Effects of remote coaching following supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation on physical activity levels, physical fitness, and patient-reported outcomes: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that cancer survivors experience difficulties maintaining physical activity levels after participation in a supervised exercise rehabilitation program. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a six-month remote coaching intervention, following a supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation program on maintenance of PA levels; and improvement of aerobic capacity, muscle strength and patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors. METHODS: Ninety-seven participants from a Dutch University Hospital's exercise rehabilitation program were randomised to the COACH group (n = 46), receiving 6 months of remote coaching after completing the exercise program, or the CONTROL group (n = 50), receiving no additional intervention. Assessment of PA levels; sedentary time; aerobic capacity; muscle strength; fatigue; health-related quality of life (HRQoL); level of anxiety and depression; and return to work (RTW) rates were conducted at baseline (T0) and six months later (T1). Multiple linear regression was used for between-group statistical comparisons of all outcomes measures. Mean differences at T1 were estimated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were observed for all outcomes at T1. An adjusted mean difference in weekly PA of 45 min (95%CI -50;140) was observed between the COACH group and the CONTROL group, favouring the COACH group, yet lacking statistical or clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our six-month remote coaching intervention did not notably improve PA levels; sedentary time; aerobic capacity; muscle strength; HRQoL; fatigue; anxiety and depression symptoms and RTW rates after participation in a supervised exercise oncology program. Although the participants who received coaching showed slightly higher levels of PA, these differences were not significant. More research is needed to identify patients in need for follow-up interventions following supervised exercise program and to investigate the effectiveness of remote coaching interventions in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NL7729, registered 13 may 2019, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL7729 .

Exercise training as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in cancer survivors: an observational study on changes in physical performance and patient-reported outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe changes in physical performance and patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivors who participated in an exercise program as part of usual-care multidisciplinary rehabilitation and the influence of training adaptations during the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: In an observational cohort study, cancer survivors underwent usual-care multidisciplinary rehabilitation including a 10-week exercise program. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the exercise program was adapted with reduced training time and frequency. Mean changes and 95% confidence intervals in physical performance (peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), peak work rate during a steep ramp test (SRT-WRpeak), 6-min walking distance, muscle strength) and patient-reported outcomes (health-related quality of life, fatigue, anxiety, and depression) were assessed between the start and the end of the exercise program. Linear regression analysis, adjusting for baseline levels of outcomes, was used to investigate differences in changes in outcomes between participants who underwent the original and the adapted program. RESULTS: All outcomes statistically significantly improved over time, regardless of adaptations in the exercise program. VO2peak increased with 9.6% and 7.7% in the original and adapted program, respectively. Significant smaller improvements were observed in SRT-WRpeak (- 3.9%) and upper body muscle strength (- 10.8%) after participation in the adapted compared to the original program. No significant between-group differences were observed for other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Physical performance and patient-reported outcomes statistically and clinically significantly improved in cancer survivors who participated in an exercise program as part of usual-care multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Improvements of performance outcomes were smaller since the training adaptations, though only significant for SRT-WRpeak and upper body strength.

Criterion Validity and Responsiveness of the Steep Ramp Test to Evaluate Aerobic Capacity in Survivors of Cancer Participating in a Supervised Exercise Rehabilitation Program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the criterion validity and responsiveness of the steep ramp test (SRT) compared with the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in evaluating aerobic capacity in survivors of cancer participating in a rehabilitation program. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study in which survivors of cancer performed an SRT and CPET before (T=0) and after (T=1) a 10-week exercise rehabilitation program. Peak work rate achieved during the SRT (SRT-WRpeak) was compared with peak oxygen consumption measured during the CPET (CPET-Vo2peak), which is the criterion standard for aerobic capacity. Correlation coefficients were calculated between SRT-WRpeak and CPET-Vo2peak at T=0 to examine criterion validity and between changes in SRT-WRpeak and CPET-Vo2peak from T=0 to T=1 to determine responsiveness. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to examine the ability of the SRT to detect a true improvement (6%) in CPET-Vo2peak. SETTING: University medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Survivors of cancer (N=106). INTERVENTIONS: Exercise rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation coefficients between CPET-Vo2peak and SRT-WRpeak and between changes in CPET-Vo2peak and SRT-WRpeak. RESULTS: An r of 0.86 (N=106) was found for the relation between SRT-WRpeak and CPET-Vo2peak at T=0. An r of 0.51 was observed for the relation between changes in SRT-WRpeak and CPET-Vo2peak (n=59). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.74 for the SRT to detect a true improvement in CPET-Vo2peak, with an optimal cutoff value of +0.26 W/kg (sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Because SRT-WRpeak and CPET-Vo2peak were strongly correlated, the SRT seems a valid tool to estimate aerobic capacity in survivors of cancer. The responsiveness to measure changes in aerobic capacity appears moderate. Nevertheless, the SRT seems able to detect improvement in aerobic capacity, with a cutoff value of 0.26 W/kg.

Smartphone App with an Accelerometer Enhances Patients' Physical Activity Following Elective Orthopedic Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Low physical activity (PA) levels are common in hospitalized patients. Digital health tools could be valuable in preventing the negative effects of inactivity. We therefore developed Hospital Fit; which is a smartphone application with an accelerometer, designed for hospitalized patients. It enables objective activity monitoring and provides patients with insights into their recovery progress and offers a tailored exercise program. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of Hospital Fit to enhance PA levels and functional recovery following orthopedic surgery. PA was measured with an accelerometer postoperatively until discharge. The control group received standard physiotherapy, while the intervention group used Hospital Fit in addition to physiotherapy. The time spent active and functional recovery (modified Iowa Level of Assistance Scale) on postoperative day one (POD1) were measured. Ninety-seven patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty were recruited. Hospital Fit use, corrected for age, resulted in patients standing and walking on POD1 for an average increase of 28.43 min (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.55-51.32). The odds of achieving functional recovery on POD1, corrected for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, were 3.08 times higher (95% CI: 1.14-8.31) with Hospital Fit use. A smartphone app combined with an accelerometer demonstrates the potential to enhance patients' PA levels and functional recovery during hospitalization.

Determinants of physical activity maintenance and the acceptability of a remote coaching intervention following supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate perceived determinants of physical activity (PA) maintenance following supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation and the acceptability of a remote coaching intervention during this period. METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was conducted. Nineteen participants (16 women, 3 men) were recruited from the intervention (n = 12) and control group (n = 7) of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of remote coaching following hospital-based, supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation. Participants in the intervention group received a 6-month remote coaching intervention after completing the exercise program, aimed at stimulating PA maintenance. The interviews were based on the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of Behaviour (COM-B model) and the framework of acceptability (TFA) and were coded using template analysis. RESULTS: Key themes regarding determinants of PA maintenance were self-efficacy, PA habits, accountability, physical complaints, and facilities. Remote coaching was perceived acceptable because it stimulated PA maintenance by offering a source of structure and social support and thereby increased accountability. Moreover, it improved confidence to perform PA, leading to increased levels of self-efficacy. The remote nature of the intervention was perceived as convenient by some of the participants, while others would have preferred additional physical appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors considered remote coaching acceptable to stimulate PA maintenance following supervised rehabilitation. Interventions should focus on increasing accountability, self-efficacy, forming habits, and helping cancer survivors to overcome barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The ability to maintain PA beyond supervised exercise oncology programs depends on many determinants. Remote coaching interventions have potential to target individually relevant determinants following exercise programs in cancer survivors.

Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the criterion validity and responsiveness of the self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) to monitor aerobic capacity in cancer survivors. METHODS: Cancer survivors participating in a 10-week supervised exercise program were included. The FitMáx©-questionnaire, DASI, VSAQ and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were completed before (T0) and after (T1) the program. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated between VO2peak estimated by the questionnaires (questionnaire-VO2peak) and VO2peak measured during CPET (CPET-VO2peak), at T0 to examine criterion validity, and between changes in questionnaire-VO2peak and CPET-VO2peak (ΔT0-T1) to determine responsiveness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to examine the ability of the questionnaires to detect true improvements (≥ 6%) in CPET-VO2peak. RESULTS: Seventy participants were included. Outcomes at T1 were available for 58 participants (83%). Mean CPET-VO2peak significantly improved at T1 (Δ1.6 mL·kg- 1·min- 1 or 8%). Agreement between questionnaire-VO2peak and CPET-VO2peak at T0 was moderate for the FitMáx©-questionnaire (ICC = 0.69) and VSAQ (ICC = 0.53), and poor for DASI (ICC = 0.36). Poor agreement was found between ΔCPET-VO2peak and Δquestionnaire-VO2peak for all questionnaires (ICC 0.43, 0.19 and 0.18 for the FitMáx©-questionnaire, VSAQ and DASI, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the FitMáx©-questionnaire was able to detect improvements in CPET-VO2peak (area under the curve, AUC = 0.77), when using a cut-off value of 1.0 mL·kg- 1·min- 1, while VSAQ (AUC = 0.66) and DASI (AUC = 0.64) could not. CONCLUSION: The self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire has sufficient validity to estimate aerobic capacity in cancer survivors at group level. The responsiveness of the FitMáx©-questionnaire for absolute change is limited, but the questionnaire is able to detect whether aerobic capacity improved. The FitMáx©-questionnaire showed substantial better values of validity and responsiveness compared to DASI and VSAQ.