Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vascular ; : 17085381231155035, 2023 Feb 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36794829

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To validate the accuracy of high-risk criteria for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and analyze the correlation between age and outcome of CEA and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in risk groups. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively managed vascular surgery database in a single tertiary referral center, and 2482 internal carotid arteries (ICAs) had undergone carotid revascularization from November 1994 to December 2021. To validate high-risk criteria for CEA, patients were classified as high risk (Hr) and normal risk (Nr). Subgroup analysis was performed with patients older or younger than 75 years to investigate the relationship between age and outcome in each group. Primary endpoints were 30-day outcomes including stroke, death, stroke/death, myocardial infraction (MI), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). RESULTS: A total of 2345 ICAs in 2256 patients were enrolled. The number of patients in the Hr group was 543 (24%) and the number in the Nr group was 1713 (76%). CEA and CAS were performed on 1384 (61%) and 872 (39%) patients, respectively. The 30-day stroke/death rate was higher with CAS than CEA in both the Hr (1.1% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.032) and Nr (1.2% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001) groups. In unmatched logistic regression analysis of the Nr group (n = 1778), the rate of 30-day stroke/death (OR, 5.575; 95% CI, 2.922-10.636; p < 0.001) was higher for CAS than CEA. In propensity score matching of the Nr group, the rate of 30-day stroke/death (OR, 5.165; 95% CI, 2.391-11.155; p < 0.001) was also higher for CAS than CEA. In the age <75 subgroup of the Hr group (n = 428), CAS was associated with higher 30-day stroke/death (OR, 14.089; 95% CI, 1.314-151.036; p = 0.029). In the age ≥75 subgroup of the Hr (n = 139), there was no difference in 30-day stroke/death between CEA and CAS. In the age <75 subgroup of the Nr group (n = 1318), 30-day stroke/death (OR, 6.300; 95% CI, 2.797-14.193; p < 0.001) was higher in CAS. In the age ≥75 subgroup of the Nr group (n = 460), 30-day stroke/death (OR, 6.468; 95% CI, 1.862-22.471; p = 0.003) was higher in CAS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients older than 75 years in the Hr group, there were relatively poor 30-day treatment outcomes in both CEA and CAS. Alternative treatment is needed that can expect better outcomes in older high-risk patients. In the Nr group, CEA has a significant benefit compared with CAS, and CEA should be recommended more to these patients.

2.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(4): 1163-1171, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33887426

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Marfan syndrome (MFS) affects the cardiovascular system. Aortic root aneurysm is a pathognomonic feature of MFS; however, the abdominal aorta is rarely affected. A consensus on surveillance for the abdominal aorta in patients with MFS has not been established. In the present study, we compared the outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in patients with and without MFS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study from 2003 to 2020. We reviewed and compared 28 patients with MFS and 426 patients without MFS who had undergone OSR for AAAs. The baseline characteristics, medical comorbidities, previous cardiovascular surgery, anatomic features of the AAAs, and surgical treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The patients with MFS were younger than those without MFS at the AAA diagnosis (47.2 ± 12.3 vs 70.6 ± 7.9 years; P < .001). The proportion of women was also greater for those with MFS (46.4% vs 15.7%; P < .001). The AAAs were most often located at the infrarenal aorta in both groups. However, thoracoabdominal AAAs were more often found among patients with MFS (10.7% vs 0.9%; P < .012). The proportion of symptomatic patients was lower in the MFS group (3.6% vs 21.6%; P = .022). The maximum median diameter of the AAA at surgery was smaller in the patients with MFS (52 mm vs 58 mm; P = .001). However, concomitant aortic dissection (32.1% vs 3.3%; P < .001) was more prevalent among the patients with MFS. Consequent aneurysmal changes in the iliac artery after AAA repair were more frequent in the patients with MFS (7.1% vs 0%; P = .004). No significant differences were found in 30-day or overall mortality between the patients with and without MFS during a median follow-up period of 71 months (interquartile range, 24.7-121.1 months) and 26.7 months (interquartile range, 7.4-69.5 months), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical outcomes of OSR for AAAs for patients with MFS were not significantly different from those for patients without MFS in a well-established surveillance program of MFS.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Síndrome de Marfan/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/etiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Ilíaco/etiología , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Masculino , Síndrome de Marfan/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Marfan/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 75: 150-161, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33831517

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mycotic aortic aneurysm constitutes a potentially devastating disease that necessitates prompt suspicion and diagnosis. There is no exact consensus for treatment, but removal of infected tissues and prolonged use of antimicrobials based on the identified causative microorganisms seem widely acceptable and have been similarly practiced worldwide. However, some patients still show no identified microorganisms. In this study, we sought to determine whether there are any clinical significance or differences of note in culture-negative mycotic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Between October 2003 and August 2018, 71 patients were identified as treated for mycotic aortic aneurysms at a single tertiary institution. Review of medical records and imaging studies were completed to collect the following information: demographics, previous medical/surgical history regarding potential infection sources, laboratory and radiologic findings, clinical presentations, treatment method, and morbidity and mortality rates. For analysis, patients were categorized into two groups: the blood and/or tissue culture-positive (CP) group and the blood and/or tissue culture-negative (CN) group. The latter was further divided as CN with identified microorganism by molecular biologic methods [CN(+)] and CN with no identified microorganism [CN(-)]. RESULTS: More patients in the CP group were symptomatic than were in the CN(+) group (100% vs. 80%; P = 0.034). However, identification of causative microorganisms did not result in a difference in symptom status upon comparing the [CP + CN(+)] and [CN(-)] groups. Inflammatory markers were the most elevated in the CP group and least elevated in the CN(-) group. The aneurysm growth rate seemed slower in the CN(-) group than in the CN(+) and CP groups (1.3 vs. 3.4 vs. 9 mm/month respectively). Aneurysm rupture at initial presentation was more prevalent in the CP group (33.3%). 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography showed increased uptake regardless of whether or not the microorganisms were identified. Early mortality and disease-specific mortality rates during the follow-up period were higher in the CP group but without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the CP group, the CN groups appeared clinically less severe, and also exhibited a relatively less devastating course as exhibited by the slower aneurysm expansion rate and smaller number of ruptured aneurysms at the initial presentation.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado/microbiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/microbiología , Rotura de la Aorta/microbiología , Anciano , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico , Aneurisma Infectado/terapia , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta/terapia , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Rotura de la Aorta/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Korean Med Sci ; 36(47): e314, 2021 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34873883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the first choice of treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is endovascular aneurysm repair, especially in elderly patients, some patients require open surgical repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the mortality outcomes of open AAA repair between octogenarians and younger counterparts and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent elective open AAA repair due to degenerative etiology at a single tertiary medical center between 1996 and June 2020 were included in this retrospective review. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed to collect the following information: demographics, comorbid medical conditions, clinical presentations, radiologic findings, surgical details, and morbidity and mortality rates. For analysis, patients were divided into two groups: older and younger than 80 years of age. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mortality after elective open AAA repair. RESULTS: Among a total of 650 patients who underwent elective open AAA repair due to degenerative AAA during the study period, 58 (8.9%) were octogenarians and 595 (91.1%) were non-octogenarians. Patients in the octogenarian group were predominantly female and more likely to have lower body weight and body mass index (BMI), hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and lower preoperative serum hemoglobin and albumin compared with patients in the non-octogenarian group. Maximal aneurysm diameter was larger in octogenarians. During the median follow-up duration of 34.4 months for 650 patients, the median length of total hospital and intensive care unit stay was longer in octogenarians. The 30-day (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.374) and 1-year (6.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.108) mortality rates were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that low BMI was associated with increased 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 16.339; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.192-224.052; P = 0.037) and 1-year (OR, 8.236; CI, 2.301-29.477; P = 0.001) mortality in all patients. CONCLUSION: Because the mortality rate of octogenarians after elective open AAA repair was not significantly different compared with their younger counterparts, being elderly is not a contraindication for open AAA repair. Low BMI might be associated with increased postoperative mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Octogenarios , Oportunidad Relativa , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 62: 232-237, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31075465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Open surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) sometimes requires left renal vein division (LRVD) to gain adequate exposure of the abdominal aorta. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of LRVD on the postoperative renal function using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: From July 1996 to January 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 698 patients who underwent open aortic surgery, including 543 AAAs and 155 AIODs, at a single institution. 66 patients (9.6%, 47 AAAs, 19 AIODs) needed LRVD during the operation. A 1:3 ratio PSM was used to control the selective bias between the LRVD and non-LRVD groups. We investigated preoperative and postoperative renal function including serum creatinine (sCr) level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2). Major complications, long-term renal function, and 30-day mortality were also compared. RESULTS: The LRVD group had a significantly higher rate of renal artery reconstruction (15.2% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001) and suprarenal clamping (54.6% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001) and higher incidence of juxtarenal AIOD (24.2% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). With PSM, 63 patients in the LRVD group and 144 patients in the non-LRVD group were enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics were well balanced in the groups after PSM. There were no significant differences in preoperative eGFR (72.4 ± 21.3 vs. 76.1 ± 25.0, P = 0.306) and postoperative eGFR on day 3 (69.5 ± 26.6 vs. 77.5 ± 28.5, P = 0.065), day 7 (73.3 ± 24.8 vs. 78.5 ± 27.4, P = 0.264), and in the long-term follow-up period (69.0 ± 22.2 vs. 68.9 ± 27.1, P = 0.986, 50.2 month ± 45.50) in the 2 groups. Only the sCr level (1.40 ± 0.59 vs. 1.21 ± 0.62, P = 0.045) and eGFR (59.5 ± 23.9 vs. 71.4 ± 26.0, P = 0.002) were significantly worse on postoperative day 1 in the LRVD than in the non-LRVD group. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality (1.6% vs. 1.6%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The patients in the LVRD group underwent initial drop in renal function; however, eGFR improved during the follow-up period. There was no difference in renal function and postoperative mortality between LRVD and non-LRVD groups. Therefore, LRVD is a safe and durable procedure during complex abdominal aortic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Venas Renales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Recuperación de la Función , Venas Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Renales/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 62: 166-172, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30763710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary closure (PC) and patch angioplasty (PA) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been disputed in many studies. Some studies announced that PC is associated with a higher restenosis rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of PC and PA using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Between November 1994 and October 2016, 1,044 patients underwent primary CEA procedures at our institution and were retrospectively analyzed. The study endpoints included rates of ipsilateral stroke, any clinical stroke, cranial nerve palsy, hematoma, bleeding warranting repeat surgery within 30 postoperative days. We also investigated the restenosis rates, overall survival, stenosis-free survival, and stroke-free survival during follow-up (median follow-up 37.1 months). RESULTS: This study includes 435 cases of PC and 476 cases of PA. After PSM analysis, baseline characteristics (age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, atrial fibrillation, previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, contralateral carotid occlusion, degree of carotid stenosis, and symptomatic status within 6 months) were balanced. Finally, 377 pairs of matched cases were analyzed. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 groups in ipsilateral stroke (P = 0.45), clinical stroke (P = 0.75), cranial nerve palsy (P = 1), hematoma (P = 0.18), bleeding which required reoperation (P = 0.12) within 30 postoperative days, and restenosis rates during follow-up (P = 0.16). In addition, there were no differences between the 2 groups during follow-up in overall, stroke-free, and restenosis-free survival with P values of 0.136, 0.07, and 0.06, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the analysis using PSM, there were no significant differences between PC and PA closure during CEA in perioperative and long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Pericardio/trasplante , Técnicas de Sutura , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Angioplastia/mortalidad , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 54: 248-253, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30055242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cephalic arch is one of the sites most susceptible to stenosis in brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BCAVF). We performed a retrospective study to identify the incidence of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) in BCAVF, to compare the patency of percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) with that of cephalic vein transposition (CVT), and to establish the optimal treatment strategy for CAS. METHODS: Between January 2011 and June 2016, 462 patients underwent BCAVF creation. CAS was defined as >50% stenosis at the confluence of the cephalic and axillary veins on ultrasonography. Treatment was planned for clinically significant CAS, which was defined as >25% reduction in flow volume compared to previous examination, elevation of venous pressure, delayed puncture site hemostasis, and/or acute thrombotic occlusion. RESULTS: Seventy-seven (16.7%) patients had CAS and 42 of them (54.5%) were treated for clinically significant CAS. PTA was performed in 36 patients (85.7%), and CVT was done in 6 patients (14.3%) as the initial treatment. Nine patients underwent CVT after PTA, resulting in a total of 15 patients treated with CVT. Investigation of the patency of the 36 cases of PTA and 15 cases of CVT revealed that primary-assisted patency rates at 6 and 12 months were 68.2% and 57.3% for PTA and 100.0% and 87.5% for CVT, respectively (P = 0.038). Secondary patency rates at 6 and 12 months were 72.0% and 56.9% for PTA and 100% and 100% for CVT, respectively (P = 0.010). The median intervention rate was 2.5 interventions per access-year in the 36 cases treated with PTA and 1.5 interventions per access-year in the 15 cases treated with CVT. CONCLUSIONS: CAS is a common cause of BCAVF dysfunction, and careful surveillance is warranted. CVT should be considered for treatment of CAS to achieve better long-term patency with fewer reinterventions.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Tronco Braquiocefálico/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Anciano , Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Brazo/irrigación sanguínea , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/epidemiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 65(4): 1142-1151, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28216343

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) is still not known, and we sought to determine an optimal treatment strategy for patients with SISMAD based on its natural clinical course. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with SISMAD treated from 2001 through 2016. Diagnosis and angiographic type of SISMAD were determined with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, and the clinical features were obtained using a fixed form questionnaire. All patients were treated conservatively, except for five who unselectively underwent primary interventional treatment. For the follow-up examinations, clinical features and morphologic changes of superior mesenteric artery dissection were examined with CT angiography every 6 to 12 months. RESULTS: During the past 15 years, 116 patients with SISMAD (male, 92%; mean age, 54.7 ± 10.8 years; symptomatic, 76%) were encountered. Clinical features and morphologic changes on CT examinations were available in 100% and 88% of the patients, respectively, during the mean follow-up of 53 ± 39 months (range, 1-173 months). Of 83 symptomatic patients managed conservatively, 96% achieved pain resolution; 4% experienced prolonged pain, including one patient with bowel gangrene. After pain resolution, 20% of patients developed late recurrence of abdominal pain, which was relieved with conservative management, whereas two patients (12%) required surgery to treat bowel stricture. Follow-up examinations (n = 102) by CT angiography revealed no change in 34%, partial or complete remodeling in 63%, aneurysmal change in 2%, and dissection progression in 1% of the patients. Antithrombotic therapy offered no beneficial effects on either clinical or morphologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: With conservative treatment, the majority of patients with SISMAD showed clinical improvement and no morphologic changes during long-term follow-up. We thus recommend a conservative management strategy as the first-line treatment for patients with SISMAD, regardless of angiographic type.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Vasc Surg ; 66(6): 1668-1678.e3, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28583733

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the natural history of spontaneous isolated abdominal aortic dissection (SIAAD) and to establish an optimal management strategy for patients with SIAAD. METHODS: We searched the database of thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) performed at a single institution from January 2003 to July 2016 using the keywords "aortic dissection" and "dissection AND aorta." Once a diagnosis of SIAAD was made, we investigated the initial clinical and morphologic features and aorta-related events for all patients and morphologic changes of the aortic dissection (AD) during the follow-up period for the patients who underwent follow-up CT scans. We compared characteristics of the patients, frequencies of clinical events (aortic rupture, intervention, death), and morphologic changes (false lumen enlargement, progression of AD, remodeling of AD, and involvement of iliac or visceral artery) during the follow-up period according to the location of AD (infrarenal vs suprarenal), symptom status (symptomatic vs asymptomatic), and gender. RESULTS: There were 210 (10.7%) patients (median age, 69.4 years [interquartile range, 61.3-74.7]; male, 73.3%) who were diagnosed with SIAAD among 1958 patients with AD. SIAAD was most frequently located at the infrarenal aorta (86.2%), extended to the iliac (12.4%) or visceral artery (2.9%), and was symptomatic in 13.3% of patients. During the study period, aortic rupture developed in two patients (0.9%), aortic intervention was required in five (2.4%), and aorta-related deaths were identified in three (1.4%). Among 138 (65.7%) patients who underwent follow-up CT scans, 81.9% showed no morphologic change or remodeling during the follow-up period (median, 25 months; range, 1-158 months; interquartile range, 12.3-49.1 months). In the meantime, false lumen enlargement and longitudinal progression of AD developed in 8.7% and 6.5% of patients, respectively. However, newly developed visceral artery extension was not found in any of the patents. When characteristics of the patients and frequencies of clinical events or late morphologic changes of AD were compared on the basis of the location of AD, symptom status, and gender, female gender, presence of symptoms, and suprarenal SIAAD were more frequently associated with aorta-related mortality. False lumen enlargement was more frequent in the suprarenal AD group than in the infrarenal AD group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observation, the majority of symptomatic and asymptomatic SIAAD patients can be managed conservatively unless they present with aortic rupture, concomitant large aortic aneurysm, or underlying connective tissue disease. However, a more proactive management strategy may be required for female, symptomatic patients or those with suprarenal SIAAD.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Disección Aórtica/terapia , Rotura de la Aorta/terapia , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aortografía/métodos , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Bases de Datos Factuales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Remodelación Vascular
10.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 54(5): 573-578, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28893482

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Despite randomised evidence, the debate continues about the preferred treatment strategy for carotid stenosis in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes and restenosis rates after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) in unselected patients using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: The 30 day incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE; defined as stroke, transient ischaemic attack, myocardial infarction, or death) and procedure related complications, as well as restenosis rates during follow-up were compared between unselected patients undergoing CEA or CAS between January 2002 and December 2015 at a single institution. PSM was used to balance the following factors between the CEA and CAS cohorts: age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, smoking, atrial fibrillation, previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, valvular heart disease, contralateral carotid occlusion, degree of carotid stenosis, and symptomatic status. Statistical comparisons of outcomes were based on logistic regression analysis and log rank test. RESULTS: Of 1184 patients (654 CEA and 530 CAS), 452 PSM pairs of CEA and CAS patients were created. The CAS group showed a relatively higher 30 day incidence of MACE (7.5% vs. 2.4%; odds ratio [OR] 3.261, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.634-6.509; p = .001) but a lower incidence of procedure related complications (1.5% vs. 5.3%; OR 0.199, 95% CI 0.075-0.528; p = .001). During a mean follow-up of 49.1 months (range 1-180 months), restenosis rates were higher after CAS than after CEA (1.5% vs. 1.0% at 12 months and 5.4% vs. 1.2% at 24 months, respectively; p = .008). CONCLUSION: This PSM based observation reconfirmed previous trial results in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis in routine clinical practice: CEA showed lower 30 day MACE and mid-term restenosis rates than CAS.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 36(1): 78-86, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38014835

RESUMEN

We prioritized injury prevention and management programs, and research and development (R&D) projects using the Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for national plan. We summarized 21 programs and 31 R&D projects based on opinions collected in the opinion survey and brainstorming. Expert panel evaluated program and project relevance in the two Delphi rounds to make consensus. Total scores were calculated by adding criterion weights calculated through the AHP multiplied by the average of scores for each program and project. The top three programs were "Integrated Management System for Injury Data," "Comprehensive Injury Surveillance System," and "Transport System Improvement Program for Major Trauma." The top three R&D projects were researches on "Identification of Vulnerable Workers Injuries to Strengthen Protections," "Data Integration on Injury and Disability," and "Using Public Health Big Data to Identify Injury Status and Risk Factors." Experts highly rated the programs to improve injury surveillance system.


Asunto(s)
Proceso de Jerarquía Analítica , Salud Pública , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Phlebology ; 38(8): 516-522, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37478564

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative hemodynamic changes in varicose vein surgery related with SSV reflux using APG. METHODS: Totals of 181 limbs and 178 patients who underwent high ligation and stripping (HLS) (87 limbs), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (43 limbs), or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) (51 limbs) for SSV reflux from 1995 to 2022 were enrolled. We measured venous volume (VV), venous filling index (VFI), ejection fraction (EF), and residual volume fraction (RVF) preoperatively and at postoperative one and 6 months. RESULTS: Comparing preoperative results to those at postoperative 1 month, the reduction rates of VV, VFI, and RVF were 27, 53, and 31%, while EF increased by 18% (p < 0.001). Comparing preoperative and postoperative 6 month, the reduction rates of VV, VFI, and RVF were 27, 45, and 35%, while EF increased by 27% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were hemodynamic improvement in the lower leg after varicose vein surgery including HLS, RFA, and EVLA.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Várices , Insuficiencia Venosa , Humanos , Várices/cirugía , Vena Safena/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Hemodinámica , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Insuficiencia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Venosa/cirugía
13.
Hypertens Res ; 46(8): 1870-1879, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37185603

RESUMEN

Manganese (Mn) exposure is associated with increased risks of dementia and cerebrovascular disease. However, evidence regarding the impact of ambient Mn exposure on brain imaging markers is scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between ambient Mn exposure and brain imaging markers representing neurodegeneration and cerebrovascular lesions. We recruited a total of 936 adults (442 men and 494 women) without dementia, movement disorders, or stroke from the Republic of Korea. Ambient Mn concentrations were predicted at each participant's residential address using spatial modeling. Neurodegeneration-related brain imaging markers, such as the regional cortical thickness, were estimated using 3 T brain magnetic resonance images. White matter hyperintensity volume (an indicator of cerebrovascular lesions) was also obtained from a certain number of participants (n = 397). Linear regression analyses were conducted after adjusting for potential confounders. A log-transformed ambient Mn concentration was associated with thinner parietal (ß = -0.02 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.05 to -0.01) and occipital cortices (ß = -0.03 mm; 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01) after correcting for multiple comparisons. These associations remained statistically significant in men. An increase in the ambient Mn concentration was also associated with a greater volume of deep white matter hyperintensity in men (ß = 772.4 mm3, 95% CI: 36.9 to 1508.0). None of the associations were significant in women. Our findings suggest that ambient Mn exposure may induce cortical atrophy in the general adult population.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Demencia , Sustancia Blanca , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Gris/patología , Manganeso/efectos adversos , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Demencia/inducido químicamente
14.
Asian J Surg ; 46(9): 3741-3747, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36813675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Porto-mesenteric vein (PMV) infiltration of pancreatic cancer is classified as borderline resectable cancer. For en-bloc resectability, the probability of PMV resection and reconstruction is the most decisive factor. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze PMV resection and reconstruction during pancreatic cancer surgery using end-to-end anastomosis (EA) and a cryopreserved allograft (AG) and to verify the effectiveness of reconstruction using an AG. METHODS: Between May 2012 and June 2021, 84 patients (65 underwent EA, and 19 received AG reconstruction) underwent pancreatic cancer surgery with PMV reconstruction. An AG is a cadaveric graft with a diameter of 8-12 mm and is obtained from a liver transplant donor. Patency after reconstruction, disease recurrence, overall survival, and perioperative factors were assessed. RESULTS: The median age was higher in EA patients (p = .022) and neoadjuvant therapy (p = .02) was more in AG patients. Upon histopathological examination, the R0 resection margin did not show a significant difference by reconstruction method. During a 36-month survival analysis, primary patency was significantly superior in EA patients (p = .004), and there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (p = .628) or overall survival (p = .638) rates. CONCLUSION: Compared with EA, AG reconstruction after PMV resection during pancreatic cancer surgery showed a lower primary patency, but there was no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival rates. Therefore, the use of AG can be a viable option for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer surgery if the patient is properly followed-up postoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Vena Porta , Humanos , Vena Porta/patología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Aloinjertos/patología , Aloinjertos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
15.
Surg Today ; 42(10): 950-5, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535018

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical course of patients with venous malformation (VM) treated conservatively. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the database of our Congenital Vascular Malformation clinic and interviewed 207 patients with VM, who had been managed only conservatively. The questionnaires asked about changes in size (no change, increase in proportion to growth, increase greater than in proportion to growth, decrease) and changes in symptoms (markedly worse, moderately worse, no change, moderately improved, markedly much improved). Progression of VMs was defined as an increase greater than in proportion to growth or worsening symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty patients (24 %) reported an increase in size greater than in proportion to growth and 25 patients (12 %) reported symptoms worsening from their initial symptoms. Overall, sixty-six (32 %) of the patients reported evidence of progression of their VM. A binary logistic regression model identified VM combined with capillary malformation (CM) or lymphatic malformation (LM) as an independent predictor of VM progression (OR 2.67, 95 % CI 1.29-5.53). CONCLUSIONS: Based on responses to the questionnaire, the size and symptoms of VM progressed in 32 % of patients over the course of their life. VMs combined with CM or LM were the only independent predictor of progression of a VM after conservative management.


Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Malformaciones Vasculares/terapia , Anomalías Múltiples , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Capilares/anomalías , Niño , Preescolar , Vendajes de Compresión , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Anomalías Linfáticas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Malformaciones Vasculares/patología , Espera Vigilante , Adulto Joven
16.
Clin Cardiol ; 45(12): 1272-1276, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36086944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that the outer wall at the carotid bifurcation is the most common area of atherosclerotic plaque deposition due to the low shear stress. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the most common site of arteriosclerosis in carotid arteries is different in the early and late stages. METHODS: This is an observational study of patients with <50% stenosis of the common and internal carotid arteries (ICAs) identified by Duplex ultrasound in our health promotion center. Plaque location was categorized as a quarter of the cross-section in the distal common carotid artery (CCA) and proximal ICA. Carotid plaque score (CPS) was calculated by the addition of one point for each detected section. The sum of CPSs was calculated for each section. RESULTS: Among 3996 Duplex scans of carotid arteries in 999 patients between June 2020 and October 2020, a total of 569 patients (73.6% male; mean age, 68.4± 9.1 years; 652 CCAs and 567 ICAs) were included. Total CPS was high in the anterior and posterior sections. The distribution in the ICA was: 308 (31.0%) anterior, 90 (9.0%) medial, 373 (37.5%) posterior, and 224 (22.5%) lateral section. The distribution in the CCA was 385 (32.6%) anterior, 103 (8.7%) medial, 528 (44.7%) posterior, and 165 (14.0%) lateral section. The axial distribution of posterior and lateral sections was significantly different according to the directional flow (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and posterior sections of the CCA and ICA were atherosclerotic plaque-prone sites. This result is different from the tendency of atherogenesis to affect the lateral section having low shear stress at the carotid bifurcation.


Asunto(s)
Arteriosclerosis , Estenosis Carotídea , Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Carótida Común/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex
17.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 103(2): 112-118, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36017138

RESUMEN

Purpose: Exposure to ionizing radiation over the head and neck accelerates atherosclerotic changes in the carotid arteries. Owing to the characteristics of radiation-induced carotid stenosis (RICS), the results regarding the optimal revascularization method for RICS vary. This study compared treatment outcomes between carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in RICS. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CEA or CAS for carotid stenosis. RICS was defined as carotid stenosis (>50%) with the prior neck irradiation for cancer treatment on either side. For the analyses, demographics, comorbid conditions, carotid lesion characteristics based on imaging studies, surgical complications, neurologic outcomes, and mortality during the follow-up period were reviewed. To compare CEA and CAS results in RICS, a 1:1 propensity score matching was applied. Results: Between November 1994 and June 2021, 43 patients with RICS and 2,407 patients with non-RICS underwent carotid revascularization with CEA or CAS. RICS had fewer atherosclerotic risk factors and more frequent severe carotid stenosis and contralateral carotid occlusions than non-RICS. CAS was more commonly performed than CEA (22.9% vs. 77.1%) for RICS due to more frequent unfavorable carotid anatomy (0 vs. 16.2%). Procedure-related complications were more common in the CEA than in the CAS. However, there was no significant difference in neurologic outcomes and restenosis rates between CEA and CAS in RICS. Conclusion: Considering its lesion characteristics and cumulative incidence, RICS requires more attention than non-RICS. Although CAS has broader indications for RICS, CEA has shown acceptable results if selectively performed.

18.
J Korean Med Sci ; 26(9): 1173-7, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21935272

RESUMEN

We attempted to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of carotid artery stenosis in Korea. Twenty thousand seven hundred twelve individuals who underwent carotid artery ultrasonography for health screening between March 2005 and March 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. The population was divided into four groups, according to the degree of stenosis, as Group A, below 29%; Group B, 30% to 49%; Group C, 50% to 74%; Group D, above 75%. The medical records of the individuals were investigated, and Fisher's exact test, chi-square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests and a binary logistic regression model were used for statistical analysis. The prevalence of carotid stenosis was Group B, 5.5%; Group C, 0.9%; Group D, 0.1%. Old age, male gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease were significantly higher in Groups C and D (P = 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, 0.048, and 0.001, respectively). Among the males aged over 65 yr, the prevalence of carotid stenosis ≥ 50% and ≥ 30% were 4.0% and 18.2%, respectively. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not uncommon in Korea. Carotid ultrasonography is necessary for people with above-listed risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Prevalencia , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Ultrasonografía
19.
World Neurosurg ; 146: e419-e430, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33223129

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits and necessity of revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis remains under debate. This study aimed to determine the more durable and beneficial alternative between carotid revascularization and optimal medical treatment (OMT) alone for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis at a tertiary institution between 1994 and 2017. We compared revascularization (carotid endarterectomy [CEA] and carotid artery stenting [CAS]) with OMT alone by using inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting with propensity scores to account for selection bias. The primary end point was a composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within 30 days, plus ipsilateral stroke thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 1089 patients were included in the analysis (56% CEA, 25% CAS, 19% OMT alone). Patients who underwent CAS consistently showed greater risk regarding the primary composite end point compared with those who received OMT alone (hazard radio [HR] 3.32, 95% confidence interval 1.014-10.868; P = 0.047), but the CEA group showed no significant difference (HR 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.385-4.584; P = 0.761). The CAS group had the greatest rates of any stroke within 30 days (4.0%, P = 0.0006) and ipsilateral stroke thereafter (3.68%, P = 0.0009). There was no death within 30 days. In the long-term outcomes, neither CEA nor CAS showed significant differences in HR compared with OMT alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that for stroke prevention in asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis, CAS might be inferior to the other 2 options regarding early outcomes. However, further investigation is required regarding the efficacy and durability of OMT alone.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Asintomáticas/terapia , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Revascularización Cerebral/tendencias , Endarterectomía Carotidea/tendencias , Puntaje de Propensión , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Revascularización Cerebral/métodos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 100(3): 175-185, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33748031

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine factors associated with long-term graft patency after lower extremity arterial bypass (LEAB). METHODS: Database of LEABs for patients with chronic arterial occlusive disease (CAOD) at a single institution was retrospectively reviewed. To determine the factors we compared demographic, clinical, and procedural variables between 2 patient groups; group I (graft patency < 2 years) and group II (graft patency ≥ 5 years after LEAB) using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Among 957 LEABs, 259 limbs (group I, 125 limbs and group II, 134 limbs) in 213 patients were included for the analysis. On a univariable analysis, younger age (69 years vs. 66 years, P = 0.024), hypertension (60.8% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.017), claudication (51.2% vs. 70.9%, P = 0.001), absence of prior intervention (50.4% vs. 73.9%, P < 0.001), common femoral artery based bypass (57.6% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.035), above-the knee bypass (36.8% vs. 64.2%, P < 0.001), postoperative graft salvage procedure (3.2% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.001), and statin use (75.2% vs. 88.8, P = 0.004) were associated with long-term patency. On a multivariate analysis hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 1.91; P = 0.038), claudication (OR, 2.08; P = 0.032), no prior intervention (OR, 2.48; P = 0.001), vein graft (OR, 4.36; P = 0.001), above-the knee bypass (OR, 4.68; P < 0.001), and graft salvage procedures (OR, 7.70; P < 0.001) were identified as independent factors. CONCLUSION: These factors can be considered in decision making before treatment of patients with CAOD.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA