Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(12): 127-137, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31763759

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our purposes are to compare the accuracy of RaySearch's analytical pencil beam (APB) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for clinical proton therapy and to present clinical validation data using a novel animal tissue lung phantom. METHODS: We constructed a realistic lung phantom composed of a rack of lamb resting on a stack of rectangular natural cork slabs simulating lung tissue. The tumor was simulated using 70% lean ground lamb meat inserted in a spherical hole with diameter 40 ± 5 mm carved into the cork slabs. A single-field plan using an anterior beam and a two-field plan using two anterior-oblique beams were delivered to the phantom. Ion chamber array measurements were taken medial and distal to the tumor. Measured doses were compared with calculated RayStation APB and MC calculated doses. RESULTS: Our lung phantom enabled measurements with the MatriXX PT at multiple depths in the phantom. Using the MC calculations, the 3%/3 mm gamma index pass rates, comparing measured with calculated doses, for the distal planes were 74.5% and 85.3% for the APB and 99.1% and 92% for the MC algorithms. The measured data revealed up to 46% and 30% underdosing within the distal regions of the target volume for the single and the two field plans when APB calculations are used. These discrepancies reduced to less than 18% and 7% respectively using the MC calculations. CONCLUSIONS: RaySearch Laboratories' Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm is superior to the pencil-beam algorithm for lung targets. Clinicians relying on the analytical pencil-beam algorithm should be aware of its pitfalls for this site and verify dose prior to delivery. We conclude that the RayStation MC algorithm is reliable and more accurate than the APB algorithm for lung targets and therefore should be used to plan proton therapy for patients with lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Método de Montecarlo , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Fantasmas de Imagen , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
2.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(10): 160-171, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31541536

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. METHODS: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks that were cut to a workable shape while frozen and then thawed before being CT scanned. Secondly, we made a patient breast phantom using a breast prosthesis filled with water and placed on a flat surface. Dose distributions in the animal and breast phantoms were measured using the MatriXX PT device. RESULTS: The measured doses to the neck and breast phantoms compared exceptionally well with doses calculated by the analytical pencil beam (APB) and MC algorithms. The comparisons between APB and MC dose calculations and MatriXX PT measurements yielded an average depth difference for best gamma agreement of <1 mm for the neck phantoms. For the breast phantom better average gamma pass rates between measured and calculated dose distributions were observed for the MC than for the APB algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The MC dose calculations are more accurate than the APB calculations for the static phantoms conditions we evaluated, especially in areas where significant inhomogeneous interfaces are traversed by the beam.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Mama/efectos de la radiación , Cabeza/efectos de la radiación , Método de Montecarlo , Cuello/efectos de la radiación , Fantasmas de Imagen , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Animales , Ciervos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Terapia de Protones , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Ovinos
3.
Breast J ; 20(2): 131-46, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24479632

RESUMEN

Breast-conserving therapy consisting of segmental mastectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) has become widely accepted as an alternative to mastectomy as a treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer. WBI is typically delivered over the course of 5-6 weeks to the whole breast. Hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation and accelerated partial breast irradiation have developed as alternative radiation techniques for select patients with favorable early-stage breast cancer. These radiation regimens allow for greater patient convenience and the potential for decreased health care costs. We review here the scientific rationale behind delivering a shorter course of radiation therapy using these distinct treatment regimens in this setting as well as an overview of the published data and pending trials comparing these alternative treatment regimens to WBI.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 41(10): 986-991, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28787281

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To report 6-year outcomes from a phase I/II trial using balloon-based brachytherapy to deliver APBI in 2 days. METHODS: A total of 45 patients with early-stage breast cancer received adjuvant APBI in 2 days with high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy totaling 2800 cGy in 4 fractions (700 cGy BID) using a balloon-based applicator as part of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial. All patients had negative margins and skin spacing ≥8 mm. We evaluated toxicities (CTCAE v3) as well as ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), regional nodal failure (RNF), distant metastasis, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median age and tumor size were 66 years old (48 to 83) and 0.8 cm (0.2 to 2.3 cm), respectively. Four percent of patients were N1 (n=2) and 73% were estrogen receptor (ER) positive (n=32). Median follow-up was 6.2 years (2.4 to 8.0 y). Nearly all toxicities at 6 years were grade 1 to 2 except 1 instance of grade 3 telangiectasia (2%). Eleven percent (n=5) of patients had chronic asymptomatic fat necrosis whereas asymptomatic seromas were noted on mammogram in 13% of cases (n=6). Cosmesis at last follow-up was good or excellent in 91% of cases (n=40) and fair in 9% (n=4). Two of the previously reported rib fractures healed with conservative measures. There were no IBTR or RNF (6 y IBTR/RNF rate 0%); however, 2 patients experienced distant metastasis (4% at 6 y). The 6-year actuarial disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were 96%, 100%, and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated 2-day APBI using brachytherapy resulted in excellent clinical outcomes with acceptable chronic toxicities.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Brachytherapy ; 11(5): 369-73, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22192494

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the initial experience of three institutions using multilumen catheters to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and evaluate dosimetric improvements. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible for this analysis if they met criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation at their respective institution and were not enrolled on the national Phase III trial. Minimum guidelines for treatment planning from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 protocol were followed. Toxicities were coded using common toxicity criteria version 3.0 criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were analyzed as part of this study. Median skin spacing was 11mm with a median skin dose of 86.9% (% of prescription dose [PD]). Median rib dose was 76.1% of the PD (range, 4.3-155.7%). The V(90), V(95), and V(100) of the PD for the planning target volume evaluation was 95.4%, 95.2%, and 80.3%, respectively. Seven patients had both skin and rib spacing <7mm, with the median skin dose and rib dose being 113.4% and 130.9% of the PD. For these cases, the median V(90), V(95), and V(100) of the PD was 99.2%, 94.3%, and 81.1%, respectively, whereas the median V(150) and V(200) were 22.5cc and 7.4cc. Overall, Grade I and II radiation dermatitis were noted in 41.9% and 6.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: The multilumen device led to improvements in target coverage and normal structure doses compared with traditionally accepted guidelines. Similar toxicities were seen compared with single-lumen devices, even in patients with skin and rib spacing <7mm.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Dosis de Radiación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA