Early extracorporeal photopheresis treatment is associated with better survival in patients with chronic or recurrent acute lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Due to development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), prognosis for patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx) is still worse compared to other solid organ transplant recipients. Treatment options for slowing down CLAD progression are scarce with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as an established rescue therapy. The aim of the study was to identify characteristics of responders and non-responders to ECP treatment, assess their survival, lung function development and by that define the subset of patients who should receive early ECP treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all LTx patients receiving ECP treatment at the University Hospital Zurich between January 2010 and March 2020. Patients were followed-up for a maximum period of 5 years. Mortality and lung function development were assessed by CLAD stage and by CLAD subtype before initiation of ECP treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients received at least one ECP following LTx. A total of 57 patients (61.3%) died within the study period with a median survival of 15 months. Mortality was 57% for patients who started ECP at CLAD1, 39% for CLAD2, 93% for CLAD3, and 90% for CLAD4 (p < 0.001). Survival and lung function development was best in young patients at early CLAD stages 1 and 2. Response to ECP treatment was worst in patients with CLAD-RAS/mixed subtype (14.3%) and patients with ECP initiation in CLAD stages 3 (7.1%) and 4 (11.1%). Survival was significantly better in a subset of patients with recurrent acute allograft dysfunction and earlier start of ECP treatment (105 vs 15 months). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis of a large group of CLAD patients treated with ECP after LTx, early initiation of ECP was associated with better long-term survival. Besides a subset of patients suffering of recurrent allograft dysfunction, especially a subset of patients defined as responders showed an improved response rate and survival, suggesting that ECP should be initiated in early CLAD stages and young patients. ECP might therefore prevent long-term disease progression even in patients with CLAD refractory to other treatment options and thus prevent or delay re-transplantation.

Limited access to liver transplantation and TIPS despite high mortality, healthcare resource use and costs of cirrhosis in Germany.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data on number of patients with cirrhosis in Germany are limited. We therefore aimed to estimate prevalence, comorbidities, mortality, utilization of healthcare resources and costs of patients with cirrhosis and incidence of decompensation of cirrhosis in Germany. METHODS: This longitudinal observational study was based on an anonymized representative claims database including 4.9 million persons insured by a statutory health insurance (SHI) between 2015-2020. Patients with decompensated and compensated cirrhosis were selected via diagnostic ICD codes and followed for 2 years. RESULTS: Prevalence of cirrhosis in 2015 was 250/100 000, resulting in 201 747 (95% CI: 197 540-206 040) patients extrapolated to the German population. Out of all patients with compensated cirrhosis in 2015 who did not deceased, 16.0% developed a decompensation within 3 years. Overall, 978 patients (Ø-age: 68 years; 60% male) were included in the decompensated, and 5135 patients (Ø-age: 66 years; 59% male) in the compensated cirrhosis cohort. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a higher burden of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 7.3 vs. 4.4) and 3 times higher costs per quarter (7172 € vs. 2213 €) than patients with compensated cirrhosis. 1-year mortality after decompensation was 51% compared to 8% in compensated cirrhosis. Of note, only few patients with decompensated cirrhosis received a liver transplantation or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) (1% and 5%). CONCLUSION: Patients with cirrhosis have a high healthcare burden in especially decompensated stage. Accordingly, 1-year mortality of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany is high. Despite high health resource utilization, only few patients have access to liver transplantation or TIPS.

Long-term cost-effectiveness of matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation in the German health care system: a discrete event simulation.

INTRODUCTION: Cartilage defects in the knee can be caused by injury, various types of arthritis, or degeneration. As a long-term consequence of cartilage defects, osteoarthritis can develop over time, often leading to the need for a total knee replacement (TKR). The treatment alternatives of chondral defects include, among others, microfracture, and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (M-ACI). The purpose of this study was to determine cost-effectiveness of M-ACI in Germany with available mid- and long-term outcome data, with special focus on the avoidance of TKR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a discrete-event simulation (DES) that follows up individuals with cartilage defects of the knee over their lifetimes. The DES was conducted with a status-quo scenario in which M-ACI is available and a comparison scenario with no M-ACI available. The model included 10,000 patients with articular cartilage defects. We assumed Weibull distributions for short- and long-term effects for implant failures. Model outcomes were costs, number of TKRs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). All analyses were performed from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. RESULTS: The majority of patients was under 45 years old, with defect sizes between 2 and 7 cm2 (mean: 4.5 cm2); average modeled lifetime was 48 years. In the scenario without M-ACI, 26.4% of patients required a TKR over their lifetime. In the M-ACI scenario, this was the case in only 5.5% of cases. Thus, in the modeled cohort of 10,000 patients, 2700 TKRs, including revisions, could be avoided. Patients treated with M-ACI experienced improved quality of life (22.53 vs. 21.21 QALYs) at higher treatment-related costs (18,589 vs. 14,134 € /patient) compared to those treated without M-ACI, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3376 € /QALY. CONCLUSION: M-ACI is projected to be a highly cost-effective treatment for chondral defects of the knee in the German healthcare setting.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus digital mammography (DM) in screening is problematic due to increased radiation by the double exposure. Synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) calculated from DBT datasets at no additional dose appears a sensible alternative compared to adding DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on screening performance outcomes in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. METHODS: PubMed was searched from January 1, 2010, to September 2, 2020. Studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone in breast cancer screening were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for recalls (PPV-1), for biopsies recommended (PPV-2), and for biopsies performed (PPV-3). Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. RESULTS: Twelve papers covering 414,281 women were included from 766 records identified. CDR is increased ([RR, 95% CI] 1.35, 1.20-1.52), recall rates are decreased (0.79, 0.64-0.98), and PPV-1 is increased (1.69, 1.45-1.96) when using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. ICR and biopsy rates did not differ, but PPV-2 respectively PPV-3 increased with DBT plus s2D (1.57, 1.08-2.28 respectively 1.36, 1.17-1.58). Overall RoB of studies was assessed to be low. CONCLUSION: Results show improved diagnostic outcomes with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone and underline the value of DBT in combination with s2D in breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: • DBT plus s2D is associated with higher CDR, lower recall rates, and a higher PPV-1 compared to DM alone in breast cancer screening. • No differences in biopsy rates were found between screening modalities, but PPV-2 and PPV-3 were higher in women screened with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone. • We identified inconsistent results of ICR in two studies comparing DBT plus s2D to DM alone-resulting in no differences when pooling ICR in meta-analysis.

[Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Germany. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis]. / Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse.

BACKGROUND: The reported mortality for sepsis and septic shock varies between 15% and 59% in international comparison. For Germany, the number of studies is limited. Previous estimations of mortality in Germany are outdated or based on claims data analyses. Various authors discuss whether lacking quality initiatives and treatment standards in Germany could cause higher mortality for sepsis. This contrasts with the internationally well-recognized performance of the German intensive care infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to estimate 30-day and 90-day mortality of patients with sepsis and patients with septic shock in Germany and to compare the mortality with that of other industrialized regions (Europe, North America). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search included interventional and observational studies published between 2009 and 2020 in PubMed and the Cochrane Library that analyzed adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock in Europe and North America. Studies with less than 20 patients were excluded. The 30-day and 90-day mortality for sepsis and septic shock were pooled separately for studies conducted in Germany, Europe (excluding Germany) and North America in a meta-analysis using a random effects model. Mortality over time was analyzed in a linear regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 134 studies were included. Of these, 15 studies were identified for the estimation of mortality in Germany, covering 10,434 patients, the number of patients per study ranged from 28 to 4183 patients. The 30-day mortality for sepsis was 26.50% (95% confidence interval, CI: 19.86-33.15%) in Germany, 23.85% (95% CI: 20.49-27.21%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 19.58% (95% CI: 14.03-25.14%) in North America. The 30-day mortality for septic shock was 30.48% (95% CI: 29.30-31.67%) in Germany, 34.57% (95% CI: 33.51-35.64%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 33.69% (95% CI: 31.51-35.86%) in North America. The 90-day mortality for septic shock was 38.78% (95% CI: 32.70-44.86%) in Germany, 41.90% (95% CI: 38.88-44.91%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 34.41% (95% CI: 25.66-43.16%) in North America. A comparable decreasing trend in sepsis 30-day mortality was observed in all considered regions since 2009. CONCLUSION: Our analysis does not support the notion that mortality related to sepsis and septic shock in Germany is higher in international comparison. A higher mortality would not be obvious either, since intensive care, for example also during the COVID-19 pandemic, is regarded as exemplary in Germany and the structural quality, such as the number of intensive care beds per 100,000 inhabitants, is high in international comparison. Nevertheless, deficits could also exist outside intensive care medicine. A comparison of international individual studies should take greater account of the structure of healthcare systems, the severity of disease and the limitations resulting from the data sources used.

All-cause mortality in patients with long-term opioid therapy compared with non-opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain: a database study.

BACKGROUND: Hitherto only studies with selected populations have found an increased all-cause mortality of some selected opioids compared to selected non-opioids for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). We have examined the all-cause mortality for CNCP associated with all established opioids compared to non-opioid analgesic therapy (anticonvulsants, antidepressants, dipyrone, non-steroidal agents). METHODS: The study used the InGef (Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin) database which is an anonymized healthcare claims database including 4,711,668 insured persons who were covered by 61 German statutory health insurances between 2013 and 2017.The health insurance companies are the owners of the database. All-cause mortality was determined from death certificates. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) including age, gender, comorbidity index, and propensity score as covariates and risk differences (RD) in incidence of death between patients with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) and control-drug therapy were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 66 years; 55% were women. There were 554 deaths during 10,435 person-years for the LTOT patients, whereas there were 340 deaths during 11,342 person-years in the control group. The HR for all-cause mortality was 1.59 (95% CI, 1.38-1.82) with a risk difference of 148 excess deaths (95% CI 99-198) per 10,000 person-years. The elevated risk of death for LTOT was confined to the out-of-hospital deaths: LTOT patients had 288 out-of-hospital deaths during 10,435 person-years (276 per 10,000 person-years) whereas there were 110 deaths during 11,342 person-years (97 per 10,000 person-years) in the control group. HR was 2.29 (95% CI 1.86, 2.83). Although our propensity score matching model indicated a good classification, residual confounding cannot be fully excluded. The opioid group had a higher prevalence of heart failure and a higher use of anti-thrombotic and antiplatelet agents and of psycholeptics. CONCLUSIONS: LTOT for CNCP compared to non-opioid analgesics was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality. When considering treatment options for patients with CNCP, the relevant risk of increased all-cause mortality with opioids should be discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03778450, Registered on 7 December 2018.

Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock remain drivers for mortality in critically ill patients. The heterogeneity of the syndrome hinders the generation of reproducible numbers on mortality risks. Consequently, mortality rates range from 15 to 56%. We aimed to update and extend the existing knowledge from meta-analyses and estimate 30- and 90-day mortality rates for sepsis and septic shock separately, stratify rates by region and study type and assess mortality rates across different sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles published in PubMed or in the Cochrane Database, between 2009 and 2019 in English language including interventional and observational studies. A meta-analysis of pooled 28/30- and 90-day mortality rated separately for sepsis and septic shock was done using a random-effects model. Time trends were assessed via Joinpoint methodology and for the assessment of mortality rate over different SOFA scores, and linear regression was applied. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred records were identified. After title/abstract screening, 783 articles were assessed in full text for eligibility. Of those, 170 studies were included. Average 30-day septic shock mortality was 34.7% (95% CI 32.6-36.9%), and 90-day septic shock mortality was 38.5% (95% CI 35.4-41.5%). Average 30-day sepsis mortality was 24.4% (95% CI 21.5-27.2%), and 90-day sepsis mortality was 32.2% (95% CI 27.0-37.5%). Estimated mortality rates from RCTs were below prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Rates varied between regions, with 30-day septic shock mortality being 33.7% (95% CI 31.5-35.9) in North America, 32.5% (95% CI 31.7-33.3) in Europe and 26.4% (95% CI 18.1-34.6) in Australia. A statistically significant decrease of 30-day septic shock mortality rate was found between 2009 and 2011, but not after 2011. Per 1-point increase of the average SOFA score, average mortality increased by 1.8-3.3%. CONCLUSION: Trends of lower sepsis and continuous septic shock mortality rates over time and regional disparities indicate a remaining unmet need for improving sepsis management. Further research is needed to investigate how trends in the burden of disease influence mortality rates in sepsis and septic shock at 30- and 90-day mortality over time.

Impact of Buprenorphine Dosage on the Occurrence of Relapses in Patients with Opioid Dependence.

OBJECTIVES: Buprenorphine (BUP) is used in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) for opioid-dependent patients. Previous real-world evidence suggests that many patients receive lower BUP dosage than recommended, with 38% of patients receiving <6 mg BUP per day. The goal of this research is to evaluate the impact of BUP dosage on the risk of relapses in the real world. METHODS: This study was based on German claims data of 4 million patients. Patients identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition F11.2 (opioid dependence) between 2011 and 2012 and at least one BUP prescription were selected for this study (n = 364) and followed up over 4 years. Patients were assigned to 6 dosage groups, with <6 mg/day serving as low dosage/reference category. The impact of dosage on the occurrence of relapses (indicated by treatment interruption of >3 months without OMT prescription or hospital admissions) was examined using multivariate logistic regression. Age, gender, comorbidities, fixed/variable dosing, and up-dosing were used as covariates. RESULTS: Results showed a protective effect of higher BUP as higher BUP dosages were significantly associated with a lower risk of relapse. Using low dosage (<6 mg/day) as the reference category, ORs were 0.40 (95% CI 0.19-0.87) at 6-<8 mg/day, 0.28 (0.15-0.56) at 8-<10 mg/day, 0.26 (0.10-0.67) at 10-<12 mg/day, 0.40 (0.18-0.92) at 12-<16 mg/day, and 0.18 (0.09-0.37) at ≥16 mg/day. No covariate showed a significant effect on the probability of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The present study used a large German health claims dataset to confirm that higher BUP dosages are a protective factor for avoiding relapses in opioid-dependent patients, thus highlighting the importance of adequate BUP dosing in relapse prevention.

Fractional flow reserve measurements and long-term mortality-results from the FLORIDA study.

Background: Randomized evidence suggested improved outcomes in fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance of coronary revascularization compared to medical therapy in well-defined patient cohorts. However, the impact of FFR-guided revascularization on long-term outcomes of unselected patients with chronic or acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. Aims: The FLORIDA (Fractional FLOw Reserve In cardiovascular DiseAses) study sought to investigate outcomes of FFR-guided vs. angiography-guided treatment strategies in a large, real-world cohort. Methods: This study included patients enrolled into the German InGef Research Database. Patients undergoing coronary angiography between January 2014 and December 2015 were included in the analysis. Eligible patients had at least one inpatient coronary angiogram for suspected coronary artery disease between January 2014 and December 2015. Patients were stratified into FFR arm if a coronary angiography with adjunctive FFR measurement was performed, otherwise into the angiography-only arm. Matching was applied to ensure a balanced distribution of baseline characteristics in the study cohort. Patients were followed for 3 years after index date and primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results: In the matched population, mortality at 3 years was 9.6% in the FFR-assessed group and 12.6% in the angiography-only group (p = 0.002), corresponding to a 24% relative risk reduction with use of FFR. This effect was most pronounced in patients in whom revascularization was deferred based on FFR (8.7% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.04) and in high-risk subgroups including patients aged ≥75 years (14.9% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01) and those presenting with ACS (10.2% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: FFR-based revascularization strategy was associated with reduced mortality at 3 years. These findings further support the use of FFR in everyday clinical practice.

[Tapentadol versus classical WHO-III opioids for chronic back pain. Health services research study based on representative data from health insurance funds]. / Tapentadol versus klassische WHO-III-Opioide bei chronischen Rückenschmerzen : Versorgungsforschungsstudie auf Basis repräsentativer Krankenkassendaten.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In clinical trials, tapentadol prolonged release (PR) showed a more favourable gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared to other strong opioids in the treatment of pain. The present analysis compared tapentadol PR and classical WHO-III PR opioids in routine clinical practice. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study (matched pair approach) using anonymised health insurance data of patients with chronic low back pain who were prescribed strong opioids following pretreatment with WHO-I/II analgesics. Data were analysed from the date of first prescription in 2015 over a maximum period of two years. The primary analysis parameter was the prescription of laxatives. RESULTS: Data of 227 patients per cohort could be included in the analysis. Significantly fewer tapentadol PR than WHO-III PR patients were prescribed laxatives (20.3% vs. 37%; p < 0.0001). In addition, laxative dosages were significantly lower in the tapentadol PR cohort (26.4 vs. 82.5 defined daily doses; p < 0.0001). A significant difference in laxative prescription was also observed under long-term treatment (tapentadol PR patients 27.7% vs. WHO-III PR patients 50%; p = 0.0029). CONCLUSION: Routine clinical practice indirectly confirmed the more favourable gastrointestinal tolerability of tapentadol PR in the treatment of chronic pain which had previously been demonstrated in clinical trials and non-interventional studies.

Incidence, Prevalence, and Real-World Treatment Patterns in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from a Population-Representative German Claims Data Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world data on usage of 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are scarce. This study therefore aimed to analyze the use of different TKIs used in 1st- and 2nd-line treatment and the frequency of TKI switches in CML. METHODS: This observational study was based on the InGef research database, an anonymized representative claims dataset in Germany (n = 4 million). An incidence and prevalence patient CML cohort was followed for 5 and 3 years. Analyses regarding incidence, prevalence, and therapy distribution were performed descriptively. RESULTS: 151 patients were included in the incidence and 636 patients in the prevalence cohort. This resulted in an incidence of 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.20) and a prevalence of 14.9 (95% CI: 13.70-16.03) per 100,000 inhabitants. For the incidence cohort, data on 1st-line therapy were available for 124 patients and distributed across imatinib (N = 52), nilotinib (N = 44), dasatinib (N = 12), chemotherapies as hydroxycarbamide (N = 11), and ponatinib/bosutinib (N = 5). Twenty-six percent of patients switched TKI therapy at least once in 3 years. In the prevalence cohort, 423 patients (66.5%) had claims on existing or newly emerged cardiovascular diseases (CDs). No significant differences (p = 0.32) between TKIs in patients with CD were found. DISCUSSION: Every fourth patient switched TKI therapy within the first 3 years after treatment initiation. Switches were more likely when hints of disease progression or intolerability were observable in the database.

Prevalence, incidence, and health care utilization of patients with narcolepsy: a population-representative study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Previous estimated prevalence of narcolepsy in Europe was 47 patients per 100,000 persons, with a yearly incidence of 0.64-1.37 per 100,000. However, analyses of representative datasets from large cohorts are limited. This study aimed to estimate the population-based diagnostic prevalence and incidence of narcolepsy in Germany and to describe these patients and their health care resource utilization. METHODS: This study used the InGef research database, an anonymized representative dataset of 4 million persons covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. Patients with confirmed narcolepsy diagnoses in 2018 were included. Mid-p-exact tests were used to calculate 95% confidence intervals. Patients with narcolepsy diagnoses and narcolepsy-targeting therapy in 2014-2018 were included to describe health care resource utilization in the year prior to diagnosis. RESULTS: In 2018, diagnostic prevalence was estimated as 17.88 (95% confidence interval 16.45-19.40) and 12-month incidence as 0.79 (0.52-1.15) per 100,000 persons. Forty-six percent of patients were in psycho-behavioral therapeutic treatment and 61% of employees had sick leave days. One in three patients was hospitalized for any cause; 28% received antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic prevalence was lower, but incidence was consistent with previous reports, although previous estimates may diverge in terms of age/sex distributions. Patients showed a substantial utilization of health care resources, including sick leave and hospitalization. Almost half the patients underwent psycho-behavioral treatment in the year prior to diagnosis, which might indicate a high burden of psychiatric symptoms. The increased use of antibiotics could indicate more frequent infections than in the general population. CITATION: Kallweit U, Nilius G, Trümper D, Vogelmann T, Schubert T. Prevalence, incidence, and health care utilization of patients with narcolepsy: a population-representative study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(6):1531-1537.

Tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional mammography yields higher cancer detection compared to digital mammography alone, also in dense breasts and in younger women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on breast cancer screening performance outcomes stratified into breast density, age, and reading procedure using 'digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D)' compared to 'digital mammography (DM) alone'. METHODS: Studies comparing 'DBT with s2D' and 'DM' were searched in PubMed and Cochrane library. Pooled risk ratios (RR) using fixed or random effects models (F-/REM) for cancer detection rates (CDR), recall rates, interval cancer rates (ICR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values (PPV) 1-3 were calculated. Outcomes were stratified into breast density (non-dense and dense), age (<60, ≥60), and reading procedure (double-/non-double reading). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. RESULTS: We identified 13 studies. Using DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone resulted in a higher increase in CDR for dense ([number of studies included, FEM RR, 95% confidence interval (CI)]; n = 3, 1.60, 1.16-2.22) versus non-dense breasts (n = 3, 1.32, 1.08-1.61). Recall rates were lower in dense (n = 2, 0.84, 0.75-0.94), but much lower for non-dense breasts (n = 2, 0.65, 0.59-0.72). Age stratification resulted in small differences in CDR (<60: n = 2, 1.64, 1.18-2.29 / ≥60: n = 2, 1.56, 1.19-2.05). After screening with DBT plus s2D compared to DM alone the risk of being recalled was less in non-double (n = 3, 0.57, 0.54-0.60) than in double reading (n = 5, 0.95, 0.81-1.11) and the risk of cancer detection was higher in double reading (n = 6, 1.53, 1.40-1.67) than in non-double reading (n = 4, 1.17, 1.02-1.33). CONCLUSION: Since only few studies are available for meta-analyses statistical significance strongly depends on single study results. Taking this into account, the most important results concern the increase of CDR in women with dense breasts, the increased CDR in double reading, and the lower recall rates particularly with non-double reading.

Opioid use disorder in Germany: healthcare costs of patients in opioid maintenance treatment.

BACKGROUND: Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a substance use disorder with a chronic course associated with comorbid mental and somatic disorders, a high burden of psychosocial problems and opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) as a standard treatment. In the US, OUD imposes a significant economic burden on society, with annual societal costs estimated at over 55 billion dollars. Surprisingly, in Europe and especially in Germany, there is currently no detailed information on the healthcare costs of patients with OUD. The goal of the present research is to gather cost information about OUD patients in OMT with a focus on maintenance medication and relapses. METHODS: We analysed health claims data of four million persons covered by statutory health insurance in Germany, applying a cost-of-illness approach and aimed at examining the direct costs of OMT patients in Germany. Patients with an ICD-10 code F11.2 and at least one claim of an OMT medication were stratified into the treatment groups buprenorphine, methadone or levomethadone, based on the first prescription in each of the follow-up years. Costs were stratified for years with and without relapses. Group comparisons were performed with ANOVA. RESULTS: We analysed 3165 patient years, the total annual sickness funds costs were on average 7470 € per year and patient. Comparing costs of levomethadone (8400 €, SD: 11,080 €), methadone (7090 €, SD: 10,900 €) and buprenorphine (6670 €, SD: 7430 €) revealed significant lower costs of buprenorphine compared to levomethadone (p < 0.0001). In years with relapses, costs were higher than in years without relapses (8178 € vs 7409 €; SD: 11,622, resp. 10,378 €). In years with relapses, hospital costs were the major cost driver. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows the costs of OUD patients in OMT for the first time with a German dataset. Healthcare costs for patients with an OUD in OMT are associated with more than two times the cost of an average German patients. Preventing relapses might have significant impact on costs. Patients in different OMT were dissimilar which may have affected the cost differences.