Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 2023 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37695372

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gender disparities exist in the OBGYN discipline. This study investigates, for the first time, whether gender impacts on the confidence of practical and surgical skills among OBGYN residents, and of being prepared to work as a specialist. METHODS: The gynecological societies of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland established a web-based survey of 30 questions that was sent to all registered OBGYN members-in-training from August to September 2020. Data collection, controlling and analysis were performed by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH). RESULTS: A total of 422 participants took part in the survey, of which 375 (88.9%) were female, 46 (10.9%) were male, and one (0.2%) was divers. The diverse participant was excluded from further analyses. The gender distribution was comparable in all three countries. Multiple regression analyses showed that gender is an independent variable significantly impacting on the confidence levels in performing standard gynaecological (p = 0.03) and obstetric (p < 0.001) procedures. Similarly, the feeling of confidence in being prepared for working as a specialist in a clinic showed to be gender-dependent (p < 0.001), however, not the feeling of being prepared for working as specialist in an outpatient setting (p = 0.37). The "female factor" significantly decreases the confidence rating for surgical and practical skills and for working in a hospital. Covariates including year of training, country, workload, receiving regular feedback, and implemented simulation training were included in all analyses. DISCUSSION: Improvements of residency programs to promote female doctors to overcome factors reducing their confidence in their own OBGYN skills are highly warranted.

2.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 47(6): 485-490, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31801139

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Open fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) repair is nowadays a therapeutic option in selected cases. We aimed to evaluate changes in maternal and fetal outcome after fMMC repair during the first 8 years of experience at a tertiary referral fetal medicine center in Switzerland. -Materials and Methods: Between 2010 and 2018, fMMC repair and delivery of the neonate via planned cesarean section was performed in 67 cases. Cases were retrospectively stratified into 2 groups: a "training phase" (TP) with supervision from an external surgeon during 11 operations (2010-2014, 15 cases) followed by an "experienced phase" (EP, 2014-2018, 52 cases); each phase lasted about 4 years. Both phases were compared with regard to various maternal and fetal outcome parameters. RESULTS: Analyses did not reveal differences between TP and EP in major outcome parameters such as gestational age at delivery, chorionic membrane separation, or the incidence of placental abruption. Although more complex surgical techniques were applied in EP (e.g., dermal closure using a rotational flap), surgery time was not different from TP. At the same time, surgical complications such as oligohydramnios (27 vs. 8%, p = 0.046) with MRI-confirmed leakage (13 vs. 4%, nonsignificant) and subchorionic hematoma (20 vs. 2%, p = 0.009) were less common in EP than TP. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the level of competence at our center with regard to major perinatal outcome parameters was already high in the first years of fMMC repair. However, more complex surgical techniques and significantly less minor complications were observed during the most recent years.


Asunto(s)
Feto/cirugía , Meningomielocele/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Cesárea , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos , Suiza/epidemiología
3.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 46(3): 153-158, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30428477

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite undoubtable benefits of open fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) repair, there are considerable maternal risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate and systematically categorize maternal complications after open fMMC repair. METHODS: We analyzed data of 40 fMMC repairs performed at the Zurich Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. Maternal complications were classified according to a 5-level grading system based on a classification of surgical complications proposed by Clavien and Dindo. RESULTS: We observed no grade 5 complication (death of a patient). Five (12.5%) women demonstrated severe grade 4 complications: 1 case of uterine rupture in a nullipara at 36 gestational weeks (GW), a third-degree atrioventricular block which needed short mechanical resuscitation, a bilateral lung embolism requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management due to low-output syndrome, and chorioamnionitis and urosepsis both requiring ICU management at 31 GW. Twenty-six (65%) women had minor (grade 1-3) complications. CONCLUSIONS: Only one grade 4 complication (uterine rupture, 2.5%) was a clear-cut direct consequence of fetal surgery. The other four grade 4 complications (10%) occurred in the context of, but cannot unequivocally be attributed to, fetal surgery, since they may occur also in other circumstances. The classification system used is a tenable step towards stringent documentation of maternal complications.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Fetales/efectos adversos , Meningomielocele/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Rotura Uterina/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
GMS J Med Educ ; 39(4): Doc41, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36310887

RESUMEN

Objective: In this study, we aim to assess the current situation of postgraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynaecology in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. In addition, we aim to determine transferable advantages amongst the countries. Study design: We performed a survey through a digital questionnaire with a total of 40 questions. The survey was advertised via communication channels of the German, Austrian and Swiss gynaecological societies; the participants were enrolled anonymously. Results: A total of 422 trainees took part in the survey. Differences within the three countries where found regarding the workload and the training of sub-specialties. Generally, the participants described to spend the majority of their daily working hours on documentation. Concerning assessment of current training regulations, more than half of trainees stated that they were actually faced with notable difficulties to fulfil the required obligatory numbers of self-performed interventions being documented. When asked for their intrinsic feeling of safety, around two-third of trainees felt "confident to very confident" during standard interventions. These numbers were up to 12% higher in the group of trainees who experienced simulation training during their education. Conclusion: With the help of this survey, weak points can be identified such as workload and implementation of current training regulations. Projects and ideas as EBCOG PACT, EPAs, the reduction of bureaucracy through digitization and deepening skills through simulation make a valuable contribution to compensate for these deficits and to adapt to future requirements.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Ginecología , Obstetricia , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Ginecología/educación , Obstetricia/educación , Austria , Suiza , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Alemania , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA