A pilot study of US HTC physical therapists' concordance of PT MASAC recommendations and educational needs.

INTRODUCTION: Physical therapists (PTs) are essential providers within the Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) team caring for persons with inherited blood disorders (PWBD). OBJECTIVE: Little is known regarding PTs understanding and concordance of MASAC PT Recommendations (MASAC#238), educational resources used to maintain competency and support for a mentorship programme. METHODS: PTs at federally funded HTCs were eligible to participate in a descriptive non-validated study exploring: (i) demographics, (ii) educational background, (iii) experience in evaluation and treatment of PWBD, (iv) practice patterns indicative of concordance with MASAC#238 and (v) opinion regarding PT mentorship. RESULTS: Respondents experience caring for PWBD ranged 1-36 years, treating both adults and children. Although most acknowledged awareness of MASAC#238, dropout (14/44, 31.8%) was noted; 28/30 (93.3%) who continued were aware of the recommendations. Level of concordance with MASAC#238 varied (range 64.3%-96.2%) regarding: signs/symptoms, treatment of muscle/joint bleeding and pre/post synovectomy and knee replacement treatment. Many PTs identified patients as individual and unique, thus not all recommendations may apply. PTs utilised available educational programmes. No relationships were noted regarding years of practice, education and years caring for PWBD. All respondents favoured a mentorship programme citing benefits, but also outlined barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of necessary financial support for optimal function of a full-time PT within the HTC can enhance standards of care for PWBD. Supporting educational opportunities may enhance concordance with current MASAC PT Recommendations. Respondents valued development of a structured, hands-on mentorship programme. MASAC#23 has recently been updated in May 2023 to MASAC#275.

Patient-derived assessment tool using musculoskeletal ultrasound for validation of haemarthrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia patients experience painful joint episodes which may or may not be associated with haemarthrosis. We sought to validate a questionnaire developed by the Canadian Haemophilia Society using point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound (POC MSKUS) to confirm haemarthrosis. METHODS: The questionnaire comprised of 20 questions (10 each associated with haemarthrosis and arthritis pain) and was administered to adult haemophilia patients reporting to the Haemophilia Treatment Centre (University of California San Diego). We confirmed the presence (or absence) of haemarthrosis using POC MSKUS [Joint Activity and Damage Exam (JADE)]. We fitted univariate and multivariate generalized estimating equations to identify symptoms associated with haemarthrosis. RESULTS: We evaluated 79 painful episodes in 32 patients [median age = 38 years (range 21-74)]. POC MSKUS detected haemarthrosis in 36 (46%) episodes. The strongest predictor for haemarthrosis pain was 'like a balloon swelling with water' (odds ratio [OR] 2.88 [CI .68;12.10]); 'no feeling of sponginess with movement' (OR .24[CI .07;.76]) was the strongest for arthritic pain. We identified four questions with the strongest OR for differentiating haemarthrosis pain from arthritic pain to develop an algorithm for haemarthrosis prediction. Answering these questions in "yes/no" fashion yielded estimates of the probability of haemarthrosis CONCLUSION: Objective diagnosis of haemarthrosis by MSKUS facilitated the development of a symptom-based prediction tool for diagnosis of haemarthrosis. The tool requires further validation and will be particularly helpful in situations where MSKUS is not readily available.

Development and Reliability of the Joint Tissue Activity and Damage Examination for Quantitation of Structural Abnormalities by Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Hemophilic Joints.

OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) is used increasingly to examine hemophilic arthropathy. However, quantitative algorithms to document findings are lacking. We developed and sought to validate a protocol quantifying hemophilic joint abnormalities. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with hemophilia were examined serially for 2 years with musculoskeletal US (≈600 joint examinations and ≈6000 images). Based on the spectrum of pathologies, a quantitative algorithm, named Joint Tissue Activity and Damage Examination (JADE), was developed for soft tissue and osteochondral measurements, including power Doppler, using nominal group techniques. To study intra- and inter-rater reliability, 8 musculoskeletal US-experienced hemophilia providers performed anatomic landmark recognition and tissue measurements on 86 images with arthropathic changes, with repetition 1 month later. Twenty-three musculoskeletal US-inexperienced providers performed similar assessments. Inter-operator reliability was established by 6 musculoskeletal US-experienced hemophilia providers, each acquiring images and JADE assessments of 3 hemophilic arthropathic joints. A radiologist and musculoskeletal sonographer functioned as adjudicators. The statistical analysis was performed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Fleiss κ, and Cohen κ where appropriate. RESULTS: The musculoskeletal US-experienced providers showed excellent intra-and inter-rater reliability for tissue measurements (ICCs, 0.94-0.96). Agreement was good to excellent for landmark recognition (Fleiss κ, 0.87-0.94). Inter-operator reliability was excellent for measurements and landmark recognition (ICC, 0.90; Fleiss κ, 1.0). Agreement with adjudicators was mostly good to excellent. Musculoskeletal US-inexperienced providers showed excellent inter-rater reliability for measurements (ICC, 0.96) and moderate agreement for landmark recognition (Fleiss κ, 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The JADE protocol appears feasible for quantifying hemophilic intra-articular abnormalities. Musculoskeletal US-trained hemophilia providers showed high intra-rater, inter-rater, and inter-operator reliability, supporting JADE as a protocol for clinical management and research.

Advanced Hemophilic Arthropathy: Sensitivity of Soft Tissue Discrimination With Musculoskeletal Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) is increasingly used by hemophilia providers to guide management; however, pathologic tissue differentiation with US is uncertain. We sought to determine the extent to which point-of-care musculoskeletal US can identify and discriminate pathologic soft tissue changes in hemophilic arthropathy. METHODS: Thirty-six adult patients with hemophilia A/B were prospectively enrolled. Point-of-care musculoskeletal US examinations were performed on arthropathic joints (16 knees, 10 ankles, and 10 elbows) using standard views by a musculoskeletal US-trained and certified hematologist, who recorded abnormal intra-articular soft tissue accumulation. Within 3 days, magnetic resonance imaging was performed using conventional and multiecho ultrashort echo time sequences. Soft tissue identification (synovial proliferation with or without hemosiderin, fat, and/or blood products) was performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Findings obtained with both imaging modalities were compared and correlated in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: There was perfect agreement between the modalities on the presence of abnormal soft tissue (34 of 36 cases). However, musculoskeletal US was unable to discriminate between coagulated blood, synovium, intrasynovial or extrasynovial fat tissue, or hemosiderin deposits because of wide variations in echogenicity. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal US is valuable for point-of-care imaging to determine the presence of soft tissue accumulation in discrete areas. However, because of limitations of musculoskeletal US in discriminating the nature of pathologic soft tissues and detecting hemosiderin, magnetic resonance imaging will be required if such discrimination is clinically important.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities to transform the care of people with hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Decades of research have transformed hemophilia from severely limiting children's lives to a manageable disorder compatible with a full, active life, for many in high-income countries. The direction of future research will determine whether exciting developments truly advance health equity for all people with hemophilia (PWH). National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network conducted extensive inclusive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Working group (WG) 1 of the NHF State of the Science Research Summit distilled the community-identified priorities for hemophilia A and B into concrete research questions and scored their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG1 defined 63 top priority research questions concerning arthropathy/pain/bone health, inhibitors, diagnostics, gene therapy, the pediatric to adult transition of care, disparities faced by the community, and cardiovascular disease. This research has the potential to empower PWH to thrive despite lifelong comorbidities and achieve new standards of wellbeing, including psychosocial. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative research and care delivery will be key to capitalizing on current and horizon treatments and harnessing technical advances to improve diagnostics and testing, to advance health equity for all PWH.

Hemophilia is the best known of the inherited bleeding disorders (BD). This is a rare condition that causes disproportionate bleeding, often into joints and vital organs. Factor replacement, injecting recombinant or plasma-based clotting factor products directly into the vein, became commonplace to control the disorder in the 1990s and 2000s. Prophylaxis, or injecting replacement factor every few days into people with hemophilia (PWH), has revolutionized patients' lives. In the last few years, other advances in new therapies have entered this space, such as non-factor replacement therapies and gene therapy. With many more research advances on the horizon, the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) initiated a State of the Science Research Summit in 2020. This event was attended by over 880 interested parties to help design an agenda of research priorities for inherited BDs for the next decade, based on community consultations. NHF formed multiple Working Groups (WG), each exploring a theme resulting from the community consultations, and presenting their results at the Summit. Led by 2 hematologists who manage and treat PWH daily, the 21-community member WG1 assigned to hemophilia A and B divided into 7 subgroups to identify and organize research priorities for different topic areas. The outcomes focused on prioritizing patients' needs, technological advances, and research in the areas of greatest potential for PWH and those who care for them. The results are a roadmap for the future execution of a research plan that truly serves the community.

Reporting of exercise dose and dosage and outcome measures for gaze stabilisation in the literature: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: The concept of this review is to examine and quantify the reporting of parameters of dose (duration, speed, head excursion) and dosage (daily and weekly frequency, duration) for gaze stabilisation exercises and to report on outcome measures used to assess change in gaze stabilisation following intervention. This review includes any population completing gaze stabilisation exercises. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We searched key terms in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane. Two researchers reviewed titles, abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion. Data retrieved included: patient diagnosis, specific interventions provided, dose and dosage of gaze stabilisation interventions and outcome measures. RESULTS: From the initial 1609 results, 138 studies were included. Data extraction revealed that only 13 studies (9.4%) reported all parameters of dose and dosage. Most studies used other interventions in addition to gaze stabilisation exercises. Half of the studies did not use a clinical or instrumented outcome measure of gaze stability, using only patient-reported outcome measures. Clinical tests of gaze stability were used in 21.1% of studies, and instrumented measures of gaze stability were used in 14.7% of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Full reporting of the dose and dosage of gaze stabilisation interventions is infrequent, impairing the ability to translate current evidence into clinical care. Most studies did not use a clinical or instrumented measure of gaze stabilisation as outcome measures, questioning the validity of intervention effects. Improved reporting and use of outcome measures are necessary to establish optimal intervention parameters for those with gaze stability impairments.