerebrovascular accidents (n = 11; 68.7%). Among the donor group, 5 patients were receiving multiple vasopressor agents (31.2%), and 2 had a history of cardiac arrest (12.5%). Pancreases were transplanted either simultaneously with a cadaveric kidney (n = 6) or as solitary grafts (n = 10). RESULTS: After a mean period of cold preservation of 616 minutes (range, 475 to 844 min), delayed endocrine function occurred in 1 recipient (6%), who subsequently achieved insulin independence. Two recipients died suddenly, with functioning grafts. Two further grafts were lost due to portal vein thrombosis (6%) or late arterial thrombosis (6%). Three patients required repeat surgery (18.7%). After a mean follow-up period of 26.6 months, actuarial 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 87.5%, with insulin independence in 81.2% and 67.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous donor selection and short preservation times allow the safe use of pancreases procured from donors aged 45 years or older, thus expanding the donor pool for PTx procedures.

Successful solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage following unsuccessful islet cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There are no data regarding the outcome of solitary pancreas transplantation (SPT) with portal venous drainage (PVD) following unsuccessful islet transplantation (ITx) after multiple islet injections into the portal vein. We herein describe the outcome of three SPTs with PVD performed after failed ITx. METHODS: Between October 2002 and December 2003, three SPTs with PVD were performed following unsuccessful ITx with multiple intraportal islet injections (mean 2.3 injections: range 2 to 3 injections) in two women and one man, aged 26, 49, and 60 years. Panel reactive antibody titer was 0% in all recipients. Immunosuppression was based on induction with either basiliximab (n = 2) or thymoglobulin (n = 1); maintenance therapy included steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. During the recipient operation, the absence of venous hypertension was established by direct measurement of portal pressure, before making the final decision to drain the pancreas into the portal vein. RESULTS: Portal pressures were 16 cm H2O, 14 cm H2O, and 13 cm H2O. Pancreas grafts were reperfused after a period of cold preservation of 638, 695, and 835 minutes, respectively. All grafts showed immediate endocrine function, maintaining their recipients insulin-independent for longest follow-ups of 8, 21, and 23 months, respectively. One recipient developed a nonocclusive venous thrombus that resolved with intravenous heparin infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that unsuccessful ITx with multiple intraportal injections does not necessarily preclude the possibility of subsequent successful SPT with PVD. Further experience is needed to define contraindications and possible complications of SPT with PVD following ITx.

Outcome of 118 pancreas transplants with retroperitoneal portal-enteric drainage.

BACKGROUND: We have recently described a technique for retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation (RPTx) with portal-enteric drainage (PED). Further experience with 118 RPTx is detailed herein. METHODS: Between April 2001 and August 2004, 118 patients underwent RPTx with PED among 125 recipients (94.4%) scheduled for this procedure. Surgical complications and patient and graft survivals were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up period of 3 months (mean 27.8 +/- 13.0 months), 18 recipients (15.2%) required relaparotomy because of bleeding (n = 6; 5.1%), allograft pancreatectomy due to either hyperacute/accelerated rejection (n = 3; 2.5%) or vein thrombosis (n = 3; 2.5%), leak from duodenojejunal anastomosis (n = 2; 1.7%), bleeding and vein thrombectomy (n = 1; 0.8%), or small bowel occlusion due to bezoar (n = 1; 0.8%). One patient had a negative relaparotomy and one underwent two relaparotomies. Most patients with hemorrhage (5/7; 71.4%) were recipients of solitary pancreas grafts managed with heparin infusion. No venous thrombi extended into recipient's superior mesenteric vein. Nonocclusive venous thrombosis was diagnosed with duplex ultrasonography and confirmed at computed tomography in seven patients (5.1%). None of these patients lost graft function. Ten patients (8.5%) were diagnosed with peripancreatic fluid collections, all successfully treated by observation (n = 7) or percutaneous drainage (n = 3). Enteric bleeding occurred in eight recipients (6.8%). Overall, 1-year patient and pancreas survival rates were 97.4% and 92.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that RPTx with PED is a technical option that may be included in the repertoire of pancreas transplant surgeons.

Kidney transplantation from donors aged 65 years or more as single or dual grafts.

AIM: The organ shortage and aging donor population force transplant centers to accept donors previously considered unusable for kidney transplantation. We report the experience of two Italian transplant centers with single (SKTx) and dual (DKTx) kidney transplantation from donors aged 65 years or more. METHODS: The study population comprised 75 SKTx (mean donor age 70.5 years) and 28 DKTx (mean donor age 75.0 years). Kidneys from donors with a calculated admission creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, a Karpinski's score on kidney biopsy between 5 and 7, or both were allocated to DKTx. Grafts with better function or lower biopsy scores were employed for SKTx. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 45.3% of SKTx and in 39.3% of DKTx. After a mean follow-up period of 30.0 +/- 19.5 months, the acute rejection rate was 24.0% in SKTx and 7.1% in DKTx. Mean serum creatinine was 1.8 +/- 0.9 and 1.8 +/- 1.3 mg/dL in SKTx, and 1.8 +/- 1.6 mg/dL and 1.3 +/- 0.2 mg/dL in DKTx at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Patient survival was 93.3% and 91.2% in SKTx, and 92.9% and 92.9% in DKTx at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Graft survival was 92.0% and 88.3% in SKTx, and 89.3% and 89.3% in DKTx at the same time intervals. Keeping preservation time below 16 hours and avoiding calcineurin inhibitors were both associated with improved graft survival and function. CONCLUSION: Careful donor selection, short preservation time, and tailored immunosuppression allow safe and efficient use of elderly donor kidneys.

University of Wisconsin solution versus Celsior solution in clinical pancreas transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the safety and efficacy of University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and Celsior solution (C) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A retrospective review of 154 PTx performed over a 61-month period included 77 grafts preserved with UW and 77 with C. The two groups were comparable for both donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 624 minutes (range 360 to 945 minutes) for UW versus 672 minutes (range 415 to 1005 minutes) for C (P = NS), no primary endocrine nonfunction occurred. Delayed endocrine function was diagnosed in two grafts in the UW group (2.6%) versus none in the C group (P = NS). After a minimum follow-up of 4 months (mean 26.5 +/- 15.2 months), 22 recipients (UW = 11 vs C = 11; P = NS) required relaparotomy. Overall, 18 pancreata were lost due to either patient death with functioning graft (UW = 4 vs C = 1; P = NS) or graft loss due to other reasons (UW = 8 vs C = 5; P = NS). Actuarial 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 93.5% and 86.8% for UW compared with 98.7% and 98.7% for C (P = .04). Actuarial graft survival rates at the same times were 88.3% and 75.0% for UW compared with 90.4% and 90.4% for C (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and C show similar safety and efficacy profiles for PTx.

Ninety-five percent insulin independence rate 3 years after pancreas transplantation alone with portal-enteric drainage.

AIMS: Portal-enteric drainage (PED) might be particularly suitable for pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), since it has been associated with an immunologic advantage and achieves excellent metabolic results. We describe our experience with a consecutive series of 40 PTAs with PED. METHODS: Between April 2001 and March 2004, 40 consecutive PTAs were performed with PED. Recipients were selected according to the American Diabetic Association recommendations. Donors were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although matching for A and B loci was considered at the time of graft allocation. Immunosuppression consisted of induction treatment with basiliximab (n = 34) or thymoglobulin (n = 6), and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 690 minutes (range, 517-965 min) all pancreases functioned immediately. Three grafts were lost due to hyperacute or accelerated rejection. No graft was lost to vascular thrombosis, although 5 (12.5%) nonocclusive thromboses were identified and the grafts were rescued with intravenous heparin infusion. A repeat laparotomy was required in 7 recipients (17.5%) No patient required multiple repeat laparotomies, and none died. After a mean follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 1-36 mo), 2 recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes, which were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 3-year patient, and graft survival rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The following parameters showed significant improvement compared with pretransplantation evaluation: hemoglobin A1C concentration, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, arterial blood pressure, cardiac performance, retinopathy, proteinuria, and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation alone with PED provides high rates of long-term insulin-independence.

Neoral versus prograf in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with portal venous drainage: three-year results of a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The preferential use of tacrolimus (Prograf) over cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is mainly based on historical, retrospective studies. We herein report the 3-year results of a single-center, prospective, randomized comparison of the two calcineurin inhibitors in the setting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppression and portal drainage of pancreas allografts. METHODS: Between May 2001 and August 2004, 47 SPKTx recipients who were stratified by recipient sex, were alternatively assigned to treatment with Neoral (n = 22) or Prograf (n = 25). Concurrent immunosuppression included induction treatment with basiliximab and maintenance with MMF and steroids. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 24.0 months, all patients remained in the study arm into which they were initially enrolled. No pancreas rejection episode was observed. One acute kidney rejection was recorded in the Neoral arm (4.5%) as compared with 7 (28.0%) including one steroid-resistant episode, in the Prograf arm (P = .03). The cumulative incidence of adverse events was 31.8% (n = 7) in the Neoral arm compared with 92.0% (n = 23) in the Prograf arm (P < .0001). One patient died in each study arm. Patient, pancreas, and kidney survivals overlapped at 1- and 3-years posttransplant, namely all 95.4% for the Neoral arm compared with 95.8%, 91.8%, and 95.8%, respectively, for the Prograf arm (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in MMF-based immunosuppression there is no convincing evidence that Prograf should be preferred to Neoral in SPKTx.

Surveillance and rescue of pancreas grafts.

BACKGROUND: Technical failure rates are higher for pancreas allografts (PA) compared with other solid organs. Posttransplant surveillance and prompt availability of rescue teams with multidisciplinary expertise both contribute to improve this result. We herein report a single institution's experience with posttransplant surveillance and rescue of PA. METHODS: A retrospective survey was performed of a consecutive series of 177 whole organ pancreas transplants in 173 patients. Antithrombotic prophylaxis was used in all recipients and tailored on anticipated individual risk of thrombosis. During the first posttransplant week, all PA were monitored with daily Doppler ultrasonography. Surgical complications were defined as all adverse events requiring relaparotomy during the initial hospital stay or the first 3 posttransplant months. RESULTS: A total of 26 relaparotomies were performed in 25 patients (14.7%). One recipient needed two relaparotomies (0.6%). Graft rescue was attempted in patients without permanent parenchymal damage at repeat surgery and in 12 recipients diagnosed with nonocclusive vascular thrombosis. Overall 25 grafts (96.3%) were rescued and one was lost. One-year recipient and graft survivals in patients with versus without complications potentially leading to allograft loss were 92.6% and 63.0% versus 94.4% and 94.3%, respectively. Excluding complications for which graft rescue was not possible, 1-year graft survival rate increased to 78.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Close posttransplant surveillance can allow rescue of a relevant proportion of PA developing nonocclusive venous thrombosis or other surgical complications. Further improvement awaits better understanding of biological reasons for posttransplant complications jeopardizing PA survival and the development of more effective preventive measures.

Kidney preservation with university of Wisconsin and Celsior solution: a prospective multicenter randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Although the University of Wisconsin (U.W.) solution continues to be the most commonly used for intra-abdominal organs, a new solution, Celsior, already used for heart and lungs, has been proposed for kidney and liver preservation. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of Celsior as compared with U.W. on immediate graft function and a 2-year follow-up of kidney transplants. METHODS: A prospective multicenter randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Celsior solution in the clinical preservation of the kidney. In this report, we present the data collected as of September 2000. One hundred donors were included in the trial resulting in 187 renal transplants. Ninety-nine kidneys were stored in Celsior solution and 88 in U.W. solution. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 31.3% of the Celsior group and in 33.9% of the U.W. group (P=n.s.). Mean serum creatinine levels and mean daily urinary output were also comparable. Two year graft survival in kidneys preserved with Celsior was 84% as compared with 75% for U.W.-preserved kidneys without any significant statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the preservation of kidneys in Celsior solution in a clinical setting is equivalent to that of U.W. solution. When using Celsior during multiple-organ donor harvesting it would be possible to perform an in situ flush of all intra-abdominal and intrathoracic organs with a single cold storage solution.

A new technique for total hepatectomy in the pig for testing liver support devices.

BACKGROUND: A large animal model of total hepatectomy is suitable to test the efficacy of any system designed to support patients in hepatic coma. The models previously described in the pig entail a significant degree of surgical trauma, which might alter the evolution of the ensuring hepatic failure and compromise the reproducibility of the model. METHODS: Twenty-eight pigs underwent a total hepatectomy according to a new technique. A model was considered satisfactory when it required no blood transfusions and when hematologic and hemodynamic parameters determined before, during, and until 4 hours after hepatectomy showed no significant variations. Moreover, to revive the pattern of hepatic coma produced in the anhepatic model, 7 pigs were monitored until brain death occurred. RESULTS: Twenty-five pigs (89%) underwent a smooth total hepatectomy with minimal variations of the selected parameters. They constituted a highly homogeneous group. Survival of the 7 pigs, followed up until brain death occurred, ranged from 625 to 1595 minutes (mean 1013.57 minutes). The animals remained stable until a few hours before brain death, an event heralded by a final sharp increase of the serum ammonia level and by a well-evident decline of both arterial pressure and liver-dependent clotting factors. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of total hepatectomy allows the construction of a reproducible model of anhepaty suitable to test the efficacy of any system conceived to temporarily replace hepatic functions.

Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy for pain relief in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

HYPOTHESIS: Unilateral truncal thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (TS) provides safe and effective treatment for pain relief in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. DESIGN: Before-and-after trial of 24 patients undergoing 25 TS procedures. SETTING: Surgical unit at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 24 patients with severe pain due to unresectable (primary or recurrent) pancreatic cancer refractory to drug therapy and with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. INTERVENTION: The key point of the reported operation is intrathoracic carbon dioxide insufflation, which allows a more distal division of the greater splanchnic nerve and a 2-port technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and the effect of this symptom on quality of life were assessed before and after TS using a 10-point visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: Four TS procedures were technical failures because of pleural adhesions. One patient required a contralateral procedure 12 weeks after TS. Mean (+/- SD) preoperative VAS basal score was 7.4 +/- 1.7. Twenty-four hours after TS, it was reduced to 0.6 +/- 1.0. Significant reduction of VAS scores persisted over the first 3 months after TS (P<.001). Recurrence of pain of low intensity (mean VAS basal score, 4.2) was observed in 8 patients. Significant improvement (P<.001) in each area covered by the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire was reported at 1 month after TS. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy offered substantial short-term relief of pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, and significantly ameliorated the quality of their residual life.

Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in Italy: a national profile.

BACKGROUND: There are no data concerning the national experience with laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) in Italy. A survey was therefore conducted in May 2003 to establish current practice patterns and to describe the outcome of this procedure. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to the 37 Italian kidney transplant centers. Items covered each center's attitude toward LLDN, number of cases performed, and the outcome of donors and recipients. RESULTS: The return rate was 100%. The surveyed centers performed 4818 kidney transplants between January 2000 and May 2003, including 401 (8.3%) from living donors of whom 113 (28.2%) used grafts retrieved by laparoscopy. Despite an absolute increase in the number of living donors, the occurrence of a similar trend in cadaveric donation did not significantly change the overall living donor rate. Sixty-eight percent of LLDNs were done at only two centers. There was no mortality or graft loss and only a minor morbidity related to LLDN. Italian transplant surgeons showed a positive attitude toward LLDN; only a few of those not performing it had no plans to begin an LLDN program. CONCLUSIONS: Three years after the first national case, LLDN had not yet change the living donor rate, although an increasing number of donor nephrectomies were now performed by laparoscopy. Overall the results with the new technique are encouraging, although the pattern of diffusion of LLDN between different areas is heterogeneous and will demand continuous efforts on training programs in laparoscopic techniques for transplant surgeons.

Pancreas transplantation from marginal donors.

BACKGROUND: Marginal donor organs are a supplementary source of grafts that has not been fully exploited for pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A total of 100 PTx were performed with grafts procured from either 48 nonmarginal donors (NMD) or 52 marginal donors (MD), namely age greater than 45 years and/or severe hemodynamic instability at the time of procurement. PTx outcome was evaluated as the incidence of delayed endocrine pancreas function (DEPF), the complication rate, and the patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: The DEPF rate was 6.2% for NMD as compared to 0 for MD (P >.05). Relaparotomy rate was 12.5% for NMD and 9.6% for MD (P >.05). Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% and 94.2% for NMD and MD, respectively (P >.05). Equivalent figures for patients were 97.9% and 98.1%, respectively (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas from MD may be safely employed and significantly expand the donor pool for PTx.

Pancreas transplant alone.

Pancreas transplant alone (PTA) represents a growing proportion of overall pancreas transplantations, with 1-year patient and graft survivals of almost 100% and higher than 80%, respectively. PTA can restore normoglycemia without exogenous insulin administration and eliminate acute diabetic complications. In our series of 28 PTA, performed with portal-enteric drainage, 2-year patient and pancreas survivals were 100% and 87%, respectively. In patients with successful transplantation, rapid normalization of blood glucose level and HbA1c concentration was observed, due to restored endogenous insulin secretion. Several classical cardiovascular risk factors were measured before and after transplant, with significant improvements shortly after transplantation. Diabetic retinopathy improved in 58.8% of examined eyes, stabilized in 35.3%, and worsened in 5.9%. In conclusion, PTA represents a clinically relevant option for patients with type 1 diabetes without advanced renal disease. It restores normoglycemia in the vast majority of patients and seems to have a positive impact on late diabetic complications.