Analysis of carbenoxolone by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in mouse brain and blood after systemic administration.

Carbenoxolone is a derivative of glycyrrhetinic acid found in the root of Glycyrrhiza glabra, colloquially known as licorice. It has been used as a treatment for peptic and oral ulcers. In recent years, carbenoxolone has been utilized in basic research for its ability to block gap junctional communication. Better understanding the distribution of carbenoxolone after systemic administration can lead to a better understanding of its potential sites of action. Presented is an ultra high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometer (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for the identification and quantification of carbenoxolone in mouse blood and brain tissue. Twenty mice were injected intraperitoneally with 25 mg/kg carbenoxolone and brain tissue and blood were collected for analysis. Blood concentrations (mean ± SD) at 15, 30, 60 and 120 min were determined to be (n = 5) 5394 ± 778, 2636 ± 836, 1564 ± 541 and 846 ± 252 ng/mL, respectively. Brain concentrations (mean ± SD) at 15, 30, 60 and 120 mins were determined to be (n = 5) 171 ± 62, 102 ± 35, 55 ± 10 and 27 ± 9 ng/g, respectively. The analysis of these specimens at the four different time points resulted in blood and brain half-lives in mice of ~43 and 41 min, respectively. The UHPLC-MS/MS method was determined to be sensitive and robust for quantification of carbenoxolone.

Urine drug screen findings among ambulatory oncology patients in a supportive care clinic.

PURPOSE: Professional organizations provide no guidelines regarding assessment and management of opioid abuse risk in cancer. Universal precautions (UP) developed for non-cancer pain, include assessments for aberrant behavior, screening questionnaires, and urine drug screens (UDS). The role of UDS for identifying opioid abuse risk in cancer is uncertain. Our aim is to characterize inappropriate UDS, and identify a potential role for UDS in therapeutic decision-making. METHODS: An observational retrospective chart review of 232 consecutive supportive care clinic patients were seen during the study. Twenty-eight of the two hundred thirty-two did not meet inclusion criteria. One hundred fifty of the two hundred four had active cancer, while 54 had no evidence of active disease. Clinicians ordered UDS based on their clinical judgment of patients' substance misuse risk. Edmonton symptom assessment scores, history of substance abuse, alcohol use, tobacco use, aberrant behavior, and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) were obtained. RESULTS: Pain scores and MEDD were higher (p = 0.021; p < 0.001) in the UDS group vs non-UDS. Forty percent of the patients (n = 82/204) had at least one UDS and 70% (60/82) had an inappropriate result. Thirty-nine percent (32) were inappropriately negative, showing no prescribed opioids. Forty-nine of the eighty-two were positive for non-prescribed opioids, benzodiazepine, or illicit substance. Eleven of the forty-nine had only cannabis metabolites in their urine. There were no significant differences between appropriate and inappropriate UDS groups regarding pain scores, MEDD or referral to psychology, psychiatry, or substance abuse specialists. CONCLUSIONS: UDS on the 82 oncology patients at high risk for substance misuse were frequently positive (46%) for non-prescribed opioids, benzodiazepines or potent illicit drugs such as heroin or cocaine, and 39% had inappropriately negative UDS, raising concerns for diversion.

A Case Series of Clenbuterol Toxicity Caused by Adulterated Heroin.

BACKGROUND: Adulteration of drugs of abuse may be done to increase profits. Some adulterants are relatively innocuous and others result in significant toxicity. Clenbuterol is a ß2-adrenergic agonist with veterinary uses that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for human use. It is an infrequently reported heroin adulterant. We describe a cluster of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed clenbuterol exposure resulting in serious clinical effects. CASE SERIES: Ten patients presented with unexpected symptoms shortly after heroin use. Seven evaluated by our medical toxicology service are summarized. Presenting symptoms included chest pain, dyspnea, palpitations, and nausea/vomiting. All patients were male, with a median age of 40 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-46 years). Initial vital signs included a heart rate of 120 beats/min (IQR 91-137 beats/min), a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min (IQR 18-22 breaths/min), a temperature of 36.8°C (IQR 36.7-37.0°C), a systolic blood pressure of 107 mm Hg (IQR 91-131 mm Hg), and a diastolic blood pressure of 49 mm Hg (IQR 40-70 mm Hg). Serum potassium nadir was 2.5 mEq/L (IQR 2.2-2.6 mEq/L), initial glucose was 179 mg/dL (IQR 125-231 mg/dL), initial lactate was 9.4 mmol/L (IQR 4.7-10.5 mmol/L), and peak creatine phosphokinase was 953 units/L (IQR 367-10,363 units/L). The median peak troponin level in six patients was 0.7 ng/mL (IQR 0.3-2.4 ng/mL). Three patients underwent cardiac catheterization and none had significant coronary artery disease. Clenbuterol was detected in all patients after comprehensive testing. All patients survived with supportive care. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Atypical presentations of illicit drug intoxication may raise concern for drug adulteration. In the case of heroin use, the presence of adrenergic symptoms or chest pain with hypokalemia, lactic acidosis, and hyperglycemia suggests adulteration with a ß-agonist, such as clenbuterol, and patients presenting with these symptoms often require hospitalization.

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of methadone metabolite EDDP [2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine] in urine.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a new EDDP [2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine] enzyme immunoassay (EDDPI; Lin-Zhi International, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) for the detection of this primary methadone urinary metabolite. METHODS: All specimens were tested with two different cutoff calibrators at 150 and 300 ng/ml EDDP on an ADVIA 1200 Chemistry System auto-analyzer. Controls containing 0, -25% (negative control), and +25% (positive control) of the cutoff calibrators (Lin-Zhi) were analyzed with each batch. All urine specimens were then analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) for EDDP. RESULTS: Approximately, 42% (151) of the 362 specimens yielded positive results by the EDDP assay at 150 and/or 300 ng/ml cutoff values. Of these specimens, HPLC-MS/MS confirmed the presence of EDDP > 25 ng/ml in all 151 specimens. No specimen yielding negative EDDPI results contained EDDP by HPLC/MS/MS. At 150 ng/ml cutoff, the EDDPI demonstrated a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.986, and an overall agreement of HPLC/MS/MS of >99%. At 300 ng/ml cutoff, the EDDPI demonstrated a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.959, and an overall agreement of HPLC/MS/MS results of 97.5%. CONCLUSION: The Lin-Zhi EDDPI provides a precise, reliable method for the routine detection of methadone metabolite in urine specimens, particularly in pain management compliance testing.

High-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of 2CC-NBOMe and 25I-NBOMe in human serum.

2CC-NBOMe {4-chloro-2,5-dimethoxyphenethyl-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl) methyl] ethanamine} and 25I-NBOMe {2-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl) methyl] ethanamine} are of a class of N-benzyl phenethylamine derivatives whose synthesis was first reported in the scientific literature in 2011. Recent reports from 'personal drug experience websites' and in the popular press indicate these drugs are the latest in a series of designer 'Bath Salt' drugs of abuse. The presented high-performance liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) method was developed for the detection and quantification of 2CC-NBOMe and 25I-NBOMe in serum of intoxicated emergency department patients. The assay applies 2-​(2,​5-​dimethoxyphenyl)-​N-​(2-​methoxybenzyl) ethanamine (25H-NBOMe) as the internal standard. Samples were extracted using solid-phase extraction columns. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Luna 3 µ C8(2) 100 Å, 100 × 2.0 mm, column. Detection was accomplished by multiple-reaction monitoring via an electrospray ionization source operating in the positive ionization mode. The calibration curves were linear over the investigated concentration range, 30-2000 pg/mL, with a lower limit of detection of 10 pg/mL for both 2CC-NBOMe and 25I-NBOMe. The method proved suitable for serum clinical toxicology testing. Two severely intoxicated emergency department patients were determined to have serum concentrations of 250 and 2780 pg/mL of 25I-NBOMe using the presented method.

Detection of 58 fentanyl analogs using ARK fentanyl II and Immunalysis fentanyl immunoassays.

OBJECTIVES: The ability to detect fentanyl analogs in urine aids in patient management. Little is published about the new ARK™ Fentanyl II Assay formulation's ability to detect fentanyl analogs. Norfentanyl (fentanyl metabolite) cross-reactivity with the ARK II assays is 7%, while the Immunalysis SEFRIA assay norfentanyl cross-reactivity is approximately 0.005%. The purpose of this study was to determine the new ARK II and SEFRIA fentanyl assays' detection of 58 fentanyl analogs. DESIGN & METHODS: Drug-free urine was fortified with 0-100 ng/mL (0-0.297 µmol/L) of the fentanyl analog and analyzed using the previously evaluated immunoassays. Results were compared to molecular structure. Of the 58 analogs tested at ≤ 100 ng/mL (0-0.297 µmol/L), the ARK II and SEFRIA assays produced 51 and 57 positive results respectively. The cross-reactivity of the assay was predominantly determined by the location of the modification. Most modifications to the aniline ring and/or amide group did not affect the ARK II or SEFRIA assay. Modifications to the piperidine ring decreased detection by ARK II assay. Of the 7 compounds which were undetected by the ARK II assay, all had modifications to the N-alkyl chain. Norsufentanil was not detected by either assay and was the only analog not detected by the SEFRIA assay. CONCLUSIONS: The ARK II and Immunalysis fentanyl immunoassays can detect a range of fentanyl analogs with acryl, butyryl, or furanyl modifications to the amide group or aniline ring of the molecule. N-alkyl chain and piperidine ring modifications significantly affect the ARK II assay's ability to detect the analogs, while the SEFRIA assay appeared less affected and detected all analogs tested except for norsufentanil, which was also not detected by the ARK II assay.

The preanalytical stability of emerging cannabinoid analogs (delta-8 THC and its metabolites, delta-10 THC and carboxy-HHC) in urine.

There has been a surge in the presence and use of cannabinoids since the federal legalization of hemp (Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018). This increase is attributed not only to the use of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) and cannabidiol, the most abundant phytocannabinoid components of cannabis and hemp, respectively, but also to the use of many other emerging THC analogs. Structurally, these analogs are similar to ∆9-THC. Urine specimens for drug analysis are often collected offsite and transported to a laboratory for analysis. Screening assays are usually the first step in urine drug testing. These assays are usually qualitative and automated, which for negative specimens, reduce cost and reporting time. The stability of ∆9-THC and its metabolites has been known for some time; however, the stability of emerging analogs has not been elucidated, and therefore, assuming equivalent storage stability can be erroneous. Previous work assessed the cross-reactivity of ∆8-THC and its major metabolites, the ∆10-THC chiral analogs and the chiral 11-COOH-hexahydrocannabinol analogs. Stability was assessed for each analyte at a concentration two times greater than the analytes' determined decision point. Samples were prepared in drug-free urine at three different pHs (4.5, 7 and 9) and stored at three different temperatures (4°C, 20°C and 45°C) in triplicate. Samples were analyzed utilizing the Lin-Zhi International Cannabinoids Enzyme Immunoassay cannabinoid screening kit calibrated at the 25 ng/mL cut-off. Overall, the cannabinoid analogs produced diminishing instrument responses depending on pH and temperature. The parent analogs were not detected after a single day at 45°C regardless of pH. In general, carboxylic acid analogs at the acidic pH (4.5) produced diminished instrument responses when compared to their counterparts stored at neutral (7) and basic (9) pH. The time, storage temperature and pH of urine specimens may affect the screening results of specimens collected for cannabinoid drug screening.

The cross-reactivity of cannabinoid analogs (delta-8-THC, delta-10-THC and CBD), their metabolites and chiral carboxy HHC metabolites in urine of six commercially available homogeneous immunoassays.

There has been an exponential surge in the presence and use of cannabinoids since the federal legalization of hemp (Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018). This growth is attributed to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), the most abundant phytocannabinoid components of cannabis and hemp, respectively, but with many other emerging THC analogs. Structurally, these analogs are similar to delta-9-THC, yet very little information is available about their potency and even less information is available regarding their detectability using commercially available cannabinoid screening kits. Due to their structural similarity, current cannabinoid homogeneous immunoassay screening methods may be able to detect these emerging cannabinoid analogs and their metabolites. Six urine immunoassay kits (Abbott Cannabinoids-Abbott Diagnostics, LZI Cannabinoids (cTHC) Enzyme Immunoassay-Lin-Zhi International, DRI® Cannabinoid Assay and CEDIA™ THC-Thermo Fisher Scientific, ONLINE DAT Cannabinoid II-Roche Diagnostics and Syva EMIT®II Plus-Siemens Healthineers) were evaluated at two different cutoff concentrations: 50 ng/mL and 20 or 25 ng/mL, assay dependent. The analysis was performed on an Abbott Architect Plus c4000 (Abbott Diagnostics). Delta-8-THC, CBD, olivetol and their major metabolites, and delta-10-THC and HHC carboxylic acid chiral analogs were evaluated. The cross-reactivity was evaluated by preparing each analyte at 20, 50, 100 and 1,000 ng/mL in urine. Analytes that did not cross-react at 1,000 ng/mL for a cutoff were considered not detectable. If detected, the lowest concentration was used as the decision point to determine the precision at the immunoassay's cutoff. The six commercially available urine cannabinoid homogeneous immunoassay screening kits cross reacted with the following analogs: delta-8-THC, 11-OH-delta-8-THC, 11-COOH-delta-8-THC, 6-OH-CBD, 7-OH-CBD, all delta-10-THC and HHC carboxylic acid chiral analogs and olivetol with varying selectivity depending on the screening kit and cutoff concentration. The kits did not cross-react with the following analogs: CBD, 7-COOH-CBD, Abnormal CBD, CBDA-A and olivetolic acid.

Evaluation of Strontium Interference in Calcium Measurement Procedures and Content in Supplements as Measured by ICP-MS.

BACKGROUND: Bone health supplements containing strontium are available without prescription, however, the effects of strontium interference on clinical laboratory calcium measurement procedures are unknown. METHODS: To evaluate strontium interference on total calcium measurements, plasma pools with exogenously added strontium were measured by 3 total calcium measurement procedures. For ionized calcium measurements, whole blood pools prepared with exogenously added strontium were measured by 2 ionized calcium measurement procedures. An inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry assay (ICP-MS) was validated for research measurements of strontium content in commercially available supplements. RESULTS: Exogenous strontium addition to plasma caused positive bias for total calcium measurements. Strontium concentrations of 1.0 mg/dL (0.114 mmol/L), 2.5 mg/dL (0.284 mmol/L), and 5.0 mg/Dl (0.568 mmol/L) resulted in mean biases of 1.9% to 3.5%, 4.9% to 9.0%, and 10.8% to 19.2%, respectively, for total calcium measurement procedures. Biases for ionized calcium measurements were less than 4.5% for a strontium concentration of 5.0 mg/dL (0.568 mmol/L). An in-house-developed ICP-MS assay for strontium in commercially available supplements exhibited within-laboratory and within-run coefficients of variation of less than 3%, and a linear response was obtained over the assay analytical measurement range of 10 to 100 000 ng/mL (0.0001 to 1.141 mmol/L). Strontium recovery for the ICP-MS assay was 97.1% to 105.3%. The largest amount of strontium measured in dietary supplements was 395 mg in a 1054 mg tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Some dietary supplements contain larger amounts of strontium than indicated on the product label. High concentrations of strontium may cause significant interference for total calcium measurement procedures, but ionized calcium measurement procedures are not significantly affected.

Evaluation of two enzyme immunoassays for the detection of the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine in 1,398 urine specimens.

BACKGROUND: Benzoylecgonine (BE) is the primary urinary metabolite of cocaine. Two enzyme immunoassays were evaluated for the detection of BEin urine with a 300 ng/ml cutoff: the DRI® Cocaine Metabolite Assay and Lin-Zhi International's (LZ) Cocaine Metabolite Enzyme Immunoassay. METHODS: This study involved 1,398 urine specimens from criminal justice and pain management programs. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) data were obtained for presumptive positives, and for negative urine specimens yielding responses significantly above the negative control. RESULTS: Approximately 46% (644) of the specimens yielded positive results by DRI, and 47% (664) were positive by LZ. One specimen screened positive with both assays but was found to have a nondetectable BE concentration by GC/MS, indicating one false positive for each assay. Twenty-one specimens yielding negative DRIresults contained BEabove 300 ng/ml, and 29 specimens yielded false negatives with the LZassay. Therefore, the overall agreement between both immunoassays and GC/MSresults was 98%. Assay sensitivity was 0.968 (DRI) and 0.958 (LZ); the selectivity for both assays was 0.999. Urine specimens containing cocaine, additional cocaine metabolites, and other drugs were also tested. No cross-reactivity was observed. CONCLUSION: Both the DRIand LZassays provide a precise, reliable method for the routine detection of BEin urine.

Detection and quantification of tricyclic antidepressants and other psychoactive drugs in urine by HPLC/MS/MS for pain management compliance testing.

A sensitive, specific, and rapid high-pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method was developed for the quantitation of 11 tricyclic antidepressants and/or their metabolites; fluoxetine and norfluoxetine; cyclobenzaprine; and trazodone in urine. Samples were alkalinized with 0.2 N NaOH and extracted into 2 ml of hexane: ethyl acetate (1:1), evaporated to dryness, and reconstituted with 100 µl of 20 mM ammonium formate: methanol (20:80). The chromatographic separation was performed using an Allure Biphenyl 100 × 3.2 mm, 5-µ column with a mobile phase consisting of 20 mM ammonium formate: methanol (20:80 v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The detection was accomplished by multiple-reaction monitoring via electrospray ionization source operating in the positive ionization mode. The calibration curve was linear over the investigated concentration range, 25-2,000 ng/ml, for each analyte using 1.0 ml of urine. The lower limit of quantitation for each analyte was 25 ng/ml. The intra- and inter-day precisions had coefficient of variation less than 15% and the accuracy was within the range from 88% to 109%. The method proved adequate for the tricyclic antidepressants analysis of urine for emergency clinical toxicology and pain management compliance testing.

Ivabradine toxicity: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We describe a case of symptomatic bradycardia resulting from ivabradine toxicity by measurement of ivabradine levels, of which there are limited reports in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old White female presented with several days of near syncope and dizziness accompanied by a drop in her heart rate to 50 beats per minute. She was taking ivabradine for inappropriate sinus tachycardia. After excluding several other causes of bradycardia, we made the diagnosis of ivabradine toxicity by measurement of serum ivabradine levels, an approach that is currently not clinically available. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of serum ivabradine levels and knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug can be utilized to confirm the diagnosis of ivabradine toxicity.

A HPLC-MS method to detect and quantify guanfacine in urine.

BACKGROUND: Guanfacine, an α2-adrenergic α2A)agonist long indicated to treat hypertension, is now being used to treat attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents. This new therapeutic use may require urine testing to document compliance or abuse. A simple rapid high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) method to detect and quantify guanfacine in urine following therapeutic administration is presented. METHODS: Guanfacine and protriptyline internal standard were extracted from alkalinized urine with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was evaporated, reconstituted with mobile phase and analyzed on a YMC Basic S-5 micron, 2.0 × 150 mm HPLC column connected to an MS detector operated in positive electrospray ionization mode with selected ion resonance. Elution times were <5 min. RESULTS: The analytical measurement range for guanfacine was 20-2000 ng/mL. The limit of detection and quantitation were 5 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL, respectively. Precision as %CV was <15% at 40, 100 and 500 ng/mL (n=6). Percentage recovery using the same concentrations was >89%. Interference with drugs and biological constituents was assessed; no interferences were noted. Analysis of 100 random post-diagnostic urine specimens yielded 11 guanfacine positive results with concentrations ranging from 11 to 6390 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: This HPLC-MS method provides a simple and rapid method for the routine detection and quantitation of guanfacine in urine specimens.

Negligible Nux Vomica: Homeopathic Nux Vomica remedies don't contain strychnine?

INTRODUCTION: The St. Ignatius bean of the Strychnos ignatii tree and Nux Vomica homeopathic products presumably could contain the toxic alkaloids strychnine and brucine. This study aimed to determine the amount of these toxic alkaloids in some commercially available Nux Vomica products and the St. Ignatius bean and to determine if overdose of these products could result in clinically significant toxicity. METHODS: Using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, various formulations of Nux Vomica products and St. Ignatius beans were analyzed for strychnine, and brucine with detection limits set at 0.1 ng/g. RESULTS: None of the analyzed Nux Vomica products contained any detectable strychnine or brucine, while the expected strychnine dose from a St. Ignatius bean would be < 0.001 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study reveals that the amount of strychnine in homeopathic Nux Vomica products or St. Ignatius beans are not likely to result in clinically significant strychnine toxicity.

Neonatal Exposure to Tramadol through Mother's Breast Milk.

Tramadol is an opioid used in the treatment of moderate to moderately severe pain. Tramadol's use during pregnancy is generally avoided and may cause some reversible withdrawal effects in neonates, and its use during lactation is not licensed by the manufacturer. A small clinical trial reported infants were exposed to <3% of a mother's tramadol dose through breast milk with no evidence of harmful effects. Presented is a case study of breast milk, neonatal urine, and neonatal oral fluid for the analysis of tramadol and its metabolites, along with the validation of a method for the analysis of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and N-desmethyltramadol in breast milk. Tramadol and its metabolites were extracted by solid-phase extraction after saponification of breast milk to remove lipids. Samples were analyzed by ultra-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. To the author's knowledge, this is the first report of tramadol and its metabolites in neonatal oral fluid. The breast milk concentrations were 63, 22, and 76 ng/mL for the analysis of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and N-desmethyltramadol, respectively, on day of life 12. On day of life 20, the breast milk concentrations were 1,254, 388, and 937 ng/mL for the analysis of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and N-desmethyltramadol, respectively. Oral fluid concentrations were 1,011, 1,499, and 406 ng/mL for the analysis of tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and N-desmethyltramadol, respectively, on day of life 20. Oral fluid concentrations were similar to breast milk for tramadol, almost four times higher for O-desmethyltramadol, and less than half for N-desmethyltramadol. The absolute infant dose was calculated to be 10 µg/kg/day and 294 µg/kg/day for tramadol on day of life 12 and 20, respectively.

Are Urine Propylene Glycol or Vegetable Glycerin Markers of E-cigarette Use or Abstinence?

Objectives: Urine propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG) were evaluated as potential markers for discriminating ECIG users from non-users and verifying ECIG abstinence. Methods: Urine samples from 51 ECIG users (collected pre/post 12-hours ECIG abstinence), and 50 controls (who do not use nicotine/tobacco) were analyzed for urine cotinine, PG, and VG concentration. Results: Of 42 ECIG users with pre-abstinence urine cotinine indicating nicotine use, mean (SD) urine cotinine concentration was 1053.7 ng/ml (874.5) and for controls was 1.93 ng/ml (0.4); after abstinence, ECIG users' mean cotinine decreased to 615.4 ng/ml (753.0). For ECIG users, mean urine PG pre-abstinence was 25.6 mcg/ml (20.0) and was 9.8 mcg/ml (13.5) for controls; after abstinence, ECIG users' mean urine PG decreased to 9.7 mcg/ml (15.0; ps < .05). For ECIG users, mean urine VG pre-abstinence was 7.5 mcg/ml (7.1) and was 13.2 mcg/ml (25.0) for controls; after abstinence, ECIG users' mean VG decreased to 5.0 mcg/ml (4.4; ps < .05). Conclusions: ECIG users' mean urine PG was greater than controls and decreased after 12-hours ECIG abstinence suggesting urine PG may be useful for discriminating ECIG users from non-users and verifying short-term abstinence.

A Case Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Ad Hoc Hospital Collection Device for Fentanyl in Infant Oral Fluid.

Neonatal drug exposure is currently assessed using meconium, urine, blood, hair, or umbilical cord tissue/blood. Due to the invasiveness, challenges, and limitations of collection, and/or analytical difficulties of these matrices, oral fluid may be a more desirable matrix in diagnosing opioid exposure and risk for opioid withdrawal in neonatal abstinence syndrome. Traditional oral fluid collection devices are not viable options as they are too large for neonates' mouths and may contain chemicals on the collection pad. Unstimulated and stimulated infant oral fluid samples have been used for therapeutic drug monitoring as an alternative matrix to blood. The objective of this study was to assess the viability of a simple oral fluid collection system using a sterile foam-tipped swab rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline. Two infants were administered fentanyl for post-operative pain relief while hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units at the Children's Hospital of Richmond of Virginia Commonwealth University. Oral fluid samples were collected at 16 h, 2 days, and/or 7 days following the start of intravenous infusion of fentanyl. Samples were analyzed by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for fentanyl and norfentanyl after solid-phase extraction. In one of the three samples tested, fentanyl and norfentanyl were detected at concentrations of 28 and 78 ng/mL, respectively. Based on the infusion rate, the theoretical oral fluid fentanyl concentration at steady state was calculated to be 33 ng/mL.

Determination of Cannabinoids in Breast Milk Using QuEChERS and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Use of marijuana and cannabinoids has been on the rise in recent years, including in childbearing women. This has resulted in cannabinoids being more frequently identified in breast milk as a result of its high lipid content and cannabinoids having a high lipophilicity, thereby exposing the breastfeeding infant to cannabinoids and other marijuana constituents. Presented is a method for the analysis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBN) and cannabidiol (CBD) in breast milk. THC, CBN, CBD and their isotopically labeled standards were extracted from breast milk using a modified QuEChERS method and analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. As a result of the high lipid content of breast milk, saponification of the lipids was necessary to improve overall extraction efficiency. The process efficiency percentage for THC, CBD and CBN are 55%, 80% and 25%, respectively. The recovery percentage for THC, CBD and CBN are 95%, 118% and 85%, respectively. The matrix effect percentage for THC, CBD and CBN are 53%, 66% and 26%, respectively. Linearity was assessed from 1 to 100 ng/mL for THC, CBN and CBD and had r2 > 0.996. Validation controls were prepared at 1, 3, 20, 80 and 300 ng/mL (dilution control), and the bias was determined to be less than ±20% with %CVs <15% for all controls. Due to the limited access of genuine breast milk for routinely preparing matrix matched calibration and control materials, Enfamil® Premium™ Newborn Infant Formula (0-3 months) was evaluated as a breast milk substitute. No significant differences were observed for THC, CBN and CBD using either breast milk or formula as the matrix; thus, it was determined to be an acceptable breast milk matrix substitute. The modified QuEChERS method was determined to be a robust, reliable method for the determination of THC, CBN and CBD in breast milk.

Using Papaverine and Its Metabolites, 6-Desmethyl Papaverine and 4',6-Didesmethyl Papaverine as Biomarkers to Improve the Detection Time of Heroin Use.

Opioid usage in the USA has increased over the past decade, with prescriptions increasing from 76 million in 1991 to 207 million in 2013. New regulations have curbed the number of prescriptions, leading to an increase in heroin use. Heroin-related overdoses have quadrupled between 2000 and 2015. The traditional urinary biomarkers for indicating heroin use are a combination of morphine and 6-acetyl morphine (6-AM). Morphine is detectable in urine for several days. 6-AM is detected in urine for 2-8 hours. Papaverine has been proposed as an alternative heroin biomarker. It has been reported to have a 1-2 day detection window. Papaverine metabolites have been reported to have up to a 3-day detection window. Presented is a method for the detection of papaverine and its metabolites, 6-desmethyl papaverine (6-DMP) and 4', 6-didesmethyl papaverine (4,6-DDMP), in urine using a modified Waters® MCX™ microelution method. An ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS-MS), with a Waters' BEH C18 column, and 20 mM ammonium formate water: 20 mM ammonium formate methanol mobile phase was employed. Calibration curves were linear from 0.1 to 50 ng/mL. No interferences were observed from the analysis of multicomponent therapeutic drug or drugs of abuse control materials; intra- and inter-run precision tests were acceptable. A total of 428 genuine urine specimens where heroin use was suspected were analyzed. These included 101 6-AM and 179 morphine only positive samples as well as 6 morphine-negative samples where papaverine and/or metabolites were detected. The determined concentrations in these samples for papaverine, 6-DMP and 4,6-DDMP ranged from 0.10 to 994, 0.10 to 462 and 0.12 to 218 ng/mL, respectively. The method was rugged and robust for the analysis of papaverine and metabolites, 6-DMP and 4,6-DDMP. The use papaverine and metabolites, 6-DMP and 4,6-DDMP has the potential to increase the detection window of heroin use.