Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing (SSME) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSME) were developed to improve the cosmetic results for breast cancer (BC) patients, both allowing for immediate breast reconstruction. Recommendations for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) are primarily derived from trials where patients were treated by standard mastectomies. Due to their more conservative character, SSME and especially NSME potentially leave more glandular tissue at risk for subclinical disease. METHODS: Rates and sites of locoregional failures following SSME and NSME plus/minus reconstruction were analyzed regarding tumor stage and biological risk factors. In particular, the role of PMRT in "intermediate"-risk and early stage high-risk breast cancer patients was revisited. Implications on targeting and dose delivery of PMRT were critically reviewed. RESULTS: The value of PMRT in stage III BC remains undisputed. For node-negative BC patients, the majority of reports classify clinical and biological features such as tumor size, close surgical margins, premenopausal status, multicentricity, lymphangiosis, triple-negativity, HER2-overexpression, and poor tumor grading as associated with higher rates of locoregional relapse, thus, building an "intermediate" risk group. Surveys revealed that the majority of radiation oncologists use risk-adaptive models also considering the number of coinciding factors for the estimation of recurrence probability following SSME and NSME. Constellations with a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk of >10% are usually triggering the indication for PMRT. There was no common belief that the amount of residual tissue, e.g., tissue thickness over flaps, serves as additional decision aid. Modern treatment planning can ensure optimal dose distribution for PMRT in almost all patients with SSME. There are no reliable data supporting a reduction of the treatment volume from the CTV chest wall, e.g., to the nipple-areola complex, to the dorsal aspect behind the implant volume, the pectoralis muscle, nor the regional interpectoral, axillary, or complete regional lymph nodes only. The omission of a skin bolus in intermediate-risk BC does not compromise oncological safety. CONCLUSIONS: For intermediate-risk as well as early stage high-risk BC patients, the DEGRO Breast Cancer Expert Panel recommends the use of PMRT following SSME and NSME when a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk is likely to be greater than 10%, as estimated by clinical and biological risk factors. Subvolume-only radiation is discouraged outside of trials. The impact of adequate systemic treatment and the value of radiotherapy on optimal locoregional tumor control, with the goal of less than 5% LRR at 10-years follow-up, has to be verified in prospective trials.

DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer V: Therapy for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, as well as local therapy in cases with synchronous distant metastases.

AIM: The purpose of this work is to give practical guidelines for radiotherapy of locally advanced, inflammatory and metastatic breast cancer at first presentation. METHODS: A comprehensive survey of the literature using the search phrases "locally advanced breast cancer", "inflammatory breast cancer", "breast cancer and synchronous metastases", "de novo stage IV and breast cancer", and "metastatic breast cancer" and "at first presentation" restricted to "clinical trials", "randomized trials", "meta-analysis", "systematic review", and "guideline" was performed and supplemented by using references of the respective publications. Based on the German interdisciplinary S3 guidelines, updated in 2012, this publication addresses indications, sequence to other therapies, target volumes, dose, and fractionation of radiotherapy. RESULTS: International and national guidelines are in agreement that locally advanced, at least if regarded primarily unresectable and inflammatory breast cancer should receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy first, followed by surgery and radiotherapy. If surgery is not amenable after systemic therapy, radiotherapy is the treatment of choice followed by surgery, if possible. Surgery and radiotherapy should be administered independent of response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment. In patients with a de novo diagnosis of breast cancer with synchronous distant metastases, surgery and radiotherapy result in considerably better locoregional tumor control. An improvement in survival has not been consistently proven, but may exist in subgroups of patients. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is an important part in the treatment of locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer that should be given to all patients regardless to the intensity and effect of neoadjuvant systemic treatment and the extent of surgery. Locoregional radiotherapy in patients with primarily distant metastatic disease should be prescribed on an individual basis.

Induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer : is it time for a randomized phase III trial?

BACKGROUND: in the era of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), the development of distant metastases is the predominant mode of failure in rectal cancer patients today. Integrating more effective systemic therapy into combined modality programs is the challenge. The question that needs to be addressed is how and when to apply systemic treatment with adequate dose and intensity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this review article focuses on phase II-III trials designed to improve 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based combined modality treatment for rectal cancer patients through the inclusion of concurrent, adjuvant or, most recently, induction combination chemotherapy. Computerized bibliographic searches of PubMed were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists and abstracts of ASCO/ASTRO/ESTRO meetings. RESULTS: after preoperative CRT and surgical resection, approximately one third of patients do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly due to surgical complications, patients' refusal, or investigator's discretion. In order to be able to apply chemotherapy with sufficient dose and intensity, an innovative approach is to deliver systemic therapy prior to preoperative CRT rather than adjuvant chemotherapy. Emerging evidence from several phase II trials and, recently, randomized phase II trials indicate that induction chemotherapy is feasible, does not compromise CRT or surgical resection, and enables the delivery of chemotherapy in adequate dose and intensity. Although this approach did not increase local efficacy in recent trials (e.g., pathological complete response rates, tumor regression, R0 resection rates, local control), it may help to improve control of distant disease. CONCLUSION: whether this improvement in applicability and dose density of chemotherapy will ultimately translate into improved disease-free survival will have to be tested in a larger phase III trial.

The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 releases a subset of G-CSF-primed peripheral blood progenitor cells with specific gene expression characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: AMD3100 is a new CXCR4 antagonist that induces a rapid release of hematopoietic progenitors from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood. We conducted a clinical study where patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with AMD3100 (A) to increase the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) when given a mobilization regimen of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, G). Because experimental data suggest that A+G-mobilized PBPCs are functionally different from G-mobilized PBPCs, we were interested in an intraindividual comparison of the gene expression profile of CD34+ cells in the two different settings. METHODS: To this end peripheral blood CD34+ cells of three patients (three G, three A+G samples) were isolated by immunomagnetic followed by flow cytometric sorting to a purity of >99%. Total RNA was purified. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed by using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus2.0 and the software package Micro Array Solutions 1.3 (SAS Institute Inc.). RESULTS: We found a pattern of unanimously higher (81 genes, log2 ratio > 0.5; p < 0.0001) or lower (29 genes, log2 ratio < -0.4; p < 0.0001) expressed genes in the A+G-mobilized vs G-mobilized CD34+ PBPCs. Significant changes of four selected genes noted in the microarray analysis were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Genes were grouped according to gene function. Only increased expression was found in the categories antiapoptosis (e.g., MPO, HSPA1B), cell cycle (e.g., MS4A3, RRM2), replication/DNA repair (e.g., MPO, HSPA1B), cell motility (e.g., TNFSF4, HMMR), and oxygen transport. Decreased expression occurred in the proapoptosis gene group (e.g., MDA5, BCL10). CXCR4 receptor gene expression itself was significantly 1.5-fold higher in the A+G vs G group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that A+G-mobilized CD34+ PBPCs express significantly higher amounts of genes that potentially promote superior engraftment after myeloablative therapy than G-mobilized CD34+ PBPCs.