Outcomes following balloon sphincteroplasty as an adjunct to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) at the time of cholecystectomy is an efficient pathway for management of choledocholithiasis. Performing this safely under one anesthetic offers advantages over a two-step process with cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Despite the proven efficacy of LCBDE, endoscopy continues to be predominantly utilized. Simplifying the intervention may drive LCBDE adoption. To this end, we refined a stepwise intraoperative pathway that utilizes over the wire balloon catheters to dilate the Sphincter of Oddi to facilitate stone passage into the duodenum. To determine the efficacy during the initial adoption phase on a general surgery service, we reviewed our experience with LCBDE balloon sphincteroplasty as part of this pathway. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent LCBDE with balloon sphincteroplasty at a single tertiary care center over a three-year period. Preoperative demographics, imaging/laboratory results, intra and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was managed with transcystic balloon sphincteroplasty during LCBDE in 28 cases over a three-year period. The cohort included 16 women and 12 men with a mean age of 47 years (range = 19-89). Operative indications included cholecystitis (n = 11, 39%), choledocholithiasis (n = 13, 47%), cholelithiasis (n = 2, 7%), and gallstone pancreatitis (n = 2, 7%). The stones were successfully cleared by the balloon sphincteroplasty technique in 75% of the cases. The average fluoroscopy time during LCBDE was 338 s (± 214). The average operating room time was 173 min (± 35). Mean length of stay was 58 h (± 46). There were no intra- or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Wire ready cholangiography followed by balloon sphincteroplasty with saline/contrast flush is a simple and safe way to clear the common bile duct. This technique is a gateway for further expansion and adoption of LCBDE.

SAGES safe cholecystectomy modules improve practicing surgeons' judgment: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, major bile duct injury (BDI) rates during this operation remain unacceptably high. In October 2018, SAGES released the Safe Cholecystectomy modules, which define specific strategies to minimize the risk of BDI. This study aims to investigate whether this curriculum can change the knowledge and behaviors of surgeons in practice. METHODS: Practicing surgeons were recruited from the membership of SAGES and the American College of Surgeons Advisory Council for Rural Surgery. All participants completed a baseline assessment (pre-test) that involved interpreting cholangiograms, troubleshooting difficult cases, and managing BDI. Participants' dissection strategies during cholecystectomy were also compared to the strategies of a panel of 15 experts based on accuracy scores using the Think Like a Surgeon validated web-based platform. Participants were then randomized to complete the Safe Cholecystectomy modules (Safe Chole module group) or participate in usually scheduled CME activities (control group). Both groups completed repeat assessments (post-tests) one month after randomization. RESULTS: Overall, 41 participants were eligible for analysis, including 18 Safe Chole module participants and 23 controls. The two groups had no significant differences in pre-test scores. However, at post-test, Safe Chole module participants made significantly fewer errors managing BDI and interpreting cholangiograms. Safe Chole module participants were less likely to convert to an open operation on the post-test than controls when facing challenging dissections. However, Safe Chole module participants displayed a similar incidence of errors when evaluating adequate critical views of safety. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized-controlled trial, the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy modules improved surgeons' abilities to interpret cholangiograms and safely manage BDI. Additionally, surgeons who studied the modules were less likely to convert to open during difficult dissections. These data show the power of the Safe Cholecystectomy modules to affect practicing surgeons' behaviors in a measurable and meaningful way.

Intraoperative Botulinum Toxin Chemodenervation and Analgesia in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Purpose. To analyze the impact of botulinum toxin chemodenervation on postoperative opiate consumption through a novel intraoperative injection protocol. Methods. A retrospective review of the implementation of a novel intraoperative botulinum toxin injection into both rectus and oblique musculature. Patients undergoing open retrorectus release, with and without intraoperative chemodenervation with Botox, were retrospectively collected between 2015 and 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, and opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were retrospectively captured. Basic descriptive statistics and linear regression analysis were performed. Results. 19 patients in the Botox and 22 in the no Botox group were analyzed. Basic demographics were similar with female preponderance in the Botox group, 58% vs 27%, P = .05. Median hernia length was 15 cm for both groups (P = .57), median hernia width was 8 vs 9 cm (P = .39), epidural catheter used in 0 vs 4 (P = .11), transverse abdominal plane blocks in 3 vs 4 (P = 1), median MME usage was 191 vs 230 (P = .37) in the inpatient setting, 225 vs 300 (P = .17) in the outpatient setting, and 405 vs 568 (P = .07) in total for Botox vs no Botox groups. Stepwise linear regression analysis identified Botox as the only predictor for MME usage, P = .048. Conclusions. Chemodenervation was the only factor associated with reduced opioid usage compared to a standard group using multimodality analgesia. The role of muscular pain in laparotomy is likely underappreciated and understudied. Intraoperative selective muscular chemodenervation may play a significant role in recovery from abdominal surgery and requires further study.

Association of preoperative workup and comorbidities with risk of gastroesophageal surgery failure.

Background: While surgical failure rates for fundoplication and hiatal hernia repair are low, there has been no clear evaluation of the preoperative risk factors associated with surgical failure. This study aimed to identify risk factors predisposing patients to surgical failure. Methods: Patients who underwent antireflux surgery during a 3-year period were evaluated for evidence of surgical complications and placed accordingly into the failure or control group. Demographic data, comorbidities, clinical presentation, preoperative evaluation, and surgical data were collected and compared between the groups. Results: In total, 86 patients with failure and 42 controls were identified among our cohort. No significant differences were found between groups based on sex (P=0.640). However, patients with failure were younger than controls (57.0 vs. 64.7 years, P=0.0001). Body mass index, tobacco use and alcohol use did not differ significantly between the groups (P=0.189, P=0.0999, P=0.060). Notably, psychiatric illness was more common in the failure group (P=0.0086). Neither hypertension (P=0.134) nor diabetes (P=0.335) had significant differences between groups. For procedures, no significant differences were found for the frequencies of preoperative imaging (P=0.395) or manometry (P=0.374), but pH/BRAVO studies (P=0.0193) and endoscopy (P<0.001) were both performed more frequently in the failure group. Conclusions: Patients with psychiatric comorbidities are at higher risk of surgical failure. Alcohol use trended toward significance, which warrants further investigation. We also noted an increase in rates of preoperative pH and endoscopy studies, contrary to the prior literature; this is likely due to more complex cases requiring additional workup.

Ethnicity, medical insurance, and living kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: Relationships between race/ethnicity, recipient medical insurance, and living donor kidney transplantation (LKT) are incompletely described. METHODS: Associations between medical insurance and LKT were assessed in 447 recipients at a southeastern US transplant center. Primary and secondary payers were included in the analyses. RESULTS: A total of 387 deceased donor transplantations and 60 LKTs were performed in 246 (55%) European American (EA), 175 (39.2%) African American (AA), 15 (3.4%) Asian, and 11 (2.5%) Hispanic recipients. Among recipients, 182 (40.8%) were privately insured, 125 (28%) had Medicaid, and the remainder had Medicare, Medicare supplements, or Medicare replacement policies. A higher proportion of patients with private insurance, relative to those without private insurance, received LKT (22% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.0001). Among ethnic groups, LKT with, vs. without, private insurance was 27.5% vs. 12.4% in EAs (p = 0.0028) and 14.3% vs. 0.9% in AAs (p = 0.0005). Medicaid recipients (n = 125) were less likely to receive LKT than those without Medicaid (4.8% vs. 16.8%, p = 0.0003). Among the 69 AA recipients with Medicaid, none received LKT (0 Medicaid vs. 9.5% without Medicaid, p = 0.0065). CONCLUSIONS: Recipient insurance status is associated with LKT, positively with private insurance and negatively with Medicaid. AAs were impacted to a greater extent, potentially contributing to lower rates of LKT.

Reclaiming the management of common duct stones in acute care surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) is well positioned to manage choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but barriers to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) include experience and the perceived need for specialized equipment. The technical complexity of this pathway is generally seen as challenging. As such, LCBDE is historically relegated to the "enthusiast." However, a simplified, effective LCBDE technique as part of a "surgery first" strategy could drive wider adoption in the specialty most often managing these patients. To determine efficacy and safety, we sought to compare our initial ACS-driven experience with a simple, fluoroscopy-guided, catheter-based LCBDE approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We reviewed ACS patients who underwent LCBDE or LC + ERCP (pre-/postoperative) at a tertiary care center in the 4 years since starting this surgery first approach. Demographics, outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) were compared on an intention to treat basis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via using wire/catheter Seldinger techniques under fluoroscopic guidance with flushing or balloon dilation of the sphincter as needed. Our primary outcomes were LOS and successful duct clearance. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were treated for choledocholithiasis with 71 undergoing LCBDE. The success rate of catheter-based LCBDE was 70.4%. Length of stay was significantly reduced for the LCBDE group compared with the LC + ERCP group (48.8 vs. 84.3 hours, p < 0.01). Of note, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in the LCBDE group. CONCLUSION: A simplified catheter-based approach to LCBDE is safe and associated with decreased LOS when compared with LC + ERCP. This simplified step-up approach may help facilitate wider LCBDE utilization by ACS providers who are well positioned for a timely surgery first approach in the management of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Resolution of Liver Function Tests After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is gaining traction for the management of choledocholithiasis. Liver function tests (LFTs) are often used to determine the success of ductal clearance, yet the impact of differing therapeutic interventions, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or LCBDE, have on postprocedure LFT is insufficiently described. We hypothesize that these interventions have different postoperative LFT profiles. The preprocedural and postprocedural total bilirubin (Tbili), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were analyzed of 167 patients who had successful ERCPs (117) or LCBDEs (50). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients demonstrated a significant decrease in all LFTs postprocedure (n = 117; P = <0.001 for all) with a continued downtrend when a second set of LFTs was obtained (n = 102; P = <0.001 for all). For successful LC+LCBDEs, there was no significant change between preoperative and 1st postoperative Tbili, AST, ALT, and ALP and the 2nd postoperative labs.

Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Hyperkinetic Biliary Dyskinesia.

BACKGROUND: Biliary dyskinesia (BD) is a poorly understood functional gallbladder disorder. Diagnosis is made with abdominal pain and an intact gallbladder without signs of anatomical obstruction on imaging or pathology. Our aim was to assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) resolves hyperkinetic BD symptoms. METHODS: Records of patients ≥18 years of age, who underwent LC by four surgeons at a tertiary care center between 2012 and 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a documented gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) <80% or had biliary stones or sludge on pathology or imaging. Demographic information, HIDA results, preoperative testing, operative details, gallbladder pathology, and symptom status at follow-up were collected from electronic medical records. Improvement in BD symptoms was assessed using McNemar's test. Risk differences with standard errors were employed to estimate percent reduction in symptoms. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Of those who presented for follow-up (n = 91), 92.3% (n = 84) reported partial or complete resolution of symptoms. Preoperative symptoms, including back pain (16.7%, 95% CI: [7.9%, 25.5%]; P < .0001), epigastric pain (31.1% [21.3%, 41.3%]; P < .0001), nausea (56.7% [45.0%, 65.8%]; P < .0001), RUQ pain (57.8% [46.1%, 66.9%]; P < .0001), and vomiting (27.8% [18.4%, 37.7%]; P < .0001) showed significant improvement after LC. Chronic cholecystitis and/or cholesterolosis were present on pathology in 79.8% of gallbladders. DISCUSSION: Our study currently represents the largest cohort of patients with hyperkinetic BD. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to result in resolution of symptoms for this clinical entity.

Video. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and holmium laser lithotripsy: a novel approach to the management of common bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) have proved to be safe and effective ways of managing common bile duct (CBD) stones. Clearance of large or impacted CBD stones by routine endoscopic maneuvers can be challenging, often requiring more invasive techniques such as open CBD exploration, which increases morbidity. This report presents a novel approach to managing impacted CBD stones using laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration and holmium laser lithotripsy with favorable outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective review analyzes five patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative management of impacted CBD stones via LCBDE and holmium laser lithotripsy. The technique is described, and outcomes are measured. Data via chart review and use of intraoperative video were obtained with institutional review board approval. RESULTS: Stone clearance from the CBD was achieved for all the patients. The median age of the patients was 39 years. The diameters of the CBDs ranged from 10 to 20 mm, and the median number of stones was one. No mortality was associated with this procedure, and the median hospital stay was 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CBD exploration via a transcystic approach together with holmium laser lithotripsy is a safe and effective way to clear large solitary or impacted CBD stones. This technique also avoids choledochotomy and may be used in concert with other methods such as ERCP, percutaneous cholangioscopy, and open exploration.

Obstructive Gastroparesis: Patient Selection and Effect of Laparoscopic Pyloroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Functional obstructive gastroparesis is an understudied subtype of gastroparesis with normal 3 cycle per minute gastric myoelectrical activity that responds to botulinum toxin A injection and balloon dilation of the pylorus. AIMS: To determine the effect of pyloroplasty on symptoms, weight, gastric emptying, and gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with gastroparesis and normal 3 cycle per minute gastric myoelectrical activity. METHODS: Ten patients (average age 36 years with gastroparesis and normal 3 cycle per minute gastric myoelectrical activity) who had at least two successful endoscopic pyloric therapies and then underwent pyloroplasty were identified. Electrogastrography with water load satiety test was performed to determine gastric myoelectrical activity. Gastric emptying was measured with 4-h scintigraphy. KEY RESULTS: Six months after pyloroplasty, nine of ten patients reported improved symptoms and weight increased an average of 6.4 lb (p = 0.04). The average percentage of meal retained at 4 h decreased from 47% before to 16% after pyloroplasty (p < 0.01) and normalized in six patients. After pyloroplasty, the percent distribution of gastric myoelectrical activity power in the 3 cycle per minute range decreased at each measured interval compared with pre-pyloroplasty (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Pyloroplasty in these patients with obstructive gastroparesis improved gastric emptying and decreased 3 cycle per minute gastric myoelectrical activity, consistent with relief of functional gastric outlet obstruction. (2) Pyloric neuromuscular dysfunction is a key factor in delayed emptying in patients with functional obstructive gastroparesis.

Live Quality Assurance: Using a Multimedia Messaging Service Group Chat to Instantly Grade Intraoperative Images.

BACKGROUND: The technique for attaining photographic evidence of the critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has previously been defined; however, the consistency, accuracy, and feasibility of CVS in practice is unknown. The aim of this study was to use an already established image sharing and grading system to determine the feasibility of timely feedback after sharing intraoperative images of the CVS and to evaluate if and how cholecystitis affects the ability to attain a CVS. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 193 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 14 surgeons between August 2017 and January 2019. Anterior and posterior intraoperative CVS images were shared using a standard multimedia messaging system (MMS). Images were graded remotely by members of the group using an established scoring system, and their times to response and scores were recorded. Response data were analyzed for the ability to attain timely and consistent CVS scores. RESULTS: There were 74 urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis and 119 nonurgent cholecystectomies performed during the study period. Scoring of shared images occurred in less than 5 minutes, and peer review (mean 3 responses) showed agreement that was not significantly different. In patients with acute cholecystitis, a small but significant difference was observed between anterior and posterior image scoring agreement. CONCLUSIONS: An established image sharing and grading system for CVS can be used for real-time intraoperative feedback without increasing operative time or compromising private health information. The CVS is almost always attainable; however, decreases in CVS quality and grading agreement are observed in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Myotomy-First Approach to Epiphrenic Esophageal Diverticula.

Introduction: Epiphrenic esophageal diverticula are typically treated with concurrent cardiomyotomy and diverticulectomy. However, resection of these diverticula can be technically difficult and associated with significant morbidity with a staple line leak rate ranging up to 27%. For this reason, and because the diverticulum is secondary to a primary esophageal motility disorder such as achalasia, we decided to adopt a laparoscopic myotomy-first strategy, reserving the diverticulectomy for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms. Methods: From 2004 to 2018, 22 patients with epiphrenic diverticula were treated by laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication alone, with the plan to add the diverticulectomy as a second stage if needed. There were 13 women and 9 women, with a mean age of 68 years. Results: Patients had been symptomatic for an average of 36 months. The most common presenting symptom was dysphagia (91%), followed by regurgitation (77%). More than half of the diverticula were solitary and on the right side. Esogphagoscopy ruled out cancer. Esophageal manometry (18 patients) showed achalasia in 14 patients, nutcracker esophagus in 3 patients, and nonspecific motility disorder in 1 patient. There were no perioperative complications, and average length of stay was 2.5 days. At a mean follow-up of 68 months, dysphagia resolved in 77% and regurgitation in 86% of patients. Three patients had persistent symptoms: 2 patients underwent a transthoracic diverticulectomy (1 patient with resolution of symptoms and 1 patient with no improvement). Another patient had per oral endoscopic myotomy, but his dysphagia persisted. Conclusions: The laparoscopic myotomy-first approach reduces risk and unnecessary surgery. A laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication provide excellent resolution of symptoms for most, whereasonly a few will need a staged resection of the diverticulum.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transgastric ERCP: A Single-Institution Experience.

Background: Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LAERCP) is used for treatment in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), where transoral access to the biliary tree is not possible. We describe our technique and experience with this procedure. Methods: Electronic medical record search was performed from September 2012 to January 2016, identifying patients who underwent LAERCP per operative records. Charts were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and outcomes data. Results: Sixteen patients were identified. Average time since bypass was 6.9 years, and length of stay was 3.7 days. Five patients underwent simultaneous cholecystectomy. Eleven patients, or 43%, had cholecystectomy more than 2 years previously. ERCP with sphincterotomy was completed in 15 of 16 patients (94%). Our technique involves access to the bypassed stomach via a laparoscopically placed 15 mm port. We observed one major complication of post-ERCP necrotizing pancreatitis. No minor complications nor mortalities were seen in our series. Conclusion: Biliary obstruction can occur many years after RYGB and cholecystectomy. Our findings suggest that RYGB patients may be at a higher risk of primary CBD stone formation. LAERCP is a reliable option for common bile duct (CBD) clearance; our technique of LAERCP is technically simple and associated with low complication rate, making it appealing to surgeons not trained in advanced laparoscopy.

Association of a Surgical Task During Training With Team Skill Acquisition Among Surgical Residents: The Missing Piece in Multidisciplinary Team Training.

IMPORTANCE: The human patient simulators that are currently used in multidisciplinary operating room team training scenarios cannot simulate surgical tasks because they lack a realistic surgical anatomy. Thus, they eliminate the surgeon's primary task in the operating room. The surgical trainee is presented with a significant barrier when he or she attempts to suspend disbelief and engage in the scenario. OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a simulation-based operating room team training strategy that challenges the communication abilities and teamwork competencies of surgeons while they are engaged in realistic operative maneuvers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pre-post educational intervention pilot study compared the gains in teamwork skills for midlevel surgical residents at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center after they participated in a standardized multidisciplinary team training scenario with 3 possible levels of surgical realism: (1) SimMan (Laerdal) (control group, no surgical anatomy); (2) "synthetic anatomy for surgical tasks" mannequin (medium-fidelity anatomy), and (3) a patient simulated by a deceased donor (high-fidelity anatomy). INTERVENTIONS: Participation in the simulation scenario and the subsequent debriefing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Teamwork competency was assessed using several instruments with extensive validity evidence, including the Nontechnical Skills assessment, the Trauma Management Skills scoring system, the Crisis Resource Management checklist, and a self-efficacy survey instrument. Participant satisfaction was assessed with a Likert-scale questionnaire. RESULTS: Scenario participants included midlevel surgical residents, anesthesia providers, scrub nurses, and circulating nurses. Statistical models showed that surgical residents exposed to medium-fidelity simulation (synthetic anatomy for surgical tasks) team training scenarios demonstrated greater gains in teamwork skills compared with control groups (SimMan) (Nontechnical Skills video score: 95% CI, 1.06-16.41; Trauma Management Skills video score: 95% CI, 0.61-2.90) and equivalent gains in teamwork skills compared with high-fidelity simulations (deceased donor) (Nontechnical Skills video score: 95% CI, -8.51 to 6.71; Trauma Management Skills video score: 95% CI, -1.70 to 0.49). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Including a surgical task in operating room team training significantly enhanced the acquisition of teamwork skills among midlevel surgical residents. Incorporating relatively inexpensive, medium-fidelity synthetic anatomy in human patient simulators was as effective as using high-fidelity anatomies from deceased donors for promoting teamwork skills in this learning group.

Fundoplication for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease arises from the effects of refluxed gastric contents on the proximal aerodigestive tract. LPR patients are often lumped into the category of "atypical" reflux. LPR symptoms are hoarseness, globus, cough, and pharyngitis. Severe disease is associated with subglottic stenosis and laryngeal cancer. Treatment includes lifestyle modifications and medications. The role of fundoplication for LPR has yet to be defined. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-one patients underwent fundoplication for LPR. They were prospectively followed with three outcomes measures: The Reflux Symptom Index, a laryngoscopic grading scale (Reflux Finding Score), and a reflux-based specific quality-of-life scale. RESULTS: Average early followup was at 4 months and late followup was at 14 months. The Reflux Symptom Index improved by 5.4 early (p < 0.05) and 6.5 late (p < 0.05). Improvement between early and late periods approached significance (p < 0.09). Reflux Finding Score improved 3.8 (p < 0.05) early and 4.4 (p < 0.05) late. The Quality of Life Index improved 0.6 early and 2.3 (p < 0.05) late. By Reflux Symptom Index criteria, 26 patients were improved early versus 35 late (p < 0.05). Factors associated with poor outcomes were structural laryngeal changes in five patients (p < 0.05) and no response to proton pump inhibitors in six patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fundoplication augments treatment of LPR. Improvement of symptoms continues past the first 4 months. Laryngoscopy is critical in patient selection because selected findings are associated with outcomes, diagnosis, and management.

A comparison of pre-operative comorbidities and post-operative outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic nissen fundoplication at high- and low-volume centers.

INTRODUCTION: Commonly cited data promoting laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) as safe and efficacious are typically published by single centers, affiliated with teaching institutions with a high volume of cases, but LNF is not universally performed at these hospitals. The purpose of this study is to assess where these procedures are being done and to compare pre-operative comorbidities and post-operative outcomes between high-and low-volume centers using a state-wide inpatient database. METHODS: This is a retrospective study using data from the North Carolina Hospital Association Patient Data System. Selected patients include adults (>17 years old) that have undergone laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease as an inpatient from 2005 to 2008. Patients that underwent operative management for emergent purposes or had associated diagnoses of esophageal cancer or achalasia were excluded from the study. High-volume centers were defined as institutions that performed ten or more LNFs per year averaged over a period of 4 years. Comparative statistics were performed on comorbidities and complications between high- and low-volume centers. RESULTS: A total of 1,019 patients underwent LNF for GERD in North Carolina between 2005 and 2008 in the inpatient setting. High-volume centers performed 530 LNFs (52%) while low-volume centers performed 489 LNFs (48%). Patients at high-volume centers were older (median 52.5 years old vs. 49.0 years old, p = 0.019), had a higher incidence of diabetes (13.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.026), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.1% vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.015), hyperlipidemia (9.6% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.004), and cystic fibrosis (2.8% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.03). Patients with a history of transplantation were also more likely to undergo LNF at a high-volume center (15.8% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.0001). There were no deaths among the two groups and also no difference between median length of stay (2.7 days for high-volume center vs. 2.6 days for low-volume center). Low-volume centers had a higher incidence of intraoperative accidental puncture or laceration (3.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.017) while high-volume centers had a higher incidence of atelectasis (5.3% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of the LNFs in North Carolina are performed at low-volume centers. High-volume centers perform LNF on older patients with more comorbidities. Low-volume centers have three times more accidental perforations, yet there is no detectable difference in mortality or median length of stay. It is impossible to tell if these perforations are managed at these low-volume centers or transferred to facilities with a higher level of care. These findings argue for regionalization of LNF and for a reevaluation of the global safety of this operation.

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of the liver in proximity to major vasculature: effect of the Pringle maneuver.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Pringle maneuver has been shown to increase ablation size during radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Efficacy of laparoscopic Pringle in proximity to major vasculature has not been well described. Laparoscopic RFA was performed in proximity to major hepatic vessels to examine effects of the Pringle on ablation size and vascular damage. METHODS: Laparoscopic RFA was performed in 10 pigs. Each underwent ablation of a peripheral site, and sites adjacent to the portal and hepatic veins. Ultrasound was used to position the RFA adjacent to vascular structures. US flow characteristics verified occlusion of blood flow. Five pigs underwent laparoscopic RFA with Pringle and five underwent laparoscopic RFA alone. Animals were then sacrificed for gross and microscopic evaluation. RESULTS: Peripheral, hepatic, and portal vein ablations showed no significant differences in volume between non-Pringle and Pringle lesions, though the median ablation volume for the peripheral site in the Pringle group was approximately twice that of the non-Pringle group. Pringle group overall median time to target temperature was significantly shorter (P = 0.047). Histologic examination revealed no evidence of endothelial damage or thermal-induced intravascular thrombosis of the hepatic or portal veins. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RFA with Pringle in proximity to major vascular structures does not significantly increase ablation size, or cause acute vascular damage. Further studies are necessary to determine the utility of the Pringle in proximity to major intrahepatic blood vessels.