Hepatitis B in Heart Transplant Donors and Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Expanding the heart donor pool to include patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) could help ameliorate the organ shortage in heart transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the management and recipient outcomes of D+/R- and D-/R+ heart transplants. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published on heart transplants involving HBV+ donors and/or HBV+ recipients. A comparison was performed between two groups where heart transplants were performed a) D+/R- (n = 98) versus b) D-/R+ (n = 65). RESULTS: Overall, 13 studies were selected, comprising 163 patients. Mean patient age was 55 y (95% CI: 39, 78) and 79% (69, 86) were male. Active post-transplant HBV infection requiring antiviral treatment occurred in 11% (1, 69) of D+/R- recipients and 33% (9, 71) of D-/R+ recipients. Post-transplant antiviral therapy was given to 80% (6, 100) of D+/R- recipients compared to 72% (42, 90) of D-/R+ recipients (P = 0.84). Hepatitis-related mortality was observed in no D+/R- recipients and 7% (2, 27) of D-/R+ recipients. Survival 1-y post-transplant was comparable between both groups at 83% (83, 92) and 81% (61, 92) for D+/R- and D-/R+ transplants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our review found that HBV D+/R- heart transplantation was associated with fewer active hepatitis infections and lower hepatitis-related mortality than D-/R+ transplantation, with comparable survival at 1 y. Additional studies utilizing HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) to compare outcomes with HBsAg+ and anti-HBc+ donors are crucial to reach more definitive conclusions about the risk of donor-derived infections in this context.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices associated survival awaiting heart and heart-kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) technology has translated to better outcomes for patients on CF-LVAD support as a bridge-to-transplant. However, data are lacking regarding the subset of CF-LVAD patients with renal failure awaiting simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (HKTx). We sought to better understand the characteristics and outcomes of patients in this group. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was used to identify adult patients listed for heart transplant (HTx) or HKTx from January 1, 2009 to March 31, 2017. Patients were followed from time on waitlist to either removal from waitlist or transplantation. Demographic and clinical data for HTx and HKTx patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed waitlist and post-transplant survival. For waitlisted patients, both death and removal from the waitlist due to deteriorating medical condition were considered events. RESULTS: Overall, 26 638 patients registered for transplant were analyzed. 25 111 (94%) were listed for HTx, and 1527 (6%) for HKTx. 7683 (29%) patients listed for HTx had CF-LVAD support. For those listed for HKTx, 441 (28%) underwent dialysis alone, 256 (17%) had CF-LVAD support alone, and 85 (6%) were treated with both CF-LVAD and dialysis. 15 567 (58%) underwent HTx, and 621 (2%) underwent HKTx. In these groups, post-transplant survival was similar (p = 0.06). Patients listed for HKTx treated with both dialysis and CF-LVAD had significantly worse waitlist survival compared to HKTx recipients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Post-transplant survival is comparable between HTx and HKTx, and early survival is similar between HTx patients and those listed for HTx with CF-LVAD support. However, outcomes on the waitlist for HKTx in CF-LVAD patients on dialysis is significantly worse compared to HKTx recipients. This highlights the need to better account for this patient population when allocating organs.

Outcomes of percutaneous temporary biventricular mechanical support: a systematic review.

Percutaneous biventricular assist devices (BiVAD) are a recently developed treatment option for severe cardiogenic shock. This systematic review sought to identify indications and outcomes of patients placed on percutaneous BiVAD support. An electronic search was performed to identify all appropriate studies utilizing a percutaneous BiVAD configuration. Fifteen studies comprising of 20 patients were identified. Individual patient survival and outcomes data were combined for statistical analysis. All 20 patients were supported with a microaxial LVAD, 12/20 (60%) of those patients were supported with a microaxial (RMA) right ventricular assist device (RVAD), and the remaining 8/20 (40%) patients were supported with a centrifugal extracorporeal RVAD (RCF). All patients presented with cardiogenic shock, and of these, 12/20 (60%) presented with a non-ischemic etiology vs 8/20 (40%) with ischemic disease. For the RMA group, RVAD support was significantly longer [RMA 5 (IQR 4-7) days vs RCF 1 (IQR 1-2) days, p = 0.03]. Intravascular hemolysis post-BiVAD occurred in three patients (27.3%) [RMA 3 (33.3%) vs RCF 0 (0%), p = 0.94]. Five patients received a durable left ventricular assist device, one patient received a total artificial heart, and one patient underwent a heart transplantation. Estimated 30-day mortality was 15.0%, and 78.6% were discharged alive. Both strategies for percutaneous BiVAD support appear to be viable options for severe cardiogenic shock.

Assessing donor-recipient size metrics for heart transplant outcomes: UNOS database analysis.

STUDY: There is no widely accepted donor to recipient size-match metric to predict outcomes in cardiac transplant. The predictive ability of size-match metrics has not been studied when recipients are stratified by heart failure etiology. We sought to assess the performance of commonly used size metrics to predict survival after heart transplant, accounting for restrictive versus non-restrictive pathology. METHODS: The UNOS registry was queried from 2000 to 2017 for all primary isolated heart transplants. Donor-recipient ratios were calculated for commonly used size metrics and their association with survival was assessed using continuous, nonlinear analysis. RESULTS: 29 817 patients were identified. Height (P < .001), predicted heart mass (PHM) (P = .003), ideal body weight (IBW) (P < .001) and body mass index (BMI) (P = .003) ratios were significantly associated with survival, while weight and body surface area (BSA) ratios were not. When stratified, only BMI ratio retained significance for both restrictive (P = .051) and non-restrictive (P = .003) subsets. Recipients with restrictive etiology had increased risk of mortality with both a lower and higher BMI ratio. CONCLUSIONS: While many metrics show association with survival in the non-restrictive subset, BMI is the only metric that retains significance in the restrictive subset. Recipients with restrictive and non-restrictive etiologies of heart failure tolerate size mismatch differently.

Quality of life metrics in LVAD patients after hemocompatibility-related adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAE) negatively influence survival. However, no study has examined the impact of these events on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation (CF-LVAD). We assessed the impact of HRAE events on HRQOL and hypothesized that HRAE's adversely impact HRQOL and functional outcomes. METHODS: INTERMACS database identified patients undergoing primary CF-LVAD implantation from 2008 to 2017. HRAEs included stroke, non-surgical bleeding, hemolysis, and pump thrombosis and were identified as defined in the literature. HRAEs were further stratified as Tier 1-2 and disabling stroke events. Time-series analysis was executed for HRAE patients with values pre-HRAE, post-HRAE, and closest to 12 months follow up. Local polynomial regression curves modeling individual patients were superimposed into "spaghetti" plots. RESULTS: All HRQOL and functional metrics improved in patients over time, despite HRAE complications. However, these patient metrics were significantly reduced compared to the non-HRAE cohort. Advanced data visualization techniques noted a decline after experiencing an HRAE with a subsequent recovery to baseline levels or higher. Six-minute walk test (6MWT) was noted to be most affected in the post-HRAE period but recovered similar to other metrics. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of HRAE following CF-LVAD implantation did not negatively impact the quality of life. However, the 6MWT did not increase in the post-HRAE period in all HRAE patients. Improvement of heart failure symptoms after CF-LVAD coupled with optimal management following the HRAE act to preserve the enhanced quality of life.

Intraoperative prothrombin complex concentrate administration and outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) administration has increased among cardiac surgery patients in recent years; however, use in LVAD implantation/exchange is not widespread due to the fear of thrombotic complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing LVAD implantation/exchange with intraoperative PCC administration versus traditional transfusion practices alone. Adult LVAD implants/exchanges at our institution between 2015 and 2018 were included. Patients were categorized as receiving intraoperative PCC or no-PCC (traditional). The primary outcome was the need for allogenic transfusion and transfusion volume at 48 hours after initial intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. A total of 160 patients (39 PCC, 121 traditional) were analyzed. In unadjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group received lower intraoperative transfusion volumes compared to the traditional group although not statistically significant (1464 mL [IQR 796, 4876] vs. 2568 mL [IQR 1292, 3606]; P value .37). In the fully adjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group had increased odds of transfusion within 48 hours of ICU admission (OR 4.06, 95% CI: 1.35-12.20; P < .01); however, there was no significant difference in transfusion volumes (P = .09). Patients receiving PCCs had higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (10.3% vs. 0%; P  < .01) and 30-day mortality (17.9% vs. 4.1%; P < .01). LVAD pump thrombosis occurred in 2.6% versus 0.8% in the PCC and traditional groups, respectively; P = .98. Patients undergoing LVAD implantation and exchange represent a complex surgical cohort. The results of this study suggest that the intraoperative PCC use during LVAD implant/exchange was associated with reduced intraoperative transfusions. Intraoperative PCC use was, however, associated with higher odds of postoperative transfusion, although transfusion volumes were not significantly different. While the deep vein thrombosis and 30-day mortality rates were higher in the PCC group, these results are likely related to the degree of surgical and patient complexity rather than PCC use itself. Further studies are needed to assess PCC use in this surgical cohort.

Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are not uncommon after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. In this systematic review, we sought to identify the patterns of VA that occurred following CF-LVAD implantation and evaluate their outcomes. An electronic search was performed to identify all articles reporting the development of VA following CF-LVAD implantation. VA was defined as any episode of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or sustained (>30 seconds) ventricular tachycardia (VT). Eleven studies were pooled for the analysis that included 393 CF-LVAD patients with VA. The mean patient age was 57 years [95%CI: 54; 61] and 82% [95%CI: 73; 88] were male. Overall, 37% [95%CI: 19; 60] of patients experienced a new onset VA after CF-LVAD implantation, while 60% [95%CI: 51; 69] of patients had a prior history of VA. Overall, 88% of patients [95%CI: 78; 94] were supported on HeartMate II CF-LVAD, 6% [95%CI: 3; 14] on HeartWare HVAD, and 6% [95%CI: 2; 13] on other CF-LVADs. VA was symptomatic in 47% [95%CI: 28; 68] of patients and in 50% [95%CI: 37; 52], early VA (<30 days from CF-LVAD) was observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 7% [95%CI: 5; 11]. Mean follow-up was 22.9 months [95%CI: 4.8; 40.8], during which 27% [95%CI: 17; 39] of patients underwent heart transplantation. In conclusion, approximately a third of patients had new VA following CF-LVAD placement. VA in CF-LVAD patients is often symptomatic, necessitates treatment, and carries a worse prognosis.

Characteristics and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common adverse event after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We sought to evaluate patterns of GIB development and related outcomes in CF-LVAD recipients. An electronic search was performed to identify all articles related to GIB in the setting of CF-LVAD implantation. A total of 34 studies involving 1087 patients were pooled for analysis. Mean patient age was 60 years (95% CI 57-64) and 24% (95% CI 21-28%) were female. The mean time from CF-LVAD implantation to the first GIB was 54 days (95% CI 24-84) with 40% (95% CI 34-45%) of patients having multiple episodes of GIB. Anemia was present in 75% (95% CI 41-93%) and the most common etiology of bleeding was arteriovenous malformations (36% [95% CI 24-50%]). The mean duration of follow-up was 14.6 months (95% CI 6.9-22.3) during which the all-cause mortality rate was 21% (95% CI 12-36%) and the mortality rate from GIB was 4% (95% CI 2-9%). Thromboembolic events occurred in 32% (95% CI 22-44%) of patients with an ischemic stroke rate of 16% (95% CI 3-51%) and a pump thrombosis rate of 8% (95%CI 3-22%). Heart transplantation was performed in 31% (95% CI 18-47%) of patients, after which 0% (95% CI 0-10%) experienced recurrent GIB. GIB is a major source of morbidity among CF-LVAD recipients. While death due to GIB is rare, cessation of anticoagulation during treatment increases the risk of subsequent thrombotic events. Heart transplant in these patients appears to reliably resolve the risk of future GIB.

Repair of ischemic ventricular septal defect with and without coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) following myocardial infarction (MI) is a relatively infrequent complication with high mortality. We sought to investigate the effect of concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) on outcomes following post-MI VSD repair. METHODS: Electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published from 2000 to 2018. Sixty-seven studies were selected for the analysis comprising 2174 patients with post-MI VSD. Demographic information, perioperative variables, and outcomes including survival data were extracted and pooled for systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Single-vessel disease was most common (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 42-52), left anterior descending coronary artery was the most commonly involved vessel (55%, 95% CI, 46-63), and anterior wall was the most commonly affected territory (57%, 95% CI, 51-63). Concomitant CABG was performed in 52% (95% CI, 46-57) of patients. Of these, infarcted territory was re-vascularized in 54% (95% CI, 23-82). A residual/recurrent shunt was present in 29% (95% CI, 24-34) of patients. Of these, surgical repair was performed in 35% (95% CI, 28-41) and transcatheter repair in 11% (95% CI, 6-21). Thirty-day mortality was 30% (95% CI, 26-35) in patients who had preoperative coronary angiogram, and 58% (95% CI, 43-71) in those who did not (P < .01). No significant survival difference observed between those who had concomitant CABG vs those without CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant CABG did not have a significant effect on survival following VSD repair. Revascularization should be weighed against the risks associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass.

Device exchange versus nonexchange modalities in left ventricular assist device-specific infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

No standardized treatment algorithm exists for the management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD)-specific infections. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of CF-LVAD-specific infections as managed by device exchange to other treatment modalities not involving device exchange. Electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature relating to the management of CF-LVAD-specific infections. All identified articles were systematically assessed for selection criteria. Thirteen studies with 158 cases of CF-LVAD-specific infection were pooled for analysis. Overall, 18/158 (11.4%) patients underwent CF-LVAD exchange, and 140/158 (88.6%) patients were treated with non-exchange modalities. The proportion of patients with isolated driveline infections or pump or pocket infections did not differ significantly between the groups. During a mean follow-up of 290 days, there were no significant differences in the overall mortality [exchange 17.6% (4.3-50.6) vs. non-exchange 23.3% (15.8-32.9), P = 0.67] and infection recurrence rates [exchange 26.7% (8.7-58.0) vs. non-exchange 38.6% (15.4-68.5), P = 0.56]. In the setting of CF-LVAD-specific infections, device exchange does not appear to confer an advantage in the overall mortality and infection recurrence as compared to non-exchange modalities.

Infection following CF-LVAD exchange for non-infectious indications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients on continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) often require CF-LVAD exchange. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of infection following CF-LVAD exchange performed for non-infectious indications. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed to identify all studies of patients undergoing CF-LVAD exchange for pump thrombosis or device malfunction. Of 2,698 articles identified, 6 studies with 81 total patients met the inclusion criteria. Cohort-level data were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60 years (95% CI: 41-78), and 74% were male (95% CI: 61-84). Pump thrombosis was the most common indication for exchange in 70% of patients (95% CI: 47-86). Other indications were driveline fracture and electrical malfunction in 21% (95% CI: 5-56) and 12% (95% CI: 4-33) of patients, respectively. Prior to exchange, 95% of patients were on HeartMate II (HM2) LVADs (95% CI: 86-98) and average duration of support for these patients was 27.1 months (95% CI: 9.3-44.8). The majority were placed on a HM2 following exchange (88% (95% CI: 45-98)) versus HM3 (12% (95% CI: 2-55)). Follow-up was an average of 16.4 months (95% CI: 6.8-26.0). Following exchange, 16 of 81 patients developed infection, with pooled mean incidence of 24% (95% CI: 14-38). 30-day mortality was 14% (95% CI: 7-26). Survival at follow-up was 65% (95% CI: 52-76). CONCLUSIONS: Infection following CF-LVAD exchange can occur at rates higher than those observed with primary implantation; therefore, effective strategies need to implemented early and consistently to help lower infections rates and help improve outcomes following exchange.

Infective endocarditis following heart transplantation: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but potentially fatal complication following heart transplantation (HTx). There is a lack of literature regarding the patterns and clinical course of IE development following HTx. We sought to pool the existing data in regards to defining characteristics, management options, and outcomes of IE following HTx. METHODS: An electronic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Ovid Medline, and the Scopus databases were performed to identify all articles in the English literature that report IE following HTx in adult patients. Patient-level data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Systematic search yielded 57 patients from 32 articles. Median patient age was 52 [IQR 43, 59] and 75% of patients (43/57) were male. Median time to IE presentation post-HTx was 8.4 [IQR 3.0, 35.8] months. IE of the mitral valve was observed in 36.8% (21/57) of patients, followed by mural IE in 24.6% (14/57), and tricuspid valve IE in 21.1% (12/57). The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus in 26.3% (15/57), Aspergillus fumigatus in 19.3% (11/57), Enterococcus faecalis in 12.3% (7/57), and an undetermined or unspecified organism in 14.0% (8/57) patients. Overall case fatality was 44.6% (25/56). Fungal IE was associated with a significantly higher case fatality 75.0% (9/12) than that of bacterial IE 36.1% (13/36) (p = 0.02). Surgical management of post-HTx IE was observed in 35.1% (20/57) of patients. This included valve surgery for 70.0% (14/20), including the mitral valve in 50.0% (7/14), aortic valve in 35.7% (5/14), and the tricuspid valve in 14.3% (2/14) of patients. CONCLUSION: In addition to bacterial organisms, fungi also represent a frequent cause of IE in post-HTx patients. Overall HTx patient survival in the setting of IE is poor and may be worse if caused by A. fumigatus.

Development of malignancies and their outcomes in patients supported on continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: With increased use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD), development of malignant tumors in this population is not uncommon. We sought to evaluate malignancies in CF-LVAD patients and evaluate the outcomes of treatment strategies. METHODS: Overall, 18 articles consisting of 28 patients were identified who developed malignancies after CF-LVAD placement. Patient-level data were extracted for systematic review. RESULTS: Median patient age was 60 years [59-67] and 85.7% (24/28) were male. CF-LVAD was placed as bridge-to-transplant (BTT) in 60.9% (14/23) of patients. The three most common malignancy types were GI in 35.7% (10/28) of patients, lung in 21.4% (6/28) and skin in 10.7% (3/28). Median time from CF-LVAD implant to malignancy diagnosis was 6.9 [2.5-12.8] months. Metastatic disease occurred in 17.9% (5/28) over a median time of 5.0 [1.0-82.0] months from the diagnosis. Surgical resection of the malignancy was performed in 57.1% (16/28) of patients. Our results showed that while there was a significantly higher probability of survival among patients who underwent surgery versus those who did not, when only stage I and II patients were included in the analysis, this difference was no longer statistically significant. Three patients were relisted for heart transplant after surgical treatment, and two received the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of malignancies in patients on CF-LVADs may improve survival and transplant eligibility status, therefore, a CF-LVAD should not always preclude surgical treatment.

Outcomes of surgical treatment for carcinoid heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) develops from vasoactive substances released by neuroendocrine tumors, which can cause significant patient morbidity and mortality without surgical intervention. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate granular perioperative details and long-term outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Electronic search of Ovid, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed to examine surgical treatment of carcinoid disease. Nine articles comprising 416 patients were selected. Study-level data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63 years (95% confidence interval, 57-70) with 53% (95% confidence interval, 46-61) of patients being male. In addition, 75% (95% confidence interval, 54-96) of neuroendocrine tumors originated from the small bowel or colon and 98% (95% confidence interval, 93-100) had liver metastases. Right heart failure was present in 48% (95% confidence interval, 14-81). Moderate or severe regurgitation was present in 97% (95% confidence interval, 95-99) of tricuspid and 72% (95% confidence interval, 58-83) of pulmonary valves. In addition, 99% (95% confidence interval, 98-100) of tricuspid and 59% (95% confidence interval, 38-79) of pulmonary valves were replaced. Bioprosthetic valves were used in 80% (95% confidence interval, 68-93) of tricuspid positions. Mean hospital duration of stay was 16 days (95% confidence interval, 7-25). Thirty-day mortality was 9% (95% confidence interval, 6-12). Mean follow-up was 25 months (95% confidence interval, 11-39). Median survival was 3 years (95% confidence interval, 2.5-3.5). CONCLUSION: For patients >18 years of age, surgical treatment of carcinoid heart disease can be performed with a reasonable safety profile. However, overall survival appears to have ongoing effects of the primary disease.

Domino heart transplant following heart-lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The domino-donor operation occurs when a "conditioned" heart from the heart-lung transplant (HLT) recipient is transplanted into a separate heart transplant (HT) recipient. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the indications and outcomes associated with the domino procedure. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all prospective and retrospective studies on the domino procedure in the English literature. Eight studies reported 183 HLT recipients and 263 HT recipients who were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: HLT indications included cystic fibrosis in 58% (95% CI: 27-84%) of recipients, primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) in 17% (95% CI: 12-24%), bronchiectasis in 5% (95% CI: 3-10%), emphysema in 5% (95% CI: 0-45%), and Eisenmenger's syndrome in 4% (95% CI: 2-8%). HT indications included ischemic heart disease in 40% (95% CI: 33-47%), non-ischemic disease in 39% (95% CI: 25-56%), and re-transplantation in 10% (95% CI: 1-59%). The pooled mean pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in HT recipients was 3.05 Woods units (95% CI: 0.14-5.95). The overall mortality in the HLT group was 28% (95% CI: 18-41%) at an average follow-up of 15.68 months (95% CI: 0.82-30.54), and 35% (95% CI: 17-58%) in the HT group at an average follow-up of 37.26 months (95% CI: 6.68-67.84). Freedom from rejection in HT was 94% (95% CI: 75-99%) at 1 month, 77% (95% CI: 30-96%) at 6 months, and 41% (95% CI: 33-50%) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The domino procedure appears to be a viable option in properly selected patients that can be performed safely with acceptable outcomes.

Indications and outcomes of combined heart-liver transplant: A systematic review and met-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) has become a viable option for treating concomitant heart and liver failure. However, data are lacking with respect to long-term outcomes. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all studies on CHLT. Following application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of seven studies consisting of 99 CHLT patients were included from the original 1864 articles. RESULTS: CHLT recipient mean age was 53.0 years (95% CI 48.0-58.0), 67.5% of which (95% CI 56.5-76.9) were male. 65.5% (95% CI 39.0-85.0) of patients developed heart failure due to amyloidosis whereas 21.6% (95% CI 12.3-35.2) developed heart failure due to congenital causes. The most common indication for liver transplant was amyloidosis [65.5% (95% CI 39.0-85.0)] followed by liver failure due to hepatitis C [13.8% (95% CI 2.1-54.4)]. The mean intensive care unit length of stay was 8 days (95% CI 5-11) with a mean length of stay of 24 days (95% CI 17-31). Cardiac allograft rejection within the first year was 24.7% (95% CI 9.5-50.7), including antibody mediated [5% (95% CI 1.7-15.2)] and T-cell mediated rejection [22.7% (95% CI 8.8-47.1)]. Overall survival was 87.5% (95% CI 78.6-93.0) at 1 year and 84.3% (95% CI 75.4-90.5) at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: CHLT in select patients with coexisting end-stage heart and liver failure appears to offer high survival and low rejection rates.

Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: A body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2 is a relative contraindication to heart transplantation in patients with end-stage heart failure. Bariatric surgery can be considered either concomitantly with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) placement, or staged after CF-LVAD has been placed. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of these approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies. After assessment for inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight studies were pooled for systematic review and metaanalysis. RESULTS: Overall, of 59 patients, 22 (37%) underwent simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy with CF-LVAD implantation while 37 (63%) underwent staged sleeve gastrectomy after CF-LVAD. The mean age of patients was 46 years (95% CI: 39-53) with 40% females. Mean BMI at most recent follow-up (33.4 kg/m2, 95% CI: 30.2-36.6) was significantly lower compared with mean preoperative BMI (46.7 kg/m2, 95% CI: 42.9-50.6) (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in total incidence of postoperative complications (simultaneous, 16% (95% CI: 1-87%) versus staged, 23% (95% CI: 7-53%)) or in overall survival (simultaneous, 93% (95% CI: 72-99%) versus staged, 79% (95% CI: 60-90%), p = 0.17) for average follow-up time of 12.7 months. Bariatric surgery resulted in 66% of patients (95% CI: 51-79) to be listed for heart transplantation, including 33% (95% CI: 22-47) who were transplanted. CONCLUSIONS: Both simultaneous and staged bariatric surgeries with CF-LVAD placement have comparable outcomes and significantly reduce BMI. This can allow previously ineligible patients to undergo heart transplantation.

Surgical Pulmonary Embolectomy Outcomes for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with significant mortality. Surgical embolectomy is a viable treatment option; however, it remains controversial as a result of variable outcomes. This review investigates patient outcomes after surgical embolectomy for acute PE. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify articles reporting surgical embolectomy for treatment of PE. 32 studies were included comprising 936 patients. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data were extracted and pooled for systematic review. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 56.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.5, 60.1), and 50% were male (95% CI, 46, 55); 82% had right ventricular dysfunction (95% CI, 62, 93), 80% (95% CI, 67, 89) had unstable hemodynamics, and 9% (95% CI, 5, 16) experienced cardiac arrest. Massive PE and submassive PE were present in 83% (95% CI, 43, 97)] and 13% (95% CI, 2, 56) of patients, respectively. Before embolectomy, 33% of patients (95% CI, 14, 60) underwent systemic thrombolysis, and 14% (95% CI, 8, 24) underwent catheter embolectomy. Preoperatively, 47% of patients were ventilated (95% CI, 26; 70), and 36% had percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (95% CI, 11, 71). Mean operative time and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time were 170 minutes (95% CI, 101, 239) and 56 minutes (95% CI, 42, 70), respectively. Intraoperative mortality was 4% (95% CI, 2, 8). Mean hospital and intensive care unit stay were 10 days (95% CI, 6, 14) and 2 days (95% CI, 1, 3), respectively. Mean postoperative systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was significantly decreased from the preoperative period (sPAP 57.8, mm Hg; 95% CI, 53, 62.7) to the postoperative period (sPAP, 31.3 mm Hg; 24.9, 37.8); P < .01). In-hospital mortality was 16% (95% CI, 12, 21). Overall survival at 5 years was 73% (95% CI, 64, 81). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical embolectomy is an acceptable treatment option with favorable outcomes.

Comparison of SynCardia total artificial heart and HeartWare HVAD biventricular support for management of biventricular heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing SynCardia total artificial heart (TAH) and biventricular HeartWare ventricular assist device (Bi-HVAD) support for biventricular heart failure (HF). METHODS: Electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies detailing patients who underwent biventricular assist device implantation using Bi-HVAD devices and those who underwent TAH placement for biventricular HF. Twelve studies including 512 patients in the TAH group versus 38 patients in the Bi-HVAD group were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ischemic cardiac etiology was present in 32% (95% CI, 24-47) of TAH vs. 15% (95% CI, 4-44) of Bi-HVAD patients (P=0.21). There was a comparable incidence of stroke [TAH 11% (95% CI, 7-16) vs. Bi-HVAD 13% (95% CI, 2-51), P=0.86] and acute kidney injury [TAH 28% (95% CI, 2-89) vs. Bi-HVAD 27% (95% CI, 9-59), P=0.98]. Overall infection rate was 67% (95% CI, 47-82) in TAH and 36% (95% CI, 10-74) in Bi-HVAD (P=0.16). Driveline infections were comparable between the two groups [TAH 11% (95% CI, 6-19) vs. Bi-HVAD 8% (95% CI, 1-39), P=0.73] and although a higher incidence of mediastinitis was found in the Bi-HVAD group [TAH 4% (95% CI, 2-7) vs. Bi-HVAD 15% (95% CI, 4-45), P=0.07] there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Postoperative bleeding was present in 42% (95% CI, 28-58) of TAH vs. 23% (95% CI, 8-52) of Bi-HVAD (P=0.22). Patients in the TAH group had shorter duration of support [TAH 71 days (95% CI, 15-127) vs. Bi-HVAD 167 days (95% CI, 116-217), P=0.01]. At the mean follow-up time of 120 days, (95% CI, 83-157) patients in both groups had similar overall mortality [TAH 36% (95% CI, 22-49) vs. Bi-HVAD 26% (95% CI, 6-46), P=0.44] including mortality on device support [TAH 26% (95% CI, 17-36) vs. Bi-HVAD 21% (95% CI, 4-37), P=0.55]. Discharge home on support was achieved in 6% (95% CI, 4-17%) of TAH patients vs. 73% (95% CI, 48-89%) of Bi-HVAD (P<0.01), and 68% (95% CI, 52-84) of TAH patients were transplanted vs. 61% (95% CI, 47-75) in the Bi-HVAD group (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on Bi-HVAD support were more likely to be able to be discharged home on support and had similar overall mortality to TAH, albeit with much longer duration of support.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Decommissioning Compared with Explantation for Ventricular Recovery: A Systematic Review.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) withdrawal with ventricular recovery represents the optimal outcome for patients previously implanted with an LVAD. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the patient outcomes of device withdrawal via minimally invasive pump decommissioning as compared with reoperation for pump explantation. An electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature assessing LVAD withdrawal. All identified articles were systematically assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, 44 studies (85 patients) were included in the analysis, of whom 20% underwent decommissioning and 80% underwent explantation. The most commonly used LVAD types included the HeartMate II (decommissioning 23.5% vs. explantation 60.3%; p = 0.01) and HeartWare HVAD (decommissioning 76.5% vs. explantation 17.6%; p < 0.001). At median follow-up of 389 days, there were no significant differences in the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (p = 0.88), infection (p = 0.75), and survival (p = 0.20). However, there was a trend toward a higher recurrence of heart failure in patients who underwent decommissioning as compared with explantation (decommissioning 15.4% vs. explantation 8.2%, cumulative hazard; p = 0.06). Decommissioning appears to be a feasible alternative to LVAD explantation in terms of overall patient outcomes.