Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Rhinoplasty: Need for Use and Implementation.

Patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) are increasingly utilized to capture data about patients' quality of life. PROMs play an important role in the value-based health care movement by providing a patient-centered metric of quality. There are many barriers to the implementation of PROMs, and widespread adoption requires buy-in from numerous stakeholders including patients, clinicians, institutions, and payers. Several validated PROMs have been utilized by facial plastic surgeons to measure both functional and aesthetic outcomes among rhinoplasty patients. These PROMs can help clinicians and rhinoplasty patients participate in shared decision making (SDM), a process via which clinicians and patients arrive at treatment decisions together through a patient-centered approach. However, widespread adoption of PROMs and SDM has not yet been achieved. Further work should focus on overcoming barriers to implementation and engaging key stakeholders to increase the utilization of PROMs in rhinoplasty.

Detection of circulating tumor human papillomavirus DNA before diagnosis of HPV-positive head and neck cancer.

Human papillomavirus (HPV), most commonly HPV16, causes a growing subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), including the overwhelming majority of oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas in many developed countries. Circulating biomarkers for HPV-positive HNSCC may allow for earlier diagnosis, with potential to decrease morbidity and mortality. This case-control study evaluated whether circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) is detectable in prediagnostic plasma from individuals later diagnosed with HPV-positive HNSCC. Cases were participants in a hospital-based research biobank with archived plasma collected ≥6 months before HNSCC diagnosis, and available archival tumor tissue for HPV testing. Controls were biobank participants without cancer or HPV-related diagnoses, matched 10:1 to cases by sex, race, age and year of plasma collection. HPV DNA was detected in plasma and tumor tissue using a previously validated digital droplet PCR-based assay that quantifies tumor-tissue-modified viral (TTMV) HPV DNA. Twelve HNSCC patients with median age of 68.5 years (range, 51-87 years) were included. Ten (83.3%) had HPV16 DNA-positive tumors. ctHPV16DNA was detected in prediagnostic plasma from 3 of 10 (30%) patients with HPV16-positive tumors, including 3 of 7 (43%) patients with HPV16-positive oropharynx tumors. The timing of the plasma collection was 19, 34 and 43 months before cancer diagnosis. None of the 100 matched controls had detectable ctHPV16DNA. This is the first report that ctHPV16 DNA is detectable at least several years before diagnosis of HPV16-positive HNSCC for a subset of patients. Further investigation of ctHPV16DNA as a biomarker for early diagnosis of HPV16-positive HNSCC is warranted.

Unusual presentation of HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the nasolacrimal duct as carcinoma of unknown primary.

Most human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive carcinomas of unknown primary (CUP) in the cervical lymph nodes are ultimately found to arise from the oropharynx, which has by far the highest prevalence of HPV-positivity among head and neck tumors. However, HPV is also detected in a subset of tumors from other sites. In this case report, we describe the first reported instance of a lacrimal sac carcinoma presenting as an HPV-positive CUP. A 64-year-old male presented with isolated right-sided neck swelling, found on core biopsy to be HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Initial diagnostic workup did not reveal a primary site, and he was treated for T0N1M0 oropharyngeal SCC with chemoradiation. Shortly afterwards he developed epiphora and was found to have an FDG-avid lesion along his inferior right orbit. Biopsy revealed HPV-positive SCC, presumed to be the true primary site of his previously diagnosed CUP. He was treated with surgical resection, proton-beam radiation, and carboplatin-paclitaxel. He had an excellent outcome with no evidence of disease 18 months following treatment completion. This case underscores the importance of continued vigilance and thorough investigation for a primary tumor site even when cervical nodal metastases are HPV-positive. While the vast majority of HPV-positive head and neck tumors arise in the oropharynx, other anatomical sites may also harbor HPV-positive malignancies.

Patient Experience of Head and Neck Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction.

Importance: Major head and neck surgery with microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction is complex, with considerable risk of morbidity. Little is known about patients' experiences, including decision-making prior to, and regret following, free flap surgery. Objective: To characterize patient experiences and decision regret of patients undergoing head and neck reconstructive free flap surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-methods cohort study comprising semistructured interviews was conducted June to August 2021 at a single tertiary academic cancer center. Participants underwent head and neck reconstructive surgery with microvascular free tissue transfer (flap) more than 3 months before recruitment (range, 3 months to 4 years). Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for themes. Participants also completed a Decision Regret Scale questionnaire. Exposure: Microvascular free flap surgery for head and neck reconstruction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thematic analysis of interviews, decision regret score. Results: Seventeen participants were interviewed. Median (IQR) age was 61 (52-70) years. Overall, 7 participants were women (49%), and 10 of 17 were men (59%). The most common free flap was fibula (8/17, 47%). Three major themes with 9 subthemes were identified: theme 1 was the tremendous effect of preoperative counseling on surgical decision-making and satisfaction, with subthemes including (1) importance of clinical care team counseling on decision to have surgery; (2) emotional context colors preoperative understanding and retention of information; (3) expectation-setting affects satisfaction with preoperative counseling; and (4) desire for diversified delivery of preoperative information. Theme 2 was coexisting and often conflicting priorities, including (1) desire to survive above all else, and (2) desire for quality of life. Theme 3 was perception of surgery as momentous and distressing, including (1) surgery as a traumatic event; (2) centrality of mental health, emotional resolve, and gratitude to enduring surgery and recovery; and (3) sense of accomplishment in recovery. On the Decision Regret Scale, most participants had no regret (n = 8, 47%) or mild regret (n = 5, 29%); 4 had moderate-to-severe regret (24%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this mixed-methods cohort study, patient experiences surrounding major head and neck reconstructive free flap surgery were described. Opportunities to improve support for this complex and vulnerable population, and to mitigate decision regret, were identified.

Evidence-based perioperative opioid-sparing techniques during the United States opioid crisis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current United States opioid epidemic resulted from the overprescribing of opioids by physicians and surgeons in response to deceptive and unlawful marketing campaigns by pharmaceutical companies seeking to profit from opioid sales. Surgeons have a moral obligation to employ evidence-based opioid-sparing analgesia protocols for management of perioperative pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence strongly supports the use of NSAIDs in perioperative pain management, with large studies demonstrating no increased risk of postoperative hemorrhage or renal insult. SUMMARY: We present an evidence-based approach for opioid-sparing perioperative pain management, including multimodal analgesia guidelines used at our center for patients undergoing free flap facial reanimation procedures.

Roid Rage: Historical Perspective on the Emergence of Oral Steroids as a Treatment of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVES: To review the historical circumstances that led to the emergence of corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and to discuss how this history has influenced current perspectives on the condition. METHODS: PubMed and Google scholar were used to identify articles of ISSNHL and oral corticoid steroid use. Historical articles accessed through our institutional medical library were also reviewed. RESULTS: The use oral corticosteroids as a treatment for ISSNHL was seemingly influenced by three key historical circumstances that, together, provided the substrate for the treatment's use in ISSNHL. First, ISSNHL was a frustrating condition with uncertainty regarding its etiology and few reliable treatment options. Second, the discovery of corticosteroids was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1950, which led to widespread application of this therapy. Third historical circumstance was the evolution and emergence of more rigorous methodological study designs in clinical research. In 1980, these events culminated in a double-blind study evaluating the effectiveness of oral steroids for treatment of ISSNHL. Interestingly, this study is often misrepresented as a randomized controlled trial, which ultimately contributed to adoption of a new standard for treatment in ISSNHL. Research subsequent to these historical events has challenged the notion of corticosteroids as a gold standard but has not altered the historically established paradigm of corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of steroids as a treatment for ISSNHL evolved from our specialty's need to address a complex condition, a novel therapeutic discovery, and a landmark study that met emerging methodological standards. Despite these strong historical foundations, ISSNHL remains a condition with an unknown etiology and the therapeutic value of corticosteroids remains unpredictable despite their gold standard label.

The relationship between safety-net hospital status and outcomes among elderly head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of safety-net status, case volume, and outcomes among geriatric head and neck cancer patients is unknown. METHODS: Chi-square tests and Student's t tests to compare head and neck surgery outcomes of elderly patients between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. Multivariable linear regressions to determine predictors of outcome variables including mortality index, ICU stays, 30-day readmission, total direct cost, and direct cost index. RESULTS: Compared with non-safety-net hospitals, safety-net hospitals had a higher average mortality index (1.04 vs. 0.32, p = 0.001), higher mortality rate (1% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.002), and higher direct cost index (p = 0.001). A multivariable model of mortality index found the interaction between safety-net status and medium case volume was predictive of higher mortality index (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Safety-net status is correlated with higher mortality index and cost in geriatric head and neck cancer patients. The interaction between medium volume and safety-net status is independently predictive of higher mortality index.

Patient Recovery and Satisfaction with Perioperative Care After Rhinoplasty.

Background: Recovery after rhinoplasty is not well characterized in the literature. Objective: To quantify key aspects of patient recovery after rhinoplasty and characterize factors that may impact recovery and overall satisfaction with perioperative care. Methods: Prospective cohort study of rhinoplasty patients undergoing surgery at a tertiary referral center between January 2018 and January 2020, and completed a patient experience questionnaire at first postoperative visit. Results: Fifty-one patients underwent functional septorhinoplasty. Mean age was 37.8 years (standard error [SE] 2.4) with median 36.0 years (range 16-79). Fifty-three percent were female (n = 27). Patients resumed most daily activities within 4.1 days. Overall satisfaction with perioperative care was high (mean 9.6, SE 0.1), although 29% of patients (n = 15) wished they had more information regarding surgical care. Patients who did not desire additional information reported higher satisfaction and faster time to activity recovery compared with those who desired additional information. Conclusions: Rhinoplasty patients are able to resume most routine activities within 4.1 days after surgery, although patients desiring additional information about care demonstrate lower satisfaction with perioperative care and slower recovery compared to those who felt well informed.

Cancer-Related Activity Limitations Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize self-reported cancer-related activity limitations among a broad population of head and neck (HNC) survivors and identify sociodemographic factors associated with these limitations. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Health Interview Survey. METHODS: The study population included individuals who completed the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) from 1997 to 2018 and self-reported a cancer diagnosis. Data regarding activity limitations, cancer history, mental health, and demographics were extracted from the NHIS. Poisson regression was used to evaluate associations between demographics and cancer-related limitations, and a descriptive analysis was performed to identify the most common types of cancer-related limitations experienced by HNC survivors. RESULTS: Individuals with HNC were more than twice as likely to report having a disability caused by cancer when compared to individuals with other cancers (24% vs. 11%, P < .001). Cancer-related disability was highest among HNC survivors who were Black (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.13-2.18), were aged 50 to 64 (aPR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.1-2.74), had high school or lower education (aPR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.07-5.37), and had Medicaid insurance (aPR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.62-4.10). Among HNC patients who reported a cancer-related limitation, the most common limitations included difficulty working (78%), going out (51%), and socializing (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer-related activity limitations are more common among HNC survivors compared to survivors of other cancers, and disproportionately affect socioeconomically disadvantaged HNC survivors. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations experienced by HNC survivors to provide counseling and resources to help patients cope with these limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:593-599, 2022.

Patterns of Technology Use Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer and Implications for Telehealth.

OBJECTIVE: To describe baseline technology use within the head and neck cancer (HNC) population prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. SETTING: The NHIS is a survey of population health administered in person annually to a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized US residents via a complex clustered sampling design. METHODS: Data regarding technology use, cancer history, and demographics were extracted from the NHIS. The study population comprised individuals who completed the NHIS Sample Adult survey from 2012 to 2018 and self-reported a cancer diagnosis. Poisson regression was used to evaluate associations between demographics and general or health-related technology use and prevalence ratios reported. RESULTS: Patients with HNC were less likely to use general technology (computers, internet, or email) when compared with other patients with cancer (60% vs 73%, P < .001), although this difference was not statistically significant after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Among patients with HNC, older age, lower education, and lower income were negatively associated with general technology use (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59-0.87] for age 65-79 years vs <50 years; aPR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.85] for high school vs master; aPR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.48-0.91] for income 100%-200% vs >400% federal poverty level). Older age and lower education were negatively associated with health-related technology use (aPR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.32-0.67] for age 65-79 years vs <50 years; aPR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.30-0.74] for high school vs master). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disparities exist in technology use rates among patients with HNC. Access to technology may pose a barrier to telehealth visits for many patients with HNC due to the unique socioeconomic demographics of this patient population.

Development and content validation of the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool: A quality improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Recent efforts to increase access to safe and high-quality surgical care in low- and middle-income countries have proven successful. However, multiple facilities implementing the same safety and quality improvement interventions may not all achieve successful outcomes. This heterogeneity could be explained, in part, by pre-intervention organizational characteristics and lack of readiness of surgical facilities. In this study, we describe the process of developing and content validating the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new tool was developed in two stages. First, qualitative results from a Safe Surgery 2020 intervention were combined with findings from a literature review of organizational readiness and change. Second, through iterative discussions and expert review, the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool was content validated. RESULTS: The Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool includes 14 domains and 56 items measuring the readiness of surgical facilities in low- and middle-income countries to implement surgical safety and quality improvement interventions. This multi-dimensional and multi-level tool offers insights into facility members' beliefs and attitudes at the individual, team, and facility levels. A panel review affirmed the content validity of the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool. CONCLUSION: The Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool is a theory- and evidence-based tool that can be used by change agents and facility leaders in low- and middle-income countries to assess the baseline readiness of surgical facilities to implement surgical safety and quality improvement interventions. Next steps include assessing the reliability and validity of the Safe Surgery Organizational Readiness Tool, likely resulting in refinements.

The conserved microRNA miR-34 regulates synaptogenesis via coordination of distinct mechanisms in presynaptic and postsynaptic cells.

Micro(mi)RNA-based post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms have been broadly implicated in the assembly and modulation of synaptic connections required to shape neural circuits, however, relatively few specific miRNAs have been identified that control synapse formation. Using a conditional transgenic toolkit for competitive inhibition of miRNA function in Drosophila, we performed an unbiased screen for novel regulators of synapse morphogenesis at the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ). From a set of ten new validated regulators of NMJ growth, we discovered that miR-34 mutants display synaptic phenotypes and cell type-specific functions suggesting distinct downstream mechanisms in the presynaptic and postsynaptic compartments. A search for conserved downstream targets for miR-34 identified the junctional receptor CNTNAP4/Neurexin-IV (Nrx-IV) and the membrane cytoskeletal effector Adducin/Hu-li tai shao (Hts) as proteins whose synaptic expression is restricted by miR-34. Manipulation of miR-34, Nrx-IV or Hts-M function in motor neurons or muscle supports a model where presynaptic miR-34 inhibits Nrx-IV to influence active zone formation, whereas, postsynaptic miR-34 inhibits Hts to regulate the initiation of bouton formation from presynaptic terminals.

A lack of crowding? Body size does not decrease with density for two behavior-manipulating parasites.

For trophically transmitted parasites that manipulate the phenotype of their hosts, whether the parasites do or do not experience resource competition depends on such factors as the size of the parasites relative to their hosts, the intensity of infection, the extent to which parasites share the cost of defending against the host's immune system or manipulating their host, and the extent to which parasites share transmission goals. Despite theoretical expectations for situations in which either no, or positive, or negative density-dependence should be observed, most studies document only negative density-dependence for trophically transmitted parasites. However, this trend may be an artifact of most studies having focused on systems in which parasites are large relative to their hosts. Yet, systems are common where parasites are small relative to their hosts, and these trophically transmitted parasites may be less likely to experience resource limitation. We looked for signs of density-dependence in Euhaplorchis californiensis (EUHA) and Renicola buchanani (RENB), two manipulative trematode parasites infecting wild-caught California killifish (Fundulus parvipinnis). These parasites are small relative to killifish (suggesting resources are not limiting), and are associated with changes in killifish behavior that are dependent on parasite-intensity and that increase predation rates by the parasites' shared final host (indicating the possibility for cost sharing). We did not observe negative density-dependence in either species, indicating that resources are not limiting. In fact, observed patterns indicate possible mild positive density-dependence for EUHA. Although experimental confirmation is required, our findings suggest that some behavior-manipulating parasites suffer no reduction in size, and may even benefit when "crowded" by conspecifics.