[Comparison of efficacy between personalized vestibular rehabilitation and otolith reposition for the treatment of atypical benign paroxysmal positional vertigo].

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of personalized vestibular rehabilitation and otolith reposition in treating atypical benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out. Fifty patients diagnosed with atypical BPPV in the Vertigo Clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from October 2022 to September 2023 were recruited and randomly divided into manual reduction group (25 cases) and vestibular rehabilitation group (25 cases) according to the random number table. All patients were given flunarizine. Patients in the manual reduction group were treated by Epley maneuver and (or) Barbecue maneuver, while the vestibular rehabilitation group was given personalized vestibular rehabilitation therapy. After two weeks' treatment, the clinical symptoms (positional vertigo/nystagmus) and total dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) score, DHI physical (DHI-P), DHI emotional (DHI-E), and DHI functional (DHI-F) of the two groups were evaluated and compared. Results: A total of 50 patients diagnosed with atypical BPPV were included, including 23 males and 27 females, with an average age of (48.8±14.5) years. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, disease severity, Romberg, position test abnormality ratio (Dix-hallpike/Roll test), temperature test, and video head impulse test baseline test results (all P>0.05). After 2 weeks of treatment, the effective rates of the treatment in the manual reduction and vestibular rehabilitation groups were 56.0% (14/25) and 88.0% (22/25), respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.025). The total DHI score, DHI-P, DHI-E, and DHI-F scores in both groups were significantly decreased after treatment (all P<0.001). Compared with the manual reduction group, the total DHI score (23.2±2.7 vs 36.4±15.7, P=0.002), DHI-P (10.2±4.6 vs 13.7±5.3, P=0.016) and DHI-F (6.5±6.4 vs 13.0±7.2, P=0.002) in the vestibular group were lower, however, there was no significant difference in DHI-E score between the two groups (6.6±4.8 vs 9.6±7.3, P=0.087). Conclusion: Compared with otolith reposition, personalized vestibular rehabilitation therapy plays a better role in improving the symptoms and decreasing DHI score for patients with atypical BPPV.

[Construction of a risk prediction model for diabetes after kidney transplantation based on genome-wide association study].

Objective: To explore the clinical risk factors and susceptibility genes of diabetes after kidney transplantation (PTDM) and construct a risk prediction model for PTDM. Methods: The data of kidney transplant recipients who underwent follow-up in the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University and Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2001 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The recipients were divided into PTDM group and Non-PTDM group according to whether they were complicated with PTDM. The differences in clinical indicators between the two groups were compared, the risk factors affecting the incidence of PTDM were determined, and susceptibility genes of PTDM were screened by genome-wide association study (GWAS). PTDM risk prediction models based only on clinical indicators (Model 1) and clinical indicators combined with susceptibility genes (Model 2) were established respectively, and the predictive performance of the two prediction models was compared. Finally, the Nomogram of the optimal model was drawn, and the discrimination, calibration and clinical applicability of the model were evaluated. Results: A total of 113 kidney transplant recipients (70 males and 43 females) were included, with an average age of (46.2±10.8) years. There were 51 cases in PTDM group and 62 cases in Non-PTDM group. The related factors screened by GWAS and logistic regression analysis included family history of diabetes (OR=88.912, 95%CI: 5.827-1 356.601, P=0.001), preoperative triglyceride (TG) (OR=1.888, 95 %CI: 1.150-3.098, P=0.012), uric acid (UA) (OR=1.011, 95%CI: 1.000-1.022, P=0.045) and rs802707 (OR=10.046, 95%CI: 1.462-69.042, P=0.019). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC) predicted by Model 1 for PTDM was 0.891 (95%CI: 0.811-0.972), with the sensitivity of 0.889 and the specificity of 0.742. The AUC of ROC curve predicted by Model 2 for PTDM was 0.930 (95%CI: 0.864-0.995), with the sensitivity of 0.885 and the specificity of 0.900. Conclusions: Family history of diabetes, preoperative TG and UA, and rs802707 are significantly associated with the occurrence of PTDM. In addition, the combination of susceptibility genes could improve the predictive ability of clinical indicators for the risk of PTDM.

[Study on the fit testing for the workers wearing hearing protection device in machinery manufacturing enterprises].

Objective: To investigate the occupational noise hazards in five machinery manufacturing enterprises, and to evaluate the individual noise reduction values and influencing factors of workers wearing hearing protection device (HPD) by individual fit testing. Methods: From November 2021 to January 2022, 5 machinery manufacturing enterprises in Bao'an District of Shenzhen were selected to conduct an occupational health survey to understand the noise exposure level of workers. The 3MTM E-A-RfitTM fitness test system was used to test the baseline individual sound attenuation value level (PAR) of the daily wear of the ear protecters for 485 workers in typical noise working positions. Workers whose PAR values could not meet the requirements of noise reduction at work were instructed to wear and repeated tests were conducted. PAR results of the workers before and after the intervention were collected and analyzed. Results: The noise workers who received the suitability test were mainly distributed in 24 types of work, the job noise exposure level was 80.2 dB (A) ~ 95.0 dB (A), and the job noise excess rate was 52.5% (138/263). The median baseline PAR [M (Q(1), Q(3)) ] for 485 workers was 6.0 (0.0, 14.0) dB. The baseline PAR of male workers, those with more than 15 years of working experience, those with more than 15 years of using ear guards, those who considered ear guards comfortable to wear, those with college degree or above, and those exposed to noise level 90 dB (A) were higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). A total of 275 workers (56.7%) did not pass the baseline PAR test, and there was no statistically significant difference in the intervention rate of workers in different noise groups (P>0.05). PAR in subjects who did not pass baseline after intervention increased from 0.0 (0.0, 3.0) dB to 15.0 (12.0, 18.2) dB. Conclusion: The workplace noise hazard of machinery manufacturing enterprises is serious, and there is a great difference between the baseline PAR and the nominal value of the hearing guard worn by the noise exposed workers. The intervention measures can effectively improve the protective effect of wearing ear protectors.