RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) experience frailty, which remains unexplored in acute exacerbations of ILD (AE-ILD). A better understanding may help with prognostication and resource planning. We evaluated the association of frailty with clinical characteristics, physical function, hospital outcomes, and post-AE-ILD recovery. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of AE-ILD patients (01/2015-10/2019) with frailty (proportion ≥0.25) on a 30-item cumulative-deficits index. Frail and non-frail patients were compared for pre- and post-hospitalization clinical characteristics, adjusted for age, sex, and ILD diagnosis. One-year mortality, considering transplantation as a competing risk, was analysed adjusting for age, frailty, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: 89 AE-ILD patients were admitted (median: 67 years, 63% idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). 31 were frail, which was associated with older age, greater CCI, lower 6-min walk distance, and decreased independence pre-hospitalization. Frail patients had more major complications (32% vs 10%, p = .01) and required more multidisciplinary support during hospitalization. Frailty was not associated with 1-year mortality (HR: 0.97, 95%CI: [0.45-2.10]) factoring transplantation as a competing risk. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty was associated with reduced exercise capacity, increased comorbidities and hospital complications. Identifying frailty may highlight those requiring additional multidisciplinary support, but further study is needed to explore whether frailty is modifiable with AE-ILD.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Humanos , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/complicaciones , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/terapia , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Field-based walk tests conducted remotely may provide an alternative method to a facility-based assessment of exercise capacity for people with advanced lung disease. This prospective study evaluated the level of agreement in the distance walked between a 6-min walk test (6MWT) and an incremental shuttle walk test performed by using standard in-person procedures and test variations and settings. METHODS: Adults with advanced lung disease underwent 4 study visits: (i) one in-person standard 6MWT (30-m corridor) and one in-person treadmill 6MWT, (ii) a remote 6MWT in a home setting (10-m corridor), (iii) 2 in-person standard incremental shuttle walk tests (10-m corridor), and (iv) a remote incremental shuttle walk test in a home setting (10-m corridor). A medical-grade oximeter measured heart rate and oxygen saturation before, during, and for 2 min after the tests. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were included (23 men [82%]; 64 (57-67) y old; 19 with interstitial lung disease [68%] and 9 with COPD [32%]; and 26 used supplemental oxygen (93%) [exertional [Formula: see text] of 0.46 ± 0.1]). There was no agreement between the tests. Greater walking distances were achieved with standard testing procedures: in-person 6MWT versus treadmill 6MWT (355 ± 68 vs 296 ± 97; P = .001; n = 28), in-person 6MWT versus remote 6MWT (349 ± 68 vs 293 ± 84; P = .001; n = 24), and in-person incremental shuttle walk test versus remote incremental shuttle walk test (216 ± 62 vs 195 ± 63; P = .03; n = 22). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the distance walked may have resulted from different track lengths, widths, and walking surfaces. This should be considered in test interpretation if tests are repeated under different conditions.
Asunto(s)
Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Prueba de Paso , Caminata , Humanos , Masculino , Prueba de Paso/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Caminata/fisiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Oximetría/métodos , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodosRESUMEN
Purpose: The use of tele-rehabilitation as a mode for physiotherapy services was widely implemented following the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study explored the perceived value and experiences of physiotherapists relating to tele-rehabilitation for cardiorespiratory care. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with physiotherapists who provided tele-rehabilitation to adults with cardiorespiratory conditions between March 11 and December 31, 2020. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Seven participants were interviewed; six practising solely in pulmonary rehabilitation and one practising in both pulmonary and cardiac rehabilitation. Three major themes emerged: (1) the pandemic presented unique challenges to implementing tele-rehabilitation while exacerbating previous challenges inherent with virtual care, (2) tele-rehabilitation use during the pandemic was deemed as equally effective in quality of care and patient adherence when compared to in-person services, and (3) tele-rehabilitation had significant value during the pandemic and has potential as an alternative delivery model post pandemic. Conclusion: Despite the inherent challenges, tele-rehabilitation was endorsed by participants as a suitable and effective alternative to care delivery and holds promise as a post-pandemic delivery model. Further evaluation is needed to support and optimize tele-rehabilitation use in physiotherapy practice.
Objectif: les services de téléréadaptation en physiothérapie ont été largement mis en place après le début de la pandémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). La présente étude a exploré la perception d'utilité et les expériences des physiothérapeutes à l'égard des soins cardiorespiratoires en téléréadaptation. Méthodologie: les chercheurs ont fait des entrevues semi-structurées auprès de physiothérapeutes qui ont donné des services de réadaptation à des adultes atteints d'affections cardiorespiratoires entre le 11 mars et le 31 décembre 2020. Ils ont analysé les entrevues au moyen d'une analyse de contenu classique. Résultats: Sept participants ont participé à l'entrevue, dont six effectuaient seulement de la réadaptation pulmonaire et le dernier, à la fois de la réadaptation pulmonaire et cardiaque. Trois grands thèmes en sont ressortis : 1) la pandémie a soulevé des défis uniques liés à la mise en Åuvre de la téléréadaptation tout en exacerbant des problèmes déjà inhérents aux soins virtuels, 2) le recours à la téléréadaptation pendant la pandémie était considéré comme aussi efficace pour la qualité des soins et l'adhésion des patients que les services en personne et 3) la téléréadaptation était très utile pendant la pandémie et a du potentiel comme autre modèle de prestation après la pandémie. Conclusion: malgré des difficultés inhérentes, les participants ont trouvé que la téléréadaptation était une solution appropriée à la prestation des soins et qu'elle se révélait un modèle de prestation prometteur après la pandémie. Une évaluation plus approfondie s'impose pour soutenir et optimiser le recours à la téléréadaptation en physiothérapie.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Exercise training post-transplant has been shown to improve physical function and quality of life in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Online resources in the form of websites and videos are commonly used to provide education and instruction on exercise and physical activity in SOT; however, the content and quality of these online resources has not been evaluated. Methods: The first 200 websites and videos identified on Google and YouTube using the English search term "exercise and physical activity in solid organ transplantation" were analyzed. Website and video content was evaluated based on 25 key components of exercise and physical activity in SOT as described in established exercise program recommendations. Website and video quality was determined using DISCERN, Global Quality Scale (GQS), and Patient Education Materials and Assessment Tool (PEMAT; threshold for which material is deemed understandable or actionable is >70%). Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to assess website and video characteristics, content, and quality metrics. Results: Forty-nine unique SOT websites (n = 15) and videos (n = 34) were identified, with the two most common categories being foundation/advocacy organizations and scientific resources. The average reading grade level of websites was 13 ± 3. Website and video content scores varied significantly (websites 11.3 ± 6.4; videos 8.4 ± 5.3). DISCERN total score and GQS score were low (median range for DISCERN 2.5-3.0; median for GQS 2.0 for both websites and videos, out of 5). PEMAT understandability and actionability scores were also low across websites and videos (mean range 57%-67% and 47%-65%, respectively). Foundation/advocacy websites had higher content and quality scores compared to scientific organizations and news/media articles. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive assessment of online content and quality of website and video resources on physical activity and exercise in adult SOT recipients. There were a limited number of online English patient-directed resources related to physical activity in SOT, most of which only partly captured items outlined in consensus exercise program recommendations and were of low quality and understandability and actionability. This work provides important insight to the English-speaking transplant community on the current state of online exercise health information and provides future direction for resource development.