Elevated frequency and everyday functioning implications of vascular depression in persons with HIV disease.

Depression and cardiovascular disease are common and associated with one another in HIV disease. This study aimed to determine the frequency and everyday functioning implications of the clinical syndrome of vascular depression among people living with HIV (PLWH). Participants in this cross-sectional study included 536 PLWH and 272 seronegative individuals who completed a biomedical and psychiatric research evaluation. Vascular depression was operationalized as the current presence of: 1) two or more vascular conditions; and 2) depression as determined by a normative elevation on the Depression/Dejection subscale of the Profile of Mood States or a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder per the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Everyday functioning was measured by both self- and clinician-rated activities of daily living. A logistic regression model showed that HIV was associated with a three-fold increased risk of vascular depression, independent of potential confounding factors. A second logistic regression model within the PLWH sample showed that PLWH with vascular depression had significantly greater odds of dependence in everyday functioning as compared to PLWH with either vascular disease or depression alone. The elevated frequency of vascular depression in PLWH is consistent with the vascular depression hypothesis from the late-life depression literature. The high rate of functional dependence among PLWH with vascular depression highlights the clinical importance of prospective work on this syndrome in the context of HIV disease.

A developmental approach to diversifying neuroscience through effective mentorship practices: perspectives on cross-identity mentorship and a critical call to action.

Many early-career neuroscientists with diverse identities may not have mentors who are more advanced in the neuroscience pipeline and have a congruent identity due to historic biases, laws, and policies impacting access to education. Cross-identity mentoring relationships pose challenges and power imbalances that impact the retention of diverse early career neuroscientists, but also hold the potential for a mutually enriching and collaborative relationship that fosters the mentee's success. Additionally, the barriers faced by diverse mentees and their mentorship needs may evolve with career progression and require developmental considerations. This article provides perspectives on factors that impact cross-identity mentorship from individuals participating in Diversifying the Community of Neuroscience (CNS)-a longitudinal, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R25 neuroscience mentorship program developed to increase diversity in the neurosciences. Participants in Diversifying CNS were comprised of 14 graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and early career faculty who completed an online qualitative survey on cross-identity mentorship practices that impact their experience in neuroscience fields. Qualitative survey data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and resulted in four themes across career levels: (1) approach to mentorship and interpersonal dynamics, (2) allyship and management of power imbalance, (3) academic sponsorship, and (4) institutional barriers impacting navigation of academia. These themes, along with identified mentorship needs by developmental stage, provide insights mentors can use to better support the success of their mentees with diverse intersectional identities. As highlighted in our discussion, a mentor's awareness of systemic barriers along with active allyship are foundational for their role.