Clinical trial links oncolytic immunoactivation to survival in glioblastoma.

Immunotherapy failures can result from the highly suppressive tumour microenvironment that characterizes aggressive forms of cancer such as recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM)1,2. Here we report the results of a first-in-human phase I trial in 41 patients with rGBM who were injected with CAN-3110-an oncolytic herpes virus (oHSV)3. In contrast to other clinical oHSVs, CAN-3110 retains the viral neurovirulence ICP34.5 gene transcribed by a nestin promoter; nestin is overexpressed in GBM and other invasive tumours, but not in the adult brain or healthy differentiated tissue4. These modifications confer CAN-3110 with preferential tumour replication. No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered. Positive HSV1 serology was significantly associated with both improved survival and clearance of CAN-3110 from injected tumours. Survival after treatment, particularly in individuals seropositive for HSV1, was significantly associated with (1) changes in tumour/PBMC T cell counts and clonal diversity, (2) peripheral expansion/contraction of specific T cell clonotypes; and (3) tumour transcriptomic signatures of immune activation. These results provide human validation that intralesional oHSV treatment enhances anticancer immune responses even in immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments, particularly in individuals with cognate serology to the injected virus. This provides a biological rationale for use of this oncolytic modality in cancers that are otherwise unresponsive to immunotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03152318 ).

Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma.

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas. METHODS: In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.).

Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial.

Neoantigens, which are derived from tumour-specific protein-coding mutations, are exempt from central tolerance, can generate robust immune responses1,2 and can function as bona fide antigens that facilitate tumour rejection3. Here we demonstrate that a strategy that uses multi-epitope, personalized neoantigen vaccination, which has previously been tested in patients with high-risk melanoma4-6, is feasible for tumours such as glioblastoma, which typically have a relatively low mutation load1,7 and an immunologically 'cold' tumour microenvironment8. We used personalized neoantigen-targeting vaccines to immunize patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma following surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy in a phase I/Ib study. Patients who did not receive dexamethasone-a highly potent corticosteroid that is frequently prescribed to treat cerebral oedema in patients with glioblastoma-generated circulating polyfunctional neoantigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses that were enriched in a memory phenotype and showed an increase in the number of tumour-infiltrating T cells. Using single-cell T cell receptor analysis, we provide evidence that neoantigen-specific T cells from the peripheral blood can migrate into an intracranial glioblastoma tumour. Neoantigen-targeting vaccines thus have the potential to favourably alter the immune milieu of glioblastoma.

PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group.

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.

Medical and neurologic management of brain tumor patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article discusses commonly encountered medical and neurological complications in patients with brain tumors and highlights recommendations for their management based on updated evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Use of dexamethasone is correlated with worse prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, and in brain metastases, high doses may lead to increased side effects without additional clinical benefit. There are multiple antiseizure medications (ASM) to choose from and possible interactions and toxicity must be considered when choosing an agent. Additionally, there is growing interest in the use of AMPA receptor blockers as ASM in patients with brain tumors. Nonpharmacological strategies for the management of fatigue remain paramount. Cognitive decline is common after whole brain radiation (WBRT) and hippocampal-sparing WBRT results in superior cognitive outcomes. Venous thromboembolism is a common complication and there is growing evidence on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population. SUMMARY: There is evolving evidence on the management of medical and neurological complications in patients with brain tumors. These complications, require early identification and multidisciplinary collaboration and expertise.

Intracranial outcomes following neurosurgical resection in patients with brain metastases secondary to HER2-positive breast cancer versus other subtypes.

PURPOSE: Neurosurgical resection serves an important role in select patients with breast cancer and brain metastases but can delay systemic therapy and yield complications. Consequently, identification of patients most likely to benefit from surgery is important. Given the poorer long-term intracranial responses to radiotherapy sometimes observed in HER2-positive (HER2 +) patients, we investigated whether neurosurgical resection is differentially beneficial in this population. METHODS: We identified 633 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases arising from breast cancer managed at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2010 and 2022. Patients were stratified by breast cancer subtype: HER2 + (N = 189), hormone receptor positive (HR +)/HER2- (N = 267), and triple negative (N = 177). Per-patient and per-metastasis outcomes were evaluated; interaction models assessing the impact of neurosurgical resection by subtype were constructed. RESULTS: Relative to HR + /HER2- subtype, omission of upfront neurosurgical resection in patients with HER2 + disease was associated with increased subsequent utilization of salvage stereotactic radiation, whole brain radiotherapy, and craniotomy (interaction HR 2.02 [95% CI, 1.04-3.93], p = 0.04; HR 3.92 [95% CI, 1.24-12.40], p = 0.02; HR 4.98 [95% CI, 1.34-18.58], p = 0.02, respectively). Tumors stemming from HER2 + versus HR + /HER2- primaries displayed increased local recurrence when upfront neurosurgical resection was omitted (interaction HR 3.62 [95% CI, 1.06-12.38], p = 0.04). No such associations were noted when comparing triple negative to HR + /HER2- subtype (p-interaction > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: Patients with HER2 + disease and brain metastases may disproportionately benefit from upfront neurosurgical resection relative to other subtypes. If validated, our results may suggest a lower threshold to consider surgery in brain metastases secondary to HER2 + breast cancer.

RANO 2.0 criteria: concepts applicable to the neuroradiologist's clinical practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria aim at improving the standardization and reliability of treatment response assessment in clinical trials studying central nervous system (CNS) gliomas. This review presents the evidence supporting RANO 2.0 updates and discusses which concepts can be applicable to the clinical practice, particularly in the clinical radiographic reads. RECENT FINDINGS: Updates in RANO 2.0 were supported by recent retrospective analyses of multicenter data from recent clinical trials. As proposed in RANO 2.0, in tumors receiving radiation therapy, the post-RT MRI scan should be used as a reference baseline for the following scans, as opposed to the pre-RT scan, and radiographic findings suggesting progression within three months after radiation therapy completion should be verified with confirmatory scans. Volumetric assessments should be considered, when available, especially for low-grade gliomas, and the evaluation of nonenhancing disease should have a marginal role in glioblastoma. However, the radiographic reads in the clinical setting also benefit from aspects that lie outside RANO 2.0 criteria, such as qualitative evaluations, patient-specific clinical considerations, and advanced imaging. SUMMARY: While RANO 2.0 criteria are meant for the standardization of the response assessment in clinical trials, some concepts have the potential to improve patients' management in the clinical practice.

Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0.

PURPOSE: To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS: This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS: Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION: These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.

Clinical trial design for novel targeted agents in neuro-oncology.

Biomarker-based clinical trials investigating targeted treatments for brain tumors have surged due to better access to biomarker testing and a deeper grasp of the molecular basis of tumor development. The design of clinical trials is crucial for evaluating safety, confirming effectiveness, and affirming the clinical advantage of novel agents, with the goal of approval by regulatory authorities to expand patient treatment options. Given some challenges unique to brain tumors, early-stage clinical trials for novel targeted agents must integrate pharmacokinetics and tissue-based pharmacodynamic assessments to establish timely go-no-go decisions for larger studies. Surgical window-of-opportunity trials can allow for the comparison of treated and untreated tumor samples, verifying target engagement and its modulatory effects for evidence of biological activity. Due to the challenges of achieving the required sample sizes to power efficacy analyses, later-stage trials of targeted therapies can include basket trials which test one drug on multiple tumor types, while umbrella trials evaluate several biomarkers within a single histology. Platform trials can also be leveraged to investigate multiple biomarker-driven hypotheses within a unified protocol and can incorporate Bayesian algorithms for adaptive randomization. Selecting appropriate endpoints, such as progression-free survival or overall response rate, is crucial and novel response assessment criteria need to be considered in the context of the tumor and therapy being investigated. Lastly, inclusivity in trials is essential to address health disparities and engage diverse patient populations to ensure real-world impact. Future trials should build upon the knowledge gained from both initial achievements and past setbacks in the field.

A multi-center, clinical analysis of IDH-mutant gliomas, WHO Grade 4: implications for prognosis and clinical trial design.

PURPOSE: Mutations in the Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) genes, IDH1 or IDH2, define a group of adult diffuse gliomas associated with a younger age at diagnosis and better prognosis than IDH wild-type glioblastoma. Within IDH mutant gliomas, a small fraction of astrocytic tumors present with grade 4 histologic features and poor prognosis. In molecular studies, homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B is independently predictive of poor prognosis and short survival. As a consequence, 2021 WHO classification now also recognizes this molecular feature, CDKN2A/B deletion, as sufficient for classifying an astrocytoma as IDH-mutant, WHO Grade 4, regardless of histological grading. Here, we investigate outcomes of patients with WHO Grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma both with and without CDKN2A/B deletion, to compare these groups and evaluate clinical and radiographic factors that contribute to survival. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 79 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma with CDKN2A/B deletion detected at initial diagnosis across five international institutions as well as a comparison group of 51 patients with IDH-mutant, astrocytoma, histologically Grade 4 without detectable CDKN2A/B deletion. We assembled clinical and radiographic features for all patients. RESULTS: We find that CDKN2A/B deletion was associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS; p = 0.0004) and progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.0026), with median OS of 5.0 years and PFS of 3.0 years, compared to 10.1 and 5.0 years for tumors with a grade 4 designation based only on histologic criteria. Multivariate analysis confirmed CDKN2A/B deletion as a strong negative prognosticator for both OS (HR = 3.51, p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR = 2.35, p = 0.00095). In addition, in tumors with CDKN2A/B deletion, preoperative contrast enhancement is a significant predictor of worse OS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.22-3.93, p = 0.0090) and PFS (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.02-2.97, p = 0.0420). CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the severe prognostic impact of CDKN2A/B deletion in IDH-mutant astrocytomas and highlight the need for further refinement of tumor prognostic categorization. Our results provide a key benchmark of baseline patient outcomes for therapeutic trials, underscoring the importance of CDKN2A/B status assessment, in addition to histologic grading, in clinical trial design and therapeutic decision-making for IDH-mutant astrocytoma patients.

Updated Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for Gliomas.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and its versions were developed by expert opinion consensus to standardize response evaluation in glioma clinical trials. New patient-based data informed the development of updated response assessment criteria, RANO 2.0. RECENT FINDINGS: In a recent study of patients with glioblastoma, the post-radiation brain MRI was a superior baseline MRI compared to the pretreatment MRI, and confirmation scans were only beneficial within the first 12 weeks of completion of radiation in newly diagnosed disease. Nonenhancing disease evaluation did not improve the correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival in newly diagnosed and recurrent settings. RANO 2.0 recommends a single common response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas, regardless of the treatment modality being evaluated. It also provides guidance on the evaluation of nonenhancing tumors and tumors with both enhancing and nonenhancing components.

The Role of Mutant IDH Inhibitors in the Treatment of Glioma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations has led to a transformation in our understanding of gliomas and has paved the way to a new era of targeted therapy. In this article, we review the classification of IDH-mutant glioma, standard of care treatment options, clinical evidence for mutant IDH (mIDH) inhibitors, and practical implications of the recent landmark INDIGO trial. RECENT FINDINGS: In the phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled INDIGO trial, mIDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib increased progression-free survival among non-enhancing grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas following surgery. This marks the first positive randomized trial of targeted therapy in IDH-mutant glioma, and led to the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of vorasidenib in August 2024 for grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma. Vorasidenib is a well-tolerated treatment that can benefit a subset of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. Targeting mIDH also remains a promising strategy for select groups of patients excluded from the INDIGO trial. Ongoing and future studies, including with new agents and with combination therapy approaches, may expand the benefit and unlock the potential of mIDH inhibitors.

Current drug development and trial designs in neuro-oncology: report from the first American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society for Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials Conference.

Successful drug development for people with cancers of the CNS has been challenging. There are multiple barriers to successful drug development including biological factors, rarity of the disease, and ineffective use of clinical trials. Based upon a series of presentations at the First Central Nervous System Clinical Trials Conference hosted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society for Neuro-Oncology, we provide an overview on drug development and novel trial designs in neuro-oncology. This Review discusses the challenges of therapeutic development in neuro-oncology and proposes strategies to improve the drug discovery process by enriching the pipeline of promising therapies, optimising trial design, incorporating biomarkers, using external data, and maximising efficacy and reproducibility of clinical trials.

Novel trial designs in neuro-oncology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An important factor contributing to the low rate of success in identifying effective therapies for brain tumor patients is the slow, inefficient, and expensive process of drug development, as well as small patient numbers, low patient participation in clinical trials, and reluctance of patients to enroll in ineffective control arms. In recent years, a number of novel trial designs have been developed to try to address some of these issues. RECENT FINDINGS: Surgical 'window-of-opportunity' trials that evaluate tumor drug concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects provide invaluable early data early guiding the development of novel therapies. Basket and bucket trials facilitate the development of therapies that target specific biomarkers subsets. Platform trials utilizing Bayesian adaptive randomization and shared control arms such as the INSIGhT and GBM-AGILE trials increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of developing novel therapies. There is also growing interest in leveraging external control arms with patient level data to evaluate efficacy in single arm trials, and facilitate interim analysis and potentially reduce the number of control patients in randomized trials. SUMMARY: These novel designs will hopefully reduce the inefficiencies of developing novel therapies in neuro-oncology and facilitate the identification of more effective therapies for brain tumor patients.

Activity of a first-in-class oral HIF2-alpha inhibitor, PT2385, in patients with first recurrence of glioblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoxia inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF2α) mediates cellular responses to hypoxia and is over-expressed in glioblastoma (GBM). PT2385 is an oral HIF2α inhibitor with in vivo activity against GBM. METHODS: A two-stage single-arm open-label phase II study of adults with GBM at first recurrence following chemoradiation with measurable disease was conducted through the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium. PT2385 was administered at the phase II dose (800 mg b.i.d.). The primary outcome was objective radiographic response (ORR = complete response + partial response, CR + PR); secondary outcomes were safety, overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS). Exploratory objectives included pharmacokinetics (day 15 Cmin), pharmacodynamics (erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor), and pH-weighted amine- chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI to quantify tumor acidity at baseline and explore associations with drug response. Stage 1 enrolled 24 patients with early stoppage for ≤ 1 ORR. RESULTS: Of the 24 enrolled patients, median age was 62.1 (38.7-76.7) years, median KPS 80, MGMT promoter was methylated in 46% of tumors. PT2385 was well tolerated. Grade ≥ 3 drug-related adverse events were hypoxia (n = 2), hyponatremia (2), lymphopenia (1), anemia (1), and hyperglycemia (1). No objective radiographic responses were observed; median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.6-2.5) and OS was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.9-12.6). Drug exposure varied widely and did not differ by corticosteroid use (p = 0.12), antiepileptics (p = 0.09), or sex (p = 0.37). Patients with high systemic exposure had significantly longer PFS (6.7 vs 1.8 months, p = 0.009). Baseline acidity by pH-weighted CEST MRI correlated significantly with treatment duration (R2 = 0.49, p = 0.017). Non-enhancing infiltrative disease with high acidity gave rise to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: PT2385 monotherapy had limited activity in first recurrent GBM. Drug exposure was variable. Signals of activity were observed in GBM patients with high systemic exposure and acidic lesions on CEST imaging. A second-generation HIF2α inhibitor is being studied.

Molecular Profiling and Targeted Therapies in Gliomas.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Molecular profiling enables the evaluation of genetic alterations for the diagnosis and classification of gliomas and the selection of appropriate therapies. This review summarizes the current role of molecular profiling and targeted therapies for gliomas. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular profiling is an integral part of the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas. Progress in the development of targeted therapies remains limited due to many factors including the presence of the blood-brain barrier and issues of tumor heterogeneity. Nonetheless, advances have been made with the IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib for IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas, the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAFV600E mutated gliomas, and the therapies for subsets of patients with fusions and H3K27M-altered diffuse midline gliomas. While there has been progress in the use of molecular profiling for the classification and treatment of gliomas, much work remains for targeted therapies to realize their potential.

Therapeutic avenues for cancer neuroscience: translational frontiers and clinical opportunities.

With increasing attention on the essential roles of the tumour microenvironment in recent years, the nervous system has emerged as a novel and crucial facilitator of cancer growth. In this Review, we describe the foundational, translational, and clinical advances illustrating how nerves contribute to tumour proliferation, stress adaptation, immunomodulation, metastasis, electrical hyperactivity and seizures, and neuropathic pain. Collectively, this expanding knowledge base reveals multiple therapeutic avenues for cancer neuroscience that warrant further exploration in clinical studies. We discuss the available clinical data, including ongoing trials investigating novel agents targeting the tumour-nerve axis, and the therapeutic potential for repurposing existing neuroactive drugs as an anti-cancer approach, particularly in combination with established treatment regimens. Lastly, we discuss the clinical challenges of these treatment strategies and highlight unanswered questions and future directions in the burgeoning field of cancer neuroscience.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant low-grade and high-grade glioma (ROAR): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2, basket trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatments are needed to improve outcomes for high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. The activity and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib were evaluated in adult patients with recurrent or progressive BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. METHODS: This study is part of an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 Rare Oncology Agnostic Research (ROAR) basket trial at 27 community and academic cancer centres in 13 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the USA). The study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2. Patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily orally until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. In the high-grade glioma cohort, patients were required to have measurable disease at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma response criteria and have been treated previously with radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients with low-grade glioma were required to have measurable non-enhancing disease (except pilocytic astrocytoma) at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology low-grade glioma criteria. The primary endpoint, in the evaluable intention-to-treat population, was investigator-assessed objective response rate (complete response plus partial response for high-grade glioma and complete response plus partial response plus minor response for low-grade glioma). This trial is ongoing, but is closed for enrolment, NCT02034110. FINDINGS: Between April 17, 2014, and July 25, 2018, 45 patients (31 with glioblastoma) were enrolled into the high-grade glioma cohort and 13 patients were enrolled into the low-grade glioma cohort. The results presented here are based on interim analysis 16 (data cutoff Sept 14, 2020). In the high-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 12·7 months (IQR 5·4-32·3) and 15 (33%; 95% CI 20-49) of 45 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including three complete responses and 12 partial responses. In the low-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 32·2 months (IQR 25·1-47·8). Nine (69%; 95% CI 39-91) of 13 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including one complete response, six partial responses, and two minor responses. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 31 (53%) patients, the most common being fatigue (five [9%]), decreased neutrophil count (five [9%]), headache (three [5%]), and neutropenia (three [5%]). INTERPRETATION: Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma, with a safety profile consistent with that in other indications. BRAFV600E testing could potentially be adopted in clinical practice for patients with glioma. FUNDING: Novartis.

Survival outcomes associated with MGMT promoter methylation and temozolomide in gliosarcoma patients.

PURPOSE: Gliosarcoma is an uncommon glioblastoma subtype, for which MGMT promoter methylation's relationship with response to temozolomide chemotherapy is unclear. We therefore examined this question using a national cohort. METHODS:  The National Cancer Database was queried for patients histopathologically diagnosed with gliosarcoma between 2010 and 2019. The associations between MGMT promoter methylation, first-line single-agent chemotherapy-presumed to be temozolomide herein-and overall survival (OS) were examined using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correction for multiple testing (p < 0.01 was significant). RESULTS: 580 newly-diagnosed gliosarcoma patients with MGMT status were available, among whom 33.6% were MGMT promoter methylated. Median OS for gliosarcoma patients that received standard-of-care temozolomide and radiotherapy was 12.1 months (99% confidence interval [CI] 10.8-15.1) for MGMT promoter unmethylated and 21.4 months (99% CI 15.4-26.2) for MGMT promoter methylated gliosarcomas (p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis of gliosarcoma patients-which included the potential confounders of age, sex, maximal tumor size, extent of resection, and radiotherapy-receipt of temozolomide was associated with improved OS in both MGMT promoter methylated (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.11-0.47, p < 0.001) and unmethylated (HR 0.50 vs. no temozolomide, 99% CI 0.29-0.89, p = 0.002) gliosarcomas. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with improved OS among temozolomide-treated gliosarcoma patients (p < 0.001), but not in patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: In a national analysis of gliosarcoma patients, temozolomide was associated with prolonged OS irrespective of MGMT status. These results provide support for the current practice of trimodal therapy for gliosarcoma.

DICER1 mutations in primary central nervous system tumors: new insights into histologies, mutations, and prognosis.

PURPOSE: We sought to characterize clinical outcomes for adult and pediatric patients with primary CNS tumors harboring DICER1 mutations or loss of DICER1. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients who were treated between 1995 and 2020 for primary CNS tumors containing DICER1 mutations or loss of DICER1 on chromosome 14q, identified by targeted next generation sequencing. Kaplan-Meier plots and log rank tests were used to analyze survival. Cox proportional-hazards model was used for univariate and multivariable analyses for all-cause mortality (ACM). RESULTS: Within our cohort, the most common malignancies were grade 3/4 glioma (61%), grade 1/2 glioma (17%), and CNS sarcoma (6%). Sarcoma and non-glioma histologies, and tumors with biallelic DICER1 mutations or deletions were common in the pediatric population. Mutations occurred throughout DICER1, including missense mutations in the DexD/H-box helicase, DUF283, RNaseIIIa, and RNaseIIIb domains. For patients with grade 3/4 glioma, MGMT methylation (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.16-0.73, p = 0.005), IDH1 R132 mutation (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.41, p = 0.001), and missense mutation in the DexD/H-box helicase domain (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.38, p = 0.003) were independently associated with longer time to ACM on multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: DICER1 mutations or loss of DICER1 occur in diverse primary CNS tumors, including previously unrecognized grade 3/4 gliomas as the most common histology. While prior studies have described RNaseIIIb hotspot mutations, we document novel mutations in additional DICER1 functional domains. Within the grade 3/4 glioma cohort, missense mutation in the DexD/H-box helicase domain was associated with prolonged survival.