[Target volume concepts in radiotherapy and their implications for imaging]. / Zielvolumenkonzepte in der Strahlentherapie und ihre Bedeutung für die Bildgebung.

CLINICAL ISSUE: Successful radiotherapy requires precise localization of the tumor and requires high-quality imaging for developing a treatment plan. STANDARD TREATMENT: Irradiation of the tumor region, including a safety margin. TREATMENT INNOVATIONS: The target volume consists of the gross tumor volume (GTV) containing visible parts of the tumor, the clinical target volume (CTV) covering the GTV plus invisible tumor extensions, and the planning target volume (PTV) to account for uncertainties. The non-GTV parts of the CTV are based on historical patient data. The PTV margins are based on a calculation of possible uncertainties during planning, setup, or treatment. Normal tissue deserves the identical care in contouring, since its tolerance may limit the tumor dose, taking into account the contours of organs at risk. Serial risk organs benefit from defining a planning organ of risk volume (PRV) to better limit the dose delivered to them. DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: The better the imaging, the more reliable the definition of the GTV and treatment success will be. Multiple imaging sequences are desirable to support the delineation of the tumor. They may result in different CTVs that, depending on their tumor burden, may require different doses. PERFORMANCE: The definition of standardized target volumes according to the ICRU reports 50, 62, and 83 forms the basis for an individualized radiation treatment planning according to unified criteria on a high-quality level. ACHIEVEMENTS: Radio-oncology is by nature interdisciplinary, the diagnostic radiologist being an indispensable team partner. A regular dialogue between the disciplines is pivotal for target volume definition and treatment success. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Imaging for target volume definition requires highest quality imaging, the use of functional imaging methods and close cooperation with a diagnostic radiologist experienced in this field.

A Randomised Phase II Trial of Hippocampal Sparing Versus Conventional Whole Brain Radiotherapy After Surgical Resection or Radiosurgery in Favourable Prognosis Patients With 1-10 Brain Metastases.

AIMS: To assess in patients with 1-10 brain metastases, each of which has been treated by neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, whether hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) better spares neurocognitive function (NCF) than standard WBRT. Further, to assess whether a phase III randomised trial of HS-WBRT would be feasible in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentre, randomised, open label phase II trial was undertaken, randomising patients to 30Gy in 10 fractions of WBRT or HS-WBRT. The primary endpoint was decline in Total recall using Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) at 4 months post treatment. To assess this, we aimed to recruit 84 patients over 3 years. Secondary endpoints included further measures of NCF, quality of life, duration of functional independence, local control of treated metastases, development of new metastases, disease control within the hippocampal regions, overall survival, steroid and antiepileptic medication requirements, and toxicity. RESULTS: The trial closed prematurely due to slower than anticipated recruitment. From April 2016 to January 2018, 23 patients were randomised. Follow up was a median of 25 months. Fifteen patients (6 WBRT, 9 HS-WBRT) were assessed for the primary endpoint; of these, 1 in each arm experienced significant decline in the 4-month HVLT-R Total recall score (p = 0.8). Patients in the HS-WBRT arm experienced less insomnia (p < 0.01) and drowsiness (p < 0.01). There were no differences in other secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: A phase III randomised trial of HS-WBRT was shown not to be feasible at this time in the UK. As most randomised trials of HS-WBRT reported to date share common endpoints, including NCF, an individual patient data meta-analysis should be undertaken.

Outcomes of Patients Treated in the UK Proton Overseas Programme: Central Nervous System Group.

AIMS: In 2008, the UK National Health Service started the Proton Overseas Programme (POP), to provide access for proton beam therapy (PBT) abroad for selected tumour diagnoses while two national centres were being planned. The clinical outcomes for the patient group treated for central nervous system (CNS), base of skull, spinal and paraspinal malignancies are reported here. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since the start of the POP, an agreement between the National Health Service and UK referring centres ensured outcomes data collection, including overall survival, local tumour control and late toxicity data. Clinical and treatment-related data were extracted from this national patient database. Grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported following Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0 definition, occurring later than 90 days since the completion of treatment. RESULTS: Between 2008 and September 2020, 830 patients were treated within the POP for the above listed malignancies. Overall survival data were available for 815 patients and local control data for 726 patients. Toxicity analysis was carried out on 702 patients, with patients excluded due to short follow-up (<90 days) and/or inadequate toxicity data available. After a median follow-up of 3.34 years (0.06-11.58), the overall survival was 91.2%. The local control rate was 85.9% after a median follow-up of 2.81 years (range 0.04-11.58). The overall grade ≥3 late toxicity incidence was 11.97%, after a median follow-up of 1.72 years (0.04-8.45). The median radiotherapy prescription dose was 54 GyRBE (34.8-79.2). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate the safety of PBT for CNS tumours. Preliminary clinical outcomes following PBT for paediatric/teen and young adult and adult CNS tumours treated within the POP are encouraging, which reflects accurate patient selection and treatment quality. The rate of late effects compares favourably with published cohorts. Clinical outcomes from this patient cohort will be compared with those of UK-treated patients since the start of the national PBT service in 2018.

Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate estimation by Cockcroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Wright and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae in oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of Cockcroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Wright and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae as a substitute for the gold standard measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using chromium 51 EDTA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of GFR measurements in oncology patients from a University Teaching Hospital over 3 years was carried out. Bias and precision of estimates of GFR were compared with measured GFR. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty patients with measured GFR (median 90 ml/min, range 23-179 ml/min) were identified. Cockcroft-Gault produced the smallest bias (median percentage error -1.4%) and highest precision (median absolute percentage error 14.0%) and was the most accurate for carboplatin dosing. For patients>30% over their ideal body weight (IBW), using IBW+30% in the Cockcroft-Gault formula was more precise than using actual body weight or IBW. The Wright formula was most accurate for patients aged 70+years and patients with a body mass index (BMI)≥30 but overestimated GFR when GFR<50 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: When measured GFR is unavailable, we advise estimating GFR using the Cockcroft-Gault formula and using IBW+30% for patients weighing>30% over their IBW. If the GFR is ≥50 ml/min and the patient is >70 years and/or BMI≥30, the Wright formula gives the best estimate of GFR.

Fractionated conformal radiotherapy in vestibular schwannoma: early results from a single centre.

AIMS: To assess the local control and cranial nerve toxicity in vestibular schwannoma patients treated with fractionated conformal radiotherapy delivered using a linear accelerator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients were referred for consultation to the Oncology Department in Addenbrookes Hospital between 1996 and 2005. The 42 cases who received fractionated conformal radiotherapy are the subject of this analysis. All patients had radiological or symptomatic progression. Conformal radiotherapy was prescribed at 50Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks, delivered using a linear accelerator. Patients were immobilised using either a beam direction shell or a Gill Thomas Cosman relocatable stereotactic head frame. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (range 28-81) with 57% men. The average tumour size was 21.5mm on magnetic resonance imaging. Before treatment, 20 (48%) patients were deemed to have useful hearing on the affected side. The median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 0.3-6.5 years) and the actuarial local control rate at 2.5 years was 96.9% (one patient progressed after treatment). In previously hearing patients, the actuarial rate of useful hearing preservation was 100%, and the rate of mild hearing loss was 20% at 1 year and 26.7% at 2.5 years of follow-up. There were five neurofibromatosis type 2 patients treated, two of whom had useful hearing before radiotherapy. In one patient this was affected, with a 20dB loss, although he still has useful hearing. In those with normal facial nerve function before radiotherapy (n=40), this was preserved in 96.8% at 2.5 years. Trigeminal nerve function was preserved in all patients (n=38) who had normal nerve function before radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Although follow-up was relatively short in this single institution series, fractionated linear accelerator radiotherapy gave excellent local control, useful hearing preservation and retained cranial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma.

New developments in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy for metastases.

Brain metastases are common and the prognosis for patients with multiple brain metastases treated with whole brain radiotherapy is limited. As systemic disease control continues to improve, the expectations of radiotherapy for brain metastases are growing. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a high precision localised irradiation given in a single fraction prolongs survival in patients with a single brain metastasis and functional independence in those with up to three brain metastases. SRS technology has become commonplace and is available in many radiation oncology and neurosurgery departments. With increasing use there is a need for appropriate patient selection, refinement of dose-fractionation and safe integration of SRS with other treatment modalities. We review the evidence for current practice and new developments in the field, with a specific focus on patient-relevant outcomes.

Neurocognitive Effects Following Cranial Irradiation for Brain Metastases.

About 90% of patients with brain metastases have impaired neurocognitive function at diagnosis and up to two-thirds will show further declines within 2-6 months of whole brain radiotherapy. Distinguishing treatment effects from progressive disease can be challenging because the prognosis remains poor in many patients. Omitting whole brain radiotherapy after local therapy in good prognosis patients improves verbal memory at 4 months, but the effect of higher intracranial recurrence and salvage therapy rates on neurocognitive function beyond this time point is unknown. Hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy and postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery are investigational techniques intended to reduce toxicity. Here we describe the changes that can occur and review technological, pharmacological and practical approaches used to mitigate their effect in clinical practice.

FISHing Tips: What Every Clinician Should Know About 1p19q Analysis in Gliomas Using Fluorescence in situ Hybridisation.

1p19q co-deletion is a chromosomal alteration associated with primary brain tumours of oligodendroglial histology. It is an established predictive and prognostic biomarker that informs whether patients are offered radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both. In the near future, 1p19q co-deletion status may also be incorporated into the reclassification of gliomas. Analysis is commonly carried out using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) because it is a reliable and validated laboratory technique. The result is generally considered to be dichotomous (1p19q co-deletion present or absent), but there are subtleties in interpretation that are of clinical relevance. Separate centres may interpret certain chromosome deletion patterns differently. Pivotal trials in mixed and pure anaplastic oligodendrogliomas have used slightly different FISH probe ratios as the cut-off for chromosome deletion. Here we review the clinical implications of this variability and review the process of 1p19q co-deletion assessment using FISH in gliomas from a clinician's perspective. We also consider common alternative methods of analysis.

Imaging and target volume delineation in glioma.

Here we review current practices in target volume delineation for radical radiotherapy planning for gliomas. Current radiotherapy planning margins for glioma are informed by historic data of recurrence patterns using radiological imaging or post-mortem studies. Radiotherapy planning for World Health Organization grade II-IV gliomas currently relies predominantly on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences to identify the gross tumour volume (GTV). Isotropic margins are added empirically for each tumour type, usually without any patient-specific individualisation. We discuss novel imaging techniques that have the potential to influence radiotherapy planning, by improving definition of the tumour extent and its routes of invasion, thus modifying the GTV and allowing anisotropic expansion to a clinical target volume better reflecting areas at risk of recurrence. Identifying the relationships of tumour boundaries to important white matter pathways and eloquent areas of cerebral cortex could lead to reduced normal tissue complications. Novel magnetic resonance approaches to identify tumour extent and invasion include: (i) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance metrics; (ii) diffusion tensor imaging; and (iii) positron emission tomography, using radiolabelled amino acids methyl-11C-L-methionine and 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine. Novel imaging techniques may also have a role together with clinical characteristics and molecular genetic markers in predicting response to therapy. Most significant among these techniques is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, which uses dynamic acquisition of images after injection of intravenous contrast. A number of studies have identified changes in diffusion and microvascular characteristics occurring during the early stages of radiotherapy as powerful predictive biomarkers of outcome.

Automated delineation of radiotherapy volumes: are we going in the right direction?

Rapid and accurate delineation of target volumes and multiple organs at risk, within the enduring International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement framework, is now hugely important in radiotherapy, owing to the rapid proliferation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and the advent of four-dimensional image-guided adaption. Nevertheless, delineation is still generally clinically performed with little if any machine assistance, even though it is both time-consuming and prone to interobserver variation. Currently available segmentation tools include those based on image greyscale interrogation, statistical shape modelling and body atlas-based methods. However, all too often these are not able to match the accuracy of the expert clinician, which remains the universally acknowledged gold standard. In this article we suggest that current methods are fundamentally limited by their lack of ability to incorporate essential human clinical decision-making into the underlying models. Hybrid techniques that utilise prior knowledge, make sophisticated use of greyscale information and allow clinical expertise to be integrated are needed. This may require a change in focus from automated segmentation to machine-assisted delineation. Similarly, new metrics of image quality reflecting fitness for purpose would be extremely valuable. We conclude that methods need to be developed to take account of the clinician's expertise and honed visual processing capabilities as much as the underlying, clinically meaningful information content of the image data being interrogated. We illustrate our observations and suggestions through our own experiences with two software tools developed as part of research council-funded projects.

Interobserver variation in clinical target volume and organs at risk segmentation in post-parotidectomy radiotherapy: can segmentation protocols help?

OBJECTIVE: A study of interobserver variation in the segmentation of the post-operative clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for parotid tumours was undertaken. The segmentation exercise was performed as a baseline, and repeated after 3 months using a segmentation protocol to assess whether CTV conformity improved. METHODS: Four head and neck oncologists independently segmented CTVs and OARs (contralateral parotid, spinal cord and brain stem) on CT data sets of five patients post parotidectomy. For each CTV or OAR delineation, total volume was calculated. The conformity level (CL) between different clinicians' outlines was measured using a validated outline analysis tool. The data for CTVs were re-analysed after using the cochlear sparing therapy and conventional radiation segmentation protocol. RESULTS: Significant differences in CTV morphology were observed at baseline, yielding a mean CL of 30% (range 25-39%). The CL improved after using the segmentation protocol with a mean CL of 54% (range 50-65%). For OARs, the mean CL was 60% (range 53-68%) for the contralateral parotid gland, 23% (range 13-27%) for the brain stem and 25% (range 22-31%) for the spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: There was low conformity for CTVs and OARs between different clinicians. The CL for CTVs improved with use of a segmentation protocol, but the CLs remained lower than expected. This study supports the need for clear guidelines for segmentation of target and OARs to compare and interpret the results of head and neck cancer radiation studies.

Efficacy and tolerability of limited field radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

AIMS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are most commonly managed with chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which may or may not include non-involved regional lymph nodes in the clinical target volume. We present our results of CRT for LAPC using capecitabine and delivering radiotherapy to a limited radiation field that excluded non-involved regional lymph nodes from the clinical target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were studied. Patients received 50.4 Gy external beam radiotherapy in 28 fractions, delivered to a planning target volume expanded from the primary tumour and involved nodes only. Capecitabine (500-600 mg/m2) was given twice daily continuously during radiotherapy. Toxicity and efficacy data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Nausea, vomiting and tumour pain were the most common grade 2 toxicities. One patient developed grade 3 nausea. The median time to progression was 8.8 months, with 20% remaining progression free at 1 year. The median overall survival was 9.7 months with a 1 year survival of 30%. Of 21 patients with imaged progression, 13 (62%) progressed systemically, three (14%) had local progression, two (10%) had locoregional progression and three (14%) progressed with both local/locoregional and systemic disease. CONCLUSION: CRT using capecitabine and limited field radiotherapy is a well-tolerated, relatively efficacious treatment for LAPC. The low toxicity and low regional progression rates support the use of limited field radiotherapy, allowing evaluation of this regimen with other anti-cancer agents.

Radical chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction: what planning margins should we use?

Distal oesophageal and Type I-II oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas have a poor prognosis. In radical chemoradiotherapy, consensus is lacking on radiotherapy margins. Here, we review the effect of common imaging modalities on the extent of the gross tumour volume (GTV) and the evidence for margins. To do this, papers were identified from PubMed, and geometric uncertainties were combined using the British Institute of Radiology formula. CT and endoscopic ultrasound were best for GTV delineation, but the role of positron emission tomography is uncertain. Evidence suggests 3 cm proximal and 5 cm distal GTV-CTV (clinical target volume) margins (along the mucosa) for advanced tumours, but is lacking for early tumours and radial margins. Nodal spread, present in most pT2 tumours, is strongly prognostic and is initially to regional nodes (not wholly covered by typical radiotherapy). Calculated CTV-PTV (planning target volume) margins for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using literature estimates of tumour motion and set-up errors with bony online set-up correction, ignoring delineation errors, are 2.2 cm superiorly (sup) and inferiorly (inf) and 1.2-1.3 cm radially (1.3 cm sup-inf; 0.8 cm radially if the tumour's mid-position is known). As these margins may risk excessive toxicity, we propose treating microscopic disease for potentially curable tumours (cT2N0, some cT3N0), but gross disease only for advanced tumours. Recommended GTV-CTV margins are a maximum of 3 cm proximally and 5 cm distally up to cT2N0; 3 cm proximally and 5 cm distally for cT3N0 if anticipated toxicity allows; and 0 cm for cT4 and most node-positive tumours. The CTV-PTV margins above must be added to this for all stages. Methods of including elective nodal areas close to the GTV should be researched, e.g. nodal maps and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.