Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: does sequence matter?

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains - despite the implementation of new chemotherapy protocols - a disease with short overall survival (OS). METHODS: Eighty-three patients were treated with locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with either FOLFIRINOX or nab-Paclitxel and Gemcitabine (nabPGem) as first- or second line therapy. We analysed the outcome for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in terms of treatment regimen and sequence. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented in good performance status (PS) with a median age of 68 years. Fourty-two patients received FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy, 41 patients were treated with nabPGem as first line therapy. Forty-eight patients received both treatments. The OS of all 83 patients was 12.6 months (95% CI: 10.7-14.6), resulting in a 1-year OS of 54%. Forty-eight patients received FOLFIRINOX followed by nabPGem or vice versa. There was no significant difference in OS or PFS for either of the two sequences (p = 0.9). The OS for FOLFIRINOX followed by nabPGem or nabPGem followed by FOLFIRINOX was 13.7 months (95% CI: 12.6-14.7) and 13.8 months (95% CI: 8.6-19), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence FOLFIRINOX followed by nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine or vice versa lead to an equal OS outcome.

Front-line Platinum Continues To Have a Role in Advanced Bladder Cancer.

Cisplatin remains a valid option in muscle-invasive or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and is even more efficient when nivolumab is added. The well-known side-effect profile and the limited number of treatment cycles represent great advantages over modern drug combinations such as enfortumab-vedotin plus pembrolizumab.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for the First-Line Treatment of Intermediate/Poor-Risk Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus both sunitinib and pazopanib for the treatment of first-line unresectable advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from a healthcare system perspective in Switzerland. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model, consisting of progression-free, progressed disease, and death, was constructed. Efficacy estimates were based on data from the CheckMate 214 trial (NCT02231749) with a minimum follow-up of 42 months. Two Swiss oncologists were consulted to determine disease management resource use. Costs were derived from the Swiss tariff lists for outpatient (TARMED Online Browser 1.09) and inpatient (2020 data from Swiss diagnosis-related groups) treatments. Drug acquisition costs (ex-factory prices) were obtained from the March 2020 price list published by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. Treatment-specific EQ-5D-3L-based utilities were derived from CheckMate 214 using a French value set as a proxy for Switzerland. The model utilized a 1-week cycle length and a 40-year time horizon, with costs and effects discounted by 3.0% per annum. One-way sensitivity analyses, probabilistic analysis, and scenario analyses assessed the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab yielded incremental 1.43 life-years and 1.36 lifetime discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) relative to sunitinib and pazopanib at an additional cost of 147,453 Swiss Francs (CHF) and CHF145,643, respectively. With an incremental cost-utility ratio of CHF108,326 per QALY gained versus sunitinib, and CHF106,996 per QALY gained versus pazopanib, the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination can be considered a cost-effective option for the treatment of patients with aRCC in Switzerland, with a willingness-to-pay threshold of CHF200,000. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of the deterministic results. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab, which represents one of the standard-of-care first-line treatments for intermediate- or poor-risk aRCC patients, is a life-extending and cost-effective treatment option for patients in Switzerland.

Safety profile of darolutamide versus placebo: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Darolutamide is an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) used in patients with prostate cancer (PC). In pivotal trials, it has demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile. There are no head-to-head comparison studies between the different ARPIs, but the efficacy of these drugs seems to be similar making the toxicity profile a key element for treatment selection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of all clinical trials assessing treatment with darolutamide for patients with PC using placebo as the control using the PubMed/Medline and Cochrane library databases. We also performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety of darolutamide versus placebo evaluating adverse events (AE) leading to treatment discontinuation and the rate of the AE reported as "AE of interest" in the ARAMIS trial. The comparison among darolutamide and the placebo group in terms of safety and tolerability was performed using odds ratio (OR) as meta-analytic outcome. RESULTS: We identified three articles comprising 2902 patients for the systematic review and meta-analysis (1652 treated with darolutamide and 1250 with placebo). Darolutamide did not increase AE leading to treatment discontinuation compared to placebo (pooled OR: 1.176, 95% CI 0.918-1.507, p = 0.633). Regarding the "AE of interest" there was no difference between darolutamide and placebo in terms of asthenia, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac disorder, coronary artery disorder, depression mood disorder, falls, fatigue, heart failure, hot flushes, hypertension, mental-impairment disorder, rash, seizure and weight loss. The only "AE of interest" with a statistically significant difference in favor of placebo was bone fractures (pooled OR: 1.523, 95% CI 1.081-2.146). CONCLUSIONS: In our systematic review and meta-analysis, darolutamide showed a toxicity profile comparable to placebo with the exception of bone fractures. In the absence of head-to-head comparison studies between the different ARPIs, the results of our research suggest a preferred use of darolutamide in the approved settings.

Lack of consensus identifies important areas for future clinical research: Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 findings.

BACKGROUND: Innovations in treatments, imaging and molecular characterisation have improved outcomes for people with advanced prostate cancer; however, many aspects of clinical management are devoid of high-level evidence. At the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019, many of these topics were addressed, and consensus was not always reached. The results from clinical trials will most reliably plus the gaps. METHODS: An invited panel of 57 experts voted on 123 multiple-choice questions on clinical management at APCCC 2019. No consensus was reached on 88 (71.5%) questions defined as <75% of panellists voting for the same answer option. We reviewed clinicaltrials.gov to identify relevant ongoing phase III trials in these areas of non-consensus. RESULTS: A number of ongoing phase III trials were identified that are relevant to these non-consensus issues. However, many non-consensus issues appear not to be addressed by current clinical trials. Of note, no phase III but only phase II trials were identified, investigating side effects of hormonal treatments and their management. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of consensus almost invariably indicates gaps in existing evidence. The high percentage of questions lacking consensus at APCCC 2019 highlights the complexity of advanced prostate cancer care and the need for robust, clinically relevant trials that can fill current gaps with high-level evidence. Our review of these areas of non-consensus and ongoing trials provides a useful summary, indicating areas in which future consensus may soon be reached. This review may facilitate academic investigators to identify and prioritise topics for future research.

Extracerebral metastases determine the outcome of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the era of cytokines, patients with brain metastases (BM) from renal cell carcinoma had a significantly shorter survival than patients without. Targeted agents (TA) have improved the outcome of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) however, their impact on patients with BM is less clear. The aim of this analysis was to compare the outcome of patients with and without BM in the era of targeted agents. METHODS: Data from 114 consecutive patients who had access to targeted agent were analyzed for response rates (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). All patients diagnosed with BM underwent local, BM-specific treatment before initiation of medical treatment. RESULTS: Data of 114 consecutive patients who had access to at least one type of targeted agents were analyzed. Twelve out of 114 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients (10.5%) were diagnosed with BM. Systemic treatment consisted of sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus or bevacizumab. The median PFS was 8.7 months (95% CI 5.1 - 12.3) and 11.4 months (95% CI 8.7 - 14.1) for BM-patients and non-BM-patients, respectively (p = 0.232). The median overall survival for patients with and without BM was 13.4 (95% CI 1- 43.9) and 33.3 months (95% CI 18.6 - 47.0) (p = 0.358), respectively. No patient died from cerebral disease progression. ECOG Performance status and the time from primary tumor to metastases (TDM) were independent risk factors for short survival (HR 2.74, p = 0.001; HR: 0.552, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Although extracerebral metastases determine the outcome of patients with BM, the benefit from targeted agents still appears to be limited when compared to patients without BM.

Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel or FOLFIRI in platinum-refractory advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma-experience at two centres.

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab is a VEGFR-2 antibody that has proven to prolong overall survival (OS) in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric/gastrooesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. We present data from patients treated with ramucirumab and paclitaxel or FOLFIRI after failure of at least one platinum- and 5-FU-containing chemotherapy (CHT) regimen. METHODS: In this retrospective two-center study, 56 patients with metastatic gastric cancer (47%) or adenocarcinoma of the GEJ (53%) were treated with paclitaxel and ramucirumab (n=38) as second-line (75%) or beyond second-line (25%) therapy. FOLFIRI-ramucirumab (FOLFIRI-R) (n=16) was given to patients with a short interval between taxane-based perioperative CHT and occurrence of metastatic disease or to those ineligible for paclitaxel. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for patients treated with paclitaxel-ramucirumab (pacl-R) were 2.9 (95% CI: 2.3-3.6) and 4.4 (4.1-4.7) months, respectively, and those for patients treated with FOLFIRI-R were 5.9 (95% CI: 0.35-11.4) and 8.3 (6.6-10) months, respectively (P=0.05). We observed a trend towards prolonged PFS after perioperative taxane-based FLOT CHT (n=12) with FOLFIRI-R compared with pacl-R. Adverse events were manageable, with neutropenia and polyneuropathy (PNP) being the most common events. More than two treatment lines were given to 48.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ramucirumab in combination with FOLFIRI showed favourable PFS and OS in patients with prior treatments with platinum and/or taxane-based agents and allows further treatment lines after progression. In patients with taxane pretreatment or persistent high-grade PNP, the combination of FOLFIRI-R might be a promising combination.

Management of cardiac adverse events occurring with sunitinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib malate is the reference standard of care for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) have been observed with sunitinib treatment. Here, we present the case report of a 49-year-old male patient with mRCC in whom cardiac AEs experienced during sunitinib treatment were successfully managed. The patient was at poor prognostic risk, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3. RESULTS: The patient was treated with sunitinib 50 mg/day (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment; Schedule 4/2) following lung and bone metastases. Cardiac AEs occurred following sunitinib initiation. These events were resolved with cardiovascular co-medication. Sunitinib improved the patient's quality of life and performance status, with a prolonged duration of treatment of 24 months. CONCLUSION: This case indicates that cardiac AEs should not be a barrier to the effective use of sunitinib in mRCC.

Evaluation of Prognostic Immune Signatures in Patients with Breast, Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: CD97 is a member of the epidermal growth factor-seven transmembrane (EGF-TM7) receptor family and is dominantly expressed on immune cells and in a variety of malignant diseases. B7-H1 and B7-H3 are transmembrane proteins that are involved in suppression of the immune system. The aim of this study was to evaluate if these molecules are up-regulated in patients with cancer and change during chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed cluster of differentiation (CD) protein expression levels on tumor cell lines and in blood samples of 37 patients with solid tumors at baseline and during chemotherapy; we correlated the serum levels of CD proteins with survival outcome. RESULTS: Levels of soluble CD97 proteins were significantly elevated in all three cancer types compared to healthy controls. Patients with colorectal cancer and those with high CD97 levels had a significantly worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: This study showed a marked elevation of soluble CD97 expression in patients with certain cancer types and demonstrated definite changes in CD protein expression during chemotherapy in one patient with metastatic breast cancer.

Evaluation of Dose-Staged Gamma Knife Radiosurgical Treatment Method for High-Risk Brain Metastases.

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to evaluate the utility of 2-fraction, dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: A total of 63 large BMs in eloquent areas in 61 patients were treated with GKRS in 2 reduced doses. Treatment planning was conducted on the 50% isodose line and included the whole tumor volume as seen on T1 contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sections. The median margin and central dose were 12 Gy and 24 Gy, respectively, for both fractions. Patients were assessed using the Graded Prognostic Assessment, Recursive Partitioning Analysis, and Score Index for Radiosurgery. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (53%) had been diagnosed with multiple BMs, and extracranial metastases were present in a majority of patients before GKRS treatment. Significant decreases in tumor volume were observed between the first and second treatment stages. At 3-month follow-up, a majority of patients presented with stable or decreased lesion volumes. The remaining patients showed intralesional hemorrhaging or increasing edema that was managed conservatively. Three patients were diagnosed with tumor progression at the last follow-up and received microsurgical treatment. The median time to radiologic progression was 7 months. The median survival time after initial BM diagnosis was 6 months. Survival times were significantly longer than 3 of 4 calculated prognostic survival estimates. CONCLUSION: The new 2-fraction, dose-staged GKRS concept seems to be a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for large BMs. This method may be indicated in elderly patients or patients with surgical contraindications with large or high-risk brain metastases.

Lung transplantation for bronchiolitis obliterans after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) is a detrimental late pulmonary complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD). When systemic immunosuppressive treatment fails to improve, severe BO patients should be considered for lung transplantation (LuTX). We present seven patients undergoing LuTX for severe refractory BO after HCT. METHODS: Seven patients with hematologic malignancies developed severe cGvHD with lung involvement presenting as BO after allogeneic HCT. Evaluation for LuTX was initiated after failure of a median of 4 immunosuppressive regimens. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2012, seven patients with severe refractory BO were evaluated for LuTX. The median time from HCT to diagnosis of chronic lung GvHD was 8.2 months (range, 3.7-16.6). At a median time of 18.1 months (range, 6-120) after diagnosis of BO, six patients received a bilateral sequential LuTX, and one patient received a single LuTX. Six postoperative courses were uneventful; the patient with single LuTX died from septic multiorgan failure. Three LuTX recipients had a mild acute rejection after one to three months after LuTX, and one patient experienced fatal chronic rejection and hemolytic uremic syndrome. At present, three (43%) LuTX recipients remain alive at a median observation time of 26 months (range, 1 month-16 years) after LuTX. The median overall survival from LuTX was 24 months (95% CI, 0.5-78); the median overall survival time after allogeneic HCT is 98 months (95% CI, 46-198). CONCLUSION: This case series illustrates that LuTX is a possible therapeutic option for selected patients with severe treatment-refractory BO.

Hypothyroidism in patients with renal cell carcinoma: blessing or curse?

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib and sorafenib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that have important antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Hypothyroidism constitutes a commonly reported side effect of both drugs, and particularly of sunitinib. The objective of this analysis was to investigate whether the occurrence of hypothyroidism during treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib affects the outcome of patients with mRCC. METHODS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients with mRCC who were to receive treatment with sunitinib or sorafenib were included in a prospective analysis. Thyroid function was assessed in each patient every 4 weeks during the first 2 months of treatment and every 2 to 4 months thereafter. Assessment included serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), tri-iodthyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4). Subclinical hypothyroidism was defined as an increase in TSH above the upper limit of normal (>3.77 µM/mL) with normal T3 and T4 levels. RESULTS: Subclinical hypothyroidism was evident in 5 patients at baseline and occurred in 30 patients (36.1%) within the first 2 months after treatment initiation. There was a statistically significant correlation between the occurrence of subclinical hypothyroidism during treatment and the rate of objective remission (hypothyroid patients vs euthyroid patients: 28.3% vs 3.3%, respectively; P < .001) and the median duration of survival (not reached vs 13.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.85; P = .016). In multivariate analysis, the development of subclinical hypothyroidism was identified as an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.31; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that hypothyroidism may serve as a predictive marker of treatment outcome in patients with mRCC. Thus, the interpretation of hypothyroidism during treatment with sunitinib and sorafenib as an unwanted side effect should be reconsidered.

Cardiac toxicity of sunitinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Sunitinib and sorafenib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that have considerable efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. TKI-associated cardiotoxicity was reported in approximately 10% of the patients. Detailed cardiovascular monitoring during TKI treatment may reveal early signs of myocardial damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational, single-center study, all patients intended for TKI treatment were analyzed for coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors, history or evidence of CAD, hypertension, rhythm disturbances, and heart failure. Monitoring included assessment of symptoms, ECGs, and biochemical markers (ie, creatine kinase-MB, troponin T). Echocardiography was performed at baseline in selected patients and in all patients who experienced a cardiac event. A cardiac event was defined as the occurrence of increased enzymes if normal at baseline, symptomatic arrhythmia that required treatment, new left ventricular dysfunction, or acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were treated with either sunitinib or sorafenib. Among 74 eligible patients, 33.8% experienced a cardiac event, 40.5% had ECG changes, and 18% were symptomatic. Seven patients (9.4%) were seriously compromised and required intermediate care and/or intensive care admission. All patients recovered after cardiovascular management (ie, medication, coronary angiography, pacemaker implantation, heart surgery) and were considered eligible for TKI continuation. Statistically, there was no significant survival difference between patients who experienced a cardiac event and those who did not experience a cardiac event. CONCLUSION: Our observations indicate that cardiac damage from TKI treatment is a largely underestimated phenomenon but is manageable if patients have careful cardiovascular monitoring and cardiac treatment at the first signs of myocardial damage.