Simulated dosimetric impact of online replanning for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac.

PURPOSE: Online 1.5T MR imaging on the MR-linac gives better target visualization compared to CBCT and facilitates online adaptive treatment strategies including daily replanning. In this simulation study, the dosimetric impact of online replanning was investigated for SBRT of lymph node oligometastases as a method for correcting for inter-fraction anatomical changes. METHODS: Pre-treatment plans were created for 17 pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, with 3 and 8 mm PTV margins reflecting our clinical practice for lymph nodes with good and poor visibility on CBCT. The dose-volume parameters of the pre-treatment plans were evaluated on daily anatomy as visible on the repeated MRIs and compared to online replanning. RESULTS: With online MRI-based replanning significant dosimetric improvements are obtained for the rectum, bladder, bowel and sigmoid without compromising the target dose. The amount of unintended violations of the dose constraints for target and surrounding organs could be reduced by 75% for 8 mm and 66% for 3 mm PTV margins. CONCLUSION: The use of online replanning based on the actual anatomy as seen on repeated MRI compared to online position correction for lymph node oligometastases SBRT gives beneficial dosimetric outcomes and reduces the amount of unplanned violations of dose constraints.

Impact of magnetic resonance-guided versus conventional radiotherapy workflows on organ at risk doses in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases.

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance (MR)-linac delivery is expected to improve organ at risk (OAR) sparing. In this study, OAR doses were compared for online adaptive MR-linac treatments and conventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-linac radiotherapy, taking into account differences in clinical workflows, especially longer session times for MR-linac delivery. Materials and methods: For 25 patients with pelvic/abdominal lymph node oligometastases, OAR doses were calculated for clinical pre-treatment and daily optimized 1.5 T MR-linac treatment plans (5 × 7 Gy) and compared with simulated CBCT-linac plans for the pre-treatment and online anatomical situation. Bowelbag and duodenum were re-contoured on MR-imaging acquired before, during and after each treatment session. OAR hard constraint violations, D0.5cc and D10cc values were evaluated, focusing on bowelbag and duodenum. Results: Overall, hard constraints for all OAR were violated less often in daily online MR-linac treatment plans compared with CBCT-linac: in 5% versus 22% of fractions, respectively. D0.5cc and D10cc values did not differ significantly. When taking treatment duration and intrafraction motion into account, estimated delivered doses to bowelbag and duodenum were lower with CBCT-linac if identical planning target volume (PTV) margins were used for both modalities. When reduced PTV margins were achievable with MR-linac treatment, bowelbag doses were lower compared with CBCT-linac. Conclusions: Compared with CBCT-linac treatments, the online adaptive MR-linac approach resulted in fewer hard planning constraint violations compared with single-plan CBCT-linac delivery. With respect to other bowelbag/duodenum dose-volume parameters, the longer duration of MR-linac treatment sessions negatively impacts the potential dosimetric benefit of daily adaptive treatment planning.

Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac.

PURPOSE: At our department, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using the 1.5T MR-linac system (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has been initiated for patients with lymph node oligometastases. Superior soft tissue contrast and the possibility for online plan adaptation on the Unity may allow for hypofractionated treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric feasibility and compare the plan quality of different hypofractionated schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data was used from 12 patients with single lymph node oligometastases (10 pelvic, 2 para-aortic), which were all treated on the Unity with a prescribed dose of 5x7 Gy to 95% of the PTV. Hypofractionation was investigated for 3x10 Gy and 1x20 Gy schemes (all 60 Gy BED α/ß = 10). The pre-treatment plans were evaluated based on dose criteria and plan quality. If all criteria were met, the number of online adapted plans which also met all dose criteria was investigated. For pre-treatment plans meeting the criteria for all three fractionation schemes, the plan quality after online adaptation was compared using the four parameters described in the NRG-BR001 phase 1 trial. RESULTS: Pre-treatment plans met all clinical criteria for the three different fractionation schemes in 10, 9 and 6 cases. 50/50, 45/45 17/30 of the corresponding online adapted plans met all criteria, respectively. Violations were primarily caused by surrounding organs at risk overlapping or adjacent to the PTV. The 1x20 Gy treatment plans were, in general, of lesser quality than the 5x7 Gy and 3x10 Gy plans. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac is feasible based on dose criteria and plan quality metrics. The location of the target relative to critical structures should be considered in choosing the most suitable fractionation scheme. Especially for single fraction treatment, meeting all dose criteria in the pre-treatment situation does not guarantee that this also applies during online treatment.

Impact of a vacuum cushion on intrafraction motion during online adaptive MR-guided SBRT for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node oligometastases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vacuum cushion immobilization is commonly used during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to reduce intrafraction motion. We investigated target and bony anatomy intrafraction motion (translations and rotations) during online adaptive SBRT on an MR-linac for pelvic/para-aortic lymph node metastases with and without vacuum cushion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients underwent 5x7 Gy SBRT on a 1.5T MR-linac, 19 patients were treated with vacuum cushion, 19 without and 1 patient sequentially with and without. Intrafraction motion was calculated for target lymph nodes (GTVs) and nearby bony anatomy, for three time intervals (pre-position verification (PV), pre-post, PV-post, relating to the online MRI scans) per treatment fraction. RESULTS: Vacuum cushion immobilization significantly reduced anterior-posterior translations for the pre-PV and pre-post intervals, for bony anatomy and pre-post interval for GTV (p < 0.05). Mean GTV intrafraction motion reduction in posterior direction was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval 0.3-1.1 mm) for pre-post interval (mean time = 32 min). Shifts in other directions were not significantly reduced. More motion occurred in pre-PV interval than in PV-post interval (mean time = 16 min for both); vacuum cushion immobilization did not reduce intrafraction motion during the beam-on period. CONCLUSION: A vacuum cushion reduces GTV and bony anatomy intrafraction motion in posterior direction during pelvic/para-aortic lymph node SBRT. This motion reduction was found for the first 16 min per session. For single targets this motion can be corrected for directly with an MR-linac. Intrafraction motion was not reduced during the second half of the session, the period of radiotherapy delivery on an MR-linac. Vacuum cushion immobilization may not be necessary for patients with single lymph node oligometastases undergoing SBRT on an MR-linac.

Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients were treated at our institute for single and multiple lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac since August 2018. The superior soft-tissue contrast and additional software features of the MR-linac compared to CBCT-linacs allow for online adaptive treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to perform a target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the clinically delivered online adaptive radiotherapy treatment compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data was used from 14 patients with single lymph node oligometastases and 6 patients with multiple (2-3) metastases. All patients were treated on the 1.5T MR-linac with a prescribed dose of 5 × 7 Gy to 95% of the PTV and a CBCT-linac plan was created for each patient. The difference in target coverage between these plans was compared and plans were evaluated based on dose criteria for each fraction after calculating the CBCT-plan on the daily anatomy. The GTV coverage was evaluated based on the online planning and the post-delivery MRI. RESULTS: For both single and multiple lymph node oligometastases the GTV V35Gy had a median value of 100% for both the MR-linac plans and CBCT-plans pre- and post-delivery and did not significantly differ. The percentage of plans that met all dose constraints was improved from 19% to 84% and 20% to 67% for single and multiple lymph node cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment shows a smaller amount of unplanned violations of high dose criteria. The GTV coverage was comparable. Benefit is primarily gained in patients treated for multiple lymph node oligometastases: geometrical deformations are accounted for, dose can be delivered in one plan and margins can be reduced.

Evaluation of plan adaptation strategies for stereotactic radiotherapy of lymph node oligometastases using online magnetic resonance image guidance.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent studies have shown that the use of magnetic resonance (MR) guided online plan adaptation yields beneficial dosimetric values and reduces unplanned violations of the dose constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lymph node oligometastases. The purpose of this R-IDEAL stage 0 study was to determine the optimal plan adaptation approach for MR-guided SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) and repeated MR data from five patients with in total 17 pathological lymph nodes, six different methods of plan adaptation were performed on the daily MRI and contours. To determine the optimal plan adaptation approach for treatment of lymph node oligometastases, the adapted plans were evaluated using clinical dose criteria and the time required for performing the plan adaptation. RESULTS: The average time needed for the different plan adaptation methods ranged between 11 and 119 s. More advanced adaptation methods resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria [range, 0-16 out of 17 plans]. The results show a large difference between target coverage achieved by the different plan adaptation methods. CONCLUSION: Results suggested that multiple plan adaptation methods, based on plan adaptation on the daily anatomy, were feasible for MR-guided SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases. The most advanced method, in which a full online replanning was performed by segment shape and weight optimization after fluence optimization, yielded the most favourable dosimetric values and could be performed within a time-frame acceptable (<5 min) for MR-guided treatment.

Individual lymph nodes: "See it and Zap it".

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy systems such as the 1.5T MR-linac the daily anatomy can be visualized before, during and after radiation delivery. With these treatment systems, seeing metastatic nodes with MRI and zapping them with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) comes into reach. The purpose of this study is to investigate different online treatment planning strategies and to determine the planning target volume (PTV) margin needed for adequate target coverage when treating lymph node oligometastases with SBRT on the 1.5T MR-linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients were treated for single pelvic or para-aortic lymph node metastases on the 1.5T MR-linac with a prescribed dose of 5x7Gy with a 3 mm isotropic GTV- PTV margin. Based on the daily MRI and actual contours, a completely new treatment plan was generated for each session (adapt to shape, ATS). These were compared with plans optimized on pre-treatment CT contours after correcting for the online target position (adapt to position, ATP). At the end of each treatment session, a post-radiation delivery MRI was acquired on which the GTV was delineated to evaluate the GTV coverage and PTV margins. RESULTS: The median PTV V35Gy was 99.9% [90.7-100%] for the clinically delivered ATS plans compared to 93.6% [76.3-99.7%] when using ATP. The median GTV V35Gy during radiotherapy delivery was 100% [98-100%] on the online planning and post-delivery MRIs for ATS and 100% [93.9-100%] for ATP, respectively. The applied 3 mm isotropic PTV margin is considered adequate. CONCLUSION: For pelvic and para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes, online MRI-guided adaptive treatment planning results in adequate PTV and GTV coverage when taking the actual patient anatomy into account (ATS). Generally, GTV coverage remained adequate throughout the treatment session for both adaptive planning strategies. "Seeing and zapping" metastatic lymph nodes comes within reach for MRI-guided SBRT.

Feasibility of stereotactic radiotherapy using a 1.5 T MR-linac: Multi-fraction treatment of pelvic lymph node oligometastases.

Online adaptive radiotherapy using the 1.5 Tesla MR-linac is feasible for SBRT (5 × 7 Gy) of pelvic lymph node oligometastases. The workflow allows full online planning based on daily anatomy. Session duration is less than 60 min. Quality assurance tests, including independent 3D dose calculations and film measurements were passed.

Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The promise of the MR-linac is that one can visualize all anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy and hence adapt the treatment plan in order to always have the optimal treatment. Yet, there is a trade-off to be made between the time spent for adapting the treatment plan against the dosimetric gain. In this work, the various daily plan adaptation methods will be presented and applied on a variety of tumour sites. The aim is to provide an insight in the behavior of the state-of-the-art 1.5 T MRI guided on-line adaptive radiotherapy methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To explore the different available plan adaptation workflows and methods, we have simulated online plan adaptation for five cases with varying levels of inter-fraction motion, regions of interest and target sizes: prostate, rectum, esophagus and lymph node oligometastases (single and multiple target). The plans were evaluated based on the clinical dose constraints and the optimization time was measured. RESULTS: The time needed for plan adaptation ranged between 17 and 485 s. More advanced plan adaptation methods generally resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria. Violations were often caused by insufficient PTV coverage or, for the multiple lymph node case, a too high dose to OAR in the vicinity of the PTV. With full online replanning it was possible to create plans that met all clinical dose constraints for all cases. CONCLUSION: Daily full online replanning is the most robust adaptive planning method for Unity. It is feasible for specific sites in clinically acceptable times. Faster methods are available, but before applying these, the specific use cases should be explored dosimetrically.

Evaluation of Online Plan Adaptation Strategies for the 1.5T MR-linac Based on "First-In-Man" Treatments.

The superior soft tissue contrast provided by magnetic resonance (MR) images on the 1.5T MR-linac allows for the incorporation of patient anatomy information. In this retrospective case study, we present the simulated dosimetric effects and timings of full online replanning as compared to the five plan adaptation methods currently available on the 1.5T MR-linac treatment system. For this case, it is possible to create treatment plans with all six methods within a time slot suitable for an online treatment procedure. However, large dosimetric differences between the plan adaptation methods and full online replanning are present with regards to target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs).