Sacroiliac joint MRI for diagnosis of ax-SpA: algorithm to improve the specificity of the current ASAS MRI criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sacroiliac joint (SIJ) lesions on MRI in women with versus without axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) and establish an algorithm to determine whether such lesions are due to ax-SpA. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study assessed bone marrow edema (BME), sclerosis, erosions, osteophytes, and ankylosis at the SIJ in two groups of women, one with and another without ax-SpA. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for combinations/characteristics of lesions, using rheumatologists' assessment with assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria as the gold standard for diagnosis of ax-SpA. RESULTS: Compared to women without ax-SpA, women with ax-SpA had more BME (61% vs 17%, p < 0.001), sclerosis (40% vs 22%, p < 0.001), erosions (35% vs 5%, p < 0.001), and ankylosis (2% vs 0%, p = 0.007), but less osteophytes (5% vs 33%, p < 0.001). The ASAS MRI criteria yielded 59% sensitivity and 88% specificity, while a new algorithm achieved 56% sensitivity and 95% specificity using the following criteria: no osteophytes at the SIJ and either (i) BME at the SIJ with at least one dimension ≥ 8 mm or (ii) at least one erosion at the SIJ. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the following pragmatic algorithm for MRI diagnosis of ax-SpA in women: no osteophytes at the SIJ and either (i) BME at the SIJ with at least one dimension ≥ 8 mm or (ii) at least one erosion at the SIJ. The false positive rate when using the new algorithm (3.3%) is less than half than when using the ASAS MRI criteria (7.7%); thus, its application in clinical practice could reduce overdiagnosis and prevent overtreatment of ax-SpA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The developed algorithm has a false-positive rate that is less than half than when using the ASAS MRI criteria (3.3% vs 7.7%), thus its application in clinical practice could reduce overdiagnosis and prevent overtreatment of axial spondyloarthritis. KEY POINTS: • Compared to women without axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA), women with ax-SpA had a significantly higher prevalence of bone marrow edema (BME), sclerosis, erosions, and ankylosis, but a significantly lower prevalence of osteophytes. • A new algorithm for positive ax-SpA based on sacroiliac joint MRI was developed: no osteophytes at the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and either (i) BME at the SIJ with at least one dimension ≥ 8 mm or (ii) at least one erosion at the SIJ. • We recommend this new algorithm for diagnosis of ax-SpA in women, as it has a significantly better specificity than the assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) MRI criteria and less than half the false positive rate; thus, its application in clinical practice could reduce overdiagnosis and prevent overtreatment of ax-SpA.

Tomosynthesis performance compared to radiography and computed tomography for sacroiliac joint structural damage detection in patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis.

Purpose: To compare tomosynthesis performance to radiography for the differentiation of sacroiliitis versus normal or degenerative changes in sacroiliac joints in patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Materials and methods: Radiography, tomosynthesis and CT of sacroiliac joints (29 patients) were performed on the same day in consecutive patients with suspected SpA. The examinations were retrospectively read independently, blinded by two radiologists (one junior and one senior, and twice by one junior). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was evaluated using the kappa coefficient. Effective doses for each imaging sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were assessed and compared with CT as gold standard. Results: CT detected 15/58 joints with sacroiliitis. The imaging sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 60%, 84% and 44%, respectively, for radiography and 87%, 91% and 77% for tomosynthesis. The mean effective dose for tomosynthesis was significantly lower than that of CT (5-fold less) and significantly higher than that of radiography (8-fold more). Conclusion: Tomosynthesis is superior to radiography for sacroiliitis detection in patients with suspected SpA, with 5-fold less radiation exposure than CT.