Arthrocentesis versus non-surgical intervention as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthralgia: a randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up.

Arthrocentesis for arthralgia of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is often only indicated when conservative, non-surgical interventions have failed. However, performing arthrocentesis as initial therapy may facilitate earlier and better recuperation of the joint. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of this therapy with a long-term follow-up. Eighty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive either arthrocentesis as initial treatment (n = 41) or non-surgical intervention (n = 43). Pain (100-mm visual analogue scale, VAS) and mandibular function impairment questionnaire scores (MFIQ, 0-100) were recorded at 3, 12, and 26 weeks, and ≥ 5 years (median 6.2, interquartile range 5.6-7.4 years). Univariable analyses were performed and linear mixed-effect models were constructed. Patients in the arthrocentesis group experienced significantly lower TMJ arthralgia compared to those treated non-surgically (pain during movement: -10.23 mm (95% confidence interval -17.86; -2.60); pain at rest: - 8.39 mm (95% confidence interval -13.70; -3.08)), while mandibular function remained similar in the two groups (MFIQ -2.41 (95% confidence interval -8.61; 3.78)). Of the final sample, 10 patients (10/39, 26%) in the non-surgical intervention group and two patients (2/34, 6%) in the arthrocentesis group received additional treatment during follow-up. Thus, initial treatment with arthrocentesis reduced TMJ arthralgia more efficaciously than non-surgical intervention in the long term, while maintaining similar mandibular function.

Lower respiratory tract infection in the community: associations between viral aetiology and illness course.

OBJECTIVES: This study determined associations between respiratory viruses and subsequent illness course in primary care adult patients presenting with acute cough and/or suspected lower respiratory tract infection. METHODS: A prospective European primary care study recruited adults with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection between November 2007 and April 2010. Real-time in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to test for six common respiratory viruses. In this secondary analysis, symptom severity (scored 1 = no problem, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) and symptom duration were compared between groups with different viral aetiologies using regression and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. Additionally, associations between baseline viral load (cycle threshold (Ct) value) and illness course were assessed. RESULTS: The PCR tested positive for a common respiratory virus in 1354 of the 2957 (45.8%) included patients. The overall mean symptom score at presentation was 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.07-2.11) and the median duration until resolution of moderately bad or severe symptoms was 8.70 days (interquartile range 4.50-11.00). Patients with influenza virus, human metapneumovirus (hMPV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), coronavirus (CoV) or rhinovirus had a significantly higher symptom score than patients with no virus isolated (0.07-0.25 points or 2.3-8.3% higher symptom score). Time to symptom resolution was longer in RSV infections (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.96) and hMPV infections (AHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94) than in infections with no virus isolated. Overall, baseline viral load was associated with symptom severity (difference 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.16 per 10 cycles decrease in Ct value), but not with symptom duration. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy, working adults from the general community presenting at the general practitioner with acute cough and/or suspected lower respiratory tract infection other than influenza impose an illness burden comparable to influenza. Hence, the public health focus for viral respiratory tract infections should be broadened.

Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients: Prevalence, causes and interventions.

BACKGROUND: To reduce overutilization of laboratory testing many interventions have been tried, but selecting the most effective intervention for a given setting is challenging. To be sustainable, interventions need to align with healthcare providers' needs and daily practices. This study aimed to assess the extent of overutilization and the perspectives of healthcare providers, which may be used to guide the choice of intervention. METHODS: The extent of inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients was evaluated using a database. Surveys and focus groups were used to investigate healthcare providers' perceptions on its causes and solutions. RESULTS: On average, patients had 5.7 laboratory orders done during the first week of admission, whereas guidelines advise performing laboratory testing no more than twice per week. Repeat testing of normal test results occurred in up to 85% of patients. The frequency of laboratory testing was underestimated by survey responders, even though the majority of responders (78%) thought that laboratory tests are ordered too frequently. Residents were considered to be most responsible for laboratory test ordering.The primary causes of overutilization discussed were personal factors, such as a lack of awareness and knowledge, as well as feelings of insecurity. Regarding possible solutions, residents generally recommended educational interventions, whereas specialists tended to favour technical solutions such as lockouts. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate laboratory testing is common in internal medicine. The most important causes are a lack of awareness and knowledge, especially in residents. The intervention most favoured by residents is education, suggesting educational interventions may be most applicable.

Syndromic sample-to-result PCR testing for respiratory infections in adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Syndromic sample-to-result (SS2R) poly merase chain reaction (PCR) can rapidly identify causative pathogens of respiratory tract infections (RTI). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and applicability of one of the current SS2R diagnostics, the FilmArray® Respiratory Viral Panel. METHODS: We performed a prospective study among adults presenting with symptoms of RTI at the Emergency Department of the University Medical Centre Utrecht (the Netherlands) during the 2016-2017 viral respiratory season. Clinical data were collected. We compared SS2R results on nasopharyngeal swabs to conventional real time PCR, calculated turnaround times (TAT) and explored implementation barriers using questionnaires. RESULTS: 62 Patients were included (64.5 yr [interquartile range (IQR) 44.3-75.0]). SS2R sensitivity was 82.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.9-92.9] and specificity was 95.2% [95% CI 76.2-99.9] for detection of all present viruses (n = 60). Kappa agreement (0.73 [95% CI 0.56-0.90]) was good (p = 0.000). Median SS2R TAT was 2:06 hours [IQR 1:45-3:17] compared to 32:00 hours [IQR 26:50-40:42] of conventional PCR (n = 49, p = 0.000). Ease-of-use and fast TAT were unanimously reported as benefits, and low test capacity with a single SS2R system as drawback. CONCLUSION: SS2R testing for respiratory viruses offers a rapid and reliable diagnostic method which has great potential for more efficient and targeted management in adult patients with RTI.

Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display.

BACKGROUND: Compared to open surgery, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) relies heavily on advanced technology, such as endoscopic viewing systems and innovative instruments. The aim of the study was to objectively compare three technologically advanced laparoscopic viewing systems with the standard viewing system currently used in most Dutch hospitals. METHODS: We evaluated the following advanced laparoscopic viewing systems: a Thin Film Transistor (TFT) display, a stereo endoscope, and an image projection display. The standard viewing system was comprised of a monocular endoscope and a high-resolution monitor. Task completion time served as the measure of performance. Eight surgeons with laparoscopic experience participated in the experiment. RESULTS: The average task time was significantly greater (p <0.05) with the stereo viewing system than with the standard viewing system. The average task times with the TFT display and the image projection display did not differ significantly from the standard viewing system. CONCLUSION: Although the stereo viewing system promises improved depth perception and the TFT and image projection displays are supposed to improve hand-eye coordination, none of these systems provided better task performance than the standard viewing system in this pelvi-trainer experiment.

Arthrocentesis as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthropathy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of arthrocentesis compared to conservative treatment as initial treatment with regard to temporomandibular joint pain and mandibular movement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients with arthralgia of the TMJ (classified according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. One group received arthrocentesis as initial treatment (n = 40), the other group received conventional treatment including soft diet, physical treatment and occlusal splint therapy (n = 40). Follow-up was after 3, 12 and 26 weeks post treatment. Prior to treatment, and at every follow-up assessment, pain intensity was measured (VAS 0-100 mm at rest, and VAS 0-100 mm during movement) and maximum mouth opening (MMO) (mm interincisor distance). Furthermore patients were asked to fill out several surveys concerning the impact of mandibular impairment on their daily life, and psychosocial aspects. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, the TMJ pain (mm VAS at rest, and mm VAS during movement) had declined comparably in both groups (arthrocentesis n = 36; conservative treatment n = 36) and MMO (mm interincisor distance) had slightly improved. GEE models showed significant differences between arthrocentesis as initial treatment and conservative treatment, indicating that the arthrocentesis group improved more rapidly with regard to TMJ pain (VAS at rest p = 0.008; regression coefficient ß = -8.90 (95% confidence interval -15.50, -2.31), VAS during movement p = 0.003; regression coefficient ß = -10.76 (95% confidence interval -17.75, -3.77)) and MMO (p = 0.045; regression coefficient ß = -2.70 (95% confidence interval -5.35, -0.06)) compared to conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrocentesis as initial treatment reduces pain and functional impairment more rapidly compared to conservative treatment. However, after 26 weeks, both treatment modalities achieved comparable outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.trialregister.nl: NTR1505.

Randomized trial on the effectiveness of dexamethasone in TMJ arthrocentesis.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dexamethasone administration following arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with a placebo (saline). Twenty-eight participants with TMJ arthralgia were randomly assigned to two groups of a parallel double-blind RCT. In both groups, an arthrocentesis procedure was carried out. In one group, the procedure was followed by the administration of a single-dose intra-articular dexamethasone. In the other group, saline was administered as a control. Follow-up visits were scheduled after 1, 3, and 24 weeks. During each visit, TMJ pain (on a 100-mm VAS) and jaw stiffness (mouth opening in mm) were scored. In the statistical analysis, generalized estimating equation (GEE) models showed no differences between the two study groups, although pain and jaw stiffness were both reduced over 24 weeks. In conclusion, intra-articular dexamethasone following arthrocentesis did not improve the procedure's effect in patients presenting with TMJ arthralgia (ClinicalTrials.gov number CT01275014).