RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Selection of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant peritoneal (PM) and liver metastases (LM) for radical treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), including liver resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), needs improvement. This retrospective, monocentric study was designed to evaluate the predictive factors for early recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in such patients treated in a referral center. METHODS: Consecutive colorectal cancer patients with concomitant LM and PM treated with curative intent with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, simultaneous complete CRS, liver resection, and HIPEC in 2011-2022 were included. Clinical, radiological (before and after preoperative chemotherapy), surgical, and pathological data were investigated, along with long-term oncologic outcomes. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence (diagnosed <6 months after surgery), DFS, and OS. RESULTS: Of more than 61 patients included, 31 (47.1%) had pT4 and 27 (40.9%) had pN2 primary tumors. Before preoperative chemotherapy, the median number of LM was 2 (1-4). The median surgical PCI (peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was 3 (5-8.5). The median DFS and OS were 8.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-10.1) and 34.1 months (95% CI 28.1-53.5), respectively. In multivariate analysis, pT4 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.14 [1.2-16.78], p = 0.032]) and pN2 (OR = 3.7 [1.08-13.86], p = 0.042) status were independently associated with an early recurrence, whereas retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 39 [8.67-175.44], p < 0.001) was independently associated with poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: In colorectal cancer patients with concomitant PM and LM, an advanced primary tumor (pT4 and/or pN2) was associated with a higher risk of early recurrence following a radical multimodal treatment, whereas RLN metastases was strongly detrimental for OS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Accumulating data has shown the rising incidence and poor prognosis of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers, but few data exist on biliary tract cancers (BTC). We aimed to analyse the clinico-pathological, molecular, therapeutic characteristics and prognosis of patients with early onset BTC (EOBTC, age ≤50 years at diagnosis), versus olders. METHODS: We analysed patients diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder adenocarcinoma between 1 January 2003 and 30 June 2021. Baseline characteristics and treatment were described in each group and compared. Progression-free survival, overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated in each group using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 1256 patients were included, 188 (15%) with EOBTC. Patients with EOBTC demonstrated fewer comorbidities (63.5% vs. 84.5%, p < .0001), higher tumour stage (cT3-4: 50.0% vs. 32.3%, p = .0162), bilobar liver involvement (47.8% vs. 32.1%, p = .0002), and metastatic disease (67.6% vs. 57.5%, p = .0097) compared to older. Patients with EOBTC received second-line therapy more frequently (89.5% vs. 81.0% non-EOBTC, p = .0224). For unresectable patients with BTC, median overall survival was 17.0 vs. 16.2 months (p = .0876), and median progression-free survival was 5.8 vs. 6.0 months (p = .8293), in EOBTC vs. older. In advanced stages, fewer actionable alterations were found in EOBTC (e.g., IDH1 mutations [7.8% vs. 16.6%]; FGFR2-fusion [11.7% vs. 8.9%]; p = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EOBTC have a more advanced disease at diagnosis, are treated more heavily at an advanced stage but show similar survival. A distinctive molecular profile enriched for FGRF2 fusions was found.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/terapia , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Edad de Inicio , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Pronóstico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) account for <5% of pancreatic malignancies. The efficacy of modern chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced PASC is unknown. Patients with advanced PASC from 2008 to 2021 were consecutively included in this retrospective multicenter study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Ninety-four PASC from 16 French centers were included (median age, 67.3 years; males, 56.4%; metastatic disease, 85.1%). The first-line treatment was chemotherapy for 79 patients (84.0%) (37 FOLFIRINOX (FX), 7 Gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel (GN) and 35 for all other regimen) or best supportive care (BSC) alone for 15 patients (16.0%). No significant difference was observed between FX and GN in terms of PFS (P = .67) or OS (P = .5). Modern regimens pooled together (FX and GN) as compared to all others chemotherapy regimens showed an improvement of overall response rate (39.5% and 9.7%, P = .002), PFS (median, 7.8 vs 4.7 months, P = .02) and OS (median, 12.7 vs 9.2 months, P = .35). This large study evaluating first-line treatment regimens in advanced PASC suggests that modern regimens as FX or GN may be preferable to all other chemotherapy regimens. These results deserve confirmation in prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Gemcitabina , Desoxicitidina , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Genetic counselling (GC) is a key step in the identification of inherited germline mutations. However, the oncogenetic practices are poorly described for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) in Europe. The CAPANCOGEN study aimed to describe the GC referral practices in France and assess the implementation of international guidelines in patients with PA. METHODS: Information about GC referrals with PA was collected in 13 French centres from September 2019 to October 2021. In the 5 largest centres, personal and familial histories of cancers and diseases associated with a higher risk of germline mutations were collected in 460 patients, according to international, American, European and French GC referral guidelines. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the factors influencing GC referral. RESULTS: Among 833 patients, a total of 100 patients (12%) had an indication of GC according to local multidisciplinary tumour board meetings (MTBM). Among these patients, 41% did not undergo GC. The median time between MTBM and GC was 55 days (IQR: 14.5-112). Among 460 patients with collected personal and familial history, 31.5% were not referred to a GC despite an existing indication. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, suspected CDKN2A (p = 0.032) or BRCA mutation (p < 0.001), familial pancreatic cancer history (p < 0.001) and controlled disease with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (p < 0.001) increased the referral rate. Conversely, older age (p = 0.002) and a locally advanced PA (p = 0.045) decreased the risk of GC referral. CONCLUSIONS: GC referral is inadequate despite valuable information in patients' medical files.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudios de Cohortes , Derivación y Consulta , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric pneumatosis (GP) is a rare radiologic finding with an unpredictable prognosis. The aim of this study was to identify mortality risk factors from patients presenting with GP on computed tomography (CT), and to develop a model which would allow us to predict which patients would benefit most from operative management. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, all CT-scan reports in four tertiary centers were searched for the following terms: "gastric pneumatosis," "intramural gastric air" or "emphysematous gastritis." The retrieved CT scans were reviewed by a senior surgeon and a senior radiologist. Relevant clinical and laboratory data for these patients were extracted from the institutions' medical records. RESULTS: Among 58 patients with GP, portal venous gas and bowel ischemia were present on CT scan in 52 (90%) and 17 patients (29%), respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 31%. Univariate analysis identified the following variables as predictive of mortality at the time of the diagnosis of GP: abdominal guarding, hemodynamic instability, arterial lactate level >2 mmol/l, and the absence of gastric dilatation. Multivariable analysis identified the following variables as independent predictors of mortality: arterial lactate level (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.79) and the absence of gastric dilatation (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.79). None of the patients presenting with a baseline lactate rate<2 mmol/l died within 30 days following diagnosis, and no more than 17 patients out of 58 had bowel ischemia (29%). CONCLUSIONS: GP could be managed non-operatively, even in the presence of portal venous gas. However, patients with arterial lactate level>2 mmol/l, or the absence of gastric dilation should be surgically explored due to a non-negligible risk of mortality.
Asunto(s)
Dilatación Gástrica , Isquemia Mesentérica , Neumatosis Cistoide Intestinal , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/cirugía , Ácido Láctico , Neumatosis Cistoide Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumatosis Cistoide Intestinal/terapia , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: FOLFIRINOX has shown promising results in locally advanced (LAPA) or borderline resectable (BRPA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We report here a cohort of patients treated with this regimen from the AGEO group. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study. We included all consecutive patients with non-pre-treated LAPA or BRPA treated with FOLFIRINOX. RESULTS: We included 330 patients (57.9% male, 65.4% <65 years, 96.4% PS <2). Disease was classified as BRPA in 31.1% or LAPA in 68.9%. Objective response rate with FOLFIRINOX was 29.5% and stable disease 51%. Subsequent CRT was performed in 46.4% of patients and 23.9% had curative intent surgery. Resection rates were 42.1% for BRPA and 15.5% for LAPA. Main G3/4 toxicities were fatigue (15%), neutropenia (12%) and neuropathy (G2/3 35%). After a median follow-up of 26.7 months, median OS (mOS) and PFS were 21.4 and 12.4 months, respectively. For patients treated by FOLFIRINOX alone, or FOLFIRINOX followed by CRT, or FOLFIRINOX + /- CRT + surgery, mOS was 16.8 months, 21.8 months and not reached, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRINOX for LAPA and BRPA seems to be effective with a manageable toxicity profile. These promising results in "real-life" patients now have to be confirmed in a Phase 3 randomised trial.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this retrospective multicenter study were to assess the technical success and adverse events of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures in children in French and Belgian centers. METHODS: All children aged 1 day to 17 years who underwent ERCP between January 2008 and March 2019 in 15 tertiary care hospitals were retrospectively included. RESULTS: 271 children underwent 470 ERCP procedures. Clinical long-term follow-up was available for 72â% of our patients (340/470 procedures). The median age at intervention was 10.9 years. ERCP was therapeutic in 90â% (423/470) and diagnostic in cases of neonatal cholestasis in 10â% of the patients. The most common biliary indication was choledocholithiasis; the most common pancreatic indication was chronic pancreatitis. Biliary cannulation was successful in 92â% of cases (270/294); pancreatic cannulation in 96â% of cases (169/176); and planned therapeutic procedures in 92â% of cases (388/423). The overall complication rate was 19â% (65/340). The most common complication was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in 12â% of cases (40/340) and sepsis in 5â% (18/340). On univariate analyses, pancreatic stent removal was protective against PEP (odds ratio [OR] 0.1, 95â% confidence interval [CI] 0.01â-â0.75; Pâ=â0.03), and sepsis was associated with history of liver transplantation (OR 7.27, 95â%CI 1.7â-â31.05; Pâ=â0.01). Five patients had post-ERCP hemorrhage and two had intestinal perforation. All complications were managed with supportive medical care. There was no procedure-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Our cohort demonstrates that ERCP can be performed safely with high success rates in many pancreaticobiliary diseases of children. The rate of adverse events was similar to that in previous reports.
Asunto(s)
Coledocolitiasis , Pancreatitis , Cateterismo , Niño , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The pharmacokinetic equivalence of dose intensification with adalimumab (ADA) 80 mg every other week (EOW) compared to weekly 40 mg has only been supported by modeling systems. AIM OF THE STUDY: To compare the trough levels of ADA (TLA) and the occurrence of anti-ADA antibodies (AAA) between these two treatment regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study including all consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who had reached a longstanding and deep remission under treatment with ADA 40 mg once a week. In these patients, the ADA regimen was changed from 40 mg/week to 80 mg EOW. TLA and AAA levels using a drug-tolerant assay were monitored before and ten weeks after from the change in the ADA regimen and the results compared by a Wilcoxon paired test. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (60% CD, mean age 35 years) were included. Before and ten weeks after the changes of ADA regimen, the median TLA were (6.9 µg/mL versus 7.0 µg/mL, respectively; P = 0.34) and the AAA levels (3.4 µg/ml-eq versus 3.0 µg/ml-eq, respectively; P = 0.25.) were quite similar. Likewise, quartiles of TLA (Kendall test r = 0.91; P < 0.001) and AAA (r = 0.78; P < 0.001) did not differ before and after ADA regimen. When stratifying all the patients into 4 groups based on drug/antibody levels (immunogenic, subtherapeutic, therapeutic, or supratherapeutic), no patient needed for returning to the previous weekly regimen. In terms of acceptability, more than 60% of patients preferred an injection EOW compared once a week. CONCLUSIONS: In IBD patients who achieved a deep clinical remission under ADA 40 mg once a week, the pharmacokinetic of ADA was similar when ADA regimen was changed to 80 mg EOW. Given the patient's preference for the latter regimen, a modification of injection regimen should be systematically proposed.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/farmacocinética , Antiinflamatorios/farmacocinética , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos/sangre , Área Bajo la Curva , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In patients with IBD experiencing an immune-mediated loss of response (LOR) to antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF), algorithms recommend a switch of anti-TNF without immunosuppressive drug. The aim of our study was to compare in these patients two strategies: either switch to a second anti-TNF alone or with addition of azathioprine (AZA). After randomisation outcomes (time to clinical and pharmacokinetic failure) were compared between the two groups during a 2-year follow-up period. DESIGN: Consecutive IBD patients in immune-mediated LOR to a first optimised anti-TNF given in monotherapy were randomised to receive either AZA or nothing with induction by a second anti-TNF in both arms. Clinical failure was defined for Crohn's disease (CD) as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≥5 associated with a faecal calprotectin level >250 µg/g stool and for UC as a Mayo score >5 with endoscopic subscore >1 or as the occurrence of adverse events requiring to stop treatment. Unfavourable pharmacokinetics of the second anti-TNF were defined by the appearance of undetectable trough levels of anti-TNF with high antibodies (drug-sensitive assay) or by that of antibodies (drug-tolerant assay). RESULTS: Ninety patients (48 CDs) were included, and 45 of them received AZA after randomisation. The second anti-TNF was adalimumab or infliximab in 40 and 50 patients, respectively. Rates of clinical failure and occurrence of unfavourable pharmacokinetics were higher in monotherapy compared with combination therapy (p<0.001; median time of clinical failure since randomisation 18 vs >24 months). At 24 months, survival rates without clinical failure and without appearance of unfavourable pharmacokinetics were respectively 22 versus 77% and 22% versus 78% (p<0.001 for both) in monotherapy versus combination therapy. Only the use of combination therapy was associated with favourable outcomes after anti-TNF switch. CONCLUSION: In case of immune-mediated LOR to a first anti-TNF, AZA should be associated with the second anti-TNF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 03580876.
Asunto(s)
Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Ustekinumab is approved for treatment of Crohn's disease (CD).1,2 Few data are available to assess the usefulness of monitoring inflammatory biomarkers and therapeutic drug monitoring to predict response to ustekinumab. We conducted a prospective study to assess the relationships between these parameters and the clinical outcome at week 16 in active CD patients receiving ustekinumab.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Inducción de Remisión , Ustekinumab/sangre , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/análisis , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Heces/química , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/sangre , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Yield of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) compared with standard colonoscopy is conflicting in terms of adenoma detection rate (ADR). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) appears necessary. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched in December 2017.âAbstracts from Digestive Disease Week and United European Gastroenterology Week meetings were also searched to 2017.âAll RCTs comparing EAC with standard colonoscopy were included. Analysis was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel models. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 test. RESULTS: Of the 265 articles reviewed, 12 RCTs were included, with a total of 8376 patients (EAC group 4225; standard colonoscopy group 4151). In the meta-analysis, ADR was significantly increased in the EAC group vs. the standard colonoscopy group (41.3â% vs. 34.2â%; risk ratio [RR]â=â1.20, 95â% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.36; Pâ=â0.003; I2â=â79â%), especially for operators with low-to-moderate ADRs (<â35â%): RRâ=â1.51, 95â%CI 1.35 to 1.69; Pâ<â0.001; I2â=â43â%). In contrast, this benefit was not reached for operators with high ADRs (>â45â%): RRâ=â1.01, 95â%CI 0.93 to 1.09; Pâ=â0.87; I2â=â0.0â%). The mean number of adenomas per patient tended to be higher with EAC (mean differenceâ=â0.11 adenomas/patient, 95â%CIâ-â0.17 to 0.38). Similar results were shown for polyp detection rates (61.6â% vs. 51.4â%; RRâ=â1.20, 95â%CI 1.06 to 1.36; Pâ=â0.004). Use of the Endocuff did not impact the cecal intubation rate (95.1â% vs. 95.7â%; Pâ=â0.08), or the procedure time compared with standard colonoscopy. Adverse events related to Endocuff were rare and exclusively mild mucosal erosion (4.0â%; 95â%CI 2.0â% to 8.0â%). CONCLUSION: With moderate-quality evidence, this study showed an improvement in ADR with EAC without major adverse events, especially for operators with low-to-moderate ADRs.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma , Pólipos Adenomatosos , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenoma/patología , Pólipos Adenomatosos/diagnóstico por imagen , Pólipos Adenomatosos/patología , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía/instrumentación , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: One of the reasons for the failure of infliximab (IFX) is immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR). We aimed to report the efficacy and safety of a tolerance induction protocol in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients who had previously experienced IHR during IFX infusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reported all cases of IBD patients who had previously experienced IHR due to IFX and who were submitted to a standardized protocol of tolerance induction to IFX from 2010 to 2015. RESULTS: IHR occurred in a majority of patients (69%) during the first 3 infusions and for half of them after a period of IFX withdrawn. Skin prick tests were negative and only 2 intradermal tests were positive. Basophil activation tests and antidrug antibody measurements were performed in 8 out of 16 patients and were positive in 3 and 4 patients respectively. Induction of tolerance was successful in 69% of patients and IFX was pursued with clinical efficacy > 1 year in 7 patients (44%). Allergologic investigations were not predictive of tolerance induction success. CONCLUSION: A majority of IHR to IFX infusions occurred during the beginning or restarting of treatment and was related to a nonallergic hypersensitivity. Induction of tolerance to IFX is feasible and effective and may safely allow retreatment of IFX in almost 70% of IBD patients.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Femenino , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inducido químicamente , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated whether serum trough levels of vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against integrin α4ß7, during the induction phase of treatment can determine whether patients will need additional doses (optimization of therapy) within the first 6 months. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 47 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease (CD; n = 31) or ulcerative colitis (UC; n = 16) who had not responded to 2 previous treatment regimens with antagonists of tumor necrosis factor and were starting therapy with vedolizumab at 2 hospitals in France, from June 2014 through April 2016. All patients were given a 300-mg infusion of vedolizumab at the start of the study, Week 2, Week 6, and then every 8 weeks; patients were also given corticosteroids during the first 4-6 weeks. Patients not in remission at Week 6 were given additional doses of vedolizumab at Week 10 and then every 4 weeks (extended therapy or optimization). Remission at Week 6 of treatment was defined as CD activity score below 150 points for patients with CD and a partial Mayo Clinic score of <3 points, without concomitant corticosteroids, for patients with UC. Blood samples were collected each week and serum levels of vedolizumab and antibodies against vedolizumab were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Median trough levels of vedolizumab and interquartile ranges were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. The primary objective was to determine whether trough levels of vedolizumab measured during the first 6 weeks of induction therapy associated with the need for extended treatment within the first 6 months. RESULTS: Based on response to therapy at Week 6, extended treatment was required for 30 of the 47 patients (23 patients with CD and 7 patients with UC). At Week 2, trough levels of vedolizumab for patients selected for extended treatment were 23.0 µg/mL (interquartile range, 14.0-37.0 µg/mL), compared with 42.5 µg/mL in patients who did not receive extended treatment (interquartile range, 33.5-50.7; P = .15). At Week 6, trough levels of vedolizumab <18.5 µg/mL were associated with need for extended therapy (100% positive predictive value, 46.2%; negative predictive value; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.72) within the first 6 months. Among patients who required extended treatment at Week 10, all of those with trough levels of vedolizumab <19.0 µg/mL at Week 6 had achieved clinical remission 4 weeks later (secondary responders). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of patients with CD or UC receiving induction therapy with vedolizumab, low trough levels of vedolizumab at Week 6 (<19.0 µg/mL) are associated with need for additional doses (given at Week 10 and then every 4 weeks). All patients receiving these additional doses achieved a clinical response 4 weeks later.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacocinética , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Suero/química , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects approximately 50 % of adults in France and persists lifelong as a latent agent in different organs, including the gut. A close relationship is observed between inflammation that favors viral expression, and viral replication that modulates inflammation. In this context, CMV colitis may impact the prognosis of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and notably those with ulcerative colitis (UC). In UC, the mucosal inflammation in link with Th2 cytokines, together with immunomodulatory drugs used for controlling flares-up, favors viral reactivation within the gut, which increases mucosal inflammation ; it results in an important risk of impairing corticoid and immunosuppressor efficacy (the probability of steroid resistance is multiplied by more than 20 in case of CMV colitis), precipitating the need for colectomy. This review emphasizes the virological tools that are recommended for exploring CMV colitis during IBD and underlines the interest of using ganciclovir for treating flares-up associated to CMV colitis in UC patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition. Previous reports suggested that UC may have a worse prognosis when associated with auto-immune diseases. We compared characteristics at diagnosis and natural history of the disease between classical ulcerative colitis (CUC) and UC associated with auto-immune diseases (CAI) in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, 67 children followed for UC at Nancy University Hospital between 1993 and 2012 were included: 45 patients in the CUC group and 22 in the CAI group. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Median age at diagnosis was 11.6 years in the CAI group and 9.8 years in the CUC group. Time between symptoms onset and diagnosis was broadly similar in the two groups (<3 months) and there were no significant differences regarding biological and histological findings. At 5 years, the need for corticosteroids and azathioprine did not differ between the CAI and the CUC groups. There was also no significant difference between the two groups regarding infliximab use at 1 and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this pediatric study, CAI had similar characteristics at baseline as CUC. The course of CAI does not seem to be influenced by the presence of concomitant auto-immune diseases.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/patología , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Endoscopía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Lactante , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Local or national policy, patients' preferences, safety and/or economic concerns, or reimbursement issues may dictate stopping drug in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients. Sustained deep remission is an important predictor of a better outcome after anti-tumor necrosis (TNF) factor therapy discontinuation, including infliximab (IFX) in IBD patients, but this is not sufficient to prevent future relapse in these patients. In IBD patients under combotherapy, trough level of infliximab (TRI) could be helpful to choose stopping one of the two drugs. In patients on IFX monotherapy, TRI could help to decide reduction of drug dosing, particularly in IBD patients with supratherapeutic trough levels. Incidental findings of undetectable TRI in patients with deep remission may identify a subset of patients who may be considered for IFX cessation. Controlled trials further assessing this issue are eagerly awaited. Pending these trials, clear international recommendations for discontinuing anti-TNF therapy are needed.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Algoritmos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacocinética , Humanos , Infliximab/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
Prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer has dramatically improved during these two last decades, through a better understanding of therapeutic goals and the development of news drugs such as biologics. The character resectable, potentially resectable or not resectable of colorectal cancer liver metastasis should be considered at baseline because it determines the systemic chemotherapy which will be conducted. Considering resectable metastasis, 6 courses of FOLFOX (5 fluoro-uracil + oxaliplatin) will be administered before and after surgery in the goal of "cleaning" the body from the potential micrometastasis. In potentially resectable liver metastasis, the objective of the chemotherapy will be to get a tumor shrinkage, enabling microscopically complete resection while leaving enough functional hepatic parenchyma. In case of unresectable metastasis, obtaining a tumor response with an intensive induction chemotherapy is the guarantee of a good disease control, and authorizes to light treatment during a maintenance period, or a therapeutic break in selected patients, without altering the prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is moving from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and objective measures of disease, such as findings from endoscopy. PROs will become an important aspect of assessing activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and for labeling specific drugs for this disease. PROs always have been considered in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis, and have included measurements of quality of life, disability, or fatigue. Several disease-specific scales have been developed to assess these PROs and commonly are used in clinical trials. Outcomes reported by patients in clinical trials of IBD initially focused on quality of life, measured by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire or disease-specific scales such as the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire or its shorter version. Recently considered factors include fatigue, depression and anxiety, and work productivity, as measured by the Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, the Hospital Anxiety Depression, and the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire, respectively. However, few data are available on how treatment affects these factors in patients with IBD. Although disability generally is recognized in patients with IBD, it is not measured. The international IBD disability index currently is being validated. None of the PROs currently used in IBD were developed according to FDA guidance for PRO development. PROs will be a major primary end point of future trials. FDA guidance is needed to develop additional PROs for IBD that can be incorporated into trials, to better compare patients' experience with different therapies.