Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(6): 1189-1198, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel composite metric textbook outcome (TO) has increasingly been used as a quality indicator but has not been reported among patients undergoing surgical resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) using multi-institutional collaborative data. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection for RPS between 2000 to 2016 from eight academic institutions were included. TO was defined as a patient with R0/R1 resection that discharged to home and was without transfusion, reoperation, grade ≥2 complications, hospital-stay >50th percentile, or 90-day readmission or mortality. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 627 patients, 56.1% were female and the median age was 59 years. A minority of patients achieved a TO (34.9%). Factors associated with achieving a TO were tumor size <20 cm and low tumor grade, while ASA class ≥3, history of a prior cardiac event, resection of left colon/rectum, distal pancreatic resection, major venous resection and drain placement were associated with not achieving a TO (all P < .05). Achievement of a TO was associated with improved survival (median:12.7 vs 5.9 years, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing resection for RPS, failure to achieve TO is common and associated with significantly worse survival. The use of TO may inform patient expectations and serve as a measure for patient-level hospital performance.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/mortalidad , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/patología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(5): 980-985, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32627199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Variations in care have been demonstrated both within and among institutions in many clinical settings. By standardizing perioperative practices, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways reduce variation in perioperative care. We sought to characterize the variation in cytoreductive surgery (CRS)/heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) perioperative practices among experienced US medical centers. METHODS: Data from the US HIPEC Collaborative represents a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of CRS and CRS/HIPEC procedures performed from 12 major academic institutions. Patient characteristics and perioperative practices were reported and compared. Institutional variation was analyzed using hierarchical mixed-effects linear (continuous outcomes) or logistic (binary outcomes) regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2372 operations were included. CRS/HIPEC was performed most commonly for appendiceal histologies (64.2%). The rate of complications (overall 56.3%, range: 31.8-70.9) and readmissions (overall 20.6%, range: 8.9-33.3) varied by institution (P < .001). Institution-level variation in perioperative practice patterns existed among measured ERAS pathway process/outcomes (P < .001). The percentages of variation with each process/outcome measure attributable solely to institutional practices ranged from 0.6% to 66.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists in the perioperative care of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC at major US academic institutions. These findings provide a strong rationale for the investigation of best practices in CRS/HIPEC patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Surg Res ; 235: 52-57, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30691837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication is the gold standard operation for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It has been suggested that persistent postoperative dysphagia is increased following Nissen fundoplication compared to partial fundoplication. This study aimed to determine risk factors for persistent postoperative dysphagia, specifically examining the type of fundoplication. METHODS: Patients experiencing GERD symptoms who underwent laparoscopic Nissen, Toupet, or Dor fundoplication from 2009 to 2016 were identified from a single-institutional database. A dysphagia score was obtained as part of the GERD health-related quality of life questionnaire. Persistent dysphagia was defined as a difficulty swallowing score ≥1 (noticeable) on a scale from 0 to 5 at least 1 y postoperatively. Odds ratios of persistent dysphagia among those who underwent antireflux surgery were calculated in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for fundoplication type, sex, age, body mass index, and redo operation. RESULTS: Of the 441 patients who met inclusion criteria, 255 had ≥1 y of follow-up (57.8%). The median duration of follow-up was 3 y. In this cohort, 45.1% of patients underwent Nissen fundoplication and 54.9% underwent partial fundoplication. Persistent postoperative dysphagia was present in 25.9% (n = 66) of patients. On adjusted analysis, there was no statistically significant association between the type of fundoplication (Nissen versus partial) and the likelihood of postoperative dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent postoperative dysphagia after antireflux surgery occurred in approximately one-quarter of patients and did not differ by the type of fundoplication. These findings suggest that both Nissen and partial fundoplication are reasonable choices for an antireflux operation for properly selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/epidemiología , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 26(12): 2569-2578, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether formal regional lymph node (LN) evaluation is necessary for patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) who have peritoneal metastases is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of LN metastases on survival in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the US HIPEC collaborative, a multi-institutional consortium comprising 12 high-volume centers, was performed to identify patients with AA who underwent CRS-HIPEC with adequate LN sampling (≥ 12 LNs). RESULTS: Two hundred-fifty patients with AA who underwent CRS-HIPEC were included. Outcomes were compared between LN - and LN + disease. Baseline patient characteristics between groups were similar, with most patients undergoing complete cytoreduction (0/1: 86.0% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.08), respectively. More adverse tumor factors were found in patients with LN + disease, including poor differentiation, signet ring cells, and lymphovascular invasion. Multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) found LN + disease was independently associated with worse OS (HR: 2.82 95%CI: 1.25-6.34, p = 0.01), even after correction for receipt of systemic therapy. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, median OS was lower in patients with LN + disease (25.9 months vs. 91.4 months, p < 0.01). LN + disease remained associated with poor OS following propensity score matching (HR: 4.98 95%CI: 1.72-14.40, p < 0.01) and in patients with PCI ≥ 20 (HR: 3.68 95%CI: 1.54-8.80, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this large multi-institutional study of patients with AA undergoing CRS-HIPEC, LN status remained associated with worse OS even in the setting of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Formal LN evaluation should be performed for most patients with AA undergoing CRS-HIPEC.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso , Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias del Apéndice , Hipertermia Inducida , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Neoplasias del Apéndice/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Metástasis Linfática , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Terapia Combinada
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA