Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 92(3): 242-248, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33154179

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We set out to determine which characteristics and outcomes of stroke are associated with COVID-19. METHODS: This case-control study included patients admitted with stroke to 13 hospitals in England and Scotland between 9 March and 5 July 2020. We collected data on 86 strokes (81 ischaemic strokes and 5 intracerebral haemorrhages) in patients with evidence of COVID-19 at the time of stroke onset (cases). They were compared with 1384 strokes (1193 ischaemic strokes and 191 intracerebral haemorrhages) in patients admitted during the same time period who never had evidence of COVID-19 (controls). In addition, the whole group of stroke admissions, including another 37 patients who appeared to have developed COVID-19 after their stroke, were included in two logistic regression analyses examining which features were independently associated with COVID-19 status and with inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Cases with ischaemic stroke were more likely than ischaemic controls to occur in Asians (18.8% vs 6.7%, p<0.0002), were more likely to involve multiple large vessel occlusions (17.9% vs 8.1%, p<0.03), were more severe (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 8 vs 5, p<0.002), were associated with higher D-dimer levels (p<0.01) and were associated with more severe disability on discharge (median modified Rankin Scale score 4 vs 3, p<0.0001) and inpatient death (19.8% vs 6.9%, p<0.0001). Recurrence of stroke during the patient's admission was rare in cases and controls (2.3% vs 1.0%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that COVID-19 may be an important modifier of the onset, characteristics and outcome of acute ischaemic stroke.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido
2.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 91(4): 396-401, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32041820

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human neural stem cell implantation may offer improved recovery from stroke. We investigated the feasibility of intracerebral implantation of the allogeneic human neural stem cell line CTX0E03 in the subacute-chronic recovery phase of stroke and potential measures of therapeutic response in a multicentre study. METHODS: We undertook a prospective, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study in adults aged >40 years with significant upper limb motor deficits 2-13 months after ischaemic stroke. 20 million cells were implanted by stereotaxic injection to the putamen ipsilateral to the cerebral infarct. The primary outcome was improvement by 2 or more points on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) subtest 2 at 3 months after implantation. FINDINGS: Twenty-three patients underwent cell implantation at eight UK hospitals a median of 7 months after stroke. One of 23 participants improved by the prespecified ARAT subtest level at 3 months, and three participants at 6 and 12 months. Improvement in ARAT was seen only in those with residual upper limb movement at baseline. Transient procedural adverse effects were seen, but no cell-related adverse events occurred up to 12 months of follow-up. Two deaths were unrelated to trial procedures. INTERPRETATION: Administration of human neural stem cells by intracerebral implantation is feasible in a multicentre study. Improvements in upper limb function occurred at 3, 6 and 12 months, but not in those with absent upper limb movement at baseline, suggesting a possible target population for future controlled trials. FUNDING: ReNeuron, Innovate UK (application no 32074-222145). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT Number: 2012-003482-18.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Células-Madre Neurales/trasplante , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología
4.
Stroke ; 37(12): 2979-83, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17082474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Loss of motor function is common after stroke and leads to significant chronic disability. Stem cells are capable of self-renewal and of differentiating into multiple cell types, including neurones, glia, and vascular cells. We assessed the safety of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after stroke and its effect on circulating CD34+ stem cells. METHODS: We performed a 2-center, dose-escalation, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial (ISRCTN 16784092) of G-CSF (6 blocks of 1 to 10 microg/kg SC, 1 or 5 daily doses) in 36 patients with recent ischemic stroke. Circulating CD34+ stem cells were measured by flow cytometry; blood counts and measures of safety and functional outcome were also monitored. All measures were made blinded to treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, whose mean+/-SD age was 76+/-8 years and of whom 50% were male, were recruited. G-CSF (5 days of 10 microg/kg) increased CD34+ count in a dose-dependent manner, from 2.5 to 37.7 at day 5 (area under curve, P=0.005). A dose-dependent rise in white cell count (P<0.001) was also seen. There was no difference between treatment groups in the number of patients with serious adverse events: G-CSF, 7/24 (29%) versus placebo 3/12 (25%), or in their dependence (modified Rankin Scale, median 4, interquartile range, 3 to 5) at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF is effective at mobilizing bone marrow CD34+ stem cells in patients with recent ischemic stroke. Administration is feasible and appears to be safe and well tolerated. The fate of mobilized cells and their effect on functional outcome remain to be determined.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Anciano , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
5.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 15(6): 245-9, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17904083

RESUMEN

High blood pressure (BP), pulse pressure (PP), and rate pressure product (RPP) are each associated independently with a poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Whereas nitric oxide (NO) donors, such as glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), lower blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke, their effect on other hemodynamic measures is not known. We performed a systematic review of the effects of NO donors on systemic hemodynamic measures in patients with acute/subacute stroke. Randomized controlled trials were identified from searches of the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, and Embase. Information on hemodynamic measures, including systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and heart rate, were assessed, and hemodynamic derivatives of these were calculated: PP (PP = SBP - DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP = DBP + PP/3), mid blood pressure (MBP = (SBP + DBP)/2), pulse pressure index (PPI = PP/MAP), and RPP (RPP = SBP x HR). The effect of treatment on hemodynamic measures was calculated as the weighted mean difference (WMD) between treated and control groups with adjustment for baseline. Three trials involving 145 patients were identified; 93 patients received the NO donor, GTN, and 52 patients composed the control group. Compared with placebo, GTN significantly reduced SBP (WMD, -9.80 mm Hg; P < .001), DBP (WMD, -4.43 mm Hg; P < .001), MAP (WMD, - 6.41 mm Hg; P < .001), MBP (WMD, -7.33 mm Hg; P < .001), PP (WMD, -6.11 mm Hg; P < .001), and PPI (WMD, -0.03; P = .04). GTN increased HR (WMD, +3.87 bpm; P < .001) and lowered RPP insignificantly (WMD, -323 mm Hg.bpm; P = .14). Our findings indicate that the NO donor GTN reduces BP, PP, and other derivatives in acute and subacute stroke while increasing HR.

6.
Free Radic Biol Med ; 39(3): 412-25, 2005 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15993340

RESUMEN

Nitric oxide produced by the neuronal or inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, iNOS) is detrimental in acute ischemic stroke (IS), whereas that derived from the endothelial isoform is beneficial. However, experimental studies with nitric oxide synthase inhibitors have given conflicting results. Relevant studies were found from searches of EMBASE, PubMed, and reference lists; of 456 references found, 73 studies involving 2321 animals were included. Data on the effects of NOS inhibition on lesion volume (mm3, %) and cerebral blood flow (CBF; %, ml * min(-1) * g(-1)) were analyzed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. NOS inhibitors reduced total infarct volume in models of permanent (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.86, -0.26) and transient (SMD -0.99, 95% CI -1.25, -0.72) ischemia. Cortical CBF was reduced in models of permanent but not transient ischemia. When assessed by type of inhibitor, total lesion volume was reduced in permanent models by nNOS and iNOS inhibitors, but not by nonselective inhibitors. All types of NOS inhibitors reduced infarct volume in transient models. NOS inhibition may have negative effects on CBF but further studies are required. Selective nNOS and iNOS inhibitors are candidate treatments for acute IS.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia Encefálica/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad
7.
Thromb Haemost ; 93(3): 527-34, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15735805

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess whether triple antiplatelet therapy is superior to dual and mono therapy in attenuating platelet and leucocyte function. Aspirin (A), clopidogrel (C), and dipyridamole (D) were administered singly and in various combinations (A, C, D, AC, AD, CD, ACD), each for two weeks (without washout) to 11 healthy subjects and to 11 patients with previous ischaemic stroke in two randomised multiway crossover trials. At the end of each two-week period platelet aggregation, platelet-leucocyte conjugate formation and leucocyte activation were measured ex vivo blinded to treatment. Platelets were stimulated with collagen; additional measurements were made with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), platelet activating factor (PAF), adrenaline and the combination of, ADP, PAF and adrenaline. Results show that in the presence of collagen, ACD was superior to all antagonists or combinations, except AC, in reducing aggregation, platelet-leucocyte conjugate formation, and monocyte activation (all p<0.05). ACD was also more potent than other treatments, except AC, in inhibiting the aggregation and platelet-monocyte conjugate formation induced by the combination of ADP, PAF and adrenaline. The effects were similar in both volunteers and stroke patients. No serious adverse events or major bleeding events occurred. Triple antiplatelet therapy did not appear to be more effective than combined aspirin and clopidogrel in moderating platelet and leucocyte function. Any additional clinical benefit provided by dipyridamole may be through other mechanisms of action.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Plaquetas/efectos de los fármacos , Dipiridamol/administración & dosificación , Leucocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Plaquetas/fisiología , Isquemia Encefálica/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adhesión Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Clopidogrel , Estudios Cruzados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Leucocitos/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/sangre , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26734445

RESUMEN

We aimed to establish whether recall of elements of the neurological examination can be improved by use of a simple patient assessment score. In a previous study we demonstrated that in-patients referred to neurology at two United Kingdom (UK) hospitals were not fully examined prior to referral; we therefore designed a larger quality improvement report with 80% power to detect a 10% increase in tendon hammer or ophthalmoscope use following an educational intervention. In-patients referred to neurology over a four month period (in hospitals in the UK (10), Jordan (1), Sweden (2), and the United Arab Emirates (1)) were asked whether they recalled being examined with a tendon hammer (T), ophthalmoscope (O), and stethoscope (S) since admission. The results were disseminated to local medical teams using various techniques (including Grand Round presentations, email, posters, discounted equipment). Data were then collected for a further four month period post-intervention. Pre-intervention and post-intervention data were available for 11 centres with 407 & 391 patients in each arm respectively. Median age of patients was 51 (range 13-100) and 49 (range 16-95) years respectively, with 44.72% and 44.76% being male in each group. 264 patients (64.86%) recalled being examined with a tendon hammer in the pre-intervention arm, which significantly improved to 298 (76.21%) (p<0.001). Only 119 patients (29.24%) recollected examination with an ophthalmoscope pre-intervention, which significantly improved to 149 (38.11%)(p=0.009). The majority of patients (321 (78.87%)) pre-intervention recalled examination with a stethoscope, which significantly improved to 330 (84.4%) to a lesser extent (p=0.045). Results indicate that most patients are not fully examined prior to neurology referral yet a simple assessment score and educational intervention can improve recall of elements of the neurological examination and thus the likelihood of patients being examined neurologically. This is the largest and - to our knowledge - only study to assess this issue. This has implications for national neurological educators.

9.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 13(3): 138-40, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17903965

RESUMEN

Antiplatelet agents are effective for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke, although they do not always prevent recurrent events. Laboratory studies confirm that therapy with 3 antiplatelet agents is superior to dual therapy or monotherapy at inhibiting platelet and leucocyte function. We report here a 69-year-old man who had recurrent strokes despite single or dual antiplatelet agents, but who responded to a combination of aspirin, dipyridamole, and clopidogrel. Likewise, triple antiplatelet therapy was effective in a series of 8 additional patients during a period of 28 months of follow up. Because combining 3 agents runs the risk of major bleeding, clinical trials are essential to address issues of safety and efficacy in patients with stroke.

11.
PLoS One ; 3(8): e2852, 2008 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18682741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aspirin, dipyridamole and clopidogrel are effective in secondary vascular prevention. Combination therapy with three antiplatelet agents might maximise the benefit of antiplatelet treatment in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A randomised, parallel group, observer-blinded phase II trial compared the combination of aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole with aspirin alone. Adult patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 5 years were included. The primary outcome was tolerability to treatment assessed as the number of patients completing randomised treatment. Recruitment was halted prematurely after publication of the ESPRIT trial (which confirmed that combined aspirin and dipyridamole is more effective than aspirin alone). 17 patients were enrolled: male 12 (71%), mean age 62 (SD 13) years, lacunar stroke syndrome 12 (71%), median stroke/TIA onset to randomisation 8 months. Treatment was discontinued in 4 of 9 (44%) patients receiving triple therapy vs. none of 8 taking aspirin (p = 0.08). One recurrent stroke occurred in a patient in the triple group who was noncompliant of all antiplatelet medications. The number of patients with adverse events and bleeding complications, and their severity, were significantly greater in the triple therapy group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Long term triple antiplatelet therapy was asociated with a significant increase in adverse events and bleeding rates, and their severity, and a trend to increased discontinuations. However, the patients had a low risk of recurrence and future trials should focus on short term therapy in high risk patients characterised by a very recent event or failure of dual antiplatelet therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN83673558.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anciano , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Clopidogrel , Dipiridamol/efectos adversos , Dipiridamol/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Pulso Arterial , Seguridad , Método Simple Ciego , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Ticlopidina/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico
12.
Hypertension ; 47(6): 1209-15, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16682611

RESUMEN

High blood pressure (BP) is common in acute stroke and is independently associated with a poor outcome. Lowering BP might improve outcome if it did not adversely affect cerebral blood flow (CBF) or cerebral perfusion pressure. We investigated the effect of glyceryl trinitrate ([GTN] an NO donor) on quantitative CBF, BP, and cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with recent stroke. Eighteen patients with recent (<5 days) ischemic (n=16) or hemorrhagic (n=2) stroke were randomly assigned (2:1) to transdermal GTN (5 mg) or control. CBF (global, hemispheric, arterial territory, and lesion, using xenon computed tomography) and BP (peripheral and central) were measured before and 1 hour after treatment with GTN. The effects of GTN on CBF and BP were adjusted for baseline measurements (ANCOVA). GTN lowered peripheral systolic BP by (mean) 23 mm Hg (95% CI, 2 to 45; P=0.03) and central systolic BP by 22 mm Hg (95% CI, 0 to 44; P=0.048). In contrast, GTN did not alter CBF (mL/min per 100 g): global -1.2 (95% CI, -6.5 to 4.2; P=0.66) and ipsilateral hemisphere -1.4 (95% CI, -7.6 to 4.9; P=0.65) or area of stroke oligemia, penumbra, or core (as defined by critical CBF limits). Contralateral CBF did not change: hemisphere 0 (95% CI, -7 to 6; P=0.96). GTN did not alter cerebral perfusion pressure or zero-filling pressure. Significant reductions in BP after transdermal GTN are not associated with changes in CBF or cerebral perfusion pressure or cerebral steal in patients with recent stroke. Trials need to assess the effect of lowering BP on functional outcome.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Donantes de Óxido Nítrico/administración & dosificación , Nitroglicerina/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Donantes de Óxido Nítrico/uso terapéutico , Nitroglicerina/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Xenón
13.
Nitric Oxide ; 12(3): 141-9, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15797842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide (NO) is a candidate treatment for acute ischaemic stroke, however published studies in experimental stroke have given conflicting results. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of published controlled studies of L-arginine (the precursor for NO) and NO donors in experimental stroke. Data were analysed using the Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager software. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Altogether, 25 studies(s) were identified. L-Arginine and NO donors reduced total cerebral infarct volume in permanent (SMD -1.21, 95% CI -1.69 to -0.73, p < 0.01, s = 10) and transient models of ischaemia (SMD -0.78, 95% CI -1.21 to -0.35, p < 0.01, s = 7). Drug administration increased cortical CBF in permanent (SMD +0.86, 95% CI 0.52-1.21, p < 0.01, s = 8) but not transient models (SMD +0.34, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.70, p = 0.07, s = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of NO in experimental stroke reduces stroke lesion volume in permanent and transient models. This may be mediated, in part, by increased cerebral perfusion in permanent models. These data support clinical trials in stroke patients, although the presence of a narrow therapeutic time window may be a limiting factor.


Asunto(s)
Arginina/uso terapéutico , Infarto Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Donantes de Óxido Nítrico/uso terapéutico , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Masculino , Conejos , Ratas , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Hypertension ; 43(1): 18-24, 2004 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14662649

RESUMEN

High blood pressure (BP) is common in acute stroke and might be associated with a poor outcome, although observational studies have given varying results. In a systematic review, articles were sought that reported both admission BP and outcome (death, death or dependency, death or deterioration, stroke recurrence, and hematoma expansion) in acute stroke. Data were analyzed by the Cochrane Review Manager software and are given as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Altogether, 32 studies were identified involving 10 892 patients. When all data were included, death was significantly associated with an elevated mean arterial BP ([MABP] OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.31) and a high diastolic BP ([DBP] OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.48). Combined death or dependency was associated with high systolic BP ([SBP] OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.40) and DBP (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 1.87 to 11.70) in primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH). Similarly, high SBP (+11.73 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.30 to 22.16), MABP (+9.00 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.92 to 17.08), and DBP (+6.00 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.19 to 11.81) were associated with death or dependency in ischemic stroke. Combined death or deterioration was associated with a high SBP (OR, 5.57; 95% CI, 1.42 to 21.86) in patients with PICH. In summary, high BP in acute ischemic stroke or PICH is associated with subsequent death, death or dependency, and death or deterioration. Moderate lowering of BP might improve outcome. Acute BP lowering needs to be tested in 1 or more large, randomized trials.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Presión Sanguínea , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/clasificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA