Structure-function association between contrast sensitivity and retinal thickness (total, regional, and individual retinal layer) in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

PURPOSE: To investigate structure-function associations between retinal thickness, visual acuity (VA), and contrast sensitivity (CS), using the quantitative contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional observational study. Patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic ERM were included. Patients underwent complete ophthalmic examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging (SD-OCT) (SPECTRALIS® Heidelberg), and CS testing using the qCSF method. Outcomes included area under the log CSF (AULCSF), contrast acuity (CA), and CS thresholds at 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). RESULTS: A total of 102 eyes of 79 patients were included. Comparing standardized regression coefficients, retinal thickness in most ETDRS sectors was associated with larger reductions in AULCSF, CA, and CS thresholds at 3 and 6 cpd than those in logMAR VA. These differences in effect on VA and CS metrics were more pronounced in the central subfield and inner ETDRS sectors. Among the retinal layers, increased INL thickness had the most detrimental effect on visual function, being significantly associated with reductions in logMAR VA, AULCSF, CA, and CS thresholds at 3 and 6 cpd (all p < .01), as well as at 1.5 and 12 cpd (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Retinal thickness seems to be associated with larger reductions in contrast sensitivity than VA in patients with ERM. Measured with the qCSF method, contrast sensitivity may serve as a valuable adjunct visual function metric for patients with ERM.

A normative database of wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography quantitative metrics in a large cohort of healthy adults.

PURPOSE: Data from healthy eyes is needed to interpret optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) findings. However, very little normative data is available for wide-field swept-source OCTA (WF SS-OCTA), particularly 12 × 12-mm and disc-centered angiograms. Therefore, we aim to report quantitative metrics in a large sample of control eyes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, 482 eyes of 375 healthy adults were imaged on the 100 kHz Zeiss PLEX® Elite 9000 using protocols centered on the fovea (3 × 3, 6 × 6, and 12 × 12-mm) and optic disc (6 × 6 and 12 × 12-mm) between December 2018 and January 2022. The ARI Network (Zeiss Portal v5.4) was used to calculate vessel density (VD) and vessel skeletonized density (VSD) in the superficial capillary plexus, deep capillary plexus, and whole retina, as well as foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The subjects' median age was 55 (38-63) years, and 201 (53.6%) were female. Greater age and worse best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were associated with significantly lower VD and VSD (p < 0.05). VD and VSD differed based on race and cataract status, but not sex, on some scan protocols (p < 0.05). FAZ circularity decreased with age, and FAZ dimensions differed based on race and ethnicity in certain scan protocols. CONCLUSIONS: We report a large database of parafoveal and peripapillary vascular metrics in several angiogram sizes. In referencing these values, researchers must consider characteristics such as age, race, and BCVA, but will have a valuable point of comparison for OCTA measurements in pathologic settings.

Towards the validation of quantitative contrast sensitivity as a clinical endpoint: correlations with vision-related quality of life in bilateral AMD.

AIM: To investigate if active learning of contrast sensitivity (CS) in bilateral age-related macular degeneration (AMD) correlates better than visual acuity (VA) with vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) using factor analysis-calibrated National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25). METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional observational study in 93 patients (186 eyes) with bilateral AMD. CS was measured in one eye at a time with the quantitative CS function (qCSF) method (Adaptive Sensory Technology). Same-day VRQoL was assessed with factor analysis-calibrated NEI VFQ-25 visual function and socioemotional scales. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analyses evaluated the associations of the qCSF outcomes and VA with the NEI VFQ-25 scales. A subgroup analysis on patients with AMD with VA more than 20/25 in both eyes was performed. RESULTS: Compared with VA, CS outcomes were associated with larger effect on both visual function scale (standardised beta coefficients (ß*) for area under the logarithm of CSF (AULCSF) curve and CS thresholds at 1.5, 3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd): ß*=0.50, 0.48, 0.52, 0.46, all p<0.001, respectively, vs ß*=-0.45 for VA, all p<0.001) and socioemotional scale (ß* for AULCSF and CS threshold at 6 cpd: ß*=0.44, 0.44 vs ß*=-0.42 for VA, all p<0.001). In patients with AMD with VA more than 20/25 in both eyes (N=20), both VFQ-25 scales and all CS outcomes were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: qCSF-measured CS strongly correlates with patient-reported VRQoL in bilateral AMD, even stronger than VA does. This study further validates qCSF-measured CS as a promising functional endpoint for future clinical trials in AMD.

Comparative study of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes with concomitant age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to evaluate widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA) among eyes with concomitant age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetes mellitus or diabetic retinopathy (DM/DR). METHODS: This cross-sectional, comparative study consisted of three study groups: eyes with (1) AMD and DM/DR, (2) AMD alone and (3) DM/DR alone. WF SS-OCTA (3×3, 6×6 and 12×12 mm) images were captured. Vascular metrics included foveal avascular zone (FAZ), vessel density (VD) and vessel skeletonised density (VSD). Mixed-effects multivariable regression models adjusted for age were performed by cohort and subgroup based on AMD and DR stages. RESULTS: Our cohort included 287 eyes from 186 patients with an average age of 64±14.0 years old. Results revealed significantly reduced vascular metrics in concomitant AMD and DM/DR eyes (N=68) compared with AMD-only eyes (N=71) on all angiograms but not compared with DM/DR-only eyes (N=148). For example, when compared with AMD-only eyes, AMD and DM/DR eyes had significantly reduced VD (ß=-0.03, p=0.016) and VSD (ß=-1.09, p=0.022) on 12×12 mm angiograms, increased FAZ perimeter (ß=0.51, p=0.025) and FAZ area (ß=0.11, p=0.015) on 6×6 mm angiogram, and reductions in all VD and VSD metrics on 3×3 and 6×6 mm angiograms. However, only 3×3 mm angiogram FAZ metrics were significantly different when comparing DM/DR eyes with concomitant AMD and DM/DR eyes. CONCLUSION: WF SS-OCTA revealed significant reductions in retinal microvasculature metrics in AMD and DM/DR eyes compared with AMD-only eyes but not compared with DM/DR-only eyes.

Characterizing Macular Neovascularization in Myopic Macular Degeneration and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Swept Source OCTA.

Purpose: Visual prognosis and treatment burden for macular neovascularization (MNV) can differ between myopic macular degeneration (MMD) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We describe and compare MNV associated with MMD and AMD using swept-source (SS)-OCTA. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with documented MNV associated with MMD or AMD were consecutively recruited. Qualitative and quantitative features were assessed from 6x6mm angiograms, including the MNV area and vessel density (VD). Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were carried out. Results: Out of 75 enrolled eyes with diagnosed MNV (30 MMD-MNV and 45 AMD-MNV; mean age 55±19 and 75±8 years, respectively), 44 eyes had discernible MNV (11 MMD-MNV and 33 AMD-MNV) on SS-OCTA at the time of the study and were included in the analysis. The MMD-MNV group exhibited a three-fold smaller sized MNV (p=0.001), lower greatest linear dimension (p=0.009) and greatest vascular caliber (p<0.001) compared to AMD-MNVs, and had a higher prevalence of tree-in-bud pattern. Eyes with AMD showed a higher prevalence of type 1 MNVs with medusa pattern. There was no difference in the location of the MNV, shape's regularity, margins, presence of core vessel, capillary fringe, peripheral loops, or perilesional dark halo (p>0.05) between both conditions. After adjustment, decreased MNV area and increased VD were associated with the tree-in-bud pattern, whereas the diagnosis did not significantly influence those parameters. Conclusion: While larger studies are warranted, this study is the first to describe and compare MMD-MNV and AMD-MNV using SS-OCTA, providing relevant clinical insight on MNV secondary to MMD and AMD. These findings also further validate OCTA as a powerful tool to detect and characterize MNV non-invasively.