Histopathologic Features of Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms.

IMPORTANCE: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction occurring 2 to 8 weeks after medication initiation. Diagnosis is clinical; RegiSCAR scoring includes biopsy "suggestive of DRESS," undefined in the literature. OBJECTIVE: This study correlates DRESS dermatopathology, culprit drugs, disease course, and outcome severity compared with maculopapular drug reactions (MDR). METHODS: Between 2014 and 2023, a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care institute reviewed 55 patients with DRESS, assessing demographics, culprit drug, illness course, and histopathology. Biopsies of 15 patients with DRESS and 15 MDR patients were graded by a predefined histopathological scoring system. Statistical analysis (significant P-value<0.05) included the Fisher exact probability, ANOVA, and correlation tests. RESULTS: Among 55 patients with DRESS (mean age 50.13, 28 female/27 male), 15 (mean age 50.4, 7 female/8 male) had diagnostic biopsies. Compared with MDR patients, patients with DRESS exhibited significantly more interface dermatitis (P = 0.04), lichenoid dermatitis (P = 0.0007), pigment incontinence (P = 0.04), and periadnexal interface dermatitis (P = 0.002). MDR biopsies displayed perivascular inflammation and higher eosinophils than DRESS, trending toward significance. CONCLUSIONS: Key histopathologic features are interface dermatitis, periadnexal interface dermatitis, lichenoid dermatitis, pigment incontinence, and neutrophils dominance over eosinophils indicate DRESS clinically.

Impact of a clinical pharmacist on provider prescribing patterns in a primary care clinic.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, these agents are still underutilized in primary care practice. A clinical pharmacist was embedded at a primary care clinic to provide diabetes and hypertension management under a collaborative practice agreement with a supervising physician. OBJECTIVES: This study will evaluate whether the presence of an embedded pharmacist in a primary care clinic affects prescribing patterns of novel, evidence-based diabetes therapies. METHODS: We abstracted information on SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing patterns from 3 primary care clinics across 2 time periods as a single-center, retrospective cohort study. We used a difference-in-difference analysis to compare prescription rates and assess the impact of embedding the pharmacist into clinical practice. Prescriptions written by the pharmacist were excluded. RESULTS: Across all 3 clinics, 1309 and 1489 patients were included in the pre-intervention and postintervention periods, respectively. The percentage of patients prescribed either an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist, similar between both groups at baseline, rose to 11.6% in the nonintervention clinics and 15.0% in the intervention clinic. There was a statistically significant increase in SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing in the intervention clinic compared with nonintervention clinics (P = 0.034). This change in prescribing patterns appeared even greater when excluding prescribers who were not present during both pre-intervention and postintervention periods (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The presence of a pharmacist is associated with increased SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing within a clinic, even in patients not seen directly by the pharmacist. These results suggest that an on-site clinical pharmacist providing care for patients with diabetes may indirectly influence the prescribing behavior of co-located primary care providers, increasing the adoption of novel noninsulin diabetic medications.

Patient errors in use of injectable antidiabetic medications: A need for improved clinic-based education.

OBJECTIVES: This case series was designed to educate and inform health care professionals on the importance of providing adequate education on injectable antidiabetic agents and highlighting common medication errors related to diabetes care seen in ambulatory practice. The discussion following case descriptions will attempt to characterize patients who may be at high risk for these errors and identify ways to reduce the potential for error. CASE SUMMARY: In a diabetes care clinic, 4 cases were identified in which the patient experienced an escalation of insulin or other injectable antidiabetic medication doses with no improvement in glycemic control. Two of the cases involved failure to remove an inner needle cap because of a poor understanding of pen use. One case was attributed to switching formulations without providing proper education for an adult patient with a learning impairment, and the other was attributed to suboptimal absorption of insulin doses from lipohypertrophy. Three of the 4 cases resulted in multiple instances of hypoglycemia, and all 4 patients exhibited markedly improved glycemic control once the injection error was corrected. The clinic pharmacist played an essential role in identifying and correcting administration errors within an interdisciplinary team. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Based on the observations from the 4 cases, clinicians should be prompted to review antidiabetic medication injection techniques before initiation and periodically thereafter with their patients. Factors that should prompt further education include low health literacy, language barrier, initiation of medication by another provider, switch of medication product or formulation, obvious discrepancies between refill history and patient's self-reported adherence, observed lipohypertrophy, and escalation of doses without any improvement in glycemic control. A referral to the clinic pharmacist should be considered to provide more detailed education for these patients.

Extremity nevus count is an independent risk factor for basal cell carcinoma and melanoma, but not squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The presence of nevi portends an increased risk for melanoma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the association between extremity nevus count and the risk of melanoma and keratinocyte cancers. METHODS: We evaluated prospective cohorts of 176,317 women (the Nurses' Health Study, 1986-2012 and the Nurses' Health Study 2, 1989-2013) and 32,383 men (Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 1986-2012). Information on nevus count (none, 1-5, 6-14, ≥15) on the extremity was collected at baseline. RESULTS: There were 1704 incident cases of melanoma, 2296 incident cases of squamous cell carcinoma, and 30,457 incident cases of basal cell carcinoma, with a total of 4,655,043 person-years for melanoma and 4,267,708 person-years for keratinocyte cancers. The presence of an extremity nevus was associated with an increased risk of melanoma in all anatomic areas and increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Individuals with ≥15 nevi had the highest risk of melanoma and BCC compared to those without any extremity nevi (melanoma hazard ratio 2.79 [95% confidence interval 2.04-3.83]; BCC HR 1.40 [95% confidence interval 1.32-1.49]). No significant association was observed for squamous cell carcinoma. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of our study included self-reported nevus count and detection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Extremity nevus count is a helpful clinical marker in risk-stratifying individuals for BCC and melanoma on all body sites.

Having a first-degree relative with melanoma increases lifetime risk of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found familial aggregation of melanoma and keratinocyte cancers (KCs). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the risk of melanoma and KCs in those with a positive family history of melanoma while controlling for pigmentary and environmental risk factors. METHODS: We prospectively followed 216,115 participants from the Nurses' Health Study, Nurse's Health Study 2, and Health Professionals Follow-up Study for more than 20 years. Cox proportional hazards regression controlling for known risk factors for skin cancer was used to estimate association between family history of melanoma and melanoma and KCs. RESULTS: Compared with those without a family history of melanoma, individuals with a family history of melanoma had a 74% increased risk of melanoma (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.09), a 22% increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.40), and a 27% increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.44). Family history of melanoma increased the risk of development of truncal melanoma in both sexes, extremity melanoma in women, and extremity squamous cell carcinoma in women. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include self-reported family history and detection bias. CONCLUSION: Individuals with a family history of melanoma are at an increased risk of melanoma and KCs.

Giant proliferating trichilemmal cyst arising from a nevus sebaceus growing for 30 years.

Nevus sebaceus of Jadassohn, a congenital cutaneous hamartoma, has the potential to develop into various epidermal adnexal-origin neoplasms. While the most common neoplasms are trichoblastoma or syringocystadenoma, proliferating trichilemmal cysts are exceptionally rare. We report a case of a 63-year-old Cuban male with a giant proliferating trichilemmal cyst arising from a nevus sebaceus on the right shoulder which had been growing for 30 years. Proliferating trichilemmal cysts arising from nevus sebaceus cases are difficult to diagnose clinically and histologically as they are very rare and have not been defined by exact diagnostic criteria. Our case creates awareness of this particular tumor in nevus sebaceus and shares clinical and histological diagnostic information that can be used to make a proper diagnosis.

End points in dermatologic clinical trials: A review for clinicians.

Clinical trials are critical for the development of new therapies in dermatology, and their results help determine US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and guide care. Of special relevance is the clinical trial efficacy end point, the metric from which statistically significant outcome is derived. Clinicians' understanding of a clinical trial's end point is necessary for critical analysis of the trial results and for applying those results to daily practice. This review provides practical knowledge and critical evaluation of end points used in treatment approvals by the FDA. The end points for actinic keratosis, acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, onychomycosis, and cutaneous ulcer serve as examples.

Trends in the diagnosis and clinical features of melanoma in situ (MIS) in US men and women: A prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of melanoma in situ (MIS) is increasing, but little is known about its clinical and epidemiologic features. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine trends in diagnosis and clinical features of MIS. METHODS: Incident cases of melanoma were collected prospectively from the Nurses' Health Study (1976-2010) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2010). RESULTS: MIS incidence increased from 2 to 42 per 100,000 person-year among women, and from 11 to 73 per 100,000 person-year among men, exceeding the rate of increase of invasive melanomas. Melanoma mortality initially increased during the follow-up period then plateaued. Men were more likely than women to develop in situ melanomas on the upper half of the body (P < .001). Invasive melanomas were diagnosed at a younger age than MIS (P < .001), and were more likely to be found on the lower extremities than MIS (P < .001). LIMITATIONS: This is a strictly descriptive study without examination into mechanisms. CONCLUSION: We found epidemiologic and clinical differences for in situ and invasive melanomas, which support further examination into the variations in etiologic pathways. The lack of improvement in mortality despite the increase in detection of in situ relative to invasive lesions further highlights the need to improve invasive melanoma-specific clinical screening features.