Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 25(8): 105079, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871008

RESUMEN

This article describes a telehealth program initially created to reduce transfers to acute care from the nursing home and its evolution into a robust program that includes Behavioral Health, a Medical Director program, and telenursing.


Asunto(s)
Telemedicina , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Atención Subaguda , Casas de Salud , Transferencia de Pacientes
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use a variety of recall periods and response scales to assess CRS symptom burden. Global perspectives of CRS patients regarding optimal recall periods and response scales for CRS PROMs are unknown. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study recruiting 461 CRS patients from sites across the United States, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Austria. Participants chose which CRS symptom recall period (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, >1 month) was most reflective of their current disease state and upon which to best base treatment recommendations (including surgery). Participants also chose which of six response scales (one visual analogue scale and five Likert scales ranging from four to eight items) was easiest to use, understand, and preferred. RESULTS: A plurality of participants (40.0%) felt their CRS symptoms' current state was best reflected by a 1-month recall period. However, most patients (56.9%) preferred treatment recommendations to be determined by symptoms experienced over a >1 month period. The four- and five-item Likert scales were the easiest to understand (26.0% and 25.4%, respectively) and use (23.4% and 26.7%, respectively). The five-item (26.4% rating it most preferred and 70.9% rating it preferred) and four-item Likert (22.3% rating it most preferred and 56.4% rating it preferred) response scales were most preferred. CONCLUSION: Future PROMs for CRS should consider assessment of symptoms over a 1-month period and use a four- or five-item Likert response scale to reflect global patient preferences. These findings also inform interpretation of current CRS PROMs.

3.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(1): 141-145, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890559

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) residents are disproportionately affected by coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). We describe a health system approach that incorporated PALTC stakeholders to treat residents effectively and efficiently with monoclonal antibodies during the pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective observational. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Integrated health system headquartered in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, with urban hub and surrounding rural communities. Patients of the health system include PALTC and assisted living (AL) residents of facilities. METHODS: Monoclonal Data Registry captured time to infusion after a positive COVID-19 test, residency (independent or PALTC), and site of infusion (PALTC, hospital outpatient, infusion center). AL residents are included in PALTC data. Registry limited to patients living in SD. Communication and operational resources were tailored to support PALTC infusions. The monoclonal antibody therapy administered to PALTC residents during the first 6 weeks after emergency use authorization (EUA) of monoclonal antibodies was bamlanivimab. The EUA for bamlanivimab was revoked due to lack of effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants on April 16, 2021. RESULTS: The results are analyzed for the 6 weeks after bamlanivimab EUA. In PALTC, there was a median of 3 days between positive test and infusion. The total number of monoclonal antibody infusions captured in the registry during this time was 87 PALTC on-site infusions. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: A collaborative approach between health system executives and PALTC experts quickly enabled access to potentially life-saving therapy to a vulnerable population. PALTC settings should be routinely included in health system investment and planning to improve the capacity of the system to achieve optimal outcomes, prevent unnecessary mortality, and preserve health care resources.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Laryngoscope ; 131(7): E2116-E2120, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33300623

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: As a cardinal symptom of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), hyposmia has been recommended to be assessed as a component of CRS disease control. Herein we determine the significance of hyposmia in CRS in the context of nasal obstruction and drainage symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 308 CRS patients (102 CRSwNP, 206 CRSsNP) without prior endoscopic sinus surgery. The burden of nasal obstruction and hyposmia were assessed using the corresponding item scores on the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Burden of nasal discharge was assessed using the mean of "thick nasal discharge" and "thick post-nasal discharge" SNOT-22 item scores. Patients were all asked to rate their CRS symptom control as "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "very," or "completely." RESULTS: In CRSwNP, only 4.9% had a hyposmia score > 1 with nasal obstruction and drainage scores less than or equal to 1. In CRSsNP, only 1.9% had a hyposmia score > 1 with nasal obstruction and drainage scores less than or equal to 1. On univariate association, CRS symptom control was significantly associated with nasal obstruction, hyposmia, and drainage in both CRSwNP and CRSsNP (P < .05 in all cases). Using multivariable regression to account for all nasal symptoms, only nasal obstruction and nasal discharge scores (but not hyposmia) were significantly associated with CRS symptom control. CONCLUSIONS: Hyposmia rarely occurs without nasal obstruction or nasal drainage, and may therefore be redundant to assess for CRS disease control. Moreover, hyposmia was not associated with patient-reported CRS symptom control when accounting for the burden of nasal obstruction and drainage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2116-E2120, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Nasal/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Síntomas , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal/complicaciones , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis/complicaciones , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sinusitis/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA