Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Urol ; 150(6): 1803-5, 1993 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8230509

RESUMEN

Extracorporeal lithotripsy does not always provide satisfactory results for the treatment of ureteral stones. Such cases appear to be excellent indications for endocorporeal lithotripsy based on an association of ureteroscopy and laser. To compare the performances of 2 pulsed lasers, the pulsed dye laser (Candela) and solid Q switched laser (HMT), for the treatment of these calculi 161 ureteral stones were treated successively from November 1990 to March 1992 by a combination of ureteroscopy and laser. Endocorporeal lithotripsy was performed in 102 cases with the Candela laser, in 47 with the HMT laser and in 7 with both lasers. With a stable success rate greater than 90%, both lasers demonstrated equivalent performances regardless of the location of the stone along the ureter. However, while stone fragmentation was more rapid with the Candela laser, the HMT laser appeared to be more effective for dark stones (monohydrate calcium oxidate).


Asunto(s)
Litotripsia por Láser/instrumentación , Cálculos Ureterales/terapia , Endoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Litotripsia por Láser/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cálculos Ureterales/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA