Post-spastic flow recovery time to document vasospasm induced ischemia during acetylcholine provocation testing.

Background: Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation is an established method for diagnosing epicardial and microvascular vasospasm in contemporary clinical practice. We hypothesize that ACh-induced vasospasm is followed by post-spastic reactive hyperemia (PSRH), which is measured as an increased flow-recovery time. Objectives: To assess flow-recovery time, indicative of ischemia, among the diagnostic endotypes that follow ACh provocation testing. Methods: Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography who underwent ACh provocation testing were included in this analysis. Doppler flow was continuously measured during the procedure and used to determine the flow-recovery time, which was calculated as time between cessation of ACh infusion and the point of flow recovery. Results: Conventional provocation testing according to the COVADIS criteria diagnosed vasospasm in 63%(77/123), an equivocal result in 22%(27/123) and a negative result in 15%(19/123) of patients. In reaction to the highest-dose of ACh, flow-recovery time was significantly extended and similar in the epicardial, microvascular and equivocal test results compared to the negative result (all p < 0.001) indicative of PSRH. Conclusion: Flow-recovery time in patients with an equivocal result is similar to patients with vasospasm, which indicates the occurrence of myocardial ischemia and therefore, these patients may benefit from medical treatment.

Efficacy and safety of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist macitentan in epicardial and microvascular vasospasm; a proof-of-concept study.

Background: Treatment of patients diagnosed with angina due to epicardial or microvascular coronary artery spasm (CAS) is challenging because patients often remain symptomatic despite conventional pharmacological therapy. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cross-over proof-of-concept study, we compared the efficacy and safety of macitentan, a potent inhibitor of the endothelin-1 receptor, to placebo in symptomatic patients with CAS despite background pharmacological treatment. Methods: Patients with CAS diagnosed by invasive spasm provocation testing with >3 anginal attacks per week despite pharmacological treatment were considered for participation. Participants received either 10 mg of macitentan or placebo daily for 28 days as add-on treatment. After a wash-out period patients were crossed over to the alternate treatment arm. The primary endpoint was the difference in anginal burden calculated as [1] the duration (in minutes) * severity (on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale 1-10); and [2] the frequency of angina attacks * severity during medication use compared to the run-in phase. Results: 28 patients of whom 22 females (79%) and a mean age of 55.3 ± 7.6 completed the entire study protocol (epicardial CAS n = 19 (68), microvascular CAS n = 9 (32)). Change in both indices of anginal burden were not different during treatment with add-on macitentan as compared to add-on placebo (duration*severity: -9 [-134 78] vs -45 [-353 11], p = 0.136 and frequency*severity: -1.7 [-5.8 1.2] vs -1.8 [-6.2 0.3], p = 0.767). The occurrence and nature of self-reported adverse events were closely similar between the treatment phase with macitentan and placebo. Conclusion: In patients with angina due to epicardial or microvascular CAS despite background pharmacological treatment, 28 days of add-on treatment with the ET-1 receptor antagonist, macitentan 10 mg daily, did not reduce anginal burden compared to add-on treatment with placebo.Trial Registrationhttps://trialsearch.who.int/, Identifier: EUCTR2018-002623-42-NL. Registration date: 20 February 2019.

Presence of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction, Coronary Vasospasm, and Adenosine-Mediated Vasodilatory Disorders in Patients With Ischemia and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Coronary function testing in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) commonly includes assessment of adenosine-mediated vasodilation and acetylcholine spasm provocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of additional endothelial function testing for the diagnosis of vasomotor dysfunction in patients with INOCA. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with INOCA who underwent clinically indicated comprehensive coronary function testing. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow, determined by Doppler flow, and/or epicardial vasoconstriction compared to baseline, in response to low-dose acetylcholine. Coronary artery spasm (CAS) was defined as vasospastic angina or microvascular angina in response to coronary high-dose acetylcholine. An impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation was defined as a coronary flow reserve <2.5 and/or hyperemic microvascular resistance ≥2.5. RESULTS: Among all 110 patients, 79% had endothelial dysfunction, 62% had CAS, and 29% had an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 80% of patients who tested positively for CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. Endothelial function testing increases the diagnostic yield of coronary function testing that only incorporates adenosine testing and spasm provocation by 17% to 92%. Of patients with normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation and no inducible CAS, 68% had endothelial dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant endothelial dysfunction was prevalent in the vast majority of patients with INOCA with inducible CAS and/or an impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation. In patients with INOCA without inducible CAS and normal adenosine-mediated vasodilation, two-thirds had endothelial dysfunction. These results indicate the relevance to perform endothelial function testing in patients with INOCA in view of its therapeutic implication.

Haemodynamic characterisation of different endotypes in coronary artery vasospasm in reaction to acetylcholine.

BACKGROUND: Vasoreactivity testing with high-dose acetylcholine is considered vasospasm provocation and low-dose as endothelial function testing. AIMS: To assess the changes in reaction to low- and high-dose acetylcholine in the endotypes of CAS as defined by the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) working group. METHODS: Changes in coronary epicardial diameter, coronary blood flow (CBF) and vascular resistance were determined at low-dose acetylcholine. RESULTS: A total of 88 ANOCA patients were included in this analysis. In the negative group (n = 14) incremental infusion of acetylcholine produced a progressive increase in CBF (p = 0.008). In reaction to low-dose acetylcholine, the epicardial vasospasm group (n = 30) is characterised by epicardial vasoconstriction that is significantly more severe compared to the microvascular vasospasm group (p = 0.004)(n = 23). The equivocal group (n = 21) is characterised by an increase in CBF and reduction in vascular resistance that are both significantly different compared to the epicardial vasospasm group (p = 0.036 and p = 0.007, respectively). High-dose acetylcholine decreased epicardial diameter and CBF significantly in the epicardial vasospasm, microvascular vasospasm and in the equivocal group (all p < 0.05. Vascular resistance increased significantly in the epicardial vasospasm group (p < 0.001) and equivocal group (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In reaction to low-dose acetylcholine the negative and equivocal endotype has haemodynamic changes that suggest intact endothelium. In reaction to high-dose acetylcholine the epicardial vasospasm, microvascular vasospasm and equivocal endotype have hemodynamic changes that suggest VSMC-hyperreactivity. These results suggest that the equivocal endotype is a positive test comparable to microvascular vasospasm in the presence of normal endothelial function.

Cardiovascular imaging of women and men visiting the outpatient clinic with chest pain or discomfort: design and rationale of the ARGUS Study.

INTRODUCTION: Chest pain or discomfort affects 20%-40% of the general population over the course of their life and may be a symptom of myocardial ischaemia. For the diagnosis of obstructive macrovascular coronary artery disease (CAD), algorithms have been developed; however, these do not exclude microvascular angina. This may lead to false reassurance of symptomatic patients, mainly women, with functionally significant, yet non-obstructive coronary vascular disease. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the prevalence of both macrovascular and microvascular coronary vascular disease in women and men presenting with chest pain or discomfort, and to subsequently develop a decision-support tool to aid cardiologists in referral to cardiovascular imaging for both macrovascular and microvascular CAD evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women and men with chest pain or discomfort, aged 45 years and older, without a history of cardiovascular disease, who are referred to an outpatient cardiology clinic by their general practitioner are eligible for inclusion. Coronary CT angiography is used for anatomical imaging. Additionally, myocardial perfusion imaging by adenosine stress cardiac MRI is performed to detect functionally significant coronary vascular disease. Electronic health record data, collected during regular cardiac work-up, including medical history, cardiovascular risk factors, physical examination, echocardiography, (exercise) ECG and blood samples for standard cardiovascular biomarkers and research purposes, are obtained. Participants will be classified as positive or negative for coronary vascular disease based on all available data by expert panel consensus (a cardiovascular radiologist and two cardiologists). After completion of the clinical study, all collected data will be used to develop a decision support tool using predictive modelling and machine-learning techniques. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Center Utrecht. Results will be disseminated through national and international conferences and in peer-reviewed journals in cardiovascular disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trialregister.nl Registry NL8702.