Durable Approaches to Recurrent Rectal Prolapse Repair May Require Avoidance of Index Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse is associated with unique technical challenges, partially determined by the surgical approach used for the index operation. Success rates are variable, and data to determine the best approach in patients with recurring prolapse are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess current surgical approaches to patients with prior rectal prolapse repairs and to compare short-term outcomes of de novo and redo procedures, including recurrence of rectal prolapse. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. SETTINGS: The Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Prospective Quality Improvement database. De-identified surgeons at more than 25 sites (81% high volume) self-reported patient demographics, prior repairs, symptoms of incontinence and obstructed defecation, and operative details, including history of concomitant repairs and prior prolapse repairs. PATIENTS: Patients who were offered surgery for full thickness rectal prolapse. INTERVENTIONS: Incidence and type of repair used for prior rectal prolapse surgery were recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes of index and redo operations were calculated. Patients undergoing rectal prolapse re-repair (redo) were compared with patients undergoing first (de novo) rectal prolapse repair. The incidence of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo operations was quantified. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo settings. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (19.3%) of 461 patients underwent redo rectal prolapse repair. On short-term follow-up, redo patients had prolapse recurrence rates similar to those undergoing de novo repair. However, patients undergoing redo procedures rarely had the same operation as their index procedure. LIMITATIONS: Self-reported, de-identified data. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that recurrent rectal prolapse surgery is feasible and can offer adequate rates of rectal prolapse durability in the short term but may argue for a change in surgical approach for redo procedures when clinically feasible. See Video Abstract . LOS ENFOQUES DURADEROS PARA LA REPARACIN DEL PROLAPSO RECTAL RECURRENTE PUEDEN REQUERIR EVITAR EL PROCEDIMIENTO NDICE: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal recurrente se asocia con desafíos técnicos únicos, determinados en parte por el abordaje quirúrgico utilizado para la operación inicial. Las tasas de éxito son variables y faltan datos para determinar el mejor abordaje en pacientes con prolapso recurrente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los enfoques quirúrgicos actuales para pacientes con reparaciones previas de prolapso rectal y comparar los resultados a corto plazo de los procedimientos de novo y rehacer, incluida la recurrencia del prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Base de datos de mejora prospectiva de la calidad del Consorcio multicéntrico de trastornos del suelo pélvico. Cirujanos no identificados en más de 25 sitios (81% de alto volumen) informaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, reparaciones previas, síntomas de incontinencia y defecación obstruida y detalles operativos, incluido el historial de reparaciones concomitantes y reparaciones previas de prolapso.INTERVENCIONES:Se registro la incidencia y el tipo de reparación utilizada para la cirugía de prolapso rectal previa. Se calcularon los resultados primarios y secundarios de las operaciones de índice y reoperacion. Se compararon los pacientes sometidos a una nueva reparación (reoperacion) de prolapso rectal con pacientes sometidos a una primera reparación (de novo) de prolapso rectal. Se cuantificó la incidencia de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en operaciones de novo y rehacer.RESULTADOS:El resultado primario de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en entornos de novo y redo. Ochenta y nueve (19,3%) de 461 pacientes se sometieron a una nueva reparación del prolapso rectal. En el seguimiento a corto plazo, los pacientes reoperados tuvieron tasas de recurrencia de prolapso similares a los de los sometidos a reparación de novo. Sin embargo, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos de rehacer rara vez tuvieron la misma operación que su procedimiento índice.LIMITACIONES:Datos no identificados y autoinformados.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Nuestros resultados sugieren que la cirugía de prolapso rectal recurrente es factible y puede ofrecer tasas adecuadas de durabilidad del prolapso rectal en el corto plazo, pero puede abogar por un cambio en el enfoque quirúrgico para rehacer los procedimientos cuando sea clínicamente factible. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

The Fate of Unifocal Versus Multifocal Low-Grade Dysplasia at the Time of Colonoscopy in Patients With IBD.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations regarding management of colorectal dysplasia in the setting of IBD continue to evolve. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the rate of progression from dysplasia to adenocarcinoma, specifically focusing on the differences in unifocal and multifocal low-grade dysplasia and dysplasia found on random biopsy versus targeted biopsies. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review. SETTING: This study was conducted at an IBD referral center. PATIENTS: All adult patients (≥18 years of age) with a known diagnosis of either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease, who underwent a surveillance colonoscopy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2019, were selected. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the progression of dysplasia and the risk factors for progression. RESULTS: A total of 23,751 surveillance colonoscopies were performed among 12,289 patients between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2019. The mean age at colonoscopy was 52.1 years (SD 16.9 years), 307 patients (2.5%) had a history of primary sclerosing cholangitis, and 3887 (3.15%) had a family history of colorectal cancer. There was a total of 668 patients (5.4%) with low-grade dysplasia, 76 patients (0.62%) with high-grade dysplasia, and 68 patients (0.55%) with adenocarcinoma in the series. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year cumulative incidence rate of progressing from low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia were 1.6%, 4.8%, and 7.8%. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of progressing from low-grade dysplasia to adenocarcinoma were 0.7% and 1.6%. There were no significant differences in unifocal and multifocal progression. Primary sclerosing cholangitis, ulcerative colitis, male sex, and advanced age were all found to be significant risk factors for neoplasia on multivariable analysis. LIMITATIONS: A retrospective database was a source of information. CONCLUSION: Progression of low-grade dysplasia to adenocarcinoma, regardless of its being unifocal or multifocal, remains very low in the setting of adequate surveillance and medical management. The presence of multifocal low-grade dysplasia should not change the decision making to pursue ongoing endoscopic surveillance versus proctocolectomy. Patients who had primary sclerosing cholangitis with dysplasia found on random biopsies may be at highest risk for dysplasia progression. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A649. EL DESENLACE DE LA DISPLASIA DE BAJO GRADO UNIFOCAL VERSUS MULTIFOCAL DURANTE LA COLONOSCOPIA EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: ANTECEDENTES:Las recomendaciones para el tratamiento de la displasia colorrectal en el contexto de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal siguen evolucionando.OBJETIVO:Determinar la tasa de progresión de displasia a adenocarcinoma, centrándose específicamente en las diferencias en displasia de bajo grado unifocal y multifocal, y displasia encontradas en biopsias aleatorias versus biopsias dirigidas.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva.ÁMBITO:Centro de referencia de EII.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes adultos (> 18 años) con un diagnóstico comprobado de colitis ulcerosa o enfermedad de Crohn que se sometieron a una colonoscopia de vigilancia entre el 1 de enero de 2010 y el 1 de enero de 2019.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS:Progresión de la displasia y factores de riesgo de progresión.RESULTADOS:Se realizaron un total de 23.751 colonoscopias de vigilancia en 12.289 pacientes entre el 1/1/2010 y el 1/1/2019. La edad media en el momento de la colonoscopia fue de 52,1 años (DE 16,9 años), 307 pacientes (2,5%) tenían antecedentes de colangitis esclerosante primaria y 3887 (3,15%) tenían antecedentes familiares de cáncer colorrectal. Hubo un total de 668 pacientes (5,4%) con displasia de bajo grado, 76 pacientes (0,62%) con displasia de alto grado y 68 pacientes (0,55%) con adenocarcinoma en la serie. La tasa de incidencia acumulada de 1, 2, 5 años de progresión de displasia de bajo grado a displasia de alto grado fue del 1,6%, 4,8% y 7,8%. Las tasas de incidencia acumulada de 1 y 2 años de progresión de displasia de bajo grado a adenocarcinoma fueron 0,7% y 1,6%, respectivamente. No hubo diferencias significativas en la progresión unifocal y multifocal. Se encontró que la colangitis esclerosante primaria, la colitis ulcerosa, el sexo masculino y la edad avanzada eran factores de riesgo significativos de neoplasia en el análisis multivariable.LIMITACIONES:Base de datos retrospectiva.CONCLUSIÓN:La progresión de la displasia de bajo grado a adenocarcinoma, independientemente de que sea unifocal o multifocal, sigue siendo muy baja en el contexto de una vigilancia y un tratamiento médico adecuados. La presencia de displasia multifocal de bajo grado no debería cambiar la toma de decisión para continuar con vigilancia endoscópica continua o realizar la proctocolectomía. Los pacientes con colangitis esclerosante primaria y displasia encontrada en biopsias aleatorias pueden tener una mayor progresión de la displasia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/A649.

Preliminary Report From the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium: Large-Scale Data Collection Through Quality Improvement Initiatives to Provide Data on Functional Outcomes After Rectal Prolapse Repair.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of rectal prolapse is constantly evolving, yet numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses studying operative approaches have failed to make meaningful conclusions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report on preliminary data captured during a large-scale quality improvement initiative to measure and improve function in patients undergoing rectal prolapse repair. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected surgical quality improvement data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 14 tertiary centers specializing in pelvic floor disorders from 2017 to 2019. PATIENTS: A total of 181 consecutive patients undergoing external rectal prolapse repair were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and 3-month postoperative Wexner incontinence score and Altomare obstructed defecation score were measured. RESULTS: The cohort included 112 patients undergoing abdominal surgery (71 suture rectopexy/56% minimally invasive, 41 ventral rectopexy/93% minimally invasive). Those offered perineal approaches (n = 68) were older (median age, 75 vs 62 y; p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (ASA 3-4: 51% vs 24%; p < 0.01) but also reported higher preintervention rates of fecal incontinence (Wexner 11.4 ± 6.4 vs 8.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.01). Patients undergoing perineal procedures had similar incremental improvements in function after surgery as patients undergoing abdominal repair (change in Wexner, -2.6 ± 6.4 vs -3.1 ± 5.6, p = 0.6; change in Altomare, -2.9 ± 4.6 vs -2.7 ± 4.9, p = 0.8). Similarly, patients undergoing posterior suture rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy had similar incremental improvements in overall scores; however, patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy had a higher decrease in the need to use pads after surgery. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective data analysis and 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes improved in all of the patients undergoing prolapse surgery. Larger cohorts are necessary to show superiority among surgical procedures. Quality improvement methods may allow for systematic yet practical acquisition of information and data analysis. We call for the creation of a robust database to benefit this patient population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B581. REPORTE PRELIMINAR DEL CONSORCIO DE TRASTORNOS DEL PISO PLVICO RECOLECCIN DE DATOS A GRAN ESCALA MEDIANTE INICIATIVAS DE MEJORAMIENTO DE LA CALIDAD PARA PROPORCIONAR INFORMACIN SOBRE LOS RESULTADOS FUNCIONALES: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal está evolucionando constantemente, sin embargo, numerosos estudios clínicos y metaanálisis que evalúan los tratamientos quirúrgicos no han logrado demostrar conclusiones significativas.OBJETIVO:Reportar datos preliminares obtenidos a gran escala durante una iniciativa de mejoramiento de la calidad para medir y mejorar la función en pacientes sometidos a reparación de prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente de mejoramiento de la calidad quirúrgica.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en 14 centros terciarios especializados en trastornos del piso pélvico del 2017 al 2019.PACIENTES:Un total de 181 pacientes consecutivos sometidos a reparación de prolapso rectal externo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Escala de incontinencia de Wexner y de defecación obstruida de Altomare preoperatoria y tres meses postoperatoria.RESULTADOS:El cohorte incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal (71 rectopexia con sutura / 56% minimally invasive, 41 rectopexia ventral / 93% minimally invasive). Aquellos a los que se les realizaron abordajes perineales (n = 68) eran mayores (edad media de 75 vs. 62, p <0,01) y tenían mayorcomorbilidades (ASA 3-4: 51% vs. 24%, p <0,01), además reportaron una mayor tasa de incontinencia fecal previo a la intervención (Wexner 11,4 ± 6,4 vs. 8,6 +/- 5,8, p <0,01). Posterior a la cirugía, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos perineales tuvieron mejoría progresiva en la función similar que los pacientes sometidos a reparación abdominal (cambio en Wexner -2,6 ± 6,4 vs. -3,1 ± 5,6, p = 0,6; cambio en Altomare -2,9 ± 4,6 vs. -2,7 ± 4,9, p = 0,8). De manera similar, los pacientes con rectopexia posterior con sutura y rectopexia ventral con malla tuvieron mejoría progresiva similares en las escalas generales; no obstante, pacientes con rectopexia ventral con malla tuvieron una mayor disminución en la necesidad de usar paños protectores después de la cirugía.LIMITACIONES:Análisis de datos retrospectivo y seguimiento de tres meses.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados funcionales mejoraron en todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de prolapso. Se necesitan cohortes más grandes para demostrar superioridad entre los procedimientos quirúrgicos. Métodos de mejoramiento de la calidad pueden permitir la adquisición sistemática, pero práctica de información y análisis de datos. Hacemos un llamado para la creación de una base de datos sólida para beneficiar a esta población de pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B581. (Traducción- Dr Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

System-Wide Improvement for Transitions After Ileostomy Surgery: Can Intensive Monitoring of Protocol Compliance Decrease Readmissions? A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission is common after ileostomy formation and frequently associated with dehydration. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate a previously published intervention to prevent dehydration and readmission. DESIGN: This is a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: This study was conducted in 3 hospitals within a single health care system. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective or nonelective ileostomy as part of their operative procedure were selected. INTERVENTION: Surgeons, advanced practice providers, inpatient and outpatient nurses, and wound ostomy continence nurses participated in a robust ileostomy education and monitoring program (Education Program for Prevention of Ileostomy Complications) based on the published intervention. After informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to a postoperative compliance surveillance and prompting strategy that was directed toward the care team, versus usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge, readmission for dehydration, acute renal failure, estimated direct costs, and patient satisfaction were the primary outcomes measured. RESULTS: One hundred patients with an ileostomy were randomly assigned. The most common indications were rectal cancer (n = 26) and ulcerative colitis (n = 21), and 12 were emergency procedures. Although intervention patients had better postdischarge phone follow-up (90% vs 72%; p = 0.025) and were more likely to receive outpatient intravenous fluids (25% vs 6%; p = 0.008), they had similar overall hospital readmissions (20.4% vs 19.6%; p = 1.0), readmissions for dehydration (8.2% vs 5.9%; p = 0.71), and acute renal failure events (10.2% vs 3.9%; p = 0.26). Multivariable analysis found that weekend discharges to home were significantly associated with readmission (OR, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.2-16.9); p = 0.03). Direct costs and patient satisfaction were similar. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the heterogeneous patient population and by the potential effect of the intervention on providers taking care of patients randomly assigned to usual care. CONCLUSIONS: A surveillance strategy to ensure compliance with an ileostomy education program tracked patients more closely and was cost neutral, but did not result in decreased hospital readmissions compared with usual care. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A812.

The importance of extended postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in IBD: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who have colorectal cancer receive up to 4 weeks of postoperative out-of-hospital venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Patients with IBD are at high risk for venous thromboembolism, but there are no recommendations for routine postdischarge prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative venous thromboembolism rate in IBD patients versus patients who have colorectal cancer to determine if IBD patients warrant postdischarge thromboembolism prophylaxis. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of IBD patients and patients who had colorectal cancer who underwent major abdominal and pelvic surgery. PATIENTS: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2010). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative venous thromboembolism in IBD patients and patients who had colorectal cancer. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism were analyzed with the use of univariate testing and stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 45,964 patients were identified with IBD (8888) and colorectal cancer (37,076). The 30-day postoperative rate of venous thromboembolism in IBD patients was significantly higher than in patients who had colorectal cancer (2.7% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001). In a model with 15 significant covariates, the OR for venous thromboembolism was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.021-1.56; p = 0.03) for the IBD patients in comparison with the patients who have colorectal cancer. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective design and the limitations of the data included in the database. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD had a significantly increased risk for postoperative venous thromboembolism in comparison with patients who had colorectal cancer. Therefore, postdischarge venous thromboembolism prophylaxis recommendations for IBD patients should mirror that for patients who have colorectal cancer. This would suggest a change in clinical practice to extend out-of-hospital prophylaxis for 4 weeks in postoperative IBD patients.

Patient Outcomes After Robotic Ventral Rectopexy With Sacrocolpopexy.

IMPORTANCE: As few studies exist examining postoperative functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic sacrocolpopexy and ventral rectopexy, results from this study can help guide surgeons in counseling patients on their outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate functional outcomes and overall postoperative satisfaction as measured by the Pelvic Floor Disability Index 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), and Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I) in patients who underwent combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and rectal prolapse or intussusception (RP/I). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort and survey study of patients with combined POP and RP/I who underwent the previously mentioned surgical repair between January 2018 and July 2021. Each patient was contacted to participate in a survey evaluating postoperative symptoms related bother, sexual function, and overall satisfaction using the PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and PGI-I. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients met study inclusion criteria with 67 patients completing the surveys. The mean age and body mass index were 63.7 ± 11.5 years and 25.0 ± 5.4, respectively. Of the patients, 19% had a prior RP repair and 23% had a prior POP repair. Rectal prolapse or intussusception recurrence was reported in 10.4% of patients and objective POP recurrence was found in 7.5% of patients. Sixty-seven patients (62%) completed the surveys. The median time to survey follow-up was 18 (8.8-51.8) months. At the time of survey, the mean PFDI-20 score was 95.7 ± 53.7. The mean PISQ-12 score for all patients was 32.8 ± 7.2 and the median PGI-I score was 2.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients who underwent a combined robotic ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy, patient-reported postoperative symptom bother was low, sexual function was high, and their overall condition was much improved.

Readmission after colorectal surgery is related to preoperative clinical conditions and major complications.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission is increasingly perceived as a marker of quality and is poorly investigated in patients receiving colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe patterns and etiology of readmission, to determine the rate of readmission, and to identify risk factors for readmission after colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective medical chart review. Significant (p < 0.1) preoperative and perioperative factors associated with readmission on univariate analysis were examined in a multivariable model. SETTING: The investigation was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients included adults undergoing major colorectal operations by colorectal surgeons at the University of Minnesota in 2008-2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was hospital readmission at 60 days. RESULTS: The study included 220 patients. Common surgical indications were inflammatory bowel disease (21%), colorectal cancer (39%), and diverticular disease (13%), and 11% were emergencies. Readmissions at 60 days occurred in 25% (n = 54), mostly because of major complications (57%), nonspecific nausea, vomiting and/or pain (18%), dehydration (11%), and wound infections (11%). Predictors of readmission in multivariable analysis were major complications (OR, 13.0), female sex (OR, 5.9), prednisone use (OR, 4.3), BMI ≥30 (OR, 2.6), and preoperative weight loss (OR, 3.4). Age and comorbidity (Charlson score) were not predictors. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study at a single institution, with a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of readmission were major complications and immediate preoperative condition of the patients. Comorbidity profiling does not capture readmission risk. Because most readmissions relate to complications, further efforts to prevent these will improve readmission rates.

Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy is advocated for combined rectal and vaginal prolapse, but limited outcome data have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications and outcomes of sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy by comparing pre- and postoperative function and quality of life. DESIGN: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of all patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy at our institution from 2004 to 2011. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperatively, all patients underwent physiology testing and completed 4 validated questionnaires assessing bowel symptom severity and associated quality of life. Patients completed the same questionnaires in 2012. RESULTS: A total of 110 women (median age, 55 years; range, 28-88) underwent a sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy, 33 with concomitant hysterectomy. All patients had rectal prolapse (n = 96) or rectal intussusception (n = 14), and each also had either enterocele (n = 86) or vaginal prolapse (n = 48). Rectal prolapse with enterocele was the most common presentation (n = 75). Previous surgery included rectal prolapse repair (21%) and hysterectomy (57%). Complications included presacral bleeding (n = 2), ureteral injury (n = 2), wound infection (n = 8), and pulmonary embolism (n = 2). There were no mortalities. Fifty-two patients completed the follow-up questionnaires, with a median follow-up of 29 (range, 4-90) months, and preoperative surveys were available in 30 of these patients. Preoperatively, 93% reported constipation; 82% reported resolution or improvement postoperatively. Constipation severity, measured with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire, demonstrated improvement (1.86-1.17; p < 0.001). Fecal incontinence severity scores (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) improved (39-24; p < 0.01), and 82% of incontinent patients reported cure or improvement. Quality-of-life scores also improved significantly. No patient developed recurrent rectal prolapse. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective review, and the response rate to questionnaires was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy for combined middle and posterior compartment prolapse is a safe procedure, with low risk for recurrence, and improves bowel function and quality of life in most patients.

Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome in children: before it is too late.

PURPOSE: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in children is an infrequently reported, rapidly progressive, and often lethal condition underappreciated in the pediatric population. This underrecognition can result in a critical delay in diagnosis causing increased morbidity and mortality. This study examines the clinical course of patients treated for ACS at our institution. METHODS: A review of children requiring an emergency laparotomy (n = 264) identified 26 patients with a diagnosis of ACS. ACS was defined as sustained intraabdominal hypertension (bladder pressure >12 mm Hg) that was associated with new onset organ dysfunction or failure. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 3 months to 17 years old and were cared for in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Twenty-seven percent (n = 7) were transferred from referring hospitals, 50% (n = 13) were admitted directly from the emergency department, and 23% (n = 6) were inpatients before being transferred to PICU. Admission diagnoses included infectious enterocolitis (n = 12), postsurgical procedure (n = 10), and others (n = 4). Patients progressed to ACS rapidly, with most requiring decompressive laparotomy within 8 hours of PICU admission (range, <1-96 hours). Preoperatively, all patients had maximum ventilatory support and oliguria, 85% (n = 22) required vasopressors/inotropes, and 31% (n = 8) required hemodialysis. Mean bladder pressure was 25 mm Hg (range, 12-44 mm Hg). In 42% (n = 11), cardiac arrest preceeded decompressive laparotomy. All patients showed evidence of tissue ischemia before decompressive laparotomy with an average preoperative lactate of 8 (range, 1.2-20). Decompressive laparotomy was done at the bedside in the PICU in 13 patients and in the operating room in 14 patients. Abdominal wounds were managed with open vacuum pack or silastic silo dressings. Physiologic data including fluid resuscitation, oxygen index, mean airway pressure, vasopressor score, and urine output were recorded at 6-hour intervals beginning 12 hours before decompressive laparotomy and extending 12 hours after operation. The data demonstrate improvement of all physiologic parameters after decompressive laparotomy except for urine output, which continued to be minimal 12 hours post intervention. Mortality was 58% (n = 15) overall. The only significant factor related to increased mortality was bladder pressure (P = .046; odds ratio, 1.258). Cardiac arrest before decompressive laparotomy, need for hemodialysis, and transfer from referring hospital also trended toward increased mortality but did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: Abdominal compartment syndrome in children carries a high mortality and may be a consequence of common childhood diseases such as enterocolitis. The diagnosis of ACS and the potential need for emergent decompressive laparotomy may be infrequently discussed in the pediatric literature. Increased awareness of ACS may promote earlier diagnosis, treatment, and possibly improve outcomes.

Closed gastroschisis: total parenteral nutrition-free survival with aggressive attempts at bowel preservation and intestinal adaptation.

BACKGROUND: In infants with gastroschisis antenatal closure of the umbilical defect results in a proximal atresia with ischemia and/or volvulus of the extracorporeal midgut. It has been described as "closed gastroschisis" or "vanishing midgut." METHODS: A 10-year review of 219 gastroschisis patients identified 10 infants with this rare complication. RESULTS: In these 10 infants, the extracorporeal midgut was invariably matted and fibrosed. In 3 cases, the midgut had completely "vanished." In the remaining 7 cases, the remnant midgut was surgically reduced into the abdominal cavity with care not to compromise the diminutive vascular pedicle. Abdominal exploration was performed several weeks later to reestablish bowel continuity; 4 required an ostomy and 2 underwent a serial transverse enteroplasty. Mean residual length of salvaged small bowel was 79 cm with retention of the distal half of the colon. Eight infants survived the initial hospitalization, with a mean length of stay of 121 days and mean hospital charge of $287,094. Six of the 7 long-term survivors have been completely weaned off total parenteral nutrition. CONCLUSION: A nihilistic attitude toward infants with closed gastroschisis may not be uniformly supported because in the majority of these infants' long-term independence from total parenteral nutrition was achieved.