Acute haemolysis, DIC and renal failure after transfusion of uncross-matched blood during trauma resuscitation: illustrative case and literature review.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to report a patient with acute haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) after transfusing uncross-matched red blood cell (RBC) units and to identify the frequency of this complication. BACKGROUND: Uncross-matched RBC units are commonly transfused in emergencies, but the frequency of acute HTR is unknown. METHODS: We describe a male stabbing victim who received three units of uncross-matched RBC units complicated by acute intravascular HTR, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and renal failure. We identified 14 studies evaluating the frequency of acute HTR post-emergency transfusion of uncross-matched RBC units. RESULTS: Acute HTR was shown by haemoglobinuria, free-plasma haemoglobin and methemalbumin, with anti-K and anti-Fya eluted from recipient red cells; acute DIC featured severe hypofibrinogenemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated fibrin D-dimer and multiple bilateral renal infarcts. Two of the three transfused units reacted with pre-existing RBC alloantibodies [anti-K (titre, 128), anti-Fya (titre, 512)], explained by transfusion 25 years earlier. Our literature review found the frequency of acute HTR following emergency transfusion of uncross-matched RBC units to be 2/3998 [0·06% (95% CI, 0·01-0·21%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Although emergency transfusion of uncross-matched blood is commonly practiced at trauma centres worldwide, with low risk of acute HTR (<1/1000), our well-documented patient case demonstrates the potential for acute HTR with severe complications.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a stoichiometry-based model to explain the differing immunogenicities of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux in different clinical settings.

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. The frequency of HIT is highly variable in different clinical settings, and is more frequent with unfractionated heparin (UFH) than with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), despite the in vitro observation that HIT antibodies activate platelets similarly well with LMWH as with UFH. An important difference between UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux is their widely differing plasma concentrations. We aimed to provide a model that included anticoagulant concentrations and PF4 availability as risk factors influencing the anti-PF4/heparin immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By photon correlation spectroscopy we determined the concentrations at which UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux form complexes optimally with PF4. Plasma concentrations of UFH and LMWH were calculated based on ex vivo pharmacokinetic data, with information on fondaparinux and PF4 concentrations taken from the literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The main features of our model are: optimal complex formation occurs at prophylactic-dose UFH and high PF4 levels, whereas therapeutic-dose LMWH concentrations are too high for optimal complex formation; in contrast, concentrations of fondaparinux are usually below the optimal stoichiometric range. Thus, immunization should occur more often in situations with major rather than minor platelet activation, and--for a given degree of platelet activation (PF4 availability)--as: prophylactic-dose UFH>therapeutic-dose UFH>prophylactic-dose LMWH, fondaparinux>therapeutic-dose LMWH. Our model provides a framework for explaining empirical observations that LMWH induces less anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than does UFH, and that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are more often found in patients undergoing major surgery than in medical patients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-associated thrombosis: from arterial to venous to venous limb gangrene.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an acquired immune-mediated hypercoagulability state that is strongly associated with thrombosis. During the 1970s and 1980s, the prevailing concept was that HIT was associated only with arterial thrombosis, through its unique pathogenesis via heparin-dependent, platelet-activating IgG antibodies. However, in 1990, when I began to encounter HIT in my clinical practice, I found that most such patients developed symptomatic venous thrombosis. This historical sketch summarizes some of the research that challenged the dogma of HIT being a mainly arterial prothrombotic disorder. Two studies - one a substudy of a randomized trial of post-orthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis, and the second a retrospective five-hospital analysis of consecutive patients with positive test results for HIT antibodies - showed a marked predominance of venous over arterial thrombosis complicating HIT (~ 4 : 1). By the end of the 1990s, an even more dramatic manifestation of HIT-associated venous thrombosis was recognized: venous limb gangrene. Here, ischemic limb necrosis occurs despite palpable arterial pulses, as a result of both macrovascular and microvascular venous thrombosis. The surprising explanation was natural anticoagulant impairment (severe depletion of protein C, a vitamin K-dependent anticoagulant) resulting from treatment of HIT-associated deep vein thrombosis with warfarin (vitamin K antagonist). These insights from HIT research helped to elucidate the pathogenesis of ischemic limb losses in other intense non-HIT hypercoagulability states, including warfarin-associated venous limb gangrene complicating cancer-associated hypercoagulability, and symmetrical peripheral gangrene complicating disseminated intravascular coagulation of critical illness, in which proximate 'shock liver' helps to explain the profound failure of natural anticoagulant systems (protein C; antithrombin) in predisposing to peripheral limb microthrombosis in circulatory shock.

Cellular immune responses to platelet factor 4 and heparin complexes in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Essentials The immunogenesis of Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is not well understood. Immunization to platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin occurs early in life, before any heparin exposure. PF4 and PF4-heparin complexes induce the proliferation of CD14+ cells. Reduced levels of regulatory cytokines contribute to immune dysregulation in HIT. SUMMARY: Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse reaction to heparin characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombotic complications. HIT is caused by pathogenic antibodies that bind to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, leading to platelet activation and inducing a hypercoagulable state. Previous studies have shown immunity to PF4-heparin complexes occurs early in life, even before heparin exposure; however, the immunogenesis of HIT is not well characterized. Objectives To investigate cellular proliferation in response to PF4-heparin complexes in patients with HIT. Patients/Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy controls (n = 30), postoperative cardiac surgery patients who had undergone cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (n = 17) and patients with confirmed HIT (n = 41) were cultured with PF4 and PF4-heparin complexes. Cellular proliferation was assessed by [3 H]thymidine uptake and 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine detection. Results and Conclusions PBMCs proliferated in the presence of PF4, and this was enhanced by the addition of heparin in all study groups. CPB and HIT patients showed significantly greater proliferative responses than healthy controls. PBMC proliferation was antigen-specific, depended on the presence of platelets, and only CD14+ cells were identified as proliferating cells. Culture supernatants were tested for the levels of regulatory cytokines, and both CPB and HIT patients produced significantly lower levels of interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-ß1 than healthy controls. These findings further demonstrate cellular immune sensitization to PF4-heparin complexes occurs before heparin exposure, and suggests immune dysregulation can contribute to HIT.

Multimerin is found in the alpha-granules of resting platelets and is synthesized by a megakaryocytic cell line.

In this report, we describe the intracellular localization of multimerin in platelets and its biosynthesis by Dami cells, a megakaryocytic cell line. Immunoelectron microscopy was used to examine frozen thin sections of resting and activated platelets. Multimerin was localized within the platelet alpha-granule in an eccentric position. Within activated platelets, multimerin was found in the surface-connected open cannalicular system and on the external plasma membrane. Light microscopic immunocytochemistry demonstrated multimerin in normal megakaryocytes and in Dami cells after stimulation with PMA. Confirmation of multimerin biosynthesis by Dami cells was obtained by metabolic labeling studies. Both platelet and Dami cell multimerin demonstrated several subunit sizes on reduced SDS-PAGE. However, peptide mapping confirmed structural homology between the different multimerin subunits. Glycosidase digestion demonstrated that multimerin is heavily glycosylated with mainly complex, N-linked carbohydrate. In contrast to the multimerin isolated from platelets, cultured Dami cells secreted mainly smaller multimers of the protein. Biosynthesis of multimerin by a megakaryocytic cell line supports endogenous biosynthesis by megakaryocytes as the origin of this platelet alpha-granule protein.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study on the incidence, platelet-activating capacity and clinical significance of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA classes.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet-activating antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti-PF4/heparin) antibodies are the major cause of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, the relative utility of functional (platelet activation) vs. antigen [enzyme-immunoassay (EIA)] assays, and the significance of assay discrepancies remain unresolved. METHODS: Consecutive patient sera (n = 1650) referred for diagnostic HIT testing were screened prospectively by both the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test and anti-PF4/heparin EIA - including individual classes (IgG, IgA, IgM) - with clinical correlations studied. Platelet microparticle and annexin-V-binding properties of the sera were also investigated. RESULTS: Only 205 (12.4%) sera tested positive in either the HIPA and/or EIA: 95 (46.3%) were positive in both, 109 (53.1%) were only EIA-positive, and, notably, only one serum was HIPA-positive/EIA-negative. Of 185 EIA-positive sera, only 17.6% had detectable IgM and/or IgA without detectable IgG. Among sera positive for EIA IgG, optical density values were higher when the sera were HIPA-positive (1.117 vs. 0.768; P < 0.0001), with widely overlapping values. Two HIPA-positive but EIA-IgG-negative sera became HIPA-negative following IgG depletion, suggesting platelet-activating antibodies against non-PF4-dependent antigens. Clinical correlations showed that HIPA-negative/EIA-positive patients did not develop thrombosis and had reasons other than HIT to explain thrombocytopenia. IgM/A antibodies did not increase microparticle penetration, but increased annexin-V binding. CONCLUSIONS: The anti-PF4/heparin EIA has high ( approximately 99%) sensitivity for HIT. However, only about half of EIA-positive patients are likely to have HIT. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of IgM/A class and non-PF4-dependent antigens have only a minor role in HIT.

Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (aHIT) indicates the presence in patients of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)-polyanion antibodies that are able to activate platelets strongly even in the absence of heparin (heparin-independent platelet activation). Nevertheless, as seen with serum obtained from patients with otherwise typical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), serum-induced platelet activation is inhibited at high heparin concentrations (10-100 IU mL-1 heparin). Furthermore, upon serial dilution, aHIT serum will usually show heparin-dependent platelet activation. Clinical syndromes associated with aHIT include: delayed-onset HIT, persisting HIT, spontaneous HIT syndrome, fondaparinux-associated HIT, heparin 'flush'-induced HIT, and severe HIT (platelet count of < 20 × 109  L-1 ) with associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Recent studies have implicated anti-PF4 antibodies that are able to bridge two PF4 tetramers even in the absence of heparin, probably facilitated by non-heparin platelet-associated polyanions (chondroitin sulfate and polyphosphates); nascent PF4-aHIT-IgG complexes recruit additional heparin-dependent HIT antibodies, leading to the formation of large multimolecular immune complexes and marked platelet activation. aHIT can persist for several weeks, and serial fibrin, D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels, rather than the platelet count, may be helpful for monitoring treatment response. Although standard anticoagulant therapy for HIT ought to be effective, published experience indicates frequent failure of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-adjusted anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin), probably because of underdosing in the setting of HIT-associated DIC, known as 'APTT confounding'. Thus, non-APTT-adjusted therapies with drugs such as danaparoid and fondaparinux, or even direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban or apixaban, are suggested therapies, especially for long-term management of persisting HIT. In addition, emerging data indicate that high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin can interrupt HIT antibody-induced platelet activation, leading to rapid platelet count recovery.

Diagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific versus polyspecific enzyme-linked immunoassays in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Essentials Immunoassay specificity varies in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) testing. This meta-analysis examined 9 studies that tested samples by both IgG and polyspecific methods. IgG-specific assays confer superior diagnostic accuracy compared with polyspecific assays. These results further support recommendations in favor of IgG-specific testing. SUMMARY: Background There are conflicting data on whether the IgG-specific or polyspecific antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is preferred for the laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Objectives To directly compare diagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific versus polyspecific ELISA in HIT. Patients/Methods A systematic search yielded nine studies comprising 1948 patients with suspected HIT tested by both IgG-specific and polyspecific ELISAs and a reference standard against which the diagnostic accuracy of the ELISAs could be measured. Study quality was assessed by QUADAS-2 criteria. Results There was identical sensitivity for IgG-specific and polyspecific ELISAs (0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-0.99) and superior specificity of IgG-specific compared with polyspecific ELISA (0.87 [0.85-0.88] vs. 0.82 [0.80-0.84], respectively). Performance was similar in subgroups using the serotonin release assay and a single commercial ELISA manufacturer. The negative predictive values of IgG-specific and polyspecific ELISA were similarly high (0.99, [0.99-1.00], but the positive predictive value was superior with IgG-specific compared with polyspecific ELISA (0.56 [0.52-0.61] vs. 0.32 [0.28-0.35], respectively). The positive likelihood ratio (LR) was higher in IgG-specific than polyspecific ELISA, although negative LRs were similar. There was high risk of quality concerns in domains of index test and reference standard. Conclusions The superior diagnostic accuracy of IgG-specific ELISA reinforces the ISTH-SSC recommendation for standardization of laboratory testing for HIT. Likelihood ratios of individual assays may be used in combination with clinical scoring systems as part of an integrated diagnostic algorithm for HIT.

Clinical effectiveness of a Bayesian algorithm for the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Essentials We previously published a diagnostic algorithm for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In this study, we validated the algorithm in an independent large healthcare system. The accuracy was 98%, sensitivity 82% and specificity 99%. The algorithm has potential to improve accuracy and efficiency in the diagnosis of HIT. SUMMARY: Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening drug reaction caused by antiplatelet factor 4/heparin (anti-PF4/H) antibodies. Commercial tests to detect these antibodies have suboptimal operating characteristics. We previously developed a diagnostic algorithm for HIT that incorporated 'four Ts' (4Ts) scoring and a stratified interpretation of an anti-PF4/H enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and yielded a discriminant accuracy of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.00). Objectives The purpose of this study was to validate the algorithm in an independent patient population and quantitate effects that algorithm adherence could have on clinical care. Methods A retrospective cohort comprised patients who had undergone anti-PF4/H ELISA and serotonin release assay (SRA) testing in our healthcare system from 2010 to 2014. We determined the algorithm recommendation for each patient, compared recommendations with the clinical care received, and enumerated consequences of discrepancies. Operating characteristics were calculated for algorithm recommendations using SRA as the reference standard. Results Analysis was performed on 181 patients, 10 of whom were ruled in for HIT. The algorithm accurately stratified 98% of patients (95% CI, 95-99%), ruling out HIT in 158, ruling in HIT in 10 and recommending an SRA in 13 patients. Algorithm adherence would have obviated 165 SRAs and prevented 30 courses of unnecessary antithrombotic therapy for HIT. Diagnostic sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.48-0.98), specificity 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00), PPV 0.90 (95% CI, 0.56-0.99) and NPV 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00). Conclusions An algorithm incorporating 4Ts scoring and a stratified interpretation of the anti-PF4/H ELISA has good operating characteristics and the potential to improve management of suspected HIT patients.

Evaluation of pretest clinical score (4 T's) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in two clinical settings.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic adverse drug reaction caused by heparin. As thrombocytopenia is common in hospitalized patients receiving heparin, it would be useful to have a clinical scoring system that could differentiate patients with HIT from those with other reasons for thrombocytopenia. AIM: To compare prospectively the diagnostic utility of a clinical score for HIT in two different clinical settings. METHODS: The pretest clinical scoring system, the '4 T's', was used to classify 100 consecutive patients referred for possible HIT in one hospital (Hamilton General Hospital, HGH) into high, intermediate, and low probability groups. This system was also used to classify likewise 236 patients by clinicians in Germany referring blood for diagnostic testing for HIT in Greifswald (GW). The clinical scores were correlated with the results of laboratory testing for HIT antibodies using the serologic criteria for HIT with high diagnostic specificity. RESULTS: In both centers, patients with low scores were unlikely to test positive for HIT antibodies [HGH: 1/64 (1.6%), GW: 0/55 (0%)]. Patients with intermediate [HGH: 8/28 (28.6%), GW: 11/139 (7.9%)] or high scores [HGH: 8/8 (100%), GW: 9/42 (21.4%)] were more likely to test positive for clinically significant HIT antibodies. The positive predictive value of an intermediate or high clinical score for clinically significant HIT antibodies was higher at one center (HGH). CONCLUSIONS: A low pretest clinical score for HIT seems to be suitable for ruling out HIT in most situations (high-negative predictive value). The implications of an intermediate or high score vary in different clinical settings.

Shock, acute disseminated intravascular coagulation, and microvascular thrombosis: is 'shock liver' the unrecognized provocateur of ischemic limb necrosis?

For unknown reasons, a small minority of critically ill patients with septic or cardiogenic shock, multiorgan failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation develop symmetrical acral (distal extremity) limb loss due to microvascular thrombosis ('limb gangrene with pulses'). Case reports have described preceding 'shock liver' in some critically ill patients who developed such a picture of ischemic limb necrosis. This suggests that profoundly disturbed procoagulant-anticoagulant balance featuring uncontrolled generation of thrombin-resulting from failure of the protein C and antithrombin natural anticoagulant systems due to insufficient hepatic synthesis of these crucial proteins-could explain the microvascular thrombosis and associated limb loss. We hypothesize that shock liver is the key predisposing risk factor underlying ischemic limb necrosis in the majority of patients who develop this complication in the setting of acute disseminated intravascular coagulation complicating septic or cardiogenic shock. As shock liver precedes onset of limb ischemia by several days, therapeutic intervention may be possible.

Protamine (heparin)-induced thrombocytopenia: a review of the serological and clinical features associated with anti-protamine/heparin antibodies.

Protamine is widely used in medicine as a rapidly-acting antidote to heparin, particularly for reversing heparin anticoagulation after cardiac surgery. Protamine is also used as a stabilizing additive to certain preparations of insulin. Recent reports demonstrate that protamine and heparin form multimolecular complexes that result in high rates of immunization in post-cardiac surgery patients, particularly of immunoglobulin G (IgG) class antibodies; a subset of these anti-protamine/heparin IgG antibodies activates platelets through their FcγIIA (IgG) receptors. Although the clinical consequences of anti-protamine/heparin antibodies that are newly generated after cardiac surgery are unknown, there is evidence that platelet-activating anti-protamine/heparin antibodies already present at the time of cardiac surgery might occasionally explain more severe thrombocytopenia with delayed platelet count recovery, as well as thromboembolic complications, in the post-cardiac surgery setting. Triggers for such antibodies remain poorly-defined, but could include preoperative administration of heparin to diabetic patients receiving protamine-insulin as well as recent previous cardiac surgery. Anti-protamine/heparin antibodies have several features in common with anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) PF4/heparin antibodies implicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), including immunization by heparin-containing multimolecular complexes, predominant IgG class, pathological platelet-activating properties, relatively rapid IgG formation without IgM precedence, and antibody transience. Despite these similarities, the risk of anti-protamine/heparin antibody-mediated complications seems to affect the early post-cardiac surgery period, whereas HIT usually occurs at least 5 days following cardiac surgery. Clinicians need to become aware of this recently recognized immunohematological disorder, and research is needed to identify triggers of immunization, improve detection of pathological antibodies and identify patients at risk of this complication.

Rivaroxaban for treatment of suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia study.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a thrombogenic condition that is difficult to treat. We evaluated rivaroxaban as a treatment option in patients with suspected or confirmed HIT. One patient had recurrent thrombosis and 9/10 patients with thrombocytopenia had platelet recovery. Rivaroxaban may be an effective and safe treatment option for HIT. SUMMARY: Background Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anti-Xa inhibitor that has the potential to greatly simplify treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in this patient population, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, prospective cohort study of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT. Patients/Methods Twenty-two consecutive adults with suspected or confirmed HIT received rivaroxaban 15 mg bid until a local HIT assay result was available. Participants with a positive local assay result continued rivaroxaban 15 mg bid until platelet recovery (or until day 21 if they had acute thrombosis at study entry), then stepped down to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily until day 30. Results and Conclusions The primary outcome measure, incidence of new symptomatic, objectively-confirmed venous and arterial thromboembolism at 30 days, occurred in one HIT-positive participant (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-23.5%) and one HIT-positive participant required limb amputation despite platelet recovery. Platelet recovery was achieved in nine out of 10 HIT-positive patients with thrombocytopenia. Rivaroxaban appears to be effective for treating patients with confirmed HIT, although the small number of patients enrolled limits precision.

Distinguishing between anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies that can and cannot cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Many patients exposed to heparin develop antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, yet only those antibodies that activate platelets cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Patients who produce anti-PF4/heparin antibodies without developing HIT either have antibodies that do not cause platelet activation or produce pathogenic antibodies at levels that are insufficient to cause HIT. Understanding the differences between anti-PF4/heparin antibodies with and without HIT will improve test methods and reduce overdiagnosis. AIMS: To investigate the presence of low levels of platelet-activating antibodies in patients investigated for HIT who had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but failed to cause platelet activation in the (14) C-serotonin release assay (SRA). MATERIALS/METHODS: We developed a platelet activation assay similar to the SRA using exogenous PF4 without added heparin (PF4-SRA). This assay was able to detect low levels of platelet-activating antibodies. We used this PF4-SRA to test for platelet-activating antibodies in patients investigated for HIT. RESULTS: The PF4-SRA detected platelet-activating antibodies in seven (100%) of seven SRA-positive sera even after the samples were diluted until they were no longer positive in the standard SRA. Platelet-activating antibodies were detected in 14 (36%) of 39 patients who had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but tested negative in the SRA and did not have clinical HIT. The clinical diagnosis of HIT was confirmed by chart review and concordant with the SRA results. CONCLUSIONS: A subset of heparin-treated patients produce subthreshold levels of platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies that do not cause HIT. An increase in the titer of these pathogenic antibodies, along with permissive clinical conditions, could lead to HIT.

Clinical presentation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect of heparin that is important because of its relatively high frequency and its strong association with paradoxic venous and arterial thrombosis. As confirmatory laboratory assays are not always immediately available, physicians usually must make initial diagnostic and treatment decisions based on the clinical presentation alone. Three characteristic features of HIT can be helpful in distinguishing it from other causes of thrombocytopenia: (1) timing of the onset of thrombocytopenia, namely, a platelet count decrease that begins between days 5 and 8 (inclusive) of beginning heparin treatment; (2) mild to moderate severity of the thrombocytopenia, with platelet counts only rarely less than 15 x 10(9)/L; and (3) the development of large-vessel venous or arterial thrombosis in association with thrombocytopenia, or any of a number of unusual characteristic sequelae of HIT (warfarin-associated venous limb gangrene, bilateral adrenal hemorrhagic infarction, heparin-induced skin lesions, or acute systemic reactions following intravenous heparin bolus). In contrast to other drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia syndromes, HIT rarely is associated with bleeding. HIT is relatively common, occurring in as many as 3% of patients who receive unfractionated (UF) heparin for 2 weeks. Between 30% and 75% of patients with HIT develop thrombosis; thus, about 1% of patients who receive a course of heparin develop HIT-associated thrombosis. The observation that HIT is less likely to occur with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) suggests that HIT ultimately may be preventable.

Limitations of conventional treatment options for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Thrombosis is a common and potentially serious complication of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Discontinuation of heparin is a simple and important maneuver in patients with suspected HIT. Unfortunately, thrombosis often occurs even in those patients in whom heparin was discontinued because of thrombocytopenia alone ("isolated" HIT). It therefore is reasonable to consider prophylactic anticoagulation with an alternate anticoagulant in patients with suspected HIT, especially if their initial indication for anticoagulation persists. For patients with thrombosis complicating HIT, conventional treatment options often have important limitations. Warfarin has a slow onset of action, and its use in patients with acute HIT and deep venous thrombosis has been associated with the devastating syndrome of venous limb gangrene. Ancrod, a defibrinogenating snake venom with thrombin-like activity, has also been used to treat HIT. However, this agent does not inhibit thrombin generation in HIT, which could explain why some patients who have been treated with this agent have developed certain adverse clinical events, such as warfarin-associated venous limb gangrene. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to treat patients with HIT is limited by their high rate (up to 100%) of in vitro cross-reactivity with HIT sera, and the relatively frequent occurrence of new or recurrent thrombocytopenia or thrombosis during treatment of HIT with this class of agents. In contrast, the mixture of anticoagulant glycosamingoglycans known as danaparoid sodium has a much lower frequency of in vitro cross-reactivity with HIT sera (10% to 40%, depending upon the sensitivity of the assay). Moreover, clinically significant cross-reactivity during treatment with danaparoid appears to be uncommon, even in patients in whom in vitro cross-reactivity is demonstrable.

Investigation of human platelet alloantigens and glycoproteins using non-radioactive immunoprecipitation.

Sensitive techniques to detect platelet antibodies are needed for the investigation of immune thrombocytopenic syndromes such as neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and post-transfusion purpura. Radioimmunoprecipitation has proved useful in the investigation of platelet-antibody interactions; however, the requirement for a radioactive label is a disadvantage. We describe the immunoprecipitation of human platelet proteins labelled with nonradioactive NHSS-biotin and compare the results with proteins labelled with 125I. The efficiency of labelling was evaluated by immunoprecipitation using well-characterized human anti-platelet antisera and murine monoclonal antibodies. The immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and detected using streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase and a chemiluminescent substrate with exposure to X ray film. The biotinylation technique labelled glycoproteins Ia/IIa, Ib/IX, IIb/IIIa, IV, and p175 which carry all of the known platelet alloantigens and isoantigens. It was as sensitive as radiolabelling and had the advantage of labelling GPs Ib beta and IX, which were not labelled using radioiodine. Human sera containing alloantibodies to HPA-1a on GP IIIa, HPA-3a on GP IIb, HPA-5a and HPA-5b on GP Ia, Govb on p175, and the isoantibody Naka on GP IV precipitated the corresponding biotinylated proteins. Biotinylated proteins could be detected using a 30 s exposure compared to 2 days or longer for 125I. Immunoprecipitation of human platelet glycoproteins labeled with NHSS-biotin is a fast and sensitive alternative to conventional radioimmunoprecipitation for the study of human platelet antigens.

A 14-year study of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

PURPOSE: To determine the sites of thromboses (venous versus arterial circulation) that complicate the clinical course of immunemediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and to determine the 30-day risk for thrombosis in patients who are initially recognized with isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed objectively documented thrombotic events that complicated the clinical course of 127 patients with serologically confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia identified in one medical community over a 14-year period. We classified heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients into two groups: patients recognized with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia only after a new thrombosis had occurred, and patients initially recognized with isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We determined the subsequent 30-day risk for thrombosis for the cohort of patients initially recognized with isolated thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was associated with the development of new venous thrombotic events and arterial thrombotic events in 78 and 18 patients, respectively (ratio venous/arterial thrombosis = 4:1). Pulmonary embolism was the most common life-threatening thrombotic event, occurring in 25% of all patients. Approximately half of all heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients were recognized only after they had a complicating thrombotic event. Of the remaining 62-patient cohort initially recognized with isolated thrombocytopenia, the subsequent 30-day risk of thrombosis was 52.8%. The risk of thrombosis did not differ whether the heparin had been discontinued alone or whether warfarin had been substituted for the heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Venous thrombosis complicates heparin-induced thrombocytopenia more frequently than does arterial thrombosis. The high risk of thrombosis in patients initially recognized with isolated thrombocytopenia suggests that conventional management approaches require reappraisal.

Factor V Leiden and thrombotic complications in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

To determine whether factor V Leiden is associated with thrombotic events in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), we evaluated 165 patients with serologically confirmed HIT for the presence of factor V Leiden and determined the incidence of venous or arterial thrombosis during the period of HIT. Factor V Leiden was detected in 16 of 165 HIT patients (9.7%). HIT-associated venous thrombosis occurred in 11 of 16 factor V Leiden positive subjects and 94 of 149 factor V Leiden negative subjects (69% vs. 63%; p = 0.79). Arterial thrombosis occurred in 1 of 16 factor V Leiden positive subjects and 21 of 149 factor V Leiden negative subjects (6% vs. 14%; p = 0.70). There was no difference in the incidence of proximal limb DVT, pulmonary embolism, venous limb gangrene, local skin reactions, hemorrhagic adrenal infarction, stroke, or myocardial infarction between the groups. No difference in the severity of venous thrombosis between Leiden positive and negative subjects was detected. Our data suggest that in the acute prothrombotic milieu of HIT, heterozygous factor V Leiden is not an important additional risk factor for thrombosis.

Current concepts in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.

Platelet destruction by antibodies is a common cause of thrombocytopenia. In this review, various treatments for immune thrombocytopenia are discussed, with emphasis on corticosteroids, splenectomy, danazol, high-dose immunoglobulin G, anti-Rhesus globulin, colchicine and cytotoxic, immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide and azathioprine. An approach to the treatment of adult idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is reviewed in detail and the treatments for several other immune thrombocytopenic disorders are summarised.