A prospective evaluation of short-term dysphagia after transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been associated with improved long-term dysphagia symptomatology compared with chemoradiation. Dysphagia in the perioperative period has been inadequately characterized. The objective of this study was to characterize short-term swallowing outcomes after TORS for OPSCC. METHODS: Patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were enrolled prospectively. The Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10) was used as a measure of swallowing dysfunction (score >2) and was administered on postoperative day (POD) 1, 7, and 30. Patient demographics, weight, pain level, and clinical outcomes were recorded prospectively and focused on time to oral diet, feeding tube placement, and dysphagia-related readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included with pathologic T stages of T1 (n = 24), T2 (n = 20), T3 (n = 3), and Tx (n = 4). Self-reported preoperative dysphagia was unusual (13.7%). The mean EAT-10 score on POD 1 was lower than on POD 7 (21.5 vs 26.6; P = .005) but decreased by POD 30 (26.1 to 12.2; P < .001). Forty-seven (92.1%) patients were discharged on an oral diet, but 57.4% required compensatory strategies or modification of liquid consistency. Ninety-eight percent of patients were taking an oral diet by POD 30. There were no dysphagia-related readmissions. CONCLUSION: This prospective study shows that most patients who undergo TORS experience dysphagia for at least the first month postoperatively, but nearly all can be started on an oral diet. The dysphagia-associated complication profile is acceptable after TORS with a minority of patients requiring temporary feeding tube placement. Aggressive evaluation and management of postoperative dysphagia in TORS patients may help prevent dysphagia-associated readmissions. Cancer 2017;123:3132-40. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Frailty measurements and dysphagia in the outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE: Deconditioning and frailty may contribute to dysphagia and aspiration. Early identification of patients at risk of aspiration is important. Aspiration prevention would lead to reduced morbidity and health care costs. We therefore wondered whether objective measurements of frailty could help identify patients at risk for dysphagia and aspiration. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 183) were enrolled. Patient characteristics and objective measures of frailty were recorded prospectively. Variables tested included age, body mass index, grip strength, and 5 meter walk pace. Statistical analysis tested for association between these parameters and dysphagia or aspiration, diagnosed by instrumental swallowing examination. RESULTS: Of variables tested for association with grip strength, only age category (P = .003) and ambulatory status (P < .001) were significantly associated with grip strength in linear regression models. Whereas walk speed was not associated with dysphagia or aspiration, ambulatory status was significantly associated with dysphagia and aspiration in multivariable model building. CONCLUSION: Nonambulatory status is a predictor of aspiration and should be included in risk assessments for dysphagia. The relationship between frailty and dysphagia deserves further investigation. Frailty assessments may help identify those at risk for complications of dysphagia.

Health Literacy and Adherence to Clinical Recommendations in Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: After definitive cancer treatment, survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) are commonly recommended to participate in therapies aimed at reducing the burden of treatment-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated whether adherence to referral to physical therapy (PT) and speech-language pathology therapy (SLPT) is related to patient health literacy (HL). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients attending a multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic between 2017 and 2019. HL was measured using the Brief Health Literacy Screen, with scores below 10 indicating inadequate HL. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between HL and adherence to PT or SLPT referral. KEY RESULTS: From the overall cohort (N = 454), 80 patients (18%) had inadequate HL. Compared to those with adequate HL, patients with inadequate HL were significantly less likely to complete initial PT evaluation (74% vs. 58%, p = .034) but were not significantly less likely to complete initial SLPT evaluation (70% vs. 61%, p = .37). After adjusting for age, primary tumor site, and treatment stage, we found that patients with inadequate HL were half as likely to follow up for initial PT evaluation (odds ratio 0.45, p = .032). CONCLUSION: Overall, inadequate HL is associated with reduced adherence to PT but is not associated with adherence to SLPT among HNC survivors. These results highlight the clinical importance of HL and underscore the need for interventions to facilitate adherence to treatment for patients with inadequate HL. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(1):e52-e60.].

Association of Trismus With Quality of Life and Swallowing in Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to (1) determine the prevalence and predictors of trismus and (2) examine the relationship of trismus, swallowing dysfunction, and quality of life (QOL) in survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC). STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic. METHODS: Data on trismus and patient-reported outcomes were obtained from survivors of HNC between December 2016 and October 2019. Trismus was defined as a maximum interincisal opening ≤35 mm. QOL and swallowing dysfunction were measured with the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire and EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool-10), respectively. Linear regressions were applied to investigate the relationship of trismus with QOL and swallowing dysfunction. RESULTS: Of the 237 survivors, 22.78% (n = 54) had trismus. Advanced stage of cancer (stage III/IV vs Tis-II, P = .002) and treatment (nonsurgical and surgery + adjuvant treatment vs surgery only, P = .006) were correlated with a higher prevalence of trismus. After controlling for cancer stage and treatment type, EAT-10 scores for survivors with trismus were 9.342 (95% CI, 6.262-12.423; P < .0001) higher than those without trismus. The University of Washington Quality of Life Physical and Social-Emotional subscales for patients with trismus were 14.088 (95% CI, 9.042-19.134; P < .0001) and 10.470 (95% CI, 4.793-16.147; P = .0003) lower than those without trismus, respectively. CONCLUSION: Trismus is a common, treatment-related consequence and is associated with increased symptoms of dysphagia and decreased QOL. Early detection and management of trismus in survivors of HNC are essential to optimize QOL and reduce morbidity.

Quality of life after radiation and transoral robotic surgery in advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treatment results in impaired swallowing and quality of life (QOL). We analyzed a cross-section of advanced stage OPSCC patients treated with multimodal therapies at our Survivorship Clinic to investigate treatment factors associated with QOL. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after primary OPSCC treatment using AJCC seventh edition staging. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included (90.1% human papillomavirus positive [HPV+]). There were no QOL differences between robotic surgery with radiation ± chemotherapy patients (n = 29) and those treated by radiation ± chemotherapy (n = 44). Radiation field analysis demonstrated significant correlations between increasing doses to larynx and contralateral parotid and submandibular gland and worse swallowing as measured by the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (P = .02; P = .01; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced, mostly HPV+, OPSCC, we did not find clinically significant differences between QOL PROMs between surgical and radiation ± chemotherapy treatment groups. This highlights the need for continued therapy de-escalation along with improved interventions for treatment related toxicities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Surgical factors associated with patient-reported quality of life outcomes after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which surgical factors are associated with quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in oral cavity cancer survivors after free flap reconstruction of the oral cavity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from a multidisciplinary head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship clinic. Oral cavity cancer survivors with at least 6-months of postoperative follow-up from ablation and free flap reconstruction were included. Primary outcome measures were validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) measure of swallowing-specific QOL, University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) physical and social-emotional subscale scores and feeding tube dependence. RESULTS: Extent of tongue resection was associated with EAT-10 and the UW-QOL Physical subscale scores. Patients with oral tongue defects reported worse scores than with composite defects in the EAT-10 and UW-QOL physical domain (p = 0.0004, 0.0025, respectively). This association no longer applies when controlling for differences in extent of tongue resection. Patients with anterior composite resections reported worse EAT-10 scores than lateral resections (p = 0.024). This association no longer applies when controlling for extent of tongue resection (p = 0.46). Gastric tube dependence demonstrates similar trends to PROMs. CONCLUSION: Extent of tongue resection was strongly associated with poor QOL outcomes after free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity and mediates the associations between other defect characteristics and QOL. These findings demonstrate the need for emphasis on expected oral tongue defects when counseling patients and highlight the need to address QOL in a multidisciplinary fashion post-operatively.

Prevision of multidisciplinary head and neck cancer survivorship care during the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic.

The 2019 Coronavirus Pandemic challenges the delivery of care for patients with head and neck cancer. An important aspect of this care has been the evolution of enhanced survivorship services, which include surveillance for recurring cancer and prevention of second primaries. The application of evidence-based approaches to the identification and management of treatment and tumor-related toxicities has embraced the use of validated patient-reported outcomes instruments, health promotion, and care coordination. In this manuscript, we describe how our multidisciplinary team of survivorship providers has accommodated to the need to provide patients with social distancing while acknowledging the importance of continued care during treatment and through the spectrum of survivorship.

Burden of treatment: Reported outcomes in a head and neck cancer survivorship clinic.

OBJECTIVE: With the intensification and utilization of multimodal treatment, acute toxicities have increased; however, the frequency of treatment sequelae in long-term head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors are poorly described. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the prevalence and predictors of patient-reported late and long-term treatment-related sequelae in HNC survivors. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported outcomes from 228 survivors attending a multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic. The primary outcomes comprised quality of life (QOL), symptoms of anxiety and depression, and swallowing dysfunction. RESULTS: Male gender, tumor sites in the oropharynx and larynx, longer time since treatment, and treatment with surgery alone were associated with higher physical QOL (P < .05). Male gender, longer time since treatment, and treatment with surgery alone were associated with higher social-emotional QOL (P < .05). A reduction in anxiety symptoms and a higher QOL were related to longer time since treatment; however, a reduction in swallowing dysfunction symptoms was only related to longer time since treatment until approximately 6 years. After 6 years, survivors reported worse swallowing dysfunction (P < .05). One hundred thirty-two survivors (56%) reported at least three treatment-related effects that impacted their daily life. Finally, advanced stage disease at diagnosis (stage III-IV) was also associated with severe swallowing dysfunction (P = .004). CONCLUSION: These data indicate the remarkable prevalence of treatment-related effects in HNC survivors. These results highlight the need for de-intensification of therapies, where appropriate, and for a better understanding of pathophysiology and new approaches to mitigating treatment effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:E437-E444, 2019.

Postoperative Swallowing Assessment After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia, aspiration, and potential pneumonia represent a major source of morbidity in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Conditions that potentiate dysphagia and aspiration include frailty and prolonged intubation. Our group of speech-language pathologists has been actively involved in performance of a bedside evaluation of swallowing, and instrumental evaluation of swallowing with modified barium swallow, and postoperative management in patients undergoing lung transplantation. METHODS: All lung transplant patients from April 2009 to September 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. A clinical bedside examination was performed by the speech-language pathology team, followed by a modified barium swallow or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients were referred for evaluation. Twenty-four patients were unable to complete the evaluation. Clinical signs of aspiration were apparent in 160 patients (54%). Deep laryngeal penetration or aspiration were identified in 198 (67%) patients during instrumental testing. A group of 81 patients (27%) had an entirely normal clinical examination, but were found to have either deep penetration or aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients aspirate after lung transplantation. Clinical bedside examination is not sensitive enough and will fail to identify patients with silent aspiration. A standard of practice following lung transplantation has been established that helps avoid postoperative aspiration associated with complications.

Handgrip strength and dysphagia assessment following cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Prolonged intubation has been recognized as a risk factor for dysphagia following cardiac surgery. We conducted a study to determine whether those patients intubated longer than 12 hours following cardiac surgery exhibit low handgrip strength and if dysphagia is prevalent in those with low handgrip strength. STUDY DESIGN: Feasibility study. METHODS: Patients intubated more than 12 hours after cardiac surgery were enrolled. Handgrip strength was measured. If subjects were found to have low grip strength they underwent clinical swallowing exam by a speech-language pathologist followed by modified barium swallow (MBS) to assess for dysphagia. Severity of dysphagia was assessed with the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and need for diet modification. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent (12/14) of patients tested had low handgrip strength. Eight patients with low grip strength completed the bedside swallowing exam and MBS. Four of the eight patients (50%) had deep laryngeal penetration (PAS scores 4-5) on MBS and three (38%) patients were found to have silent aspiration (PAS 8). The findings on MBS resulted in the recommendation of a swallowing strategy and/or modified diet for six of the eight (80%) patients. Nonoral feedings were recommended for two patients (25%) based on MBS results. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients intubated >12 hours after cardiac surgery exhibit low handgrip strength. Dysphagia is prevalent among those with low handgrip strength. The role of frailty measures in screening for dysphagia deserves further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.