Do All Fractures Need Surgery?

Common fractures managed by orthopaedic surgeons include ankle fractures, proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years, humeral shaft fractures, and distal radius fractures. Recent trends indicate that surgical management is the best option for most fractures. However, there is limited evidence regarding whether most of these fractures need surgery, or whether there is a subset that could be managed without surgery, with no change in outcomes, or even possibly having improved results with lower complication rates with nonsurgical care.

Femur Fractures: Subtrochanteric.

Femur fractures range from simple oblique or transverse fractures to complex, comminuted types. The reduction and fixation of these fractures can be challenging, with difficulty in attaining fracture alignment, length, and rotation. Added to this complexity can be associated bone loss in open fractures. Various methods and techniques have been described to achieve an acceptable reduction for fracture healing without detriment to the patient's functional outcome. This chapter describes femur fractures from the subtrochanteric to supracondylar regions with fracture reduction aids, patient position, reduction tools, and implant use including plates and nails, either individually or in conjunction. Reduction starts with closed or percutaneous techniques because these are the most biologically friendly and minimize additional iatrogenic soft-tissue injury. However, obtaining an acceptable reduction may require escalation to open techniques. This chapter is divided into sections: the first details femoral nailing and the second details femoral plating.

It's All About the Timing: When Do I Take This Injury to the Operating Room?

Over time, what was considered urgent or emergent in orthopaedic trauma has been revisited, and as awareness of factors associated with outcomes has increased, priorities have changed. There are multiple procedures performed urgently in the belief that early intervention allowed for better outcomes for the injury and the patient. Classic examples of conditions for which urgent intervention has been implemented include open fractures, femoral neck fractures in the young adult, talus fractures, and compartment syndrome. All of these conditions are considered nonurgent except for compartment syndrome, which requires urgent and timely intervention. Studies have demonstrated that these injuries need to be managed in a timely fashion but not necessarily in the middle of the night. Outcomes can be improved by measures such as early antibiotic administration for open fractures, closed reduction of talus fracture-dislocations, and anatomic reduction of femoral neck fractures. These measures are more important and useful than an emergent trip to the operating room by inexperienced surgeons with staff who may be unprepared. Orthopaedic surgeons should be familiar with open fractures and the timing of irrigation and débridement, the relative urgency of managing talus fractures, and the need for immediate reduction and fixation of femoral neck fractures. For each of these injuries, factors other than timing that affect outcomes will be described. Finally, the emergent nature of diagnosis and management of compartment syndrome must also be understood.

Reduction Techniques for Diaphyseal Femur Fractures.

Achieving and maintaining reduction in patients with a diaphyseal femur fracture may be difficult; therefore, thorough preoperative planning is required. To fully prepare for successful surgical management of diaphyseal femur fractures, surgeons must consider appropriate patient positioning and necessary tools, including surgical tables, traction devices, and instruments. Principles of acceptable reduction rely on the restoration of length, alignment, and rotation. Reduction of diaphyseal femur fractures should be attained in the least invasive manner, via percutaneous reduction techniques, if possible, to preserve fracture biology and promote successful fracture healing. Intraoperative assessment of reduction often requires imaging studies of the contralateral extremity as a reference. Intraoperative assessment for associated femoral neck fractures and postoperative clinical examination of the hip and knee are imperative to the successful management of diaphyseal femur fractures. Other reference modalities and clinical examinations are required in patients with bilateral diaphyseal femur fractures.

External fixation of tibial fractures.

External fixation for definitive or initial management of tibial fractures has a long history, with pin-to-bar external fixation being the standard of care for definitive management of tibial fractures. However, the use of this method lessened because of the increased popularity of intramedullary nailing and drawbacks associated with external fixation. This method is still commonly in use in the military environment and can be used for temporary stabilization of tibial fractures, especially in the setting of periarticular injuries. These fixators also may be useful for salvage of open and/or infected fractures that are unsuitable for internal fixation.

Controversies in the intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal tibia fractures.

Management of tibia fractures by internal fixation, particularly intramedullary nails, has become the standard for diaphyseal fractures. However, for metaphyseal fractures or those at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction, the choice of fixation device and technique is controversial. For distal tibia fractures, nailing and plating techniques may be used, the primary goal for each being to achieve acceptable alignment with minimal complications. Different techniques for reduction of these fractures are available and can be applied with either fixation device. Overall outcomes appear to be nearly equivalent, with minor differences in complications. Proximal tibia fractures can be fixed using nailing, which is associated with deformity of the proximal short segment. A newer technique--suprapatellar nailing--may minimize these problems, and use of this method has been increasing in trauma centers. However, most data are still largely based on case series.

External fixation of tibial fractures.

External fixation for definitive or initial management of tibial fractures has a long history, with pin-to-bar external fixation being the standard of care for definitive management. However, the use of this method has lessened because of the increased popularity of intramedullary nailing and drawbacks associated with external fixation. This method is still commonly used in the military environment and can be used for temporary stabilization of tibial fractures, especially in the setting of periarticular injuries. These fixators also may be useful for salvage of open and/or infected fractures that are unsuitable for internal fixation.

Factors associated with surgeon recognition of mental health care opportunities and inclination to attend to mental health.

PURPOSE: A notable percentage of people that die by suicide have had a medical visit within a few months of their death. In a survey-based experiment, we evaluated: 1) whether there are any surgeon, setting, or patient factors associated with surgeon rating of mental health care opportunities, and 2) if there are any surgeon, setting, or patient factors associated with likelihood of mental health referrals. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four upper extremity surgeons of the Science of Variation Group viewed five scenarios of a person with one orthopedic condition. The following aspects of the scenarios were independently randomized: Social worker or psychologist available, office workload, socioeconomic status, gender, age, mental health factors, mental health clues, and diagnosis. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounders, surgeon likelihood of discussing mental health was associated with cancer, disadvantaged socioeconomic status, mental health factors other than being shy, prior suicide attempt, history of physical or emotional abuse, isolation, and when the office is not busy. Factors independently associated with higher likelihood of referring a patient for mental health care included cancer, disadvantaged socioeconomic status, mental health cues, mental health risk factors, and a social worker or psychologist available in the office. CONCLUSION: Using random elements in fictitious scenarios we documented that specialist surgeons are aware of and attuned to mental health care opportunities, are motivated to discuss notable cues, and will make mental health referrals, in part influenced by convenience.

Surgical techniques for complex proximal tibial fractures.

In managing complex proximal tibia fractures, several options are available to the treating surgeon. Closed management with or without external fixation, formal open reduction and internal fixation, and intramedullary nail fixation have been described in the literature. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal treatment method for complex bicondylar patterns or proximal metadiaphyseal fractures with or without involvement of the articular surface. It is helpful to review the standard and alternative surgical approaches to bicondylar tibial plateau fractures and to be aware of the intramedullary nail as an alternative approach for complex proximal metadiaphyseal patterns.

In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality With Delays in Femoral Shaft Fracture Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate trends in the timing of femur fracture fixation in trauma centers in the United States, identify predictors for delayed treatment, and analyze the association of timing of fixation with in-hospital morbidity and mortality using data from the National Trauma Data Bank. METHODS: Patients with femoral shaft fractures treated from 2007 to 2015 were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank and grouped by timing of femur fixation: <24, 24-48 hours, and >48 hours after hospital presentation. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital postoperative mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), days spent in the intensive care unit LOS (ICU LOS), and days on a ventilator. RESULTS: Among the 108,825 unilateral femoral shaft fractures identified, 74.2% was fixed within 24 hours, 16.5% between 24 and 48 hours, and 9.4% >48 hours. The mortality rate was 1.6% overall for the group. When fixation was delayed >48 hours, patients were at risk of significantly higher mortality rate [odds ratio (OR) 3.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.13-4.14], longer LOS (OR 2.14; CI 2.06-2.22), longer intensive care unit LOS (OR 3.92; CI 3.66-4.20), more days on a ventilator (OR 5.38; CI 4.89-5.91), and more postoperative complications (OR 2.05; CI 1.94-2.17; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that delayed fixation of femoral shaft fractures is associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. Patients who underwent fixation >48 hours after presentation were at the greatest risk of increased morbidity and mortality. Although some patients require optimization/resuscitation before fracture fixation, efforts should be made to expedite operative fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Comparison of the Prevalence of, Demographics of, and Effects on Outcomes of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From the National Trauma Data Bank.

OBJECTIVES: To document the prevalence of, and the effect on outcomes, operatively treated bilateral femur fractures treated using contemporary treatments. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort using data from the National Trauma Data Bank. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 119,213 patients in the National Trauma Data Bank between the years 2007 and 2015 who had operatively treated femoral shaft fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complication rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), days in the intensive care unit (ICU LOS), days on a ventilator, and mortality rates. RESULTS: Patients with bilateral femur fractures had increased overall complications (0.74 vs. 0.50, P < 0.0001), a longer LOS (14.3 vs. 9.2, P < 0.0001), an increased ICU LOS (5.3 vs. 2.4, P < 0.0001), and more days on a ventilator (3.1 vs. 1.3, P < 0.0001), when compared with unilateral fractures. Bilateral femoral shaft fractures were independently associated with worse outcomes in all primary domains when adjusted by Injury Severity Score (P < 0.0001), apart from mortality rates. Age-adjusted bilateral injuries were independently associated with worse outcomes in all primary domains (P < 0.0001) except for the overall complication rate. A delay in fracture fixation beyond 24 hours was associated with increased mortality (P < 0.0001) and worse outcomes for all other primary measures (P < 0.0001 to P = 0.0278) for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral femoral shaft fractures are an independent marker for increased hospital and ICU LOS, number of days on a ventilator, and increased complication rates, when compared with unilateral injuries and adjusted for age and Injury Severity Score. Timely definitive fixation, in a physiologically appropriate patient, is critical because a delay is associated with worse inpatient outcome measures and higher mortality rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The dedicated orthopedic trauma operating room.

The development and implementation of a dedicated orthopedic trauma operating room (OTOR) that is used for the treatment of orthopedic trauma patients has changed and improved the practice of orthopedic trauma surgery. Advantages noted with OTOR implementation include improvements in morbidity and complication rates, enhancements in the professional and personal lifestyles of the on-call surgeon, and increased physician recruitment and retention in orthopedic traumatology. However, the inappropriate use of the OTOR, which can waste valuable resources and delay the treatment of emergent cases, must be monitored and avoided.

Soft-tissue management after trauma: initial management and wound coverage.

Before proceeding with treatment, it is necessary to recognize that bony injuries are always associated with soft-tissue disruption and damage. A good soft-tissue envelope is essential to fracture healing and overall extremity function. Injury management begins by recognizing and classifying the injury. Wound débridement with irrigation fluid at low pressure and the administration of antibiotics are essential aspects of treatment. Wound treatment starts with applying dressing material using negative suction and can be guided by the tenets of an algorithm modeled on the reconstructive ladder.

The mangled limb: salvage versus amputation.

A mangled extremity is defined as a limb with injury to three of four systems in the extremity. The decision to salvage or amputate the injured limb has generated much controversy in the literature, with studies to support advantages of each approach. Various scoring systems have proved unreliable in predicting the need for amputation or salvage; however, a recurring theme in the literature is that the key to limb viability seems to be the severity of the soft-tissue injury. Factors such as associated injuries, patient age, and comorbidities (such as diabetes) also should be considered. Attempted limb salvage should be considered only if a patient is hemodynamically stable enough to tolerate the necessary surgical procedures and blood loss associated with limb salvage. For persistently hemodynamically unstable patients and those in extremis, life comes before limb. Recently, the Lower Extremity Assessment Project study attempted to answer the question of whether amputation or limb salvage achieves a better outcome. The study also evaluated other factors, including return-to-work status, impact of the level of and bilaterality of the amputation, and economic cost. There appears to be no significant difference in return to work, functional outcomes, or the cost of treatment (including the prosthesis) between the two groups. A team approach with different specialties, including orthopaedics, plastic surgery, vascular surgery and trauma general surgery, is recommended for treating patients with a mangled extremity.

National Metrics Improved Timeliness of Antibiotic Administration for Open Extremity Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotics have been shown to be an essential component in the treatment of open extremity fractures. The American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program, based on a committee of physician leaders including orthopaedic trauma surgeons, publishes best-practice guidelines for the management of open fractures. Accordingly, it established the tracking of antibiotic timing as a metric with a plan to use that metric before trauma center site reviews. Our hypothesis was that this physician-led effort at the national level would provide the necessary incentive to effect change within our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients treated at our institution for open extremity fractures was performed over 3 periods separated by 2 quality initiatives. The first initiative was an institution-driven effort to increase awareness and educate specific departments about the importance of prompt antibiotic administration. The second initiative was the tracking of antibiotic order and administration times with quarterly audits following newly published guidelines. RESULTS: Neither antibiotic order placement within 1 hour nor administration within 1 hour improved after our first institution-specific initiative. Both outcome measures significantly improved after the second quality initiative, as did median times from arrival to antibiotic order and administration. CONCLUSIONS: Metrics developed and measured by a physician-led national organization led to practice changes at our hospital. Tracking of antibiotic timing for open fracture treatment was more effective than institutional education of healthcare providers alone. This study suggests that nationally published guidelines, developed and measured by physician leaders, will be found to be relevant by other physicians and can be a powerful tool to drive change.

Reaming does not add significant time to intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia and femur.

BACKGROUND: Reamed intramedullary nailing is the current gold standard for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. Current concepts of orthopedic damage control surgery for patients with multiple injuries have placed an emphasis on appropriate surgical timing, limiting blood loss, and the duration of the initial operative procedure(s). Proponents of unreamed nailing have stated that reaming places polytraumatized patients "at risk," in part because it adds to the length of the surgical procedure and may exacerbate the severity of a patient's pulmonary injury. The purpose of this study was to determine how many minutes reaming actually takes and what percentage of operative time reaming comprises during intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. METHODS: Intraoperative timing data were collected prospectively on a total of 52 patients with 54 fractures (21 femoral and 33 tibial) who underwent reamed intramedullary nailing of acute closed or open femoral or tibial shaft fractures over a 10-month period. Total operating room, surgical, and reaming times were collected. RESULTS: The average reaming time for femur and tibia fractures was 6.9 minutes and 7 minutes, respectively. On average, reaming accounted for 4.9% of the surgical time and 3.2% of the total operating room time for femur fractures and 4.9% of the surgical time and 3.4% of the total operating room for tibia fractures. CONCLUSION: Our results show that reaming comprises a small percentage of the operative time and the total time a patient spends in the operating room.

The Financial Impact of the Affordable Care Act on a Level-1 Orthopedic Trauma Service.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on professional fees and proportion of payer type for an orthopedic trauma service at a level-1 trauma center. METHODS: We analyzed professional fee data and payer mix for the 18 months before and after implementation of the ACA. Data were collected for inpatients (IP) and outpatients (OP). We corrected for changes in patient volume between the 2-time periods by calculating average values per patient. RESULTS: Post ACA, we treated a higher percentage of patients with Medicaid and had a reduction in the percentage of uninsured/county payers. Collections for IPs decreased $75.49/patient and OPs decreased $0.10/patient. Our collection rate decreased 6% for IPs and 5% for OPs. In particular, Medicaid collections decreased by $180/IP, and $4/OP, and Medicare decreased by $61/IP and increased $5/OP post ACA, whereas contract collections increased by $140/IP and $20/OP. The changes in our own institution's insurance were mixed with decreases of $514/IP for partial risk and $735/IP for full-risk insurance and increases of $1/OP for partial risk, and $35/OP for full-risk insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Post ACA, we saw less patients, primarily in the OP setting. This shift was accompanied by a significant decrease in our collection rate; specifically, a decrease in the amount we collected per Medicaid patient-the category of payer that increased post ACA. The ACA did allow more uninsured patients access to medical care but was associated with lower IP and OP reimbursements.

Predictive Modeling for Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: Early Surgery and Delirium Have the Largest Influence on Length of Stay.

BACKGROUND: Averaging length of stay (LOS) ignores patient complexity and is a poor metric for quality control in geriatric hip fracture programs. We developed a predictive model of LOS that compares patient complexity to the logistic effects of our institution's hip fracture care pathway. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients enrolled into a hip fracture co-management pathway at an academic level I trauma center from 2014 to 2015. Patient complexity was approximated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and ASA score. A predictive model of LOS was developed from patient-specific and system-specific variables using a multivariate linear regression analysis; it was tested against a sample of patients from 2016. RESULTS: LOS averaged 5.95 days. Avoidance of delirium and reduced time to surgery were found to be notable predictors of reduced LOS. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was not a strong predictor of LOS, but the ASA score was. Our predictive LOS model worked well for 63% of patients from the 2016 group; for those it did not work well for, 80% had postoperative complications. DISCUSSION: Predictive LOS modeling accounting for patient complexity was effective for identifying (1) reasons for outliers to the expected LOS and (2) effective measures to target for improving our hip fracture program. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Delay in Flap Coverage Past 7 Days Increases Complications for Open Tibia Fractures: A Cohort Study of 140 North American Trauma Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To measure time to flap coverage after open tibia fractures and assess whether delays are associated with inpatient complications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One forty level I and II trauma centers in Canada and the United States. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (≥16 years) undergoing surgery for (1) an open tibia (including ankle) fracture and (2) a soft-tissue flap during their index admission between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, were eligible for inclusion. EXPOSURE: Time from hospital arrival to definitive flap coverage (in days). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of the following complications occurring during the index admission: (1) deep infection, (2) osteomyelitis, and/or (3) amputation. The primary analysis compared complications between early and delayed coverage groups (≤7 and >7 days, respectively) after matching on propensity scores. We also used logistic regression with time to flap coverage as a continuous variable to examine the impact of the duration of delay on complications. RESULTS: There were 672 patients at 140 centers included. Of these, 412 (61.3%) had delayed coverage (>7 days). Delayed coverage was associated with a significant increase in complications during the index admission after matching (16.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001, number needed to harm = 10). Each additional week of delay was associated with an approximate 40% increased adjusted risk of complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.82, for each week coverage was delayed, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter study of flap coverage for tibia fractures in North America. Complications rose significantly when flap coverage was delayed beyond 7 days, consistent with current guideline recommendations. Because the majority of patients did not have coverage within this timeframe, initiatives are required to improve care for patients with these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.